EcR interacts with corepressors and harbours an autonomous silencing domain functional in both Drosophila and vertebrate cells

Ligand binding is without effect on complex formation of the ligand binding domain of the ecdysone receptor (EcR)

The ligand-binding domain (LBD) encompassing the C-terminal parts of the D- and the complete E-domains of the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) fused to Gal4(AD) is present in two high molecular weight complexes (600 and 150 kDa) in yeast extracts according to size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 HR 10/30). Hormone binding is mainly associated with 150-kDa complexes. Complex formation is not influenced by hormone, but the ligand stabilizes the complexes at elevated salt concentrations. Mutational analysis of Gal4(AD)-EcR(LBD) revealed that formation of 600-kDa, but not 150-kDa, complexes depends on dimerization mediated by the EcR(LBD). Deletion of helix 12 is without effect. Mutation of K497 in helix 4, known to be essential for comodulator binding, abolishes 600-KDa complexes, but does not interfere with the formation of 150-kDa complexes. In contrast, the DE-domains of USP fused to Gal4(DBD) elute as monomer after elimination of the dimerization capacity of the ligand-binding domains by mutation of P463 in helix 10. The data presented here reveal that the complex formation of ligand-binding domains EcR and USP ligand is different.

Nuclear receptor corepressor recruitment by unliganded thyroid hormone receptor in gene repression during Xenopus laevis development

Thyroid hormone receptors (TR) act as activators of transcription in the presence of the thyroid hormone (T(3)) and as repressors in its absence. While many in vitro approaches have been used to study the molecular mechanisms of TR action, their physiological relevance has not been addressed. Here we investigate how TR regulates gene expression during vertebrate postembryonic development by using T(3)-dependent amphibian metamorphosis as a model. Earlier studies suggest that TR acts as a repressor during premetamorphosis when T(3) is absent. We hypothesize that corepressor complexes containing the nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) are key factors in this TR-dependent gene repression, which is important for premetamorphic tadpole growth. To test this hypothesis, we isolated Xenopus laevis N-CoR (xN-CoR) and showed that it was present in pre- and metamorphic tadpoles. Using a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we demonstrated that xN-CoR was recruited to the promoters of T(3) response genes during premetamorphosis and released upon T(3) treatment, accompanied by a local increase in histone acetylation. Furthermore, overexpression of a dominant-negative N-CoR in tadpole tail muscle led to increased transcription from a T(3)-dependent promoter. Our data indicate that N-CoR is recruited by unliganded TR to repress target gene expression during premetamorphic animal growth, an important process that prepares the tadpole for metamorphosis.

New human breast cancer cells to study progesterone receptor isoform ratio effects and ligand-independent gene regulation

All known progesterone target cells coexpress two functionally different progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms: 120-kDa B-receptors (PR-B) and N-terminally truncated, 94-kDa A-receptors (PR-A). Their ratio varies in normal and malignant tissues. In human breast cancer cells, homodimers of progesterone-occupied PR-A or PR-B regulate different gene subsets. To study PR homo- and heterodimers, we constructed breast cancer cell lines in which isoform expression is controlled by an inducible system. PR-negative cells or cells that stably express one or the other isoform were used to construct five sets of cells: (i) PR-negative control cells (Y iNull), (ii) inducible PR-A cells (Y iA), (iii) inducible PR-B cells (Y iB), (iv) stable PR-B plus inducible PR-A cells (B iA), and (v) stable PR-A plus inducible PR-B cells (A iB). Expression levels of each isoform and/or the PR-A/PR-B ratios could be tightly controlled by the dose of inducer as demonstrated by immunoblotting and transcription studies. Induced PRs underwent normal progestin-dependent phosphorylation and down-regulation and regulated exogenous promoters as well as endogenous gene expression. Transcription of exogenous promoters was dependent on the PR-A/PR-B ratio, whereas transcription of endogenous genes was more complex. Finally, we have described several genes that are regulated by induced PR-A even in the absence of ligand.

Ecdysone-controlled expression of transgenes

Inducible expression systems show great potential for use in human gene therapy and systems based on insect ecdysone receptors are particularly promising candidates. This article describes such systems and reviews actual and potential uses of ecdysone-controlled transgenes in vitro and in vivo. The ligand specificity of ecdysone receptor-based systems is considered, along with the safety and efficacy of the ecdysteroid and non-steroidal compounds used to activate them.

Involvement of histone deacetylase at two distinct steps in gene regulation during intestinal development in Xenopus laevis

Amphibian metamorphosis is marked by dramatic thyroid hormone (T(3))-induced changes including de novo morphogenesis, tissue remodeling and organ resorption through programmed cell death. These changes involve cascades of gene regulation initiated by thyroid hormone and its receptors. Previous studies suggest that chromatin remodeling involving changes in core histone acetylation plays a fundamental role in transcriptional regulation. A basic model has been suggested where targeted histone deacetylation is involved in transcriptional repression and histone acetylation is involved in transcriptional activation. On the other hand, the developmental roles of histone acetylation remain to be elucidated. Here we demonstrate that tadpole treatment with trichostatin A, a specific potent histone deacetylase inhibitor, blocks metamorphosis. Gene expression analyses show that trichostatin A induces the release of T(3)-response gene repression without affecting T(3)-induction of direct T(3)-response genes. However, the drug blocks the regulation of late T(3)-response genes, which may be responsible for its inhibitory effects on metamorphosis. These data support a role of deacetylases in transcriptional repression by unliganded T(3) receptor during premetamorphosis and another role at a downstream step of the gene regulation cascade induced by T(3) during metamorphosis.