Clinical and neuropathological parameters affecting the diagnostic yield of nerve biopsy

[Vasculitic involvement of the skeletal muscle and the peripheral nervous system: clinical and neuropathologic perspective]

The peripheral nervous system is a classic target organ in systemic vasculitis. In addition, the skeletal muscle can also be affected. Myalgia, muscle weakness and sensory deficits are typical signs, which can lead to severe functional limitations and impaired of quality of life. Vasculitic involvement of the skeletal muscle (vasculitic myopathy [VM]) and peripheral nerves (vasculitic neuropathy [VN]) occurs predominantly in polyarteritis nodosa and small-vessel vasculitis. VM presents with elevated markers of inflammation and is typically characterized by immobilizing myalgia with normal creatine kinase activity and diffuse or patchy areas of hyperintensity on T2-weighted MRI ("MRI myositis without myositis"). In VN, sensor motor deficits predominantly affect the lower extremity in the area supplied by several peripheral nerves (e.g., mononeuritis multiplex) with acute to subacute history. The histopathological examination of nerve and muscle biopsies is the gold standard for the diagnosis of vasculitic manifestations and has a significant impact on the therapeutic approach.

The multiple roles of nerve biopsy in the diagnosis and prognosis of suspected immune neuropathies

INTRODUCTION

The value of a sural nerve biopsy for the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is controversial. Evidence-based recommendations for its implementation are lacking. We investigated factors leading to biopsy and analyzed biopsy outcomes and consequences, assessed the predictability of biopsy outcomes through clinical parameters to avoid unnecessary biopsies, and compared results with electrophysiological and clinical severity to determine their prognostic value.

METHODS

190 sural nerve biopsies were analyzed in two cohorts. One consisted of 163 biopsies and the second of 72 biopsies from the prospective Immune-mediated Neuropathies Biomaterial and Data registry (INHIBIT). Both have an intersection of 45 patients. 75 data sets from patients without biopsy were used. Analysis of nerve conduction studies, treatment, overall disability sum score (ODSS), biopsy outcomes, and diagnosis was performed.

RESULTS

51% of biopsied patients received the diagnosis CIDP (77% fulfilled EFNS/PNS criteria), 21% were not CIDP typical, and 27% were unspecific. Biopsied patients responded less frequently to immunotherapies at time of biopsy than non-biopsied patients (p = 0.003). Immunotherapy was initiated more frequently after biopsy (p < 0.001) and more often with intravenous immunoglobulins (p < 0.0001). 76% of all biopsied patients met the electrophysiological criteria for CIDP. Sensory nerve action potential amplitudes of 0 µV still provide 73% of histological diagnostic value. Histologic signs of degeneration predicted ODSS worsening after 1 year (p = 0.028) but disease severity did not correlate with histological damage severity.

DISCUSSION

The main indication for nerve biopsy was the treatment of refractory cases of autoimmune neuropathies with the therapeutic consequence of treatment initiation or escalation. Sural biopsy also provided prognostic information. Even with extinguished sural SNAP, the biopsy can still have diagnostic value.

Neurosurgical Intervention for Nerve and Muscle Biopsies

(1) Background: Neurologic and musculoskeletal diseases represent a considerable portion of the underlying etiologies responsible for the widely prevalent symptoms of pain, weakness, numbness, and paresthesia. Because of the subjective and often nonspecific nature of these symptoms, different diagnostic modalities have been explored and utilized. (2) Methods: Literature review. (3) Results: Nerve and muscle biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing many of the responsible neurological and musculoskeletal conditions. However, the need for invasive tissue sampling is diminishing as more investigations explore alternative diagnostic modalities. Because of this, it is important to explore the current role of neurosurgical intervention for nerve and muscle biopsies and its current relevance in the diagnostic landscape of neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. With consideration of the role of nerve and muscle biopsy, it is also important to explore innovations and emerging techniques for conducting these procedures. This review explores the indications and emerging techniques for neurological intervention for nerve and muscle biopsies. (4) Conclusions: The role of neurosurgical intervention for nerve and muscle biopsy remains relevant in diagnosing many neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. Biopsy is especially relevant as a supportive point of evidence for diagnosis in atypical cases. Additionally, emerging techniques have been explored to guide diagnostics and biopsy, conduct less invasive biopsies, and reduce risks of worsening neurologic function and other symptoms secondary to biopsy.

Utilising clinical parameters to improve the selection of nerve biopsy candidates

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve biopsy is a valuable final diagnostic tool; however, histopathological results can be non-diagnostic.

AIMS

We aim to identify quality improvement measures by evaluating the pre-biopsy assessment and diagnostic yield of specific histopathological diagnosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study based on 10 years of experience with peripheral nerve biopsies at a single centre. Clinical data were obtained regarding pre-biopsy history, examination, serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) investigations, neurophysiology and peripheral nerve imaging. Based upon a histopathological outcome, patients were grouped into vasculitis, granulomatous and infiltrative (diagnostic) group, or a comparison group of non-specific axonal neuropathy and normal (non-specific/normal) group.

RESULTS

From a cohort of 64 patients, 21 (32.8%) were included in the diagnostic group and 30 (46.9%) in the non-specific/normal group. Clinical parameters associated with the diagnostic group were shorter history (mean 10.2 months vs 38.1), stepwise progression (81% vs 20%), neuropathic pain (85.7% vs 56.7%), vasculitic rash (23.8% vs 0%), mononeuritis multiplex (57.1% vs 10%), asymmetry (90.5% vs 60%), raised white cell count (47.6% vs 16.7%), myeloperoxidase antibody (19.1% vs 0%) and abnormal peripheral nerve imaging (33.3% vs 10%).

CONCLUSION

Selection of patients undergoing nerve biopsy requires careful consideration of clinical parameters, including peripheral nerve imaging. Several quality improvement measures are proposed to improve yield of clinically actionable information from nerve biopsy.

Diagnostic value of proximal cutaneous nerve biopsy in brachial and lumbosacral plexus pathologies

BACKGROUND

Brachial and lumbosacral plexopathies can result from numerous non-traumatic etiologies, including those of inflammatory, autoimmune, or neoplastic origin, that often require nerve biopsy for diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (MABC) and posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN) nerve biopsies in proximal brachial and lumbosacral plexus pathology.

METHOD

Patients undergoing MABC or PFCN nerve biopsies at a single institution were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical diagnosis, symptom duration, intraoperative findings, post-operative complications, and pathology results were recorded. Biopsy results were classified as diagnostic, inconclusive, or negative based on the final pathology.

RESULTS

Thirty patients undergoing MABC biopsies in the proximal arm or axilla and five patients with PFCN biopsies in the thigh or buttock were included. MABC biopsies were diagnostic in 70% of cases overall and 85% diagnostic in cases where pre-operative MRI also demonstrated abnormalities in the MABC. PFCN biopsies were diagnostic in 60% of cases overall and in 100% of patients with abnormal pre-operative MRIs. There were no biopsy-related post-operative complications in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

In diagnosing non-traumatic etiologies of brachial and lumbosacral plexopathies, proximal biopsies of the MABC and PFCN provide high diagnostic value with low donor morbidity.

Diagnostic yield of nerve biopsy in the evaluation of peripheral neuropathies

BACKGROUND

With progress made in neurogenetics and neuroinflammation, the indications and value of nerve biopsies in the diagnostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathies are less clear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of nerve biopsies in patients with peripheral neuropathies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of nerve biopsy reports from April 1998 to June 2021 of patients with peripheral neuropathies presenting to the Department of Pathology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The diagnostic value of the biopsies was determined based on the criteria by Midroni and Bilbao as follows: contributive (essential and helpful), non-contributive and inadequate.

RESULTS

A total of 107 nerve biopsies were analysed. Sixty-four (60 %) were males and the mean age was 52 years, ranging from 13 to 86 years. Ninety-four (88 %) were sural nerve biopsies; and only one patient (1 %) each had superficial peroneal and superficial radial nerve biopsy. The indications for the procedure were vasculitis (34 %), peripheral neuropathy of unknown aetiology (34 %), amyloidosis (14 %) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (10 %). In 68 (63 %) biopsies, the diagnostic value was contributive. Of these, 28 (26 %) were essential and 40 (37 %) were helpful. In contrast, 35 (33 %) biopsies were non-contributive and 4 (4 %) were inadequate. In 66 % (71/107) of cases, the nerve biopsy did not reveal a definite pathological diagnosis. However, in the remainder, a diagnosis of vasculitis (18 %, 19/107), followed by amyloidosis (10 %, 11/107) could be determined. For 32/71 biopsies with undetermined pathological diagnosis, neuropathy remained cryptogenic in 22 % (7/32) upon follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of vasculitis and amyloidosis, there is limited value in performing nerve biopsies in the evaluation of patients with peripheral neuropathy. However, this should be interpreted with caution as the number of patients with a clinical diagnosis of vasculitis and amyloidosis were relatively larger than patients with other diagnosis. Refinement and careful selection of cases are required to increase the diagnostic yield of nerve biopsy.

Relevance of Nerve Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy—A Systematic Review

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy is an immune-mediated pathology of the peripheral nerves and nerve roots that leads to weakness and sensory symptoms. Given its clinical heterogeneity, often times diagnosis is challenging. Even though nerve conduction studies and clinical features are the main criteria used for diagnosis, supplementary investigations, such as nerve biopsies, cerebral spinal fluid examination and magnetic resonance studies, may be used in order to confirm the diagnosis. Given the fact that the hallmark in CIDP physiopathology is the demyelination process, nerve biopsies are used to demonstrate and assess the magnitude of the phenomenon. The question and the main interest of this review is whether histopathological findings are relevant for the diagnosis and can be useful in disease assessment.

Nerve biopsy: Current indications and decision tools

After initial investigation of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of neuropathy, a clinical decision is made for a minority of patients to undergo further assessment with nerve biopsy. Many nerve biopsies do not demonstrate a definitive pathological diagnosis and there is considerable cost and morbidity associated with the procedure. This highlights the need for appropriate selection of patients, nerves and neuropathology techniques. Additionally, concomitant muscle and skin biopsies may improve the diagnostic yield in some cases. Several advances have been made in diagnostics in recent years, particularly in genomics. The indications for nerve biopsy have consequently changed over time. This review explores the current indications for nerve biopsies and some of the issues surrounding its use. Also included are comments on alternative diagnostic modalities that may help to supplant or reduce the use of nerve biopsy as a diagnostic test. These primarily include extraneural biopsy and neuroimaging techniques such as magnetic resonance neurography and nerve ultrasound. Finally, we propose an algorithm to assist in deciding when to perform nerve biopsies.

Diagnostic Value of Sural Nerve Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Cases From 1981 to 2017

Nerve biopsy represents the conclusive step in the diagnostic work-up of peripheral neuropathies, and its diagnostic yield is still debated. The aim of this study is to consider the impact of nerve biopsy on reaching a useful diagnosis in different peripheral neuropathies and its changing over time. We retrospectively analyzed 1,179 sural nerve biopsies performed in the period 1981–2017 at Neurological Clinic of Policlinico San Martino (Genoa). We relied on medical records and collected both clinical and pathological data in a database. Biopsy provided univocal diagnoses in 53% of cases (with an increase over time), multiple diagnostic options in 14%, while diagnosis was undetermined in 33% (undetermined reports decreased during the years). In 57% of patients, the pre-biopsy suspicion was confirmed, while in 43% sural biopsy modified the clinical diagnosis. The highest yield was in axonal neuropathies (29% undetermined reports vs. 40% in demyelinating and 48% in mixed neuropathies). In 68% of patients with vasculitic neuropathy, this etiology was already suspected, whereas in 32% nerve biopsy modified the clinical diagnosis. During the years, the number of annually performed biopsies decreased significantly (p = 0.007), with an increase in the mean age of patients (p < 0.0001). The percentage of hereditary neuropathies had a significant decrease (p = 0.016), while the rate of vasculitic and chronic inflammatory neuropathies increased (p < 0.0001). This is the largest Italian study addressing the yield of sural nerve biopsy. During the years, we observed a progressive refinement of the indication of this procedure, which confirms its utility for interstitial neuropathies, particularly if non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy is suspected.

Neurological Manifestations Do not Affect Cumulative Survival in Indian Patients with Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Associated Vasculitis

Background

Neurological manifestations are an important cause of morbidity in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV). It is not clear whether or not they are indicative of a severe disease course with multiple organ involvement and shortened survival.

Aims and Objectives

To characterize the neurological manifestations of AAV and analyze their relationship with other organ system and cumulative survival.

Methods

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of AAV patients at a tertiary care hospital in North India. Data was collected from medical records regarding clinical history, neurological examination, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), serology, electrophysiology, imaging, and histopathological examination findings of patients.

Results

Ninety-two patients of systemic vasculitis were identified, 67 with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), 14 with microscopic polyangiitis, 8 with Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS), and 3 with undifferentiated AAV. The median BVAS at presentation was 18.0 (interquartile range (IQR): 12.0). The median duration of follow-up was 31.3 months (IQR: 40.5). A total of 45.7% patients had neurological manifestations among which 23.8% presented with neurological complaints. Peripheral neuropathy was the most common manifestation noted in 23.9% of the patients. Among patients with GPA, 40.3% had neurological involvement (seen in 33.3% patients at presentation). Patients with nervous system disease were more likely to have associated musculoskeletal manifestations (P = 0.046) and less likely to have renal involvement (P = 0.017). The estimated cumulative survival of the subgroup with neurological involvement was 95.1 months from the time of diagnosis, which was not significantly different from the cohort without neurological involvement (113.8 months, P = 0.631).

Conclusion

Neurological morbidity commonly accompanies systemic vasculitis. Nervous system disease does not affect the survival significantly in these patients.

Drug therapy for chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND

Chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) is an insidiously progressive sensory or sensorimotor polyneuropathy that affects elderly people. Although severe disability or handicap does not occur, CIAP reduces quality of life. CIAP is diagnosed in 10% to 25% of people referred for evaluation of polyneuropathy. There is a need to gather and review emerging evidence on treatments, as the number of people affected is likely to increase in ageing populations. This is an update of a review first published in 2004 and previously updated in 2006, 2008, 2011 and 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of drug therapy for chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy for reducing disability and ameliorating neurological symptoms and associated impairments, and to assess any adverse effects of treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

In July 2016, we searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Web of Science. We searched two trials registries for ongoing trials. We also handsearched the reference lists of relevant articles, reviews and textbooks identified electronically, and we would have contacted authors and other experts in the field to identify additional studies if this seemed useful.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We sought all randomised or quasi-randomised (alternate or other systematic treatment allocation) trials that examined the effects of any drug therapy in people with CIAP at least one year after the onset of treatment. People with CIAP had to fulfil the following criteria: age 40 years or older, distal sensory or sensorimotor polyneuropathy, absence of systemic or other neurological disease, chronic clinical course not reaching a nadir in less than two months, exclusion of any recognised cause of the polyneuropathy by medical history taking, clinical or laboratory investigations, and electrophysiological studies in agreement with axonal polyneuropathy, without evidence of demyelinating features. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with a significant improvement in disability. Secondary outcomes were change in the mean disability score, change in the proportion of participants who make use of walking aids, change in the mean Medical Research Council sum score, degree of pain relief and/or reduction of other positive sensory symptoms, change in the proportion of participants with pain or other positive sensory symptoms, and frequency of adverse effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed the results of the literature search and extracted details of trial methodology and outcome data of all potentially relevant trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 39 studies and assessed them for possible inclusion in the review, but we excluded all of them because of insufficient quality or lack of relevance. We summarised evidence from non-randomised studies in the Discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Even though CIAP has been clearly described and delineated, no adequate randomised or quasi-randomised controlled clinical treatment trials have been performed. In their absence there is no proven efficacious drug therapy.

Pediatric Nerve Biopsy Diagnostic and Treatment Utility in Tertiary Care Referral

BACKGROUND

Pediatric neuropathies are both unique and similar to their adult counterparts, with genetic varieties thought to be more common. The objective of this work was to assess the utility of nerve biopsy in children at a tertiary referral center in light of availability of current genetic testing.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, nerve biopsy, and genetic testing findings of 316 pediatric (age ≤18 years) patients.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 9.8 years (4 days to 18 years). Nerve biopsy was nontargeted in 198 (182 whole sural, seven superficial peroneal, and nine other), targeted in 21 (14 fascicular sciatic and seven brachial plexus), and unknown in 97 cases. Prebiopsy localizations and diagnoses were diverse, most commonly with length-dependent localizations (n = 150). Median follow-up was 6 months (0 to 480 months). A distinctive histopathologic diagnosis was made in 106 cases (33%), including inflammatory or immune (n = 30), neoplastic (n = 19), hereditary (n = 41), vasculitis (n = 10), and other (n = 6). Nerve biopsy confirmed the suspected diagnosis in 91 (29%) individuals and changed or refined the initial diagnosis in 182 (58%). Treatment modifications as a result of biopsy occurred in 80 (25%) cases; 59 (19% of the entire cohort) with clinical improvements noted, most commonly by immunotherapy (n = 30). Low diagnostic yield occurred in "hypotonic infants" without nerve conduction abnormalities. Pain at the biopsy site beyond 1 month was rare (n = 3; 1%). Forty-four patients underwent genetic testing. Among demyelinating varieties, mutations were identified in five of 11 (46%) cases compared with only six of 33 (18%) cases of axonal varieties.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric nerve biopsy provides diagnostic information that frequently alters treatment recommendations. Furthermore, it leads to clinical improvements, especially in inflammatory immune neuropathies. For suspected inherited varieties, genetic testing has the highest diagnostic yield in demyelinating phenotypes.

Neuropathy in elderly: lessons learnt from nerve biopsy

OBJECTIVE

To study the utility of nerve biopsy in providing diagnostic, therapeutic or prognostic information that aid in clinical management in elderly subjects with peripheral neuropathy.

METHODS

Clinico-pathological data of 100 elderly subjects aged 65 and above with peripheral neuropathy who underwent nerve biopsy in the last decade (2002-2011) was reviewed.

RESULTS

The study included 100 subjects (M:F 78:22). Mean age at biopsy and symptom duration was 69.62±4.8 years and 24.17±40.4 months, respectively. The most common pattern of was distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (35%), followed by multiple mononeuropathy (29%) and asymmetric sensorimotor neuropathy (15%). The nerve biopsy was 'diagnostic' in 24%, (definite vasculitis in 12, leprosy in 10 and acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in 2) and proved 'essential' or 'helpful' in therapeutic management in 81% subjects. In 60 (60%) patients, where a pre-biopsy aetiological diagnosis could be arrived at based on the available data, nerve biopsy confirmed the diagnosis in 29 of 60 (48.3%), and offered a new diagnosis in 25 (41.7%). A higher yield of biopsy was noted in subjects with asymmetric/multiple mononeuropathy compared with symmetric neuropathies (32.7% versus 17.7%). In 40 (40%) patients without a pre-biopsy aetiological diagnosis, nerve biopsy was 'essential' in 7 of 40 (17.5%) as it provided a definitive diagnosis (definite vasculitis: 5, leprosy: 2), and 'helpful' in 21 of 40 (52.5%) (ischaemic neuropathy: 10, possible vasculitis: 9, probable vasculitis: 2).

CONCLUSION

Nerve biopsy aided in the detection of potentially treatable disorders and influenced patient management in a significant proportion of elderly subjects with peripheral neuropathy (81%), particularly in subset with undiagnosed neuropathies confirming that it's a useful tool in diagnosis of neuropathy in the elderly. With minor differences, the aetiological profile in our biopsied neuropathic elderly subjects may reflect the findings in other similar cohorts.

Vasculitic neuropathy

Vasculitis is a primary phenomenon in autoimmune diseases such as polyarteritis nodosa, Wegener's granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, microscopic polyangiitis, and essential mixed cryoglobulinemia. As a secondary feature vasculitis may complicate, for example, connective tissue diseases, infections, malignancies, and diabetes. Vasculitic neuropathy is a consequence of destruction of the vessel wall and occlusion of the vessel lumen of small epineurial arteries. Sometimes patients present with nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy, i.e., vasculitis limited to peripheral nerves and muscles with no evidence of further systemic involvement. Treatment with corticosteroids, sometimes in combination with other immunosuppressants, is required to control the inflammatory process and prevent further ischemic nerve damage.

Usefulness of superficial peroneal nerve/peroneus brevis muscle biopsy in the diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy

Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN)/peroneus brevis muscle (PBM) biopsy in 43 patients with clinically suspected vasculitic neuropathy was studied. Biopsies were classified as "definite", "suspicious" or "possible" in accordance with established criteria. Vasculitis was detected in 27 patients (21 with non-systemic vasculitis, and six with systemic vasculitis). In patients with "definite" vasculitis (n=13), the sensitivity of SPN/PBM biopsy was 76.4% with 100% specificity. By including patients suspicious for vasculitis (n=10), sensitivity increased to 85.1% but the specificity dropped to 87.5%. The overall diagnostic yield of SPN biopsy in those patients with definite vasculitis was 76.9% (10/13), and 53.8% (7/13) for muscle biopsy. The addition of muscle biopsy increased the diagnostic yield by 23%. Asymmetric nerve fiber loss, Wallerian degeneration and presence of hemosiderin were statistically significant markers of probable vasculitis. Muscle tissue was more likely to show hemosiderin (85.7%) than a nerve biopsy (71%). A combined SPN/PBM biopsy offers excellent diagnostic yield in the diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy.

Nerve biopsy--some comments on procedures and indications

Nerve biopsy is most often a final step in the evaluation of patients with peripheral neuropathy. The procedure should always be expected to result in varying degree of sensory loss within the innervation area of the biopsied nerve and chronic pain in the area may also occur. Therefore appropriate informed consent must be obtained and a weighing of such side effects and benefits for the patient, particularly therapeutical consequences, should be seriously considered before the procedure is performed. The surgical procedure and the processing in the laboratory of the nerve material must hold a high standard at all levels. Nerve biopsy should not be performed before adequate clinical, electrophysiological and laboratory investigations have been performed. The choice of nerve is important, but in most instances the sural nerve is biopsied, although the superficial peroneal nerve is also an option and allows an easy access to muscle biopsy in the same procedure. Laboratories performing nerve biopsies should have the facilities and expertise to prepare and evaluate fixed and frozen sections (paraffin, cryostat and epoxy-sections) and teased fibers, and also to perform light and electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Although not routinely used, the option of morphometry should be available as well. We recommend that properly trained technicians start the processing procedures in the operating room and, if feasible, even in hospitals outside that of the hospital with nerve laboratory. We also prefer routine use of teased fiber analysis as this visualizes in an excellent way pathological processes like axonal degeneration, demyelination and remyelination as well as other features. Evaluation of small fiber neuropathy is rarely an indication for nerve biopsy and should be investigated with skin biopsy and visualization and quantification of intraepidermal nerve fibers. Investigation of inflammatory neuropathy, particularly to demonstrate nerve vasculitis, is the main indication of nerve biopsy.

Practice parameter: the evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy.

METHODS

A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

Evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review)

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based on the level of evidence. (1) Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). (2) Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). (3) Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

The use of nerve and muscle biopsy in the diagnosis of vasculitis: a 5 year retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral nerve vasculitis is an important condition which can be diagnostically challenging and is one of the principal current indications for nerve and muscle biopsy. Previous studies have suggested that combined nerve and muscle biopsy (usually of the superficial peroneal nerve and peroneus brevis muscle) produces a higher diagnostic yield than nerve biopsy alone in the investigation of vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether in our two centres combined nerve (usually the sural) and muscle (usually the vastus lateralis) biopsy improved diagnostic yield compared with nerve biopsy alone.

METHODS

We interrogated our database of all nerve biopsies (usually of the sural nerve) performed at our institutions over 5 years and identified 53 cases of biopsy proven peripheral nerve vasculitis. Clinicopathological and neurophysiological data in these patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

The most common clinical presentation was with a painful asymmetric axonal polyneuropathy or mononeuritis multiplex (66% of cases). Nerve biopsy demonstrated definite vasculitis in 36%, probable vasculitis in 62% and no vasculitis in 2% of cases. In 24 patients a muscle biopsy (usually the vastus lateralis) was also performed and vasculitis was demonstrated in 46% of these (in 13% showing definite and 33% probable vasculitis). There was only one patient in whom vasculitis was demonstrated in muscle but not in peripheral nerve.

CONCLUSION

Combined nerve (usually sural) and vastus lateralis muscle biopsy did not significantly increase the diagnostic yield compared with nerve biopsy alone. A sensible approach to the diagnosis of peripheral nerve vasculitis is to choose a nerve to biopsy which is clinically affected and amenable to biopsy. If the sural nerve is chosen, the data suggest that it is not routinely worth doing a vastus lateralis biopsy at the same time, whereas if the superficial peroneal nerve is chosen, it seems appropriate to do a combined superficial peroneal nerve and peroneus brevis biopsy. It is still not known if both the sural and superficial peroneal nerves are involved clinically which one gives the higher yield if biopsied.

Immunosuppressive treatment for non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy is a rare disabling disease that usually has a subacute onset of progressive or relapsing-remitting sensory or sensorimotor deficits. Asymmetry, pain and weakness are key features. The diagnosis can only be made by exclusion of other causes, the absence of systemic vasculitis or other rheumatic diseases, and the demonstration of vasculitis in a nerve or a combined nerve and muscle biopsy. There is a need for efficacious therapy to prevent disease progression and to improve prognosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess if immunosuppressive treatment in non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy reduces disability, and ameliorates neurological symptoms, and if such therapy can be given safely.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (March 2006), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and ISI were searched from January 1980 until April 2006. In addition, the reference lists of relevant articles, reviews and textbooks were handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised trials that examined the efficacy of immunosuppressive treatment for non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy at least one year after the onset of therapy were sought. Participants had to fulfill the following criteria: absence of systemic or neurological disease, exclusion of any recognised cause of the neuropathy by appropriate clinical or laboratory investigations, electrophysiological studies in agreement with axonal neuropathy, confirmation of vasculitis in a nerve or a combined nerve and muscle biopsy. The primary outcome measure was to be improvement in disability. Secondary outcome measures were to be change in the mean disability score, change in muscle strength measured with the Medical Research Council sum score, change in pain or other positive sensory symptoms, number of relapses, and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed and extracted details of all potentially relevant trials. For included studies pooled relative risks and pooled weighted standardised mean differences were to be calculated to assess treatment efficacy.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies were identified and assessed for possible inclusion in the review, but all were excluded because of insufficient quality or lack of relevance.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No adequate randomised or quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials have been performed on which to base treatment for non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy. Randomised trials of corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents are needed.

Diagnostic and therapeutic value due to suspected diagnosis, long-term complications, and indication for sural nerve biopsy

In order to elicit the usefulness of sural nerve biopsy we retrospectively evaluated the courses of disease of every patient, who underwent this procedure in our department between January 1995 and March 2000. Sixty seven patients with the suspected diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy could be included. From these chart reviews and patient questionings were done. Inflammatory-demyelinating neuropathies were suspected in 14 patients (20.9%), specific histological findings confirmed diagnosis in 50% of these patients and resulted in therapy. In cases of polyneuropathy of unknown etiology (46 patients, 68.6%) diagnosis was made in 11 patients (23.9%), and lead to therapy in 9 patients (19.6%), merely. In all, diagnostic consequences arouse in 32.8%, therapeutic consequences in 26.9%. The follow-up of 47 patients (mean 24.4 months) found chronic pain in the distribution of the sural nerve in 14 patients (29.8%), dysesthesia in 22 patients (46.8%), and persistent sensory loss in 34 patients (72.3%). Only 24 patients (51.1%) would submit to biopsy again. Because of high complication rates and poor results we conclude that sural nerve biopsy should be done only in carefully selected cases after thorough clinical work-up, and should be limited to cases of suspected inflammatory neuropathies, collagenoses and immunologic neuropathies, and hereditary neuropathies.

Drug therapy for chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND

Chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy is an insidiously progressive sensory or sensorimotor polyneuropathy that affects elderly people. Although severe disability or handicap does not occur, it reduces quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether drug therapy for chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy reduces disability, ameliorates neurological symptoms and associated impairments, and whether treatment is safe.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Cochrane Library (Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Review Group Register, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI, and ACP Journal Club's Best Evidence, from 1981 until December 2002. We also hand searched the reference lists of relevant articles, reviews and textbooks identified electronically, and contacted authors and other experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We sought all randomised or quasi-randomised (alternate or other systematic treatment allocation), unconfounded trials that examined the effects of any drug therapy in patients with chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy at least one year after the onset of treatment. Patients with chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy had to fulfil the following criteria: age 40 years or older, distal sensory or sensorimotor polyneuropathy, absence of systemic or other neurological disease, chronic clinical course not reaching a nadir in less than two months, exclusion of any recognised cause of the polyneuropathy by medical history taking, clinical or laboratory investigations, electrophysiological studies in agreement with axonal polyneuropathy without evidence of demyelinating features. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a significant improvement in disability. Secondary outcomes were change in the mean disability score, change in the proportion of patients who make use of walking aids, change in the mean Medical Research Council sum score, degree of pain relief and/or reduction of other positive sensory symptoms, change in the proportion of patients with pain or other positive sensory symptoms, and frequency of adverse effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently reviewed and extracted details of trial methodology and outcome data of all potentially relevant trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen studies were identified and assessed for possible inclusion in the review, but all were excluded because of insufficient quality or lack of relevance.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Even though chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy has been clearly described and delineated, no adequate randomised or quasi-randomised controlled clinical treatment trials have been performed. In their absence there is no proven efficacious drug therapy.