S28 Breast conservation and clear margins: Invasive or in situ involvement

[Surgical management of non-palpable breast tumors]

Due to the improvement of the diagnostic and screening methods for detecting breast cancer (e.g. mammography, breast ultrasonography, MR imaging, FNAC, core biopsy or vacuum-assisted core biopsy), non-palpable breast masses are more and more commonly discovered. Resection guided by a radiologically placed hookwire has gained outstanding importance in the surgical management of these non-palpable cases of breast malformations. In this retrospective study we analyzed the data of 830 patients operated in the past 5 years because of breast malformations. Of those, 36.9% of the breast surgeries were performed because of a non-palpable breast mass. In such cases we performed preoperative histological sampling to support setting up the surgical plan. We managed to get a precise histological diagnosis preoperatively in 78% of our cases. After the introduction of vacuum-assisted core biopsy, operations for histologically indeterminate breast tumors became less common. The surgical resections of breast masses which later prove to be benign are expected to decrease further. Intraoperative radiological analysis of the resection margins helps performing a definitive surgical resection. Specimen mammography and ultrasonography is part of our daily routine. When evaluating the histological samples, the question of resection margins is substantial. In absence of clear resection margins, re-resection is needed. Due to incomplete resection margins 5.5% of the cases re-resection was needed. To avoid unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection in case of early-stage breast cancers, sentinel lymph node biopsy is always carried out.

The impact of international guidelines on breast cancer management

SUMMARY In Europe, breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women and has an annual incidence of 2000 new cases per 1,050,000. Over the past two decades, there has been a massive increase in breast cancer diagnosis, and the therapeutic strategies have changed with increasing knowledge. Most breast cancer programs are now integrated into either national or international cancer networks, and there has been a trend towards development of consensus conferences and guidelines. With this greater understanding and the publication of initial treatment guidelines in the latter half of the 1980s, there has been a reduction in associated mortality rates. Increased experience has led to vast changes in practice, requiring guidelines to constantly evolve with research findings. This leads one to question the concept of guidelines and their ability to be correct and up to date for the treatment of individual patients with breast cancer.

What is an adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Surgeon attitudes and correlates

BACKGROUND

Re-excision is common in breast-conserving surgery (BCS), partly due to lack of consensus on margin definitions. A population-based surgeon sample was used to determine current attitudes toward margin width and identify characteristics associated with margin choice.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients treated from 2005 to 2007 were identified from Los Angeles and Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. Pathology reports were used to identify their surgeons, who were surveyed (n = 418). Response rate was 74.6% (n = 312). Mean surgeon age was 51.9 years, 17.8% were female, and mean number of years in practice was 18.5.

RESULTS

Wide variation in margin selection was noted among surgeons, and did not differ for invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In a scenario of T1 invasive cancer, 11% of surgeons endorsed margins of tumor not touching ink (TNTI), 42% of 1-2 mm, 28% of > or =5 mm, and 19% >1 cm as precluding need for re-excision before radiotherapy. On multivariate analysis, having 50% or more of practice devoted to breast cancer independently predicted smaller margin choice (p = 0.03). For a patient with a 1.4-cm grade 2 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive DCIS without radiotherapy (RT) planned, 3% of surgeons chose TNTI, 12% 1-2 mm, 25% > or =5 mm, and 61% >1 cm as sufficient without re-excision. In the scenario of DCIS without RT, breast specialization independently predicted larger margin choice (p = 0.03). Gender and years in practice were not predictive of margin choice.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide variation in BCS margin definition exists. Variation is similar for invasive cancer and DCIS with RT, with more specialized surgeons choosing smaller margins. In DCIS without RT, more specialized surgeons favored larger margins. A standardized margin definition may significantly affect re-excision rates.

Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009

The 11(th) St Gallen (Switzerland) expert consensus meeting on the primary treatment of early breast cancer in March 2009 maintained an emphasis on targeting adjuvant systemic therapies according to subgroups defined by predictive markers. Any positive level of estrogen receptor (ER) expression is considered sufficient to justify the use of endocrine adjuvant therapy in almost all patients. Overexpression or amplification of HER2 by standard criteria is an indication for anti-HER2 therapy for all but the very lowest risk invasive tumours. The corollary is that ER and HER2 must be reliably and accurately measured. Indications for cytotoxic adjuvant therapy were refined, acknowledging the role of risk factors with the caveat that risk per se is not a target. Proliferation markers, including those identified in multigene array analyses, were recognised as important in this regard. The threshold for indication of each systemic treatment modality thus depends on different criteria which have been separately listed to clarify the therapeutic decision-making algorithm.