Relevance of multiple biological parameters in breast cancer prognosis

Prognostic and therapeutic role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes in breast cancer

Increased levels of total tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are generally associated with good prognosis in several breast cancer subtypes. Subtypes of TILs impact both tumor cells and immune cells in a variety of different ways, leading to either a pro-tumor or antitumor effect. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells perform as effector cells against tumor cells and are associated with better clinical outcome. Immunotherapy approaches that improve the antitumor activity and proliferation of CD8+ T and NK cells include PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, CAR T cell therapy, or ex vivo-stimulated NK cells. A subset of CD8+ T cells, tissue-resident memory T cells, has also recently been associated with good prognosis in breast cancer patients, and has potential to serve as a predictive biomarker and therapeutic target. Tumor-infiltrating B cells also secrete apoptosis-inducing IgG antibodies and can act as antigen-presenting cells to prime CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. On the other hand, regulatory T and regulatory B cells modulate the immune response from CD8+ T cells and NK cells by secreting immunosuppressive cytokines and inhibiting maturation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). These regulatory cells are typically associated with poor prognosis, therefore rendering suppression of their regulatory function a key immunotherapeutic strategy.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: friends or foes?

In the past three decades, the detection rate of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast has dramatically increased due to breast screening programs. As a consequence, about 20% of all breast cancer cases are detected in this early in situ stage. Some ductal carcinoma in situ cases will progress to invasive breast cancer, while other cases are likely to have an indolent biological behavior. The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is seen as a promising prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast cancer, mainly in HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes. Here, we summarize the current understanding regarding immune infiltrates in invasive breast cancer and highlight recent observations regarding the presence and potential clinical significance of such immune infiltrates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, their numbers, composition, and potential relationship with genomic status will be discussed. Finally, we propose that a combination of genetic and immune markers may better stratify ductal carcinoma in situ subtypes with respect to tumor evolution.

Inflammation and breast cancer

SUMMARY The relationship between breast cancer (BC) and inflammation remains unclear. Some risk factors, such as age, obesity and postmenopausal status, are also associated with increased levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines and systemic inflammation. The role of T lymphocytes during BC development has been the subject of great debate, with improved survival reported when CD8+ and CD3+ T-lymphocytic infiltrates are present. Studies of B-lymphocytic infiltrates and prognosis have yielded conflicting results, but the extent of infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages is associated with reduced relapse-free and overall survival. There is consistent evidence that increased levels of proinflammatory factors, such as IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α, and inflammatory chemokines, such as CCL2 and CCL5, are associated with increased risk of BC and poorer prognosis. However, it is not known whether this actually plays a role in tumor development. Substantially more work is needed to achieve a basis for effective anticancer therapy.

The role of the tumour inflammatory cell infiltrate in predicting recurrence and survival in patients with primary operable breast cancer

Although the first studies highlighting the importance of the tumour inflammatory cell infiltrate were reported more than 80 years ago, the prognostic value of this response in breast cancer is still controversial. With the realisation of the importance of the inflammatory response in determining tumour progression there has been renewed interest in establishing the relationship between the type, density and location of inflammatory cell infiltrate and survival in patients with primary operable breast cancer. The aim was to undertake a systematic review of the literature examining the evidence for the role of the tumour inflammatory cell infiltrate in predicting recurrence and survival in patients with primary operable breast cancer. A systematic review of published papers up to September 2011 was undertaken according to a pre-defined protocol (Fig. 1). A total of 66 independent studies (34,086 patients) were identified. It can be concluded from the review that despite the large number of studies and considerable effort over an extended period, the relationship between different aspects of tumour inflammatory cell infiltrate and outcome in primary operable breast cancer remains unclear. This is in large part due to the absence of methodological validation, underpowered studies (small sample size and sample subtype heterogeneity, insufficient follow-up) and the absence of validation datasets. Therefore, although there are tantalising examples of the potential of the tumour inflammatory cell infiltrate to improve risk stratification patients with operable breast cancer (personalised care), this has not yet been realised. Future studies with standardised methodology, large and homogenous groups, sufficient follow-up and validation datasets should be undertaken to unlock the potential of the tumour inflammatory infiltrate to predict outcome in patients with primary operable breast cancer.

Different patterns of inflammation and prognosis in invasive carcinoma of the breast

AIM

Inflammation in carcinoma of the breast may represent an immune response to the tumour, but there is evidence that this response is impaired. Inflammation may also stimulate tumour growth by releasing proteolytic enzymes and angiogenic factors. Prognostic studies have produced conflicting results, but most investigators have not evaluated the different patterns of inflammation. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that moderate or marked diffuse inflammation is associated with a better prognosis. We also tested the 'danger model', which suggests that necrosis is necessary for an effective immune response.

METHODS AND RESULTS

On multivariate analysis of women with stage 1 and 2 tumours (n = 679, median follow-up of 9.8 years), survival was independently associated with diffuse inflammation (relative risk 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.24, 0.77, P =0.005) in addition to histological grade, axillary lymph node status, tumour size and oestrogen receptor status. The presence or absence of tumour necrosis did not have a clear effect on the relationship between survival and diffuse inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate or marked diffuse inflammation in breast cancer is associated with a better prognosis, suggesting that the immune effects of the inflammation predominate over the protumour effects.

Is primary chemotherapy useful for all patients with primary invasive breast cancer?

Chemotherapy dose intensification in breast tumours is being evaluated in many multicentre trials, its indication being based on a clinical response in high-risk patients, thus selecting for tumours with rapid proliferation and low resistance. However, results from randomized trials are still pending. Clinical and pathological responses to therapy are valuable surrogate endpoints following primary chemotherapy. They will make it possible to distinguish at an early stage between patients who still retain an apoptotic response to chemotherapy and those patients whose disease will progress rapidly due to resistance mechanisms. For practical purposes, patients at risk and capable of responding represent the population of choice for primary systemic chemotherapy. Thus, by investigating mechanisms of response and resistance during the first courses of treatment we may target chemotherapy at those patients likely to benefit most from this treatment. A number of immunotherapy and vaccination trials are being conducted in many different centres. There is a lot of anecdotal evidence that cancer vaccines could help patients, but little yet in the way of solid, reproducible clinical data. Best responses to clinical testing would ideally be expected in early-stage disease because there is less tumour bulk and the patient's immune system is still able to respond. Patients with early breast cancer who are at high risk of recurrence and who have failed to respond to primary chemotherapy might be given the option of participating in adjuvant vaccination trials following the completion of local therapy.