The effects of lowering fresh gas flow during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a clinical study in patients having elective knee arthroscopy

Minimal fixed flow anesthesia for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A parallel randomized trail

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to test a safety of a fixed minimal (0.5 l/min) fresh gas flow (FGF) anesthesia as a method ensuring adequate oxygenation during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting operations.

Design

A randomized, prospective study.

Setting

Single-center clinical hospital affiliated with a university.

Participants

208 patients underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Interventions

All patients received endotracheal inhalational anesthesia with fixed minimal FGF. Half of them were anesthetized by sevoflurane and another half by isoflurane. The fresh (carrier) gas was pure oxygen in the control groups and a mixture of medical air and oxygen (FiO2 0.8) in the trial groups.

Measurements and main results

In the control groups inhaled oxygen concentration changed minimally during the operation. In the trial groups in 28.8 % of cases inhaled oxygen concentration dropped below preliminary margin (0.4). Body surface area (BSA) (B = 38.7; p = 0.002) and patient's age (B = -0.47; p = 0.004) were retained into final logistic regression model as independent predictors. We divided BSA into subcategories and analyzed data by survival cox regression with Forward LR method. Patients with BSA>2.3 (Exp.B = 183) and BSA [2.2-2.3] (Exp.B = 59) had high chance to get less than 0.4 of inhaled oxygen concentration compared to the patients with BSA <2.0 (p < 0.001).Exp(B) or OR for the patients' age as independent predictor tested in multiple logistic regression was 0.628 In other words, for every year less the patient had 1/0.628 = 1.6 times more chance to reach the preliminary low margin (0.4) of oxygenation.

Conclusions

Fixed minimal FGF 0.5 l/min with FiO2 0.8 may not be sufficient for the younger patients with BSA >2.0 to maintain inhaled oxygen concentration above 0.4. Using pure oxygen as a carrier gas during fixed minimal flow long term anesthesia is much safer and more reliable.

Brief review: theory and practice of minimal fresh gas flow anesthesia

PURPOSE

The aim of this brief review is to provide an update on the theory regarding minimal fresh gas flow techniques for inhaled general anesthesia. The article also includes an update and discussion of the practical aspects associated with minimal-flow anesthesia, including the advantages, potential limitations, and safety considerations of this important anesthetic technique.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Reducing the fresh gas flow to < 1 L·min(-1) during maintenance of anesthesia is associated with several benefits. Enhanced preservation of temperature and humidity, cost savings through more efficient utilization of inhaled anesthetics, and environmental considerations are three key reasons to implement minimal-flow and closed-circuit anesthesia, although potential risks are hypoxic gas mixtures and inadequate depth of anesthesia. The basic elements of the related pharmacology need to be considered, especially pharmacokinetics of the inhaled anesthetics. The third-generation inhaled anesthetics, sevoflurane and desflurane, have low blood and low tissue solubility, which facilitates rapid equilibration between the alveolar and effect site (brain) concentrations and makes them ideally suited for low-flow techniques. The use of modern anesthetic machines designed for minimal-flow techniques, leak-free circle systems, highly efficient CO(2) absorbers, and the common practice of utilizing on-line real-time multi-gas monitor, including essential alarm systems, allow for safe and cost-effective minimal-flow techniques during maintenance of anesthesia. The introduction of new anesthetic machines with built-in closed-loop algorithms for the automatic control of inspired oxygen and end-tidal anesthetic concentration will further enhance the feasibility of minimal-flow techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

With our modern anesthesia machines, reducing the fresh gas flow of oxygen to 0.3-0.5 L·min(-1) and using third-generation inhaled anesthetics provide a reassuringly safe anesthetic technique. This environmentally friendly practice can easily be implemented for elective anesthesia; furthermore, it will facilitate cost savings and improve temperature homeostasis.

Desflurane: a clinical update of a third-generation inhaled anaesthetic

Available volatile anaesthetics are safe and efficacious; however, their varying pharmacology provides small but potentially clinically important differences. Desflurane is one of the third-generation inhaled anaesthetics. It is the halogenated inhaled anaesthetic with the lowest blood and tissue solubilities, which promotes its rapid equilibration and its rapid elimination following cessation of administration at the end of anaesthesia. The low fat solubility of desflurane provides pharmacological benefits, especially in overweight patients and in longer procedures by reducing slow compartment accumulation. A decade of clinical use has provided evidence for desflurane's safe and efficacious use as a general anaesthetic. Its benefits include rapid and predictable emergence, and early recovery. In addition, the use of desflurane promotes early and predictable extubation, and the ability to rapidly transfer patients from the operating theatre to the recovery area, which has a positive impact on patient turnover. Desflurane also increases the likelihood of patients, including obese patients, recovering their protective airway reflexes and awakening to a degree sufficient to minimise the stay in the high dependency recovery area. The potential impact of the rapid early recovery from desflurane anaesthesia on intermediate and late recovery and resumption of activities of daily living requires further study.

Sevoflurane requirements during ambulatory surgery: a clinical study with and without AEP-index guidance

BACKGROUND

Several monitors have been developed to measure anesthetic depth. The auditory evoked response uses an auditory signal to actively test the level of brain activity. The aim of the present study was to determine whether sevoflurane titration with A-line auditory guidance from the evoked potential monitor would reduce gas consumption and improve recovery times.

METHODS

Patients (n=60, aged 18-65 years) undergoing elective knee arthroscopy were randomized to titrate the main anesthetic sevoflurane with O2:N2O (1:2), either clinically (30 patients) or in combination with a target auditory evoked potential index of 30+/-5 (30 patients) using the A-line monitor (version 1.4, Danmeter A/S; Odense, Denmark). Induction was supplemented with fentanyl, and randomized to 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 mg immediately before propofol (10 in each group). Sevoflurane consumption and emergence times were the primary and secondary study end-points.

RESULTS

Guidance from the A-line monitor did not reduce the sevoflurane consumption time or the emergence, regardless of the fentanyl dose. However, it did reduce the time from the recovery room to discharge eligibility (P<0.05). Sevoflurane consumption decreased inversely with the fentanyl dose (P<0.01), with no impact on emergence times.

CONCLUSION

The auditory evoked potential index provided by the A-line monitor does not decrease sevoflurane consumption or emergence times for ambulatory knee arthroscopy.