[Interindividual variability of contingent negative variation]

Contingent Negative Variation in the Evaluation of Neurocognitive Disorders Due to Possible Alzheimer's Disease

The usefulness of Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) potential as a biomarker of neurocognitive disorders due to possible Alzheimer's disease, is based on its possible physiological correlates. However, its application in the diagnostic evaluation of these disorders is still incipient. The aim of this study is to characterize the patterns of cognitive processing of information in the domain of nonspecific global attention, by recording potential CNV in a group of patients with neurocognitive disorders due to possible Alzheimer's disease. An experimental study of cases and controls was carried out. The sample included 39 patients classified according to DSM-5 with a neurocognitive disorder subtype possibly due Alzheimer's disease, and a Control Group of 53 subjects with normal cognitive functions. CNV potential was registered using standard protocol. The analysis of variance obtained significant differences in mean values and confidence intervals of total CNV amplitude between the three study groups. The late CNV segment amplitudes makes it possible to discriminate between the level of mild and major dysfunction in the group of patients. The CNV total amplitudes of potential allows for effective discrimination between normal cognitive functioning and neurocognitive disorders due to possible Alzheimer's disease.

[ERPs (N200, P300 and CNV) in alcoholics: relapse risk assessment]

The cognitive event-related potentials were studied in a group of 55 alcoholic patients, paired in age and sex with a group of 18 control subjects, using a protocol oddball (visual and auditory) and a protocol VCN Go/Nogo. The N200 obtained using an auditory oddball paradigm had lower amplitude in alcoholics than in controls. A significant amplitude decrease of visual P300 was also observed in alcoholic male subjects. There was however no difference in auditory P300 between alcoholics and control subjects. Using a Go/Nogo paradigm, a significant difference on the final part of the VCN appears between alcoholic and pilot subjects. In addition, the longitudinal follow-up of the same alcoholic patients showed an electrophysiological profile that allowed dividing them into two different groups. On the initial recording (17 days after weaning), the auditory oddball P300 amplitude was significantly higher at Cz and Pz among patients who relapsed during the 3 months follow-up. The same effect appeared on the CNV protocol, where the amplitude of P300 was higher in patients who subsequently relapsed than for those who remained abstinent. Cognitive ERPs may be clinically useful to improve the prediction of risk of relapse among alcoholic patients.

[Interest of neurophysiological exploration in clinical psychiatry]

Cerebral functional exploration using Event related potentials (ERPs) is greatly relevant in clinical psychiatry. Although ERP usefulness as a diagnostic tool is limited due to the complexity of psychiatric diagnosis, which raises theoretical, methodological and ethical problems that cannot be resolved by neurobiological methods, ERP offers relevant information in 3 different topics: the choice of psychotropes in pharmacotherapy; the description and understanding of cognitive processes; the psychotherapeutic relation. 1) Converging arguments from experimental studies support the hypothesis that the amplitude of P300 and CNV as well as the loudness dependence of the auditory N1/P2 response (LDAEP) are regulated by central catecholaminergic and serotoninergic neurotransmission. These systems also are the target of several psychotropes, and therefore the neurophysiological assessment may bring reliable indicators to predict favourable response to psychotropes and drug intolerance. 2) Moreover the assessment of Reaction Times and P300 and VCN parameters, jointly recorded in a single investigation, brings information about the self-organization and self-regulation of cerebral functioning, and might help the clinicians to understand the functional meaning of attentional disorders in Psychiatry. 3) Finally, the discussion of the neurophysiological results with the patient, in comparing objective and subjective data, might help him to better understand his/her difficulties and to modify his/her subjective experience of the disease.