1
|
Gao T, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Yu Y, Li Q, Zhang L. Quadratus lumborum block vs. transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain control in patients with nephrectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2024; 95:111453. [PMID: 38531283 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) on nephrectomy. DESIGN Systematic review and network meta-analysis. PATIENTS Patients undergoing nephrectomy. INTERVENTIONS TAPB and QLB for postoperative analgesia. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was 24 h morphine-equivalent consumptions after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of hospital stay after surgery, and patient satisfaction. MAIN RESULTS Fourteen studies involving 883 patients were included. Seven studies compared TAPB to control, six studies compared QLB to control, and one study compared TAPB to QLB. For direct meta-analysis of the post-surgical 24 h morphine-equivalent consumption, QLB was lower than control (mean difference [95%CI]: -18.16 [-28.96, -7.37]; I2 = 88%; p = 0.001), while there was no difference between TAPB and control (mean difference [95%CI]: -8.34 [-17.84, 1.17]; I2 = 88%; p = 0.09). Network meta-analysis showed similar findings that QLB was ranked as the best anesthetic technique for reducing postoperative 24 h opioid consumption (p-score = 0.854). Moreover, in direct meta-analysis, as compared to control, the time of first postoperative rescue analgesia was prolonged after QLB (mean difference [95%CI]: 165.00 [128.99, 201.01]; p < 0.00001), but not TAPB (mean difference [95%CI]: 296.82 [-91.92, 685.55]; p = 0.13). Meanwhile, QLB can effectively reduce opioid usages at intraoperative period, as well as at postoperative 6 h and 48 h, while TAPB can only reduce opioid consumption at 6 h after surgery. As compared to control, both TAPB and QLB exhibited the reduction in PONV and pain scores at post-surgical some timepoints. Also, QLB (mean difference [95%CI]: -0.29 [-0.49, -0.08]; p = 0.006) but not TAPB (mean difference [95%CI]: 0.60 [-0.25, 1.45]; p = 0.17) exhibited the shorter postoperative length of hospital stay than control. CONCLUSIONS QLB is more likely to be effective in reducing postoperative opioid use than TAPB, whereas both of them are superior to control with regard to the reduction in postoperative pain intensity and PONV. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO identifier: CRD42022358464.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyu Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China; Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Yigang Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China; Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Yuxin Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China; Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Yonghao Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China; Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Qing Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China; Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Tianjin 300052, China.
| | - Linlin Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China; Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Tianjin 300052, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosen DC, Winoker JS, Mullen G, Moshier E, Sim A, Pathak P, Wagaskar V, Sfakianos JP, Reddy A, Palese M, Badani KK, Wiklund P, Tewari A, Mehrazin R. Robotic Vs. Ultrasound TAP Block Vs. Local Anesthetic in Urology: Results of UROTAP Randomized Trial. BJU Int 2022; 130:815-822. [PMID: 35727844 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To prospectively compare robotically administered transperitoneal transversus abdominis plane to ultrasound-guided TAP (UTAP) to local anesthesia (LA) for pain control and narcotic use in robotic prostatectomy (RP) and robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) patients. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients undergoing RP or RPN were randomized in a single blind 2:2:1 fashion to RTAP:UTAP:LA, with the study powered to evaluate superiority of UTAP to LA and non-inferiority of RTAP to UTAP. We compared time to deliver the block, operating room time, postoperative pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS), and intraoperative and postoperative analgesia consumption. RESULTS 143 patients were randomized and received a treatment. There was no significant difference in patient baseline characteristics. UTAP did not demonstrate superiority to LA in terms of pain control. RTAP and LA were faster than UTAP (time to perform block 2.5 vs. 2.5 vs. 6.25 min, p<.001). There was no difference in postoperative narcotic, acetaminophen, ketorolac, or ondansetron requirements among all three groups (p>0.05). The study was terminated early due to the unexpected efficacy of LA. CONCLUSION UTAP and RTAP do not provide superior pain control to LA. LA's efficiency, effectiveness, and ease of administration make it a first line therapy for postoperative analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C Rosen
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jared S Winoker
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Greg Mullen
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin Moshier
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alan Sim
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Prachee Pathak
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vinayak Wagaskar
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Avinash Reddy
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Palese
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ketan K Badani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashutosh Tewari
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zayed M, Allers K, Hoffmann F, Bantel C. Transversus abdominis plane block in urological procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2021; 38:758-767. [PMID: 34101639 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks have been shown to successfully reduce pain and opioid consumption after general and gynaecological surgery. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether TAP blocks alleviate pain and opioid consumption after urological procedures. DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Without language restriction, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of TAP blocks with placebo or no treatment in urological surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were pain intensities at rest and movement at 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery and postoperative nausea and vomiting. We performed meta-analyses using random effects models. Effect sizes were expressed as mean differences for continuous variables. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0) to assess risk of bias. RESULTS We analysed 20 RCTs comprising a total of 1239 patients. The risk of bias of the studies was relatively high. TAP blocks significantly reduced postoperative pain at all time points compared with placebo or no treatment. Mean differences on an 11-point pain intensity scale were between 0.55 (95% CI: -0.90, to -0.21; P = 0.002; I2 = 94%) to 1.13 (95% CI: -1.62 to -0.65; P < 0.001; I2 = 95%) less at rest and 0.74 (95% CI: -1.25 to -0.23; P = 0.005; I2 = 79%) to 1.32 (95% CI: -1.83 to -0.81; P < 0.001; I2 = 68%) less on movements. TAP blocks also reduced opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery significantly by 12.25 mg (95% CI: -17.99 to -6.52 mg; P < 0.001; I2 = 99%) morphine equivalents. Possibly, this had no influence on postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.45; P = 0.91; I2 = 30%). CONCLUSION TAP blocks seem to offer improved analgesia when used after urological surgery. However, due to the large heterogeneity between and the considerable risk of bias within the included studies results should be viewed with caution. SYSTEMIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42018112737.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Zayed
- From the Department of Anaesthesia, Christliches Krankenhaus Quakenbrück (MZ), Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg (KA, FH), the Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv-, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie Universität Oldenburg, Klinikum Oldenburg Campus, Oldenburg, Germany and Imperial College London, UK (CB)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boselli E, Hopkins P, Lamperti M, Estèbe JP, Fuzier R, Biasucci DG, Disma N, Pittiruti M, Traškaitė V, Macas A, Breschan C, Vailati D, Subert M. European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound for regional anaesthesia (PERSEUS regional anesthesia): Peripheral nerves blocks and neuraxial anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2021; 38:219-250. [PMID: 33186303 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Nowadays, ultrasound-guidance is commonly used in regional anaesthesia (USGRA) and to locate the spinal anatomy in neuraxial analgesia. The aim of this second guideline on the PERi-operative uSE of UltraSound (PERSEUS-RA) is to provide evidence as to which areas of regional anaesthesia the use of ultrasound guidance should be considered a gold standard or beneficial to the patient. The PERSEUS Taskforce members were asked to define relevant outcomes and rank the relative importance of outcomes following the GRADE process. Whenever the literature was not able to provide enough evidence, we decided to use the RAND method with a modified Delphi process. Whenever compared with alternative techniques, the use of USGRA is considered well tolerated and effective for some nerve blocks but there are certain areas, such as truncal blocks, where a lack of robust data precludes useful comparison. The new frontiers for further research are represented by the application of USG during epidural analgesia or spinal anaesthesia as, in these cases, the evidence for the value of the use of ultrasound is limited to the preprocedure identification of the anatomy, providing the operator with a better idea of the depth and angle of the epidural or spinal space. USGRA can be considered an essential part of the curriculum of the anaesthesiologist with a defined training and certification path. Our recommendations will require considerable changes to some training programmes, and it will be necessary for these to be phased in before compliance becomes mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Boselli
- From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Pierre Oudot Hospital, Bourgoin-Jallieu, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, University of Lyon, France (EB), Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (PH), Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (ML), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France (JPE), Department of Anaesthesiology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France (RF), Intensive Care Unit, Department of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy (DGB), Department of Anaesthesiology, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy (ND), Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy (MP), Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania (VT, AM), Department of Anaesthesia, Klinikum Klagenfurt, Austria (CB), Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Melegnano Hospital (DV) and Department of Surgical and Intensive Care Unit, Sesto San Giovanni Civic Hospital, Milan, Italy (MS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li X, Xu ZZ, Li XY, Jiang TT, Lin ZM, Wang DX. The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery: a randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19:186. [PMID: 31627728 PMCID: PMC6800496 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0850-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultrasound-guided lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block can provide definite analgesia to the anterior abdominal wall. However, whether this method is useful in renal surgery through the lateral abdominal wall pathway remains unknown. The study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of lateral TAP block for retroperitoneoscopic partial or radical nephrectomy. METHOD In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, eligible patients were randomized into two groups. After anaesthesia induction, ultrasound-guided lateral TAP block was performed with either 30 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine (Group T) or an equivalent volume of normal saline (Group C). The primary outcomes were opioid consumption during surgery and in the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postsurgical pain intensity immediately awakening from anaesthesia and at 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, as well as recovery variables including the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sleep quality, time to first ambulation, drainage and length of hospital stay. RESULTS A total of 104 patients were enrolled and randomized (53 in Group T and 51 in Group C). Laparoscopic surgery was converted to open surgery in one patient of Group T; this patient was excluded from the outcome analysis. The opioid consumption during surgery (intravenous morphine equivalent dose: median 35.0 mg [interquartile range 18.0, 49.6] in Group C vs. 40.3 mg [20.9, 59.0] in Group T, P = 0.281) and in the first 24 h after surgery (10.8 mg [7.8, 21.7] in Group C vs. 13.2 mg [8.0, 26.6] in Group T, P = 0.311) did not differ significantly between groups. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the pain intensity at all time points after surgery and the recovery variables (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that, in patients undergoing retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery, preoperative lateral TAP did not decrease intra- and postoperative opioid consumption, nor did it relieve pain intensity or promote postoperative recovery in the first 24 h after surgery. However, the trial might be underpowered. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered on November 4, 2017, in the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry with the identification number ChiCTR-INR-17013244 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Zhen-Zhen Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xue-Ying Li
- Department of Biostatics, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Ting-Ting Jiang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Zeng-Mao Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
| | - Dong-Xin Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghabra H, Smith SA. Anesthesia for Urological Procedures. Anesthesiology 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74766-8_76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|