Hemodynamic evaluation of descending aortomyoplasty versus intra-aortic balloon pump performed in normal animals: an acute study

Extra-Ascending Aortic Versus Intra-Descending Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation—Effect on Coronary Artery Blood Flow

BACKGROUND

Diastolic counterpulsation has been used to provide circulatory augmentation for chronic heart failure or for short-term cardiac support. Recently an extra-aortic balloon (EAB) counterpulsation device has been proposed.

AIM

To compare the circulatory effects of counterpulsation using the EAB or an intra-aortic balloon (IAB) in the acute pig model.

METHODS

In six anaesthetized great white pigs (paced at 100 bpm), ECG, arterial and central venous pressures, flow in the coronary circulation and descending thoracic aorta were measured. Baseline data was collected, then with the EAB or an IAB fitted using 1:1 and 1:2 counterpulsation modes. Baseline data was compared to EAB and IAB data in 1:1 mode. Assisted beat data compared to unassisted beat data was also analysed in 1:2 mode.

RESULTS

Both devices augmented peak diastolic arterial pressure, and decreased afterload. EAB counterpulsation increased diastolic coronary flow in both the 1:1 mode by 69% (p < 0.05) and in the 1:2 mode by 63% (assisted versus unassisted beat, p < 0.05). The IAB significantly increased diastolic coronary flow only in the 1:2 mode by 28% (p < 0.01). Both devices augmented total coronary flow and some augmentation of aortic flow was observed.

CONCLUSION

The circulatory effect of the EAB and IAB counterpulsation were comparable. This suggests the EAB could be used as a non-blood contacting heart assist device in patients suffering moderate-severe heart failure.

Circulatory benefits of diastolic counterpulsation in an ischemic heart failure model after aortomyoplasty

OBJECTIVE

Aortomyoplasty is an experimental surgical procedure in which the latissimus dorsi muscle is wrapped around the thoracic aorta and stimulated to contract during diastole, providing diastolic counterpulsation. We hypothesized that aortomyoplasty could improve cardiac function in a chronic ischemic heart failure model, similar to the improvement seen with the intra-aortic balloon pump.

METHODS

Six dogs (25-30 kg) successfully underwent aortomyoplasty followed by serial coronary microembolization. Ejection fraction decreased from 63.5% to 36.5%. Two weeks after the final microembolization, the muscle was conditioned for 4 months to achieve fatigue resistance. One year after aortomyoplasty, hemodynamic studies during 1 hour of aortomyoplasty and 1 hour of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation determined mean diastolic aortic pressure, peak left ventricular pressure, and endocardial viability ratio for assisted and unassisted beats. Cardiac output, stroke volume, and parameters of cardiac function were also measured.

RESULTS

Endocardial viability ratio increased by 23.8% +/- 7.9% (P =.001) with aortomyoplasty counterpulsation and by 22.7% +/- 12.9% (P =.021) with the intra-aortic balloon pump. Both aortomyoplasty and the intra-aortic balloon pump significantly increased mean diastolic aortic pressure and reduced peak left ventricular pressure. Improvements in cardiac function with aortomyoplasty and the intra-aortic balloon pump were similar. Cardiac output increased from 2.61 +/- 0.88 to 3.07 +/- 1.06 L/min (P =.006), and index of afterload decreased from 5.4 +/- 1.4 to 4.8 +/- 1.4 mm Hg/mL (P =.02) during 1 hour of aortomyoplasty counterpulsation.

CONCLUSION

One year after the procedure, aortomyoplasty counterpulsation provided diastolic augmentation and improved cardiac performance similar to the improvement provided by the intra-aortic balloon pump in a chronic ischemic heart failure model. Aortomyoplasty has the potential to benefit patients with ischemic heart disease refractory to current therapies.