Trimodality management of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Staged removal of artificial patches for thoracic empyema after extrapleural pneumonectomy for diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma

A 69-year-old man with occupational exposure to asbestos was referred to our hospital with right diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. He underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy with reconstruction of the pericardium and diaphragm using elongated polytetrafluoroethylene patches, followed by postoperative chemotherapy and chest wall irradiation. One year later, he was hospitalized because of a right empyema caused by Escherichia coli infection. As chest drainage and systemic antibiotics did not eliminate the abscess around the artificial patches, a Clagett window was created. To avoid mediastinal and liver overshift into the right thoracic cavity, we only performed partial resection of the diaphragm patch and incision of the artificial pericardium. After 19 days of irrigation and dressing change, the artificial patches were completely removed. Two months later, the patient provided a culture-negative sample and had an improved nutritional status; we therefore performed closure of the Clagett window with thoracoplasty. He did not experience recurrence of empyema.

Extrapleural pneumonectomies for pleural mesothelioma

Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a fatal malignancy for which there is no definitive cure. The most effective multimodality treatment in prolonging survival is still matter of debate. Surgery remains one of the cornerstones in the multimodality therapy for MPM. Extra-pleural pneumonectomy and pleurectomy/decortication are the two main curative-intent procedures; however, the superiority of one technique over the other is still debated. This review aims to assess short- and long-term results of extrapleural pneumonectomy for MPM.Areas covered: This article focuses on the role of extrapleural pneumonectomy in MPM. A systematic review was performed by using electronic databases to identify studies that included patients treated by this procedure for MPM. Endpoints included overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence rate, perioperative mortality, and morbidity.Expert commentary: This paper offers an overview of the results that are currently obtained in patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy for MPM. The benefit of surgical treatments in MPM is still debated and its primary goal should be the achievement of a macroscopic complete resection. Several alternative multimodality protocols exist, with specific advantages and drawbacks; therefore, individualization of care for each patient is fundamental. The complexity of the surgical treatment mandates that patients be referred to specialized centers.

Extra-pleural pneumonectomy

The extra-pleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is a standardised surgical procedure born for pleural tuberculosis and later used in pleural cancer treatment, especially in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This systematic review aimed to focus on the actual overall EPP role in surgical oncology. The literature search was performed from January 1985 to January 2018 In PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane according to PRISMA protocol. The search was restricted to publications in English with the research words "extrapleural pneumonectomy", "malignant pleural mesothelioma", "pleural malignancies". The results were then filtered focusing only on papers with series of patients treated with EPP, for mesothelioma and non-mesothelioma malignancies. The search was restricted to publications in English. We found a 5-year overall survival (OS) ranging from 0 to 78%. The peri-operative mortality and morbidity ranged from 0 to 11.8% and 0 to 82.6%, respectively. The most represented and described post-operative complications reported were ARDS, pericardial tamponade, cardiac herniation, pulmonary embolism, respiratory infections, respiratory failure, atrial arrhythmia, myocardial infarction. In referral centres and selected patients, EPP is a cytoreductive or radical surgical treatment in extended pleural malignancies. Prospective studies are needed to standardise the timing of the procedure in a multimodality treatment program, according to the oncological and functional indications, to keep an acceptable complications rate and post-operative quality of life status.

Relation between neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and primary tumor metabolic activity in patients with malign pleural mesothelioma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship of the pre-treatment blood neutrophil/lymphocyte count ratio (NLR) with the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of primary masses on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) taken before treatment in patients diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and to evaluate the contribution to prognosis. A retrospective evaluation was made of 73 patients diagnosed with MPM in our hospital between January 2006 and January 2014. The SUVmax value of the primary mass on pre-treatment PET/CT, the haemogram parameters (Hb, Hct, NLR, MPV, PLT) at the time of diagnosis, the progression history, the date of the final visit, and the date of death of exitus patients was recorded from patient files PET/CT. The study group comprised 37 males (50.7%) with a mean age of 56.1 ± 11.4 years. The median survival time of these patients was 13 months. The survival time of the patient group aged <55 years was significantly longer (P = .006). Although the survival time of patients with NLR < 3 and SUVmax < 5 was longer, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .63, P = 0.08). A statistically significant difference was determined between the mean (or median) SUVmax values of the patient groups with NLR < 3 and NLR ≥3 (P = .019) with the SUVmax value of the NLR < 3 group found to be low. In conclusion, in patients with MPM, NLR ≥3 and high SUVmax values at the time of diagnosis can be considered an indicator of poor prognosis but are not a guide in the prediction of progression.

How does the timing of chemotherapy affect outcome following radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma?

OBJECTIVES

There is little evidence regarding the use of chemotherapy as part of multimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We aimed to determine whether, in those patients fit for chemotherapy, a delay in this treatment affected survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed postoperative variables of 229 patients undergoing either extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) (81 patients) or extended pleurectomy-decortication (EPD) (197 patients) for MPM at a single centre. There was no standard protocol for additional chemotherapy and varied with referral centre. Outcome was compared between 4 chemotherapy strategies: true adjuvant therapy, neo-adjuvant therapy, therapy reserved until evidence of disease progression in those otherwise fit in the post-operative setting, and those unfit for chemotherapy.

RESULTS

There was no effect of the timing of chemotherapy on overall or progression free survival in patients fit enough for treatment (p=0.39 and p=0.33 respectively). However delaying chemotherapy until evidence of disease progression in patients with non-epithelioid disease had a detrimental effect on overall survival (OS), and on progression free survival (PFS) in lymph node positive patients (15.6 vs. 8.2 months p=0.001, and 14.9 vs. 6.0 months p=0.016). Further analysis of 169 patients receiving platinum/pemetrexed as first line treatment, showed similar results; there was no effect of the timing of chemotherapy on OS or PFS (p=0.80 and p=0.53 respectively) and an improved OS in patients with non-epithelioid disease, and improved PFS in those with lymph node metastases, if chemotherapy was given in the immediate adjuvant setting (p=0.001 and 0.038) when therapy was not delayed until disease progression.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the timing of additional chemotherapy may be important in those with a poorer prognosis on the basis of cell type and nodal stage. In these patients additional postoperative chemotherapy should not be delayed.

Nanoparticle tumor localization, disruption of autophagosomal trafficking, and prolonged drug delivery improve survival in peritoneal mesothelioma

The treatment outcomes for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma are poor and associated with high co-morbidities due to suboptimal drug delivery. Thus, there is an unmet need for new approaches that concentrate drug at the tumor for a prolonged period of time yielding enhanced antitumor efficacy and improved metrics of treatment success. A paclitaxel-loaded pH-responsive expansile nanoparticle (PTX-eNP) system is described that addresses two unique challenges to improve the outcomes for peritoneal mesothelioma. First, following intraperitoneal administration, eNPs rapidly and specifically localize to tumors. The rate of eNP uptake by tumors is an order of magnitude faster than the rate of uptake in non-malignant cells; and, subsequent accumulation in autophagosomes and disruption of autophagosomal trafficking leads to prolonged intracellular retention of eNPs. The net effect of these combined mechanisms manifests as rapid localization to intraperitoneal tumors within 4 h of injection and persistent intratumoral retention for >14 days. Second, the high tumor-specificity of PTX-eNPs leads to delivery of greater than 100 times higher concentrations of drug in tumors compared to PTX alone and this is maintained for at least seven days following administration. As a result, overall survival of animals with established mesothelioma more than doubled when animals were treated with multiple doses of PTX-eNPs compared to equivalent dosing with PTX or non-responsive PTX-loaded nanoparticles.

CD157 enhances malignant pleural mesothelioma aggressiveness and predicts poor clinical outcome

Malignant mesothelioma is a deadly tumor whose diagnosis and treatment remain very challenging. There is an urgent need to advance our understanding of mesothelioma biology and to identify new molecular markers for improving management of patients. CD157 is a membrane glycoprotein linked to ovarian cancer progression and mesenchymal differentiation. The common embryonic origin of ovarian epithelial cells and mesothelial cells and the evident similarities between ovarian and mesothelial cancer prompted us to investigate the biological role and clinical significance of CD157 in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). CD157 mRNA and protein were detected in four of nine MPM cell lines of diverse histotype and in 85.2% of MPM surgical tissue samples (32/37 epithelioid; 37/44 biphasic). CD157 expression correlated with clinical aggressiveness in biphasic MPM. Indeed, high CD157 was a negative prognostic factor and an independent predictor of poor survival for patients with biphasic MPM by multivariate survival analysis (HR = 2.433, 95% CI 1.120-5.284; p = 0.025). In mesothelioma cell lines, CD157 gain (in CD157-negative cells) or knockdown (in CD157-positive cells) affected cell growth, migration, invasion and tumorigenicity, most notably in biphasic MPM cell lines. In these cells, CD157 expression was associated with increased activation of the mTOR signaling pathway, resulting in decreased platinum sensitivity. Moreover, a trend towards reduced survival was observed in patients with biphasic MPM receiving postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy. These findings indicate that CD157 is implicated in multiple aspects of MPM progression and suggest that CD157 expression could be used to stratify patients into different prognostic groups or to select patients that might benefit from particular chemotherapeutic approach.

Multimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: surgery plus chemoradiotherapy?

Malignant pleural mesothelioma, well known for its association with asbestos exposure, is an aggressive cancer of the pleura with poor prognosis if left untreated. There is no defined standard of care, but with curative surgery-based multimodality therapy, long-term survival has been documented. In addition to radiation and/or chemotherapy, multimodality therapy includes one of two operations (extrapleural pneumonectomy or radical pleurectomy/decortication) performed with the goal of resecting all gross disease. Ongoing trials are evaluating various treatment strategies involving radical resection, chemotherapy, radiation, intracavitary chemotherapy, photodynamic therapy and immunologic/biologic agents. Improvement in early diagnosis, targeted treatment and adjuvant therapy to control micrometastatic disease are needed to improve outcomes for patients with this challenging disease.

Interim results of pleurectomy/decortication and intraoperative intrapleural hyperthermic cisplatin perfusion for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma intolerable to extrapleural pneumonectomy

OBJECTIVE

Surgical procedure for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains controversial. We reviewed our protocol including pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who were intolerable to extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 2010 to April 2014, 14 patients with MPM were intended to treat with multimodality therapy including surgery. Four patients who were intolerable to EPP received a protocol consisting of P/D and intraoperative intrapleural hyperthermic cisplatin perfusion, followed by systemic chemotherapy. Ten patients received trimodality treatment of EPP, systemic chemotherapy, and intensity modulated radiation therapy for hemithorax. Surgical outcomes of acute operative results and interim survivals were examined and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

All patients obtained macroscopic complete resection and received multimodality treatment in P/D and EPP groups. Operation time was longer in P/D group; however, there were no differences in ICU stays or hospitalizations. Four patients in P/D group and seven patients in EPP group experienced postoperative complications; however, there was no operative morality. EPP group suffered from cardiac complications and P/D group had prolonged airleak. Full walk recovery was obtained earlier in P/D group. One patient in P/D group had a local recurrence 11 months after surgery, while the other three patients survived 23-41 months with no evidence of diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

P/D and intraoperative intrapleural cisplatin perfusion achieved a favorable macroscopic resection in patients with MPM who were intolerable to EPP. Postoperative complications were manageable and survival could be promising. Further study warrants with a larger number of patients.

Systematic review on pleurectomy/decortication in the multimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

SUMMARY 

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor of pleural membranes with a dismal prognosis. Following diagnosis survival is usually less than 12 months. The treatment is therefore very often palliative. In selected cases with early stage disease surgical resection is possible. Several studies have now shown that combination treatment with chemotherapy (CHT), radiotherapy (RT) and radical surgery lead to an increased overall survival (OS). This review analyzes the long-term results of the two different types of radical surgery included in the multimodality treatment: extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). Recent studies have shown P/D to have less morbidity with comparable or better OS compared with EPP while enabling more patients to complete multimodality treatment.

Extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant mesothelioma: an Italian multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study assessed perioperative outcome and long-term survival in a large series of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) to identify prognostic factors allowing better patient selection.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from nine referral centers for thoracic surgery in Italy. Perioperative outcome and survival data were available for 518 malignant pleural mesothelioma patients (84.4% with epithelial tumors, 68.0% with pathologic stage 3 disease) who underwent EPP with intention-to-treat (R0/R1) between 2000 and 2010. Induction chemotherapy was administered in 271 patients (52.3%) and adjuvant therapy in 373 patients (72.0%), including radiotherapy in 213 patients (41.1%), adjuvant chemotherapy in 43 patients (8.3%), and both in 117 patients (22.6%).

RESULTS

In all, 136 patients (26.3%) had major complications after EPP, and 36 (6.9%) died within 90 days after surgery. The median overall survival was 18 months, with a 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival of 65%, 41%, and 27%, respectively. At multivariable analysis adjusted for age and disease stage, male sex (hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12 to 1.92), nonepithelial histology (HR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.58), and trimodality treatment using induction chemotherapy (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.85) were significantly associated with survival. Development of a major complication also significantly worsened outcome (HR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.37 to 2.50).

CONCLUSIONS

The success of EPP in the context of a multimodality treatment depends on a series of patient characteristics. Female patients, patients with epithelial tumors, and patients who received induction chemotherapy will best benefit from EPP.

Surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: impact of surgery on survival and quality of life-relation to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and alternative therapies

Introduction. Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer arising from pleural mesothelium. Surgery aims to either cure the disease or control the symptoms. Two surgical procedures exist: extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). In this systematic review we assess current evidence on safety and efficacy of surgery. Methods. Five electronic databases were reviewed from January 1990 to January 2013. Studies were selected according to a predefined protocol. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included quality of life, disease-free survival, disease recurrence, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. Results. Sixteen studies were included. Median survival ranged from 8.1 to 32 months for P/D and from 6.9 to 46.9 months for EPP. Perioperative mortality was 0%–9.8% and 3.2%–12.5%, respectively. Perioperative morbidity was 5.9%–55% for P/D and 10%–82.6% for EPP. Average length of stay was 7 days for P/D and 9 days for EPP. Conclusion. Current evidence cannot definitively answer which procedure (EPP or P/D) is more beneficial in terms of survival and operative risks. This systematic review suggests that surgery in the context of trimodality therapy offers acceptable perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. Centres specialising in MPM management have better results.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: update on treatment options with a focus on novel therapies

There is evidence that improved treatments of malignant pleural mesothelioma are increasing the quality and quantity of life for patients with mesothelioma. Multimodality treatment programs that combine maximal surgical cytoreduction with novel forms of radiation therapy and more effective chemotherapy combinations may offer significant increases in survival for certain subgroups of patients with mesothelioma. Lung-sparing surgery may allow improvements in pulmonary function after surgery-based multimodality therapy, and potential longer overall survival than that seen with extrapleural pneumonectomy. Experimental treatments provide hope for all patients with mesothelioma, and in the future may be combined with standard therapy in multimodality protocols.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy in the combined-modality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

INTRODUCTION

Local therapy is becoming increasingly important as a part of the definitive treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma after extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) because of the emergence of trimodality therapy consisted of chemotherapy, EPP, and adjuvant radiotherapy. Herein, we explore the current evidence and indications for adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), as well as how to further improve this technique and adapt new technology in the delivering adjuvant radiotherapy in the setting of trimodality therapy.

METHODS

A systematic review of relevant studies identified through PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge (Web of Science), the Cochrane Library, and the National Guideline Clearinghouse search engines was performed.

RESULTS

Local control remains poor despite the inclusion of conventional adjuvant radiation therapy in trimodality therapy. This can be improved by the delivery of adjuvant IMRT. However, IMRT can be associated with severe pulmonary toxicity if the radiation dose to the remaining lung is not kept to a very low level. This is especially true when patients are receiving chemotherapy. New advances in technology can allow for lower doses to the contralateral lung, decreased treatment delivery time, and improved target dose coverage.

CONCLUSION

Excellent local control can be achieved through adjuvant IMRT after EPP for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Severe pulmonary toxicity may be avoided by setting stringent dose constraints for the contralateral lung. This can be aided by the advances in technology. Post-treatment surveillance may be reliably conducted by periodical [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging.

[Pleural mesothelioma: where are we with radical surgery and multimodal treatment?]

Multimodal treatment of pleural mesothelioma, which is reserved for specialised centres for epithelial forms without node involvement, must include preliminary laparoscopy, thoracoscopy and mediastinoscopy. Following chemotherapy, in our opinion surgical removal via pleuropneumonectomy should be performed without resection of the diaphragm and the pericardium, because of the risks of seeding and postoperative complications. Our limited experience with 15 patients has confirmed the feasibility of this with no deaths. High-dose radiotherapy of the whole pneumonectomy cavity appears essential, but the optimal technique is debatable. Only five homogeneous series of more than 40 patients incorporating hemithoracic radiotherapy have been published.

The evolution of multimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare neoplasm of the pleural surfaces that has been associated with asbestos exposure. MPM generally spreads locally along the ipsilateral pleura, especially at presentation, with distant metastatic disease typically seen only in the later stages of the disease course. As such, surgical resection and other local therapies have long been pursued as a primary form of treatment. Surgical options include debulking of the pleura by pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) or a more aggressive extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) which also involves removal of the lung, diaphragm, and involved pericardium. Even after major resection, MPM almost always recurs locally and has a poor prognosis. As such, many groups have pursued multimodality therapy, treating resectable patients with EPP, along with hemithoracic radiation to decrease the risk of local recurrence and chemotherapy to decrease the risk of distant metastatic disease. However, EPP is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and many patients are not candidates for EPP due to underlying comorbid medical conditions. Additionally, many patients are unable to tolerate complete courses of adjuvant therapy after EPP. A large, multicenter retrospective analysis comparing EPP to P/D demonstrated better outcomes among those who underwent P/D. One challenge associated with P/D has been the delivery or radiation to the removed pleura with an intact lung. Yet, advances in radiation technique have allowed the exploration of high-dose radiation therapy after P/D. The ideal timing of chemotherapy relative to surgery and the role of intracavitary chemotherapy continue to be controversial issues. Clearly, MPM requires a multidisciplinary approach and, due to the myriad of open questions, much effort continues to focus on identifying the optimal combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation.

A systematic review of extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

INTRODUCTION

The primary objective of the present systematic review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

METHODS

A systematic review of relevant studies identified through five online search databases was performed. Two reviewers independently appraised each study.

RESULTS

Thirty-four of 58 relevant studies from 26 institutions containing the most updated data were evaluated for survival and perioperative outcomes after EPP. The median overall survival varied from 9.4 to 27.5 months, and 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates ranged from 36 to 83%, 5 to 59%, and 0 to 24%, respectively. Overall perioperative mortality rates ranged from 0 to 11.8%, and the perioperative morbidity rates ranged from 22 to 82%. Quality of life assessments from three studies reported improvements in nearly all domains at 3 months postoperatively. Patients who underwent trimodality therapy involving EPP and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy had a median overall survival of 13 to 23.9 months.

DISCUSSIONS

The current evidence suggests that selected patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma may benefit from EPP, especially when combined with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for mesothelioma

Previously considered to be rare, malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive tumor with an increasing incidence linked to asbestos exposure, its main etiological factor. MPM is also a very important issue because patients have usually a short survival (median <12 months) despite current treatments. Moreover an optimal treatment for MPM is not defined yet, even if ERS/ESTS experts recently provided clear and up-to-date guidelines on MPM management. These guidelines on chemotherapy and radiotherapy for mesothelioma, as well as new therapeutic developments, are presented in this chapter.

[Surgical treatment of primary pleural tumours in our department]

AIM

The authors analyzed the results and outcome of surgical treatment of primary pleural tumors in patients treated in the last 11 years.

METHODS

31 operations were performed for primary pleural tumors in 25 patients (17 males, 8 females). The tumors were classified into the following groups: benign local fibrous tumors (benign LFTP; n = 15), recurrent malignant fibrous tumors (recurrent malignant LFTP; n = 2) and malignant mesotheliomas (MPM; n = 12). 40% of patients with MPM were exposed to asbestos. Complete resections of benign LFTPs were performed, with additional resection of the chest wall and lobectomy in two cases. Completion pneumonectomy and lobectomy were done in recurrent malignant LFTP cases. Five biopsies and pleurodesis, and one open decortication were performed. In four cases, after the biopsy, two pleurectomies and decortications (P/D) and two pleuropneumonectomies (PPN)/extra-pleural pneumonectomies (EPP) were carried out.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality. Pathological examination revealed seven epithelial, two sarcomatous and one biphasic malignant mesotheliomas. Survival was one (currently alive) and 49 months after malignant recurrent LFTP. Survival in MPM cases was 9,7 months (3-17) without resection and 17,3 months (5 (currently alive) - 29) in P/D or PPN (EPP) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPN (EPP) and P/D are safe procedures providing relatively good survival when it is done as part of complete oncological treatment. In cases of recurrent LFTP, anatomical resections recommended with completion pneumonectomy or lobectomy.

Thymidylate Synthase But Not Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 Tumor Expression Predicts Outcome in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Treated With Pemetrexed-Based Chemotherapy

Purpose

The relationship between thymidylate synthase (TS) expression and outcome in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) treated with pemetrexed (P) was retrospectively evaluated.

Patients and Methods

Sixty histologically confirmed patients with MPM previously treated with P and platinum (45 of 60) or as single agent (15 of 60) were retrospectively considered. Eighty-one control patients with MPM not P-treated were also evaluated. TS and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) gene expression levels were evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction and by immunohistochemistry using the H-score.

Results

Median TS H-score value was 90 (range, 5 to 240). A significant correlation between low TS protein expression and longer time to progression (TTP; 17.9 v 7.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 2.05, 95% CI, 1.19 to 3.77; P = .02) or overall survival (OS; 30 v 16.7 months; HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 4.91; P = .019) was found when patients were divided according to median H-score. Conversely, TS mRNA levels were not significantly correlated with outcome. In platinum-treated patients (n = 45), no correlation was found with survival according to ERCC1 median H-score, but patients in the lower tertile had a significantly shorter survival (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.08 to 8.69; P = .035). In control MPMs, TS had no prognostic role. At multivariate analysis, TS protein levels were the only independent prognostic factor for both TTP (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.13 to 6.49; P = .02) and OS (HR, 6.91; 95% CI, 1.90 to 25.07; P = .003).

Conclusion

In patients with MPM treated with P-based chemotherapy, low TS protein levels are predictive of improved TTP and OS. The role of TS assessment is worth of prospective validation in future studies on MPM.

Multimodality strategies in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Over the last decade, several improvements have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma, including better understanding of tumor biology, availability of more potent chemotherapeutic drugs, improved surgical management, and optimized multidisciplinary therapy. Radical tumor resection by means of extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is now feasible with acceptable morbidity and mortality, even after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, if performed in specialized centers. To date, the best survival data have been reported after multimodality treatment strategies that include surgical resection. In this article, we discuss several strategies that involve EPP or pleurectomy/decortication in combination with various adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies.

Trimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a fatal disease. The optimal modality and sequence of therapy are controversial. We analyzed the outcomes of a cohort of mesothelioma patients treated with induction chemotherapy, followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and adjuvant radiation.

METHODS

The study comprised a retrospective cohort of 46 patients treated with induction chemotherapy, followed by EPP, during a 10-year period. Of these, 24 completed adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and 14 had intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 20.6 months (range, 0.5 to 75 months). Operative mortality after EPP was 4.3% (n = 2). Pathologic stage was p0, 4.3%; pII, 23.9%; pIII, 56.5%; and pIV, 15.2%. Median overall survival was 24 months. On univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazards model, only nodal metastases (hazard ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 8.7; p = 0.002) was a significant predictor of survival. First site of recurrence was local in 12, the contralateral chest in 5, abdominal in 8, and distant in 5. The incidence of local recurrence was 14.3% with IMRT vs 41.7% with EBRT (p = 0.03). The time to local recurrence with the use of IMRT was 12 months vs 7 for EBRT (p = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Induction chemotherapy, followed by EPP and adjuvant radiotherapy for selected patients with mesothelioma, is safe, with acceptable operative mortality. Adjuvant IMRT may be more effective in terms of local control than EBRT.

Placenta growth factor expression has prognostic value in malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is highly aggressive and recurs rapidly despite radical multimodality treatment. Progression of mesothelioma is thought to be governed by various growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Placenta growth factor (PlGF) belongs to the VEGF family, although no study has yet investigated its expression in mesothelioma. We hypothesized that PlGF is overexpressed in mesothelioma and could have prognostic value in patients treated by extrapleural pneumonectomy.

METHODS

We assessed by immunohistochemistry with semiquantitative classification (0 = no staining; 3 = strong staining), the expression levels of PlGF and its cognate receptors VEGF receptor 1, neuropilin-1, and neuropilin-2 in 27 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy, in 14 patients with reactive mesothelium, and in 10 patients with normal mesothelium.

RESULTS

Whereas PlGF was not expressed in normal mesothelium, it was overexpressed (grade 3) more frequently in mesothelioma than in reactive mesothelium specimens (11 or 41% versus 1 or 7%, respectively, p = 0.03). Furthermore, in mesothelioma, VEGF receptor 1 and neuropilin-1 and -2 were overexpressed in 18 specimens (67%), 8 specimens (30%), and 9 specimens (33%), respectively. Mean survival after extrapleural pneumonectomy was 17 months. An inverse relationship was found between the degree of PlGF expression and survival in months (R = -0.45, p = 0.01). No correlation was found between tumor stage and survival (R = -0.33) and between tumor stage and PlGF expression (R = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that PlGF can be overexpressed in malignant pleural mesothelioma. In addition, the finding of an inverse relationship between PlGF expression levels and survival suggests a pivotal role of this factor in the recurrence and progression of mesothelioma after extrapleural pneumonectomy.

Prevention of malignant seeding at drain sites after invasive procedures (surgery and/or thoracoscopy) by hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma

INTRODUCTION

Literature data show that mesothelioma cells can implant along the surgical pathway of invasive procedures such as thoracotomy and thoracoscopy. We investigated the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy for preventing such malignant seeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma were included in the present retrospective study. All patients underwent surgery and/or thoracoscopy for diagnosis, staging or talc pleurodesis. They were treated with electron external beam radiation therapy (21 Gy in 3 fractions over 1 week), directed to the surgical pathway after the invasive procedure. After completion of radiation treatment, 20 of 32 patients (63%) underwent chemotherapy.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 13.6 months (range 3-41) from the end of radiation therapy, no patient had tumour progression in the treated area. The treatment was well tolerated, as only erythema grade I (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, RTOG, scale) was noted in 11 patients. Seventeen patients died of disease with local progression after a mean survival time of 12.6 months (range 3-27); thirteen patients are alive with disease after a mean follow-up of 13.9 months (range 4-41); two patients are alive without evidence of disease after a mean follow-up of 16.50 months (range 6-27).

DISCUSSION

The present study shows the efficacy and safety of local radiotherapy in preventing malignant seeding after thoracoscopy in patients with pleural mesothelioma although larger prospective trials are probably still needed to validate this treatment approach.

Biomarkers for malignant pleural mesothelioma: current status

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor with poor prognosis, whose main etiology is exposure to asbestos fibers. The incidence of MPM is anticipated to increase worldwide during the first half of this century. For various reasons, MPM is difficult to diagnose and is notoriously refractory to most treatments. However, recently two active chemotherapy regimens have been demonstrated to significantly increase survival in patients with MPM, and several therapeutic agents and strategies are currently under evaluation.Researchers have actively sought MPM biomarkers for more than 20 years. Biomarkers would be helpful in managing three clinical aspects of MPM: early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcome prediction. The aims of the present review are to summarize the published and recently presented data on MPM biomarkers and to identify the prospects for future translational research projects.Among the 'classical' diagnostic biomarkers measured in biological fluids, such as cytokeratins and cell surface antigens, none discriminate patients with MPM from those with other malignancies and nonmalignant diseases. Osteopontin, soluble mesothelin, and megakaryocyte potentiating factor (MPF) appear to be the most promising of the recent biomarkers, but are still subject to some limitations. Osteopontin lacks specificity for mesothelioma, while both soluble mesothelin and MPF lack sensitivity for detecting non-epithelial subtypes. Panels consisting of a small set of biomarkers do not improve the diagnostic yield, and results from molecular profiling are too preliminary to be brought into daily clinical practice. While a large number of biomarkers have been assessed in biological fluids and tumor tissue for their prognostic value, none have had a widespread impact on clinical practice. In contrast, data concerning predictive biomarkers are very limited, even though they are most interesting from the perspective of clinicians.Additional prospective studies, in large and independent samples of patients, with rigorous statistical methodology and standardized laboratory techniques are now warranted to validate and define the precise value of diagnostic and prognostic MPM biomarkers. Future research efforts should focus on biomarkers predictive of the efficacy and toxicity of standard chemotherapy. Translational research should be systematically incorporated into the design of clinical trials assessing new targeted agents in MPM.

Multidisciplinary treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

The incidence of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is increasing worldwide, and is predicted to peak in the next 10-20 years. Difficulties in MPM diagnosis and staging, especially of early disease, have thwarted the development of a universally accepted therapeutic approach. Single modality therapies (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) have generally failed to significantly prolong patient survival. As a result, multimodality treatment regimens have been developed. Radical surgery with extrapleural pneumonectomy and adjuvant treatments has become the preferred option in early disease, but the benefits of such an aggressive approach have been questioned because of significant treatment-related morbidity and mortality. In the past few years, there have been several major advances in the management of patients with MPM, including more accurate staging and patient selection, improvements in surgical techniques and postoperative care, novel chemotherapy regimens with definite activity such as antifolate (pemetrexed or raltitrexed)-platinum combinations, and new radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy has shown promising results. A number of molecular alterations occurring in MPM have been reported, providing broader insights into its biology and leading to the identification of new targets for therapy. However, currently available treatments still appear to have modest results. Further studies are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of early and advanced stages of this disease.

[Malignant pleural mesothelioma: multidisciplinary experience in a public tertiary hospital]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the experience in diagnosing and treating malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) accumulated over 5 years in a tertiary public hospital.

METHODS

The medical charts of the patients diagnosed with MPM between January of 2000 and February of 2005 were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of the 17 patients analyzed, 14 were male and 3 were female. The mean age was 54.1 years (range, 13-75 years). The biopsy specimens for histopathological examination were obtained through thoracoscopy in 9 patients (53%), Cope needle in 5 (29.5%), and open pleural biopsy in 3 (17.5%). The following histological types were identified: epithelial, in 14 patients (82%); sarcomatoid, in 1 (6%); and biphasic, in 2 (12%). The therapeutic approaches used were as follows: multimodal (pleuropneumonectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy) in 6 patients (35%); chemotherapy and radiotherapy in 6 (35%); radiotherapy alone in 3 (17.5%); and chemotherapy alone in 2 (12%). The mean survival was 11 months (range, 1-26 months).

CONCLUSIONS

In the cases studied, an integrated multidisciplinary approach was used, and a highly complex hospital infrastructure was available for the diagnosis and treatment of MPM, as recommended in the literature. However, the mean survival was only 11 months, reflecting the aggressiveness of the disease.

Prognostic factors in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma at a large tertiary referral center

INTRODUCTION

Most studies describing the natural history and prognostic factors for malignant pleural mesothelioma antedate accurate pathologic diagnosis, staging by computed tomography, and a universal staging system. We conducted a large single-institution analysis to identify prognostic factors and assess the association of resection with outcome in a contemporary patient population.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven malignant pleural mesothelioma at our institution were identified and clinical data were obtained from an institutional database. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards analysis. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

From 1990 to 2005, 945 patients were identified: 755 men, 190 women; median age, 66 years (range, 26-93). Extrapleural pneumonectomy was performed in 208 (22%), pleurectomy/decortication in 176 (19%). Operative mortality was 4% (16/384). Multimodality therapy including surgery was associated with a median survival of 20.1 months. Significant predictors of overall survival included histology, gender, smoking, asbestos exposure, laterality, surgical resection by extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, and symptoms. A Cox model demonstrated a hazard ratio of 1.4 without surgical resection when controlling for histology, stage, gender, asbestos exposure, smoking history, symptoms, and laterality (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to tumor histology and pathologic stage, predictors of survival include gender, asbestos exposure, smoking, symptoms, laterality, and clinical stage. Surgical resection in a multimodality setting was associated with improved survival.

Multicenter trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy in malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multicenter trial was to prospectively evaluate neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and radiotherapy, including quality of life as outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had malignant pleural mesothelioma of all histological types, World Health Organization performance status of zero to two and clinical stage T1-T3, N0-2, M0 disease considered completely resectable. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by EPP. Postoperative radiotherapy was considered for all patients.

RESULTS

In all, 58 of 61 patients completed three cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-five patients (74%) underwent EPP and in 37 patients (61%) the resection was complete. Postoperative radiotherapy was initiated in 36 patients. The median survival of all patients was 19.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.6-24.5]. For the 45 patients undergoing EPP, the median survival was 23 months (95% CI 16.6-32.9). Psychological distress showed minor variations over time with distress above the cut-off score indicating no morbidity with 82% (N = 36) at baseline and 76% (N = 26) at 3 months after surgery (P = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed rate of operability is promising. A median survival of 23 months for patients undergoing EPP compares favourably with the survival reported from single center studies of upfront surgery. This approach was not associated with an increase in psychological distress.

Induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and adjuvant hemi-thoracic radiation in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): Feasibility and results

BACKGROUND

Trimodality therapy seems to be the best treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). A large experience served to evaluate the efficacy of surgery followed by adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Trimodality therapy results have led us to test induction chemotherapy followed by EPP and adjuvant radiotherapy in stages I-III of MPM. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of this protocol and to estimate survival.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2003, 21 patients with MPM (14 males and 7 females, median age 59 years) were enrolled in the prospective study. Induction chemotherapy consisted of Carboplatin (AUC 5mg/mL/min on Day 1) and Gemcitabine (1000mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, 15) for three to four cycles. EPP was performed 3-5 weeks after induction therapy, while post-operative RT was given 4-6 weeks after operation.

RESULTS

Ten patients received three cycles of chemotherapy, 10 patients received four cycles and 1 patient had two cycles. Grades 3-4 haematological toxicity occurred in eight (38.1%) patients. Chemotherapy response rate was: complete 0%, partial 33.3% and stable disease 66.7%. Seventeen (80.9%) out of 21 patients underwent EPP with no intra or post-operative mortality with an overall major and minor morbidity rate at 52.4%. Median survival was 25.5 months, with an overall 1, 3 and 5-year survival rate of 71, 33 and 19%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In MPM, the combined modality approach using the Carboplatin/Gemcitabine combination as induction chemotherapy is feasible, with good results in terms of survival and morbidity. Our results are similar to those of other studies using a heavier modality treatment.

La chirurgie radicale dans le mésothéliome

Good results obtained by the team from Boston increased the interest in pleuropneumonectomy for mesothelioma. Adjuvant high-dose hemithoracic radiation after surgical resection decreased the local recurrence rate from 35 to 13%. The high rate of peritoneal (26-31%), controlateral pleural and pericardial recurrences justify the routine practice of preoperative laparoscopy and controlateral thoracoscopy and a pleuropneumonectomy without pericardotomy and diaphragmatic resection. The diaphragm is lowered to facilitate radiotherapy. Chemotherapy may be performed postoperatively.

Feasibility of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma from a viewpoint of dose distribution analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) from a viewpoint of dose distribution analysis using Simulation Environment for Radiotherapy Applications (SERA), a currently available BNCT treatment planning system.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The BNCT treatment plans were constructed for 3 patients with MPM using the SERA system, with 2 opposed anterior-posterior beams. The (10)B concentrations in the tumor and normal lung in this study were assumed to be 84 and 24 ppm, respectively, and were derived from data observed in clinical trials. The maximum, mean, and minimum doses to the tumors and the normal lung were assessed for each plan. The doses delivered to 5% and 95% of the tumor volume, D(05) and D(95), were adopted as the representative dose for the maximum and minimum dose, respectively.

RESULTS

When the D(05) to the normal ipsilateral lung was 5 Gy-Eq, the D(95) and mean doses delivered to the normal lung were 2.2-3.6 and 3.5-4.2 Gy-Eq, respectively. The mean doses delivered to the tumors were 22.4-27.2 Gy-Eq. The D(05) and D(95) doses to the tumors were 9.6-15.0 and 31.5-39.5 Gy-Eq, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

From a viewpoint of the dose-distribution analysis, BNCT has the possibility to be a promising treatment for MPM patients who are inoperable because of age and other medical illnesses.

Biology and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive tumour, with a poor prognosis and an increasing incidence as a result of widespread exposure to asbestos. The results of the treatments available are poor. Surgery and radiotherapy have a limited role in highly selected patients and systemic therapy is the only potential treatment option for the majority of patients. Despite some definite activity of the novel antifolates such as pemetrexed and raltitrexed, the results, even in combination with platinating agents, are still modest, with a median survival of approximately one year. The better understanding of the biology of mesothelioma makes the assessment of a number of targeted agents particularly interesting. Unfortunately, the targeted agents imatinib, gefitinib, erlotinib and thalidomide have been shown to be ineffective in unselected patients. Studies with anti-angiogenesis agents are ongoing. An improvement of the knowledge of major molecular pathways involved in malignant mesothelioma is needed in order to define proper targets for the systemic treatment of this disease.

Radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a relatively uncommon disease, but the incidence is increasing and is expected to peak in many developed countries in the next two decades. The management of patients with malignant mesothelioma is controversial. Very few patients are suitable for any potentially curative treatment and the effectiveness of radical therapy with surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy in curing patients or prolonging survival is uncertain. The role of radiotherapy is controversial although it has been used as part of multimodal therapy. The present review will try to clarify these uncertainties.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of radiotherapy on patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in any stage of the disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Both electronic and handsearches were conducted. All randomised controlled clinical trials were searched in electronic databases such as: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Handsearching was aimed at the identification of evidence by reviewing journals not indexed in databases, proceedings of conferences and/or scientific meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled clinical trials using radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma in any stage, alone or combined with other therapies in patients of either sex and any age, were included. Studies without a control group were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

There were no studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

To date we have not found any reports of randomised comparisons of radiotherapy alone or combined for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

As radiotherapy has never been compared to chemotherapy or surgery or to best supportive care (as part of combination therapy) in a prospective, randomised trial, no data exist supporting one or the other treatment as a better option for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. There is a need for multicentre controlled randomised trials assessing the role of radiotherapy in the radical treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. The studies should be limited to patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, classified by stage, cytology and type of radiotherapy. The type of radiotherapy should be defined in advance and variables of radiotherapy dose definition and delivery should be carefully controlled.

The role of radiation therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Radiation therapy may offer patients presenting with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) symptom palliation and improvements in quality of life. This systematic review will address the role of radiation therapy in the management of MPM.

METHODS

A thorough systematic search of the literature was conducted for published articles and conference proceedings for applicable abstracts. Relevant trials were selected and assessed.

RESULTS

Three small randomized controlled trials compared prophylactic external beam radiation therapy to no radiation therapy for patients with thoracic tracts caused by drainage tubes or diagnostic procedures. None of those trials reported any serious adverse effects. A pooled analysis found no significant reduction in the frequency of procedure tract metastases. Four non-comparative studies have shown that hemithoracic irradiation alone resulted in significant toxicity, including radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis, radiation pneumonitis, and bronchopleural fistula, without any survival benefit. Few of the identified studies reported on symptom control, and no studies included formal measures of quality of life.

CONCLUSION

There is limited evidence for the role of radiotherapy in the management of patients with MPM. Future studies including radiotherapy for the treatment of such patients should include formal measures of quality of life and symptom control.

Intrapleural topical application of cisplatin with the surgical carrier Vivostat increases the local drug concentration in an immune-competent rat model with malignant pleuromesothelioma

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate whether intrapleural topical application of cisplatin with a surgical carrier has a prolonged local tissue level in comparison with cisplatin solution while reducing systemic toxicity.

METHODS

Forty immune-competent Fischer rats were inoculated with 10(6) mesothelioma cells. Ten days later, left pneumonectomy with tumor debulking was performed. Twenty animals underwent local application of cisplatin solution (100 mg/m2), whereas the same quantity of cisplatin was topically applied as a gel with the Vivostat (Vivolution) system in 20 other animals. In each group 5 subgroups of 4 animals were defined according to the harvesting time of blood and tissue samples (2, 4, 24, and 72 hours and 1 week) after local therapy. Platinum concentrations in serum and tissue and systemic toxicity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Platinum concentrations in tissue were significantly higher in the gel group (group 1) than in the solution group (group 2) at 1, 3, and 7 days after therapy (1510, 1224, and 1069 pg/mg for group 1 vs 598, 382, and 287 pg/mg for group 2; P = .007, P = .005, and P = .0002, respectively). Laboratory findings showed renal insufficiency in the animals of the solution group at 1 week, with values of 98 mmol/L versus 7.7 mmol/L for urea and 410 mumol/L versus 43 mumol/L for creatinine (P = .02 and P = .01, respectively), which was confirmed by means of pathologic analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrapleural administration of cisplatin with the carrier Vivostat significantly provides sustained higher platinum concentrations up to 1 week in tissue in comparison with application of cisplatin solution without conferring systemic toxicity in this model.