Successful endoscopical sealing of malignant esophageotracheal fistulae by using a covered self-expandable stenting system

Efficacy and risk factors of stent placement in the treatment of malignant tracheoesophageal fistula

Background

Due to the low incidence of malignant tracheoesophageal fistula and the paucity of relevant clinical studies, the benefits of stent implantation have not been well documented. It remains unclear which factors may affect fistula closure.

Methods

Between January 2015 and January 2021, 344 patients who were diagnosed with malignant tracheoesophageal fistula at Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, were retrospectively enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Risk factors for fistula closure identified by univariate analysis were further analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

A total of 288 patients were analyzed in this study, of which 94 were treated conservatively, 170 were treated with an esophageal stent, and 24 were treated with a tracheal stent. Among them, the delta Karnofsky's performance status score values (after 2 weeks/before treatment [p = 0.0028], after 1 month/before treatment [p = 0.0103]) were significantly different between conservative and stent treatment. There was a significant reduction of pneumonia incidence in the stenting group (33.53%) compared to the conservative treatment group (77.05%) after one month (p <0.0001). In addition, the closure of fistulas was influenced by four independent risk factors: 1) treatment methods (p < 0.0001), 2) fistula size (p = 0.0003), 3) preoperative white blood cell count (p = 0.0042), and 4) preoperative Karnofsky's performance status score (p = 0.0001).

Conclusions

Stent implantation has become an effective method for treating malignant tracheoesophageal fistula compared to conservative treatment. Additionally, stent implantation, smaller fistula size, lower preoperative white blood cell count, and higher preoperative Karnofsky's performance status score suggest a better outcome.

Surgical strategies for benign acquired tracheoesophageal fistula

OBJECTIVES

Tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is characterized by abnormal connectivity between the posterior wall of the trachea or bronchus and the adjacent anterior wall of the oesophagus. Benign TEF can result in serious complications; however, there is currently no uniform standard to determine the appropriate surgical approach for repairing TEF.

METHODS

The PubMed database was used to search English literature associated with TEF from 1975 to October 2023. We employed Boolean operators and relevant keywords: 'tracheoesophageal fistula', 'tracheal resection', 'fistula suture', 'fistula repair', 'fistula closure', 'flap', 'patch', 'bioabsorbable material', 'bioprosthetic material', 'acellular dermal matrix', 'AlloDerm', 'double patch', 'oesophageal exclusion', 'oesophageal diversion' to search literature. The evidence level of the literature was assessed based on the GRADE classification.

RESULTS

Nutritional support, no severe pulmonary infection and weaning from mechanical ventilation were the 3 determinants for timing of operation. TEFs were classified into 3 levels: small TEF (<1 cm), moderate TEF (≥1 but <5 cm) and large TEF (≥5 cm). Fistula repair or tracheal segmental resection was used for the small TEF with normal tracheal status. If the anastomosis cannot be finished directly after tracheal segmental resection, special types of tracheal resection, such as slide tracheoplasty, oblique resection and reconstruction, and autologous tissue flaps were preferred depending upon the site and size of the fistula. Oesophageal exclusion was applicable to refractory TEF or patients with poor conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The review primarily summarizes the main surgical techniques employed to repair various acquired TEF, to provide references that may contribute to the treatment of TEF.

Management of Esophageal Cancer-Associated Respiratory–Digestive Tract Fistulas

Respiratory–digestive tract fistulas are fatal complications that occur in esophageal cancer treatment. Interdisciplinary treatment strategies are still evolving, especially in anatomical treatment stratification. Thus, this study aims to evaluate general therapeutic strategies for this rare condition. Medical records were reviewed for esophageal cancer-associated respiratory–digestive tract fistula patients treated between January 2008 and September 2021. Fistulas were classified according to being surgery- and tumor-associated. Treatment strategies, clinical success, and survival were analyzed. A total of 51 patients were identified: 28 had tumor-associated fistulas and 23 surgery-associated fistulas. Risk factors for fistula development such as radiation (OR = 0.290, p = 0.64) or stent implantation (OR = 1.917, p = 0.84) did not correlate with lack of symptom control for RDF patients. In contrast, advanced lymph node metastasis as another risk factor was associated with persistent symptoms after treatment for RDF patients (OR = 0.611, p = 0.01). Clinical success significantly correlated with bilateral fistula repair in surgery-associated fistulas (p = 0.01), while tumor-associated fistulas benefited the most from non-surgical (p = 0.04) or combined surgical and non-surgical intervention (p = 0.04) and a bilateral fistula repair (p = 0.02) in terms of overall survival. The therapeutic strategy should aim for bilateral fistula closure. A multidisciplinary, stepwise approach might have the best chance for restoration or symptom control with optimized overall survival in selected patients.

Successful endobronchial treatment of a non-healing tracheoesophageal fistula from a previous histoplasmosis capsulatum infection using decellularized porcine urinary bladder matrix†

Tracheoesophageal fistulas (TEF) are pathologic communications between the esophagus and the trachea or bronchi. The development of a TEF can result from malignant or benign etiologies. A common approach for the treatment of TEFs is the placement of endobronchial and esophageal stents to facilitate healing of the communication. This case report describes the successful treatment of a TEF resulting from calcified mediastinal lymphadenopathy due to a previous Histoplasmosis capsulatum infection. In addition to placement of endobronchial and esophageal stents, the non-healing TEF was treated with ACell (Gentrix^®) decellularized porcine urinary bladder matrix to facilitate complete closure of the fistulous tract.

Esophagorespiratory Fistulas: Survival and Outcomes of Treatment

GOAL

The purpose of this study was to characterize outcomes of esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERF) by etiology and initial treatment strategy.

BACKGROUND

ERF is a morbid condition for which optimal treatment strategies and outcomes are still in evolution.

STUDY

Medical records and images were reviewed for all patients diagnosed with ERF at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, between September 1, 2001 and January 1, 2012. Fistulas were classified as malignant or benign. Treatment strategies were classified as surgical or nonsurgical (typically esophageal stent placement). Technical and clinical success, survival, and survival free of second intervention were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients with acquired ERF were identified, of whom 65 (53%) were malignant and 58 (47%) benign. Initial treatment strategy was nonsurgical in 88 (72%) patients and surgical in 35 (28%); lower Charlson comorbidity scores were associated with increased likelihood of surgery. Technical and clinical success was seen in a majority of patients treated both surgically and nonsurgically. Patients with malignant ERF treated surgically survived longer than patients undergoing nonsurgical treatment (hazard ratio=5.6, P=0.005). In contrast, those with benign ERF had similar overall survival regardless of whether they received initial surgical or nonsurgical treatment; reintervention was more common in those who underwent nonsurgical treatment (hazard ratio=2.3, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that survival in malignant ERF is better with surgical intervention in selected patients. Surgical and nonsurgical techniques achieve similar survival in benign ERF, but reintervention is more common in those treated endoscopically.

Improved Overall Survival with Aggressive Primary Tumor Radiotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to characterize utilization and survival outcomes associated with primary tumor-directed radiotherapy (PTDRT) in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study using the National Cancer Data Base to evaluate patients with newly diagnosed metastatic esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2012. Overall survival outcomes after treatment with chemotherapy plus conventional palliative dose radiotherapy (<5040 cGy), chemotherapy plus definitive dose radiotherapy (≥5040 cGy), or chemotherapy alone were compared by using Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score. Potential unmeasured confounding was assessed through sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisted of 12,683 patients: 57% were treated with chemotherapy alone, 24% were treated with chemotherapy plus palliative dose radiotherapy, and 19% were treated with chemotherapy plus definitive dose radiotherapy. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus definitive dose radiotherapy was associated with improved survival (median overall survival of 8.3 versus 11.3 months [hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.74, p ≤ 0.001]), whereas chemotherapy plus palliative dose radiotherapy was associated with slightly inferior outcomes (median overall survival of 8.3 months versus 7.5 months (hazard ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.13, p ≤ 0.001). These findings were robust to potential unmeasured confounding in sensitivity analyses. Additionally, landmark analyses confirmed these findings in patients surviving 12 months or longer.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive dose, but not conventional palliative dose, PTDRT is associated with improved overall survival in metastatic esophageal cancer, suggesting that local control may be important to prognosis. These findings support integrating PTDRT into future clinical trials aimed at refining personalized treatment for patients with metastatic esophageal cancer.

Current treatment of tracheoesophageal fistula

Tracheoesophageal fistulas (TEFs) often occur with esophageal or bronchial carcinoma. Currently, we rely on implantation of delicate devices, such as self-expanding and silicone stents, in the esophagus or trachea to cover the fistula and expand the stenosis in order to relieve patient pain. However, because each case is different, our approach may not be effective for every patient. Consequently, new devices and technology have emerged to address these situations, such as degradable stents, Amplatzer^® devices, endobronchial one-way umbrella-shaped valves, and transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells. Although some studies have shown such alternatives can be reasonable solutions in special cases, further development of other new and effectual techniques is of utmost importance.

Endoscopic Management of Esophagorespiratory Fistulas: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Techniques and Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERF) are a devastating complication of benign and malignant etiologies. ERF are associated with high mortality, short survival, and poor quality of life. We performed a multicenter analysis of patients with ERF undergoing endoscopic treatment.

METHODS

Multicentre retrospective study.

RESULTS

We analyzed 25 patients undergoing 35 procedures over an 8-year period. Our data showed high technical success rates (97.1% of procedures) and with good, but not ideal, clinical success rates (60% of procedures, 80% of patients), which were defined as fistula closure confirmed by radiographic or repeat endoscopic evaluation and/or a lack of recurrent episodes of clinical aspiration to focus on durable ERF closure as opposed to only initial success. Proximal ERF were the most difficult to manage with the lowest overall clinical success rates, highest rates of recurrent aspiration despite endoscopic therapy, highest adverse events, and shortest survival times. Adverse events occurred in 40.0% of our patients and were all minor. Treatment allowed for diet advancement in 75% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This represents the largest recent collection of US data and the first multicenter study evaluating the clinical success of multiple treatment modalities while stratifying data by fistula etiology and esophageal location. The endoscopic approaches detailed in this study offer a minimally invasive and safe choice for intervention with the potential to improve quality of life despite overall suboptimal clinical success and survivorship rates for in with ERF.

Non-malignant respiratory tract fistula from the oesophagus. A lethal condition for which novel therapeutic options are emerging

OBJECTIVES

Fistulas between the oesophagus and the respiratory tract can occur as a complication to anastomotic dehiscence after oesophageal resection, without any signs of local residual tumour growth. Other causes that are, by definition, benign may rarely prevail. The traditional therapeutic approach is to divert the proximal portion of the oesophagus and transpose the conduit into the abdominal cavity. With the introduction and development of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS), new therapeutic options have emerged for these severe complications. We have evaluated our stent-based strategy for managing these life-threatening situations.

METHODS

At Karolinska University Hospital, all patients admitted with an oesophago-respiratory fistula during the period 2003-2011 followed a stent-based strategy. On clinical suspicion, a prompt computed tomography scan was performed with contrast ingestion, to visualize the status of the anastomosis and the potential communications. Often an endoscopy was done to assess the oesophagus and the conduit. The respiratory tree was inspected through a concomitant bronchoscopy. The double-stent strategy presently applied meant that covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) were applied on the alimentary and airway sides to adequately cover the fistula orifice on both sides. The subsequent clinical course determined the ensuing therapeutic strategy.

RESULTS

During the study period, 17 cases with oesophago-respiratory fistulas were treated at our unit, of which 13 exhibited fistulation following an oesophageal resection due to cancer and 4 cases had a benign underlying disease. The cancer patients did not show any obvious demographic profile when it came to the cancer sub-location, histological type of cancer, or treatment with neoadjuvant chemo- and radiochemotherapy. There was an equal distribution between hand-sutured and stapled anastomoses. In 10 of the cases, the anastomoses were located in the upper right chest; the remainder in the neck, and all reconstructions were carried out by a tubulized stomach. The diagnosis of the fistula tract between the anastomotic area and the respiratory tract was attained on the 15th postoperative day (median), with a range from 5 to 24 days.

CONCLUSIONS

When an oesophago-respiratory fistula is diagnosed, even in a situation where no neoplastic tissue is prevailing, attempts should be made to close the fistula tract by SEMS from both directions, i.e. from the oesophageal as well as the respiratory side. By this means, a majority of these patients can be initially managed conservatively with prospects of a successful outcome, although virtually all will eventually require a single-stage resection and reconstruction.

Comparative study of esophageal stent and feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy for tracheoesophageal fistula caused by esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A malignant tracheoesophageal/bronchoesophageal fistula (TEF) is a life-threatening complication of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy had been the most common treatment method for patients with TEF before the era of stenting. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with TEF treated with an esophageal metallic stent to those treated with a feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a total of 1011 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between 1996 and 2011 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and 86 patients with TEF (8.5%) were identified. The overall survival and other clinical data were compared between 30 patients treated with an esophageal metallic stent and 35 patients treated with a feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy.

RESULTS

Among the 65 patients receiving either an esophageal metallic stent or a feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy, univariate analysis showed that treatment modality with an esophageal metallic stent (P = 0.007) and radiotherapy treatment after fistula diagnosis (P = 0.04) were predictive of superior overall survival. In the multivariate comparison, treatment modality with an esophageal metallic stent (P = 0.026, odds ratio: 1.859) represented the independent predictive factor of superior overall survival. There were no significant differences between groups in mean decrease in serum albumin or mean body weight loss. Compared to the feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy group, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the stenting group (53% versus 14%, P = 0.001) were able to receive chemotherapy within 30 days after fistula diagnosis, indicating better infection control in the stenting group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with a feeding gastrostomy/jejunostomy, an esophageal metallic stent significantly improves overall survival in patients with malignant TEF in our retrospective analysis. Esophageal metallic stent placement may be considered the first-line of treatment for patients with malignant TEF.

The use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) is effective in symptom palliation from recurrent tumor after esophagogastrectomy for cancer

The efficacy of using self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) for palliation of symptoms because of tumor recurrence after prior esophagogastrectomy has not been properly assessed despite the well recognized use of SEMS in patients without prior surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using SEMS in patients who had prior esophagogastrectomy. The study group included 35 patients with carcinoma of esophagus or cardia documented to have loco-regional recurrence after esophagogastrectomy and in whom SEMS were placed for palliation. The median age was 67 (ranged 41-85). The indications for stenting were dysphagia caused by recurrence at the esophageal anastomosis (n= 4) and in the esophageal remnant (n= 5), or extrinsic compression from mediastinal nodal disease (n= 7); gastric outlet obstruction produced by extrinsic tumor compression (n= 13); and tracheo-esophageal fistulae (n= 6). Forty-three stenting procedures were performed, and the technical success rate was 97.6%. The dysphagia score improved from 4.66 to 2.54 (P < 0.001). All patients with tracheo-esophageal fistula had their symptoms successfully palliated. The immediate complication rate was 14% (n= 5); two patients had stent malpositioning, two had inadequate opening of their stents, and one had a failed stenting procedure. On follow-up, 15 (42.8%) patients required a total of 22 re-intervention procedures for various reasons: endoscopic dilatation (five dilatations in three patients), removal of foreign bodies (nine procedures in four patients), and insertion of a second SEMS related to tumor growth (eight stents in eight patients). There was no procedure-related mortality. The median survival was short at 42 days (range 5-290 days), mostly related to advanced disease stage. SEMS in patients with recurrent tumor after esophagogastrectomy is safe and effective.

Malignant respiratory-digestive fistulas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Malignant tracheoesophageal or bronchoesophageal or, less commonly, esophageal-lung parenchyma fistulas are late developments of advanced cancer of the esophagus, lung or mediastinum. Patients present mainly with intractable cough and repeated respiratory infections. Rapid deterioration and death results if this condition is left untreated.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab along with radiation therapy have been linked to the development of malignant tracheoesophageal fistula/malignant bronchoesophageal fistula in patients treated for both small-cell and nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma. Three case series have been published during 2009 presenting characteristics, treatment options and associated complications. The best palliation for this malignant condition is achieved with endoscopic placement of esophageal, respiratory or parallel stenting (esophagus and airway). Dual stenting appears to work better than single prosthesis both for palliation and safety. There were also some reports of unusual complications related to prosthesis placement as treatment of this condition. Particular attention has to be paid to tracheal compression/erosion secondary to esophageal stents.

SUMMARY

Respiratory-digestive fistulas are devastating complications of advanced cancer. Research has brought new understanding relevant to clinical practice.

Esophageal stents for the palliation of malignant dysphagia and fistula recurrence after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in staging methods, surgical techniques, and adjuvant treatment, recurrent cancer after esophagectomy is a major cause of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) in patients with dysphagia or fistula caused by recurrent cancer after esophagectomy.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study with standardized treatment and follow-up.

SETTING

Single university center.

PATIENTS

In 81 patients with recurrent cancer after previous surgical esophagectomy, 100 esophageal SEMSs were inserted for dysphagia (n = 66) or fistula formation (n = 15).

INTERVENTIONS

Stent placement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Technical and functional outcome, complications, and survival.

RESULTS

The SEMSs restored luminal patency in 65 (98%) of 66 patients and sealed malignant fistulae in 14 (93%) of 15 patients. Stent dysfunction occurred in 24 (30%) of 81 patients. They all were successfully managed by subsequent endoscopic intervention. After stent placement, a total of 16 complications were observed. Major complications occurred in 9 (11%) of 81 patients, mild complications occurred in 7 (9%) of 81 patients. The overall 30-day mortality rate after stent insertion was 25%. Progression of the disease resulted in death after a median interval of 70 days (range 1 day to 91 months).

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized design.

CONCLUSIONS

SEMS placement in recurrent esophageal cancer after surgical resection offers adequate palliation by relieving dysphagia and sealing off esophageal respiratory fistulae. Therefore, in these patients who have a relatively short life expectancy, SEMS placement should be considered the treatment of choice.

Interventional management of esophagorespiratory fistula

An esophagorespiratory fistula (ERF) is an often fatal consequence of esophageal or bronchogenic carcinomas. The preferred treatment is placement of esophageal and/or airway stents. Stent placement must be performed as quickly as possible since patients with ERFs are at a high risk for aspiration pneumonia. In this review, choice of stents and stenting area, fistula reopening and its management, and the long-term outcome in the interventional management of malignant ERFs are considered. Lastly, a review of esophagopulmonary fistulas will also be provided.

Self-expanding metal stents in palliation of malignant dysphagia: outcome of 124 Egyptian patients

Most cases of esophageal carcinoma are inoperable at presentation. Currently, the best method for palliation of malignant dysphagia, with or without esophago-respiratory fistula, is an insertion of esophageal self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) across the malignant esophageal stricture. Herein we present our experience in the use of SEMS in palliation of patients with malignant dysphagia and/or ERF. The study included 124 patients (79 males and 45 females) with advanced esophageal malignancy. The mean age was 54 (43-87) years. Nine patients had malignant ERF. All patients were subjected to SEMS insertion under both endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. SEMS insertion was successful in all patients. Nine patients had two stents. Median dysphagia score improved from 3.5 to 1.2. ERF was sealed in eight out of the nine patients. Complications related to stent implementation were reported in 41 patients. In conclusion, insertion of the SEMS is a reliable, effective, simple and safe method for palliation of malignant dysphagia with or without ERF.

Treatment of postoperative esophagorespiratory fistulas with dual self-expanding metal stents

BACKGROUND

Fistulas between the esophagus and the respiratory tract can occur as a complication to anastomotic dehiscence after esophageal resection. The traditional therapeutic approach is to deviate the proximal portion of the esophagus and transpose the conduit into the abdominal cavity. With the introduction and development of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS), new therapeutic options have emerged for these severe complications.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-seven consecutive esophageal resections were reviewed to address the outcome of a stent-based therapeutic strategy in cases with esophagorespiratory fistulas. The patency of each anastomosis was checked only at the time of clinical suspicion of leakage but then radiology, endoscopy, and bronchoscopy were used together.

RESULTS

Seven patients developed esophagorespiratory fistula. All of these fistulas were diagnosed more than 1 week after the operation. Two patients (27%) died due to the fistula. Four could be successfully treated but in two of these we were forced to change strategy and either perform a colonic interposition or externalize the esophagus. One of these patients subsequently developed total respiratory failure and required extracorporal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to recover.

CONCLUSIONS

When an esophagorespiratory fistula is diagnosed, an attempt to close the fistula tract by SEMS from both the esophageal and the respiratory side is a feasible treatment option. This strategy has to be prolonged and aggressive with a commitment to repeatedly change stents and modify sizes and designs. Thereby a majority of these patients can be managed conservatively with prospects of a successful outcome.

Comparative study of different treatments for malignant tracheoesophageal/bronchoesophageal fistulae

The aim of this study is to compare the survival time and quality of life (QOL) of patients who have received different treatment for tracheoesophageal/bronchoesophageal fistula. Between January 2003 and December 2007, 35 patients with malignant tracheoesophageal/bronchoesophageal fistula were recorded as the control group, gastrostomy group, and stenting group, respectively, according to the treatments they chose. Two weeks after the treatment, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), Quality of Life Questionnaire-esophageal module (QLQ-OES18), and a respiratory symptom-related QOL index are employed to assess QOL of these patients. There is no significant difference in survival time and constituent ratio of death reason among groups. Except for eight patients who died within 2 weeks after the treatment, all other 27 patients returned back the questionnaires. As compared to the control group, patients in the gastrostomy group gained a low score in emotional function and financial situation, while patients in the stenting group had lower scores in financial problems and seven respiratory and eating-related symptoms. In contrast with the gastrostomy group, patients in stenting group had higher scores in emotional and social functions, and lower scores in six respiratory and eating-related symptoms. With patients' QOL considered, the self-expandable coated stenting should be the first choice of therapy for malignant tracheoesophageal/bronchoesophageal fistula, whereas gastrostomy should be kept from use.

Laparotomy enables retrograde dilatation and stent placement for malignant esophago-respiratory fistula

Background

Malignant esophageal stenosis with complete obstruction and esophagorespiratory fistula (ERF) is difficult to treat with standard endoscopic techniques.

Case presentation

We report a patient in whom with local recurrence of esophageal carcinoma an esophagotracheal fistula occurred. Initially the patient had undergone esophageal resection with interposition of a gastric tube. Due to complete obstruction of the lumen by recurrent tumor conventional transoral stent placement failed. For retrograde dilatation a laparotomy was performed. Via a duodenal incision endoscopic access to the gastric tube was achieved. Using a guidewire the esophageal obstruction was traversed and dilated. Then it was possible to place an esophageal stent via an antegrade approach.

Conclusion

Open surgery enables a safe access for retrograde endoscopic therapy in patients who had undergone esophageal resection with gastric interposition.

Palliation of malignant aerodigestive fistulae with self-expanding metallic stents

Malignant aerodigestive fistulae are rare but devastating sequelae of thoracic cancers, most commonly associated with esophageal cancer. Survival following development of a malignant aerodigestive fistula is measured in weeks. Palliation is the primary goal of therapy and to this end, we report the use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) as treatment. Between May 1999 and January 2004, 12 patients were treated for malignant aerodigestive fistulae. The underlying diagnosis was esophageal cancer for 10 patients, and non-small cell lung cancer for two others. All patients were symptomatic and fistulae were diagnosed by esophagoscopy in seven, bronchoscopy in two, and esophagram in three. Seven covered Wallstents (seven esophageal) and eight covered Ultraflex (five tracheal and three esophageal) were used. A single stent was placed in eight patients (seven esophageal and one tracheal). Three patients required esophageal and tracheal stents and one patient needed two tracheal stents. General anesthesia was required in 50% of the patients. There were no procedure-related complications. Symptoms were palliated in 100% of patients and oral intake was reinstituted in 42% (5/12). All the patients were discharged from hospital after SEMS placement and one patient returned for an uneventful tracheal stent replacement secondary to mucus impaction 2 months later. SEMS placement is an effective strategy to palliate malignant aerodigestive fistulae. Complications are rare and symptoms are alleviated in most patients.

Gastrotracheal and gastrobronchial fistulas: management with covered expandable metallic stents

PURPOSE

The present study evaluated the clinical results of covered tracheobronchial metallic stent placement in the management of gastrotracheal fistulas (GTFs) and gastrobronchial fistulas (GBFs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with GTFs or GBFs after esophagogastrectomy were treated with one of two types of covered tracheobronchial metallic stents: a hinged stent or a straight stent. These included 12 GTFs and four GBFs. Thirteen hinged stents and three straight stents were placed during the initial procedure. Data regarding the technical success of stent placement, initial clinical success and failure, fistula reopening, and complications were obtained.

RESULTS

Stent placement was technically successful in all patients. The stent completely sealed off the fistula in 12 of 16 patients (75% initial clinical success rate), whereas the remaining four patients (25%) had persistent aspiration symptoms as a result of incomplete GTF or GBF closure (ie, initial clinical failure). During follow-up, the fistula reopened in three of the 12 patients in whom initial clinical success was achieved (25%). Two reopened fistulas were sealed off with stent placement, and one was treated with a nasoenteric feeding tube and a nasogastric decompression tube. All patients died during the 1-year follow-up period; mean survival time was 17 +/- 3.02 weeks (range, 1-42 weeks) after stent placement. Mean survival in patients in whom initial clinical success was achieved was significantly longer than in patients with initial clinical failure (P = .003; log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

Use of covered metallic stents appears to be a safe and moderately effective procedure to occlude GTFs and GBFs.

Inherent Problems of Tracheo-Bronchial Stenting in Patients With Tracheostomy

In cases of permanent tracheostomy after laryngectomy, tracheo-bronchial stenting may cause serious respiratory problems due to the absence of airway humidification and the inability to cough forcefully. We report 2 patients with permanent tracheostomy who underwent stenting and developed recurrent episodes of asphyxia due to stent obstruction by dried mucus. The indication for stenting of the airways must be established with great care in patients with permanent tracheostomy.

Salvage of a massive esophago-tracheal fistula resulting from a stenting treatment

We report the successful surgical resolution of a case of massive esophago-tracheal fistula (ETF) caused by a stenting treatment for stricture of an esophago-gastric anastomosis. A 54-year-old man was admitted to our hospital due to serious pneumonia secondary to ETF. He had previously received esophagectomy and post-operative chemo-radiation therapy for esophageal cancer, followed by stenting treatments for a benign stricture of the esophago-gastric anastomosis. For surgical treatment of the resulting ETF, serial operations were required. The first operation, performed under percutaneous cardiopulmonary support, included removal of the stents followed by tracheotomy, were with the coverage of the tracheal defect achieved using both major pectoral muscle flaps. A salivary fistula was also generated and an enteral nutrition tube was placed. Six months after the first operation, a pedicled ileocolic interposition was performed in order to effect reconstruction of the digestive tube, with an additional microvascular anastomosis of the ileocolic and internal thoracic artery and vein. After the second operation, the patient's ability to ingest food was restored, and he was discharged from the hospital. Thus, ETF was successfully treated by successive surgical operations with delicate intra- and post-operative respiratory management.

Endoprosthesis implantation at the pharyngo-esophageal level: Problems, limitations and challenges

AIM: To present our experience with endoscopic placement of an esophageal endoprosthesis in 19 patients.

METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was made for the use of 19 stents positioned at the level of the cervical esophagus: 11 for malignant tumours (7 causing obstruction, 4 complicated by an esophago -tracheal or -cutaneous fistula), and 8 for an acquired benign tracheo-esophageal fistula due to prolonged intubation. The covered Ultraflex stent was used in all cases except two. These two patients had an esophagocutaneous fistula following laryngectomy and a Flamingo Wall stent was used.

RESULTS: Stent implantation was technically successful in all patients. Dysphagia score was improved from 3 to 2 in stenosis patients, while sealing of the fistula was achieved in all cases. The median hospital stay was 3 d for malignant tumour patients and 13.5 d for esophagocutaneous fistula patients. One Ultraflex stent and two Flamingo Wall stents were easily removed 33 d and 3 months respectively after implantation when the fistulas had totally occluded.

CONCLUSION: Endoprosthesis implantation for malignancy and/or fistula of malignant or benign origin at the level of the cervical esophagus is an easy, well tolerated, safe and effective procedure with no complications or mortality.

Temporary stenting of acquired benign tracheoesophageal fistulas in critically ill ventilated patients

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the use of esophageal stents for temporary sealing of acquired benign tracheoesophageal fistulas developed in critically ill, ventilated patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis (1992-2003) of the data of 12 mechanically ventilated patients - six of them after major or multiple trauma - being intubated for a median of 30 days before they develop an acquired benign tracheoesophageal fistula. Five of them were in sepsis. Two types of stents were used: the Wilson-Cook esophageal balloon plastic stent in the first four cases and the Ultraflex covered self-expandable stent in the remaining eight. The total procedure was performed at bedside in the intensive care unit, with no special need for supplementary anesthesia or fluoroscopic control.

RESULTS

Stent implantation was technically successful in all patients and fistula occlusion was achieved in every case. There was no stent migration and fistulas remained sealed until death or upon decision for removal. Nine patients died between 5 days and 2 months after stent placement, as a result of their diseases. Three patients were referred for fistula surgical repair 33, 36, and 43 days after stent placement. Before surgery the stents were easily removed under direct vision.

CONCLUSION

Temporary closure of an acquired tracheoesophageal fistula developed in critically ill ventilated patients is an easy, bedside-applicable, safe, and effective palliative procedure, with no complications or mortality.

Airway stenting for unresectable esophageal cancer

Because of the close anatomical relationship between the upper esophagus and the tracheobronchial tree, many patients with advanced esophageal cancer will suffer from airway complications. These include airway stenosis or esophago-respiratory fistulation. Airway stenting is proven to offer effective palliation for patients with both these complications. When managing such patients, the thoracic surgeon faces different options in terms of pre-stenting investigation, choice of stents and stenting strategy. Although airway stenting is a safe and effective procedure in experienced hands, there are nonetheless complications which await the unwary. This review discusses the currently available options for airway stenting in these patients, and offers practical advice on avoiding the pitfalls.

Esophagorespiratory fistula: long-term results of palliative treatment with covered expandable metallic stents in 61 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term clinical results of palliative treatment of esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERFs) with covered expandable metallic stents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients with ERFs due to esophageal or bronchogenic carcinoma and one patient with ERF due to pressure necrosis caused by initial esophageal stent placement for esophageal carcinoma were treated with covered expandable esophageal or tracheobronchial metallic stents. Information about technical success of stent placement, initial clinical success and failure, fistula reopening, and complications was obtained. Survival curves for both patient groups with initial clinical success and failure were obtained and compared with Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Stent placement was technically successful in all patients, with no immediate procedural complications. The stent completely sealed off the fistula in 49 (80%) of 61 patients so that they had no further aspiration symptoms (initial clinical success). Twelve (20%) of 61 patients had persistent aspiration symptoms due to incomplete ERF closure (initial clinical failure). During follow-up, the fistula reopened in 17 (35%) of 49 patients with initial clinical success: In eight patients, the reopened ERF was sealed off successfully with stent placement or balloon dilation. In two patients with reopened ERF caused by food impaction, the reopened fistula resolved spontaneously. Seven patients did not undergo further treatment. All patients died during follow-up, and mean survival was 13.4 weeks (range, 1-56 weeks) after stent placement. Mean survival in patients with initial clinical success was significantly longer than that in patients with initial clinical failure (15.1 vs 6.2 weeks, P <.05).

CONCLUSION

Covered expandable metallic stents were placed in 61 patients with ERFs, but the initial clinical success rate was poor and the rate of reopening was high; however, interventional treatment was effective for sealing off reopened ERFs.

Management of Tracheoesophageal Fistulas in Adults

The approach to treatment of adult patients with tracheoesophageal fistulas depends on whether the fistula is congenital or acquired in origin. Most adults have acquired tracheoesophageal fistulas, and treatment depends on whether the fistula is a result of a benign process or a malignancy, with the latter usually primary esophageal cancer. For patients with benign tracheoesophageal fistulas, treatment is almost always initially supportive followed by definitive surgical correction. In general, depending on the size and location of the tracheal aspect of the fistula, surgical therapy involves primary repair of the fistula and, if necessary, resection and reconstruction of the trachea. For patients with malignant tracheoesophageal fistulas, treatment depends on whether the patient is resectable and/or medically fit for surgical therapy. However, most patients with malignant trach-eoesophageal fistulas have advanced disease and can only be treated with palliative measures. The current standard of palliative therapy for patients with malignant tracheoesophageal fistulas is the endoscopic or radiologic placement of covered self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS), which allow closure of the fistula. All three types of commercially available covered SEMS have been used in this capacity with success. Other, less common treatment options for selected patients with malignant tracheoesophageal fistulas include chemotherapy and radiation, surgical bypass, esophageal exclusion, and fistula resection and repair.