CarboMedicsS Prosthetic Heart Valve1

Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: Ten-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

This is the final report of a randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of CarboMedics (CarboMedics Inc., Austin, Tex) and St. Jude Medical (St. Jude Medical Inc, St Paul, Minn) bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses 10 years after surgery.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1996, 485 patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement were randomized to receive CarboMedics (n = 234) or St. Jude Medical (n = 251) prostheses for aortic (n = 288), mitral (n = 160), or double (n = 37) valve replacements. Patients were followed annually to the end of 2004.

RESULTS

Demographic, preoperative, and operative characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The median follow-up was 10 years in both groups (CarboMedics 99% complete, St. Jude Medical 98% complete; 3879 patient-years of follow-up). Overall, 165 patients died, 25 of valve-related causes. Ten-year survivals were 66.4% (95% confidence interval: 59.6%-72.3%) and 64.7% (95% confidence interval: 58.0%-70.6%) in the CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical groups, respectively (P = .94). Freedom at 10 years from valve-related mortality was 95.0% (95% confidence interval: 90.8%-97.3%) in the CarboMedics group and 93.0% (95% confidence interval: 88.3%-95.9%) in the St. Jude Medical group. During follow-up, 34 patients had a thromboembolic event, 79 patients had at least 1 bleeding event, and 14 patients required reoperation. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to freedom from complications (P > or = .12); freedom from thromboembolism at 10 years (CarboMedics: 91.5%, 95% confidence interval: 86.5%-94.7%; St. Jude Medical: 92.2%, 95% confidence interval: 87.5%-95.2%); freedom from bleeding events (CarboMedics: 83.0%, 95% confidence interval: 76.6%-87.8%; St. Jude Medical: 77.5%, 95% confidence interval: 71.1%-82.7%); and freedom from death or valve-related complication (CarboMedics: 51.6%, 95% confidence interval: 44.7%-58.0%; St. Jude Medical: 46.2%, 95% confidence interval: 39.7%-52.4%). Linearized rates per patient-year were 1.1% in the CarboMedics group and 0.8% in the St. Jude Medical group for thromboembolism; 2.3% in the CarboMedics group and 3.2% in the St. Jude Medical group for bleeding events; and 0.72% in the CarboMedics group and 0.47% in the St. Jude Medical group for nonstructural valve dysfunction. International normalized ratio values were similar between the 2 groups throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

At 10 years, the clinical outcome was similar with respect to these 2 mechanical bileaflet prostheses.

Long-Term Result of 1144 CarboMedics Mechanical Valve Implantations

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that the CarboMedics mechanical valve has acceptable valve-related complication rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term performance of the CarboMedics valve.

METHODS

Between August 1988 and September 1999, we implanted 1144 CarboMedics valves in 850 patients (aortic, 179; mitral, 385; double-valve, 234; tricuspid, 52). Mean patient age was 44.5 +/- 12.5 years. Follow-up was completed in 95.3% and the median follow-up period was 7.9 years (6753 patient-years). Patients were divided into four groups according to implanted valve location and number (aortic, mitral, double, and tricuspid valve groups).

RESULTS

The overall hospital mortality rate was 3.4%, and the mortality rates in these groups were 1.7% in the aortic, 2.6% in the mitral, 4.7% in the double, and 9.6% in the tricuspid valve. The tricuspid valve group revealed a significantly higher mortality rate than the aortic and mitral valve groups (p < 0.05). Overall 10-year survival was 87.1% +/- 2.6%, 88.9% +/- 1.7%, 82.4% +/- 2.9%, and 77.5% +/- 7.0% in the aortic, mitral, double, and tricuspid valve groups, respectively. Age and tricuspid valve replacement were identified as significant risk factors of long-term survival by multivariate analysis (p < 0.05), and 99.4% +/- 0.6%, 98.2% +/- 0.8%, 99.2% +/- 0.8%, and 87.6% +/- 0.5% in the aortic, mitral, double, and tricuspid valve groups were free of valve thrombosis at 10 years. The tricuspid valve group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of valve thrombosis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This long-term study of patients that received CarboMedics valve implantation demonstrates that the CarboMedics prosthetic valve has an acceptable incidence of valve-related complications. However, it should be noted that tricuspid valve replacement indicated a higher level of overall mortality and valve thrombosis.

The Carbomedics Top Hat supraannular aortic valve: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Introduced in 1993, the Carbomedics Top Hat (Sulzer, Carbomedics, Austin, TX) valve is a bileaflet mechanical aortic prosthesis designed to be placed in a supraannular position. Five institutions pooled their clinical experiences to evaluate early outcome in patients with this prosthesis.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2000, 639 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with Top Hat (Sulzer Carbomedics) valves at 5 institutions. Mean age was 60 +/- 13 years. In this heterogeneous population, 28% of patients had previous cardiac operations and 64% had concomitant procedures, including procedures involving more than 1 heart valve in 32%. Implanted prostheses sizes included the 19 mm (15%), 21 mm (37%), 23 mm (33%), 25 mm (13%), and 27 mm (2%). Mean follow-up was 2.0 +/- 1.5 years, and there were 1,206 patient-years of follow-up available for analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was 5.3%. Five-year survival was 74%. Risk factors for death included older age (p = 0.01), decreased ejection fraction (p = 0.007), and increased New York Heart Association functional class (p = 0.003). Five-year freedoms from thromboembolism and hemorrhage were 90% and 85%, respectively. Five-year freedoms from explant and endocarditis were both 99%. There were no structural valve failures.

CONCLUSIONS

The Top Hat valve outcomes have been similar to those of the standard Carbomedics intraannular prostheses. The unique design of the Top Hat valve, with all its components in the aortic sinuses, has particular advantages in the small aortic root, in settings where leaflet entrapment may occur, and in multiple valve replacement.

"Our complication rates are lower than theirs": statistical critique of heart valve comparisons

OBJECTIVES

From the widely differing complication rates published for every heart valve, is it possible to determine a true rate for each valve and to compare the rates of two different valves? We investigated this question for the two most popular bileaflet valves.

METHODS

Aortic valve data were abstracted from 14 St Jude Medical (St Jude Medical Inc, Minneapolis, Minn; 33,125 patient-y) and 11 Carbomedics (Sulzer Carbomedics Inc, Austin, Tex; 19,141 patient-y) series, and mitral valve data were abstracted from 11 St Jude Medical (21,553 patient-y) and 8 Carbomedics (8368 patient-y) series. Regression analysis was used to accommodate heterogeneity among rates with the same valve model, to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the valve model effect, and to incorporate other series-level risk factors.

RESULTS

Most of the complication rates with both valve models exhibited significant heterogeneity. For thromboembolism and bleeding, the relative risks for valve model were not significantly different from unity. Valve thrombosis rates exhibited less heterogeneity: the Carbomedics valve had a lower rate in the aortic position (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.6) and a higher rate in the mitral position (hazard ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.0-3.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike simple weighted averages of valve complication rates, regression methods can incorporate heterogeneity related to center effects and allow for inclusion of other risk factors. Thromboembolism and bleeding rates were not significantly different with St Jude Medical and Carbomedics valves. Valve thrombosis appeared to differ between the two valves, but the absolute differences in rates were small. Because of the variability among rates with the same valve, statistical comparisons must be interpreted cautiously.

Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: an interim report

OBJECTIVE

This is a midterm report of a study comparing the clinical performance of CarboMedics and St Jude Medical heart valve prostheses through a projected 10-year period.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1996, a total of 485 patients undergoing mechanical valve replacement were prospectively randomly assigned to receive either CarboMedics (n = 234) or St Jude Medical (n = 251) prostheses for aortic (n = 288), mitral (n = 160), or double (n = 37) valve replacements and were followed up annually.

RESULTS

Baseline and operative characteristics were similar between the two groups with respect to major demographic characteristics, preoperative clinical status, and operative data. Mean follow-up was 50 +/- 22 months for the CarboMedics group (97% complete) and 47 +/- 20 months for the St Jude Medical group (96% complete), yielding a total of 1959 patient-years. The 30-day mortality, and 5-year actuarial survival, and linearized survival were 6.0%, 82.4% +/- 2.6%, and 4.3% per patient-year in the CarboMedics group and 4.4%, 79.9% +/- 2.8%, and 4.7% per patient-year in the St Jude Medical group (log-rank P =.7). Freedom at 5 years from valve-related mortality, major thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and other nonstructural valve dysfunction was, respectively, 96.7% +/- 1.4% (0.7% per patient-year), 90.9% +/- 2.1% (2.2% per patient-year), 87.3% +/- 2.5% (3.6% per patient-year), and 96.1% +/- 1.4% (0.7% per patient-year) in the CarboMedics group and 95.9% +/- 1.5% (1.0% per patient-year), 92.5% +/- 1.8% (2.0% per patient-year), 82.6% +/- 2.8% (4.3% per patient-year), and 96.0% +/- 1.3% (0.6% per patient-year) in the St Jude Medical group, with no overall intergroup differences. No statistically significant intergroup differences in international normalized ratio values were detected during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows no significant differences in the early and midterm clinical outcomes between patients who received CarboMedics valve prostheses and those who received St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses. Choices with respect to valve type can be based on considerations other than patient outcome.

Standard aortic St. Jude valve at 18 years: performance profile and determinants of outcome

BACKGROUND

The standard St. Jude disc valve has been in use for 20 years and remains the dominant mechanical valve of today. With nearly 19 years of follow-up, the present large series could indicate the performance profile and its determinants in the very long term.

METHODS

A detailed follow-up was performed to a maximum of 18.6 years in 694 patients aged 15 to 83 years who undervent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the standard St. Jude valve during 1980 to 1993. The Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent determinants of outcome in the aortic stenosis (n = 490) and regurgitation (n = 204) groups.

RESULTS

Overall survival was 58%, 39%, and 37% at 10, 15, and 18 years, respectively. Only 12% of deaths (0.60%/ patient-year) were related to the valve with a 15-year freedom of 91%. Embolism (1.18%/patient-year) and anticoagulant-related bleeding (2.24%/patient-year) were the dominant complications with 10-year/15-year freedoms of 90%/80% and 85%/72%, respectively. Only 24% of bleeding events were classified as major. Valve thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (0.04%/patient-year): 1 did not receive vitamin K antagonist treatment and International Normalized Ratio was below target level in the other. There were no mechanical failures. Endocarditis (0.42%/patient-year) and paravalvular leak (0.42%/ patient-year) occurred with 15-year freedoms of 92% and 96%, respectively, with a relation between the latter (but not the former) and preoperative endocarditis in the regurgitation group. Freedom from serious complications (2.33%/patient-year) and all complications joined (4.33%/ patient-year) were 72% and 54%, respectively, at 15 years with a 96% freedom from redo AVR (0.36%/patient-year). Age- and heart-related variables were independent risk factors for mortality, thromboembolism, bleeding, serious complications, and all complications joined. Small valve (19 and 21 mm) adversely affected serious and all complications in the regurgitation group.

CONCLUSIONS

With a follow-up approaching 2 decades and exhibiting a low rate of valve-related deaths, acceptable low thrombogenicity, and absence of mechanical failure, the standard aortic St. Jude disc valve sets the standard for contemporary mechanical valves.