Surgical treatment of left ventricular post-infarction aneurysm with endoventriculoplasty: late clinical and functional results

Impact of surgical ventricular restoration on early and long-term outcomes of patients with left ventricular aneurysm: A single-center experience

Left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) is a common complication of myocardial infarction. However, the optimal treatment for LVA remains controversial.In this retrospective study, we analyzed the early and long-term clinical consequences of surgical ventricular restoration on 102 patients who had undergone repair between January, 2005 and January, 2015. The LVA repair approaches comprised of patch plasty (n = 28), linear repair (n = 40), and plication repair (n = 34).Patient demographics were 60.8% male, and the mean age was 60.5 ± 7.2 years. The in-hospital mortality rate was 7.8% (8/102), including 6 patients who died from low cardiac output and 2 from multiorgan failure. During the early postoperative period, left ventricular sizes significantly decreased in the patch plasty and linear repair groups compared with the plication group. In addition, all 3 repair techniques greatly ameliorated left ventricular ejection fraction (P < .05), and there was no significant difference in survival rate between groups (P = .25).Surgical ventricular restoration (linear repair, plication repair, and patch plasty) obtained equivalently appreciable outcomes for cardiac function improvement, perioperative mortality, and survival. Selection of a surgical technique for LVA patients should be optimized to individual patient conditions including the morphological characteristics of the aneurysm and ischemic scar.

Early results after surgical treatment of left ventricular aneurysm

Background

Left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) is a serious complication of myocardial infarction and reduces the chances of survival. Controversy still exists regarding the optimal surgical technique for LVA repair. We analyze the efficacy of two techniques, linear vs. endoventricular circular patch plasty, for repair of LVA and the efficacy of surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) on beating heart.

Methods

This study included 62 patients who underwent SVR from 1086 consecutive patients were subjected to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2000 and 2009. All selected patients were divided either into group liner or patch according to the choice of the repair technique depended on factors such as localization, size and dimension of the scar. The patients also were divided either into group beating heart or cardioplegia. The pre-, intra- and postoperative relevant data of all selected patients were analyzed.

Results

The mortality was not significantly different between linear and patch repair groups, also the actuarial survival rates within 24 months (p= 0.529). Postoperative echocardiographic findings showed significant improvements in left ventricular function in both groups. The beating heart technique reduced postoperative peak release by 27% for Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) compared with the cardioplegia group (0.46 ± 0.06 ng/mL versus 0.63 ± 0.09 ng/mL, p= 0.004), and increased the perioperative survival by 9% (97.2% versus 88.5%), but the actuarial survival rates were not significantly different between the groups from 2 to 24 months (p= 0.151).

Conclusions

Both techniques (linear and patch) achieved good results with respect to mortality, functional status and survival. The choice of surgical technique should be adapted in each patient. The beating heart technique may to some extent relieve myocardial injury in patients undergoing SVR.

Surgical treatment of left ventricular aneurysm

When a left ventricular aneurysm leads to pulmonary congestive symptoms, aneurysmectomy may provide relief. This retrospective study included 269 patients who underwent aneurysmectomy between 1993 and 2002, by the classic Cooley operation in 164 and by Dor ventriculoplasty in 105. There were no significant differences in early and late survival between groups, although the frequency of extended anteroseptal infarction was higher in patients undergoing the Dor procedure. Postoperative echocardiographic findings showed significant improvements in left ventricular function in both groups, in terms of end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and ejection fraction. Left ventricular aneurysmectomy significantly improved the clinical status and hemodynamic parameters of symptomatic patients. The choice of surgical technique depends on the extent of the scar segment, especially the presence of an anteroseptal scarred area. The Dor procedure is more suitable for restoring normal left ventricular geometry in patients with extensive septal infarction.

Ventricular Restoration by Linear Endoventricular Patchplasty and Linear Repair

Surgical ventricular restoration improves cardiac function in patients with large left ventricular aneurysms. Aneurysm repair techniques have evolved to geometric repair by exclusion of the aneurysmal area with a circular patch. But even circular endoventricular patchplasty may result in a less elliptical ventricle. We modified the techniques of both linear and geometric repair. The early and intermediate outcomes in 102 patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm, treated between 2001 and 2004, were analyzed. Concomitant procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 73 patients, mitral valve repair in 29, cryoablation in 3, and post-infarction ventricular septal rupture repair in 3. Overall mortality was 12.7%. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly postoperatively, from 31.5% ± 6.5% to 34.2% ± 5.9%. There were significant decreases in end-diastolic volumes from 140.3 ± 38.3 to 100.8 ± 33.5 mL, and end-systolic volumes from 95.1 ± 26.1 to 66.0 ± 21.7 mL. These benefits continued at the 12- to 52-month follow-up. Our modified technique restores a near physiological left ventricular geometry and has a favorable clinical outcome.

Surgery of left ventricular aneurysm: a meta-analysis of early outcomes following different reconstruction techniques

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of linear and geometric left ventricular aneurysm reconstruction on early postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A search of computerized databases supplemented with manual bibliographic review was performed for all peer-reviewed English language publications concerning randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting the results of left ventricular reconstruction after both linear and geometric reconstruction techniques. Meta-analyses of several short-term outcomes were performed.

RESULTS

No randomized trial was identified. Eighteen nonrandomized trials were found with a total of 1,814 and 803 patients who underwent linear and geometric reconstruction, respectively. Meta-analysis of all studies (n = 18) revealed an increased risk of in-hospital death for patients undergoing linear reconstruction (relative risk = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 2.26, p = 0.01). The subanalysis of studies in which linear reconstruction was adopted mainly in the first period of time, and geometric reconstruction was adopted in a later phase, still showed a significant advantage in terms of in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing geometric reconstruction (n = 11 studies, relative risk = 1.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 2.93, p = 0.004). By contrast, when the two surgical approaches were carried out in the same time lag, there was no difference between linear and geometric reconstruction techniques (n = 7 studies, relative risk = 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 1.92, p = 0.89). No differences in the other outcomes of interest were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantage for geometric reconstruction techniques in terms of in-hospital mortality shown in some studies can be an effect of learning curve or of improvement over time in management of these difficult patients. Further studies are required to clarify this issue.

The extent of akinesis is predictive of the in-hospital mortality from endoaneurysmorrhaphy

Endoaneurysmorrhaphy (EAR) has become an important therapeutic option in the treatment of patients with left ventricular (LV) aneurysm and congestive heart failure. Today, more and more patients are referred for EAR with a dilated akinetic LV rather than a classic dyskinetic LV aneurysm. Little is known about the contribution of the extent of akinesis to perioperative mortality. We reviewed the data of 147 patients with anterior left ventricular aneurysms undergoing EAR. Seventy percent of the patients were male; mean age was 62+/-9 years. Demographic, hemodynamic, angiographic and surgical variables were analyzed using univariate statistic tests in order to determine risk factors for in-hospital mortality.Eighty-two percent of the LV aneurysms had at least some dyskinesia, but 70% were mainly akinetic. 133 patients had additional bypass surgery, one had additional mitral valve replacement. In-hospital mortality was 4.1% (n=6). Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were the total extent of akinetic myocardium (p=0.027) in the 30 degrees RAO view and the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB, p=0.0068) which was itself dependent on the LV ejection fraction (p=0.001), the number of stenosed coronary arteries (p=0.004), and the extent of akinesis (p=0.023). The extent of dyskinesia was not associated with either perioperative mortality (p=0.36) or CPB duration. EAR can be performed with acceptable perioperative results. Because akinesis increases in many patients with time, and because the duration of ECC was dependent on variables reflecting the severity of the underlying heart disease, our findings underscore the importance of optimal timing for the surgical intervention.

Left ventricular aneurysm/reshaping techniques

Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) is an emerging technique aiming to restore left ventricular geometry and function in dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy. It applies not only to the classic aneurysm (Type 1) but also to the true ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (Type 3) and to the intermediate type (Type 2). This type classification based on systolic morphology allows patient selection. SVR is performed under total cardiac arrest with antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia, following complete coronary revascularization, almost always on the left anterior descending artery and mitral repair through ventriculotomy, when needed. Results on more than 1000 patients show that SVR is safe and effective in improving pump function, clinical status and survival in patients with post-infarction ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Surgery for left ventricular aneurysm: Early and late survival after simple linear repair and endoventricular patch plasty

OBJECTIVE

Simple linear resection and endoventricular patch plasty are alternative techniques to repair postinfarction left ventricular aneurysm. The aim of the study was to compare these 2 methods with regard to early mortality and long-term survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 159 patients undergoing operations between 1989 and 2003. The epidemiologic design was of an exposed (simple linear repair, n = 74) versus nonexposed (endoventricular patch plasty, n = 85) cohort with 2 endpoints: early mortality and long-term survival. The crude effect of aneurysm repair technique versus endpoint was estimated by odds ratio, rate ratio, or relative risk and their 95% confidence intervals. Stratification analysis by using the Mantel-Haenszel method was done to quantify confounders and pinpoint effect modifiers. Adjustment for multiconfounders was performed by using logistic regression and Cox regression analysis. Survival curves were analyzed with the Breslow test and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Early mortality was 8.2% for all patients, 13.5% after linear repair and 3.5% after endoventricular patch plasty. When adjusted for multiconfounders, the risk of early mortality was significantly higher after simple linear repair than after endoventricular patch plasty (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-17.8). Mean follow-up was 5.8 +/- 3.8 years (range, 0-14.0 years). Overall 5-year cumulative survival was 78%, 70.1% after linear repair and 91.4% after endoventricular patch plasty. The risk of total mortality was significantly higher after linear repair than after endoventricular patch plasty when controlled for multiconfounders (relative risk, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-9.7). Linear repair dominated early in the series and patch plasty dominated later, giving a possible learning-curve bias in favor of patch plasty that could not be adjusted for in the regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Postinfarction left ventricular aneurysm can be repaired with satisfactory early and late results. Surgical risk was lower and long-term survival was higher after endoventricular patch plasty than simple linear repair. Differences in outcome should be interpreted with care because of the retrospective study design and the chronology of the 2 repair methods.

Repair of left ventricular aneurysm: surgical risk and long-term survival

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to identify predictors for survival after repair of postinfarction left ventricular aneurysm.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 149 patients who had an operation for postinfarction left ventricular aneurysm between 1989 and 2001. The following variables were recorded: preoperative clinical, angiographic, and echocardiographic findings and operative procedures. Outcomes were early mortality (<30 days) and long-term survival. Risk factors were pinpointed using t test or Mann-Whitney test, contingency tables, and survival curves. Independent risk factors were identified by logistic regression and Cox regression methods. Mean follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 0 to 13.8 years).

RESULTS

The early mortality (<30 days) rate was 8.7% altogether, and the 5-year cumulative survival rate was 77%. Advanced age, history of ventricular arrhythmia, three-vessel disease, and linear repair technique were independent risk factors for early and total mortality. Poor left ventricular function predicted reduced long-term survival but did not increase surgical risk. Survival was not affected by gender, diabetes, type and severity of symptoms, anterior or posterior aneurysm, revascularization of the left anterior descending artery, or number of distal anastomoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Postinfarction left ventricular aneurysm can be repaired with acceptable surgical risk and long-term survival. Survival is reduced in cases with advanced age, history of ventricular arrhythmia, three-vessel disease, poor left ventricular function, and linear repair of the aneurysm.