Surgical strategy for lung volume reduction surgery

Sternotomy or bilateral thoracoscopy: pain and postoperative complications after lung-volume reduction surgery

OBJECTIVES

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and median sternotomy (MS) are two approaches in lung-volume reduction surgery (LVRS). This study focused on the two surgical approaches with regard to postoperative pain.

METHODS

In this prospective, non-randomized study, pain was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the brief pain inventory (BPI). Incentive spirometry (IS) assessed restriction of the thoracic cage due to pain. Factors associated with treatment complications, medication usage, hospital stay, operating times, and chest-tube duration differences were examined between groups.

RESULTS

Of 85 patients undergoing LVRS, 23 patients underwent reduction via MS and 62 patients via bilateral VATS. VAS scores revealed no difference in postoperative pain except for VAS scores on days 6 (PM) and 7 (PM). BPI scores yielded higher scores in the VATS group on postoperative day (POD) 1 in the reactive dimension, but no other overall differences. MS patients receiving tramadol consumed a higher mean amount than VATS patients on POD 5 and POD 6. IS change from baseline to postoperative were similar between groups, and increased pain correlated with decreased IS scores on POD 1. Chest-tube duration, complications, and pain medication were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral VATS and MS offer similar outcomes with regard to postoperative pain and complications. These results suggest that the choice of LVRS operative approach should be dependent on disease presentation, surgeon expertise, and patient preference, not based upon differences in perceived postoperative pain between MS and bilateral VATS.

[Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema: a unilateral or bilateral approach?]

INTRODUCTION

Lung Volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is a recognized therapeutic option for patients presenting with severe and disabling pulmonary emphysema. Case selection is based upon clinical, morphological and functional criteria.

STATE OF THE ART

LVRS has shown promising results, with improvements in exercise capacity, pulmonary function and quality of life, in selected patients with severe and disabling emphysema. A variety of surgical techniques have been described. The procedure may be unilateral or bilateral, through a sternotomy or by a video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) technique. The controversial aspects of the surgical technique will be analysed and discussed in the following review.

PERSPECTIVES

A bilateral approach clearly offers a better functional improvement when compared to a unilateral procedure, however, the postoperative functional decline appears greater and more rapid after a bilateral procedure. A unilateral approach, with often less postoperative morbidity, allows the option to perform a future contra-lateral procedure in the event of further clinical or functional deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected cases LVRS is an effective treatment for severe pulmonary emphysema. Different surgical techniques have been described. Nowadays VATS is considered to be the technique of choice, with the option to carry out a future unilateral or bilateral procedure.

Historical perspectives

The history of surgery for emphysema is filled with numerous surgical attempts to improve the disorder. Although many of these procedures have proved to be futile, lung volume reduction surgery has now arrived. This article outlines the progression of procedures and the logic for which they were thought to be of benefit.