Efficacy of Relocation of Submandibular Duct in Cerebral Palsy Patients with Drooling

Oral Health Care for Children and Youth With Developmental Disabilities: Clinical Report

Oral health is an essential component of overall health for all individuals. The oral health of children and youth with developmental disabilities (CYDD) involves unique characteristics and needs of which pediatricians and pediatric clinicians can be aware. Risk for oral disease in CYDD is multifactorial and includes underlying medical conditions, medications, and ability to participate in preventive oral health care and treatment, and lack of access to providers is common for this population despite being eligible for Medicaid. Pediatric clinicians are uniquely positioned to support the oral health needs of CYDD and their families through the medical home. This clinical report aims to inform pediatric clinicians about the unique oral health needs of CYDD. It provides guidance on assessing caries risk and periodontal status using structured screening instruments; understanding dental trauma, the role of diet and caries risk, trauma prevention, and malocclusion; and providing anticipatory guidance on oral hygiene that includes tooth brushing, use of fluoridated toothpaste, assessing community water fluoridation, advocating for a dental home by 1 year of age, and transition to adult dental care as part of adolescent health care. It also highlights special considerations for dental treatment rendered under sedation or general anesthesia that CYDD may need. Pediatric clinicians can help reduce risk of CYDD developing dental disease by understanding the unique needs of their patients and their barriers to accessing oral health care in their community, communicating with the child's dental home, and advocating for safe and accessible dental procedures.

Postoperative Airway Management after Submandibular Duct Relocation in 96 Drooling Children and Adolescents

The aim of this study was to evaluate our institutions airway management and complications after submandibular duct relocation (SMDR). We analysed a historic cohort of children and adolescents who were examined at the Multidisciplinary Saliva Control Centre between March 2005 and April 2016. Ninety-six patients underwent SMDR for excessive drooling. We studied details of the surgical procedure, postoperative swelling and other complications. Ninety-six patients, 62 males and 34 females, were treated consecutively by SMDR. Mean age at time of surgery was 14 years and 11 months. The ASA physical status was 2 in most patients. The majority of children were diagnosed with cerebral palsy (67.7%). Postoperative swelling of the floor of the mouth or tongue was reported in 31 patients (32.3%). The swelling was mild and transient in 22 patients (22.9%) but profound swelling was seen in nine patients (9.4%). In 4.2% of the patients the airway was compromised. In general, SMDR is a well-tolerated procedure, but we should be aware of swelling of the tongue and floor of the mouth. This may lead to a prolonged period of endotracheal intubation or a need for reintubation which can be challenging. After extensive intra-oral surgery such as SMDR we strongly recommend a extended perioperative intubation and extubation after the airway is checked and secure.

Submandibular duct ligation after botulinum neurotoxin A treatment of drooling in children with cerebral palsy

AIM

To assess: (1) the effect on drooling of bilateral submandibular duct ligation as surgical therapy after the administration of submandibular botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) for excessive drooling and (2) the predictive value of treatment success with BoNT-A on treatment success after bilateral submandibular duct ligation.

METHOD

This was a within-participant retrospective observational study in which 29 children with severe drooling (15 males, 14 females) received BoNT-A treatment at a mean age of 9 years 6 months (SD 2y 5mo), followed by bilateral submandibular duct ligation at a mean age of 10 years 11 months (SD 2y 4mo). Fifteen children were diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP), with 12 children classified in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels IV and V. The 14 children without CP had non-progressive developmental disorders. The primary drooling severity outcomes were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; subjective assessment) and drooling quotient (objective assessment). Measurements were taken before each intervention and again at 8 and 32 weeks.

RESULTS

The VAS was significantly lower after bilateral submandibular duct ligation at follow-up compared to BoNT-A treatment (mean difference -33, p≤0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-43.3 to -22.9). The mean drooling quotient did not significantly differ between BoNT-A treatment and bilateral submandibular duct ligation at follow-up (3.3, p=0.457; 95% CI=-4.35 to 9.62) or between 8 and 32 weeks (4.7, p=0.188; 95% CI=-2.31 to 11.65).

INTERPRETATION

BoNT-A treatment and bilateral submandibular duct ligation are both effective treatment modalities for drooling. At 32-week follow-up, subjective drooling severity after bilateral submandibular duct ligation was significantly lower compared to previous BoNT-A injections in participants. However, treatment success with BoNT-A is no precursor to achieving success with bilateral submandibular duct ligation.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Bilateral submandibular duct ligation is an effective therapy for drooling after treatment with botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A). Treatment success with BoNT-A is not a predictor of successful therapy with bilateral submandibular duct ligation.

An evaluation of predictors for success of two-duct ligation for drooling in neurodisabilities

BACKGROUND

Drooling is dependent on various clinical variables. However, while drooling proves refractory to two-duct ligation in 40% of patients, predictors for treatment success are sparse and to date there is little evidence why some respond well while others are non-responders. We aim to find predictors for treatment success and study the effectiveness of two-duct ligation for drooling in neurodisabilities.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients with moderate to severe drooling who had undergone two-duct ligation were screened for inclusion. Four patients were excluded due to missing or unreliable primary outcomes. The average age at the time of surgery was 12 years. Predictors were evaluated for treatment success which was defined as ≥ 50% visual analog scale for severity of drooling and/or drooling quotient reduction from baseline. Treatment effect was measured after 8 and 32 weeks compared to baseline.

RESULTS

Age (more mature), adequate posture (no anteflexion), and normal speech are predictors for treatment success. Compared to baseline, drooling quotient was significantly lower at 8 (difference 18.6%, 95% confidence interval 12.3-24.9%) and 32 weeks (difference 10.1%, 95% confidence interval 3.9-16.4%). Compared to baseline, visual analog scale was significantly lower at 8 (difference 45.0, 95% confidence interval 37.0-52.9) and 32 weeks (difference 32.9, 95% confidence interval 25.0-40.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, adequate posture, and a normal speech are predictors for treatment success, are easily determined pre-operatively, and help the clinician providing patient-specific probability of treatment success. There is a significant subjective and objective decrease of drooling after two-duct ligation.

Randomized controlled trial comparing botulinum vs surgery for drooling in neurodisabilities

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of submandibular duct ligation (2-DL) and submandibular botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) for drooling in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

METHODS

A randomized, interventional, controlled, and partly single-blinded study was performed in which submandibular BoNT-A was compared with 2-DL to treat excessive drooling. Main outcomes included a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), drooling quotient (DQ), drooling severity (DS) scale and drooling frequency (DF) scale. Each was obtained at baseline, and 8 and 32 weeks post treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (mean age: 11 years, mean baseline VAS score 7.9, mean baseline DQ 27.3%) were randomized to the 2-DL or BoNT-A group. Four patients were excluded from analyses, leaving 53 patients for intention-to-treat analyses. Response to treatment, defined as a ≥50% reduction in DQ or VAS score, was higher for 2-DL after 32 weeks (63.0% vs 26.9%, p = 0.008). Both VAS score (24.5, p < 0.001) and DQ (-9.3%, p = 0.022) were significantly lower at follow-up after 2-DL vs BoNT-A. The total number of adverse events (p = 0.088, 40.7% vs 19.2%) and postoperative complaints was higher (p < 0.001, mean 9.6 vs 3.6 days) for 2-DL than for BoNT-A.

CONCLUSION

The 2-DL procedure is a more effective treatment for drooling than botulinum toxin, but carries a slightly greater risk of complications and morbidity.

TRIALREGISTERNL IDENTIFIER

NTR3537.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that for children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities and severe drooling, 2-DL compared to a one-time intraglandular BoNT-A injection is more effective at reducing drooling at 32 weeks.

Submandibular duct transposition for drooling in children: A Casuistic review and evaluation of grade of satisfaction

INTRODUCTION

Drooling of saliva is the unintentional loss of saliva from the mouth resulting in excess pooling of saliva in the anterior portion of the oral cavity. It is considered normal in infants and usually resolves itself by 15-18 months of age. It is a common problem in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy or other neurological disorders. Drooling interferes with speech, impairs oral hygiene and contributes to oral dermatitis, aspiration pneumonias and fluid electrolyte imbalances. It has a profoundly negative impact on quality of life and contributes to social exclusion, self-esteem problems and significant discomfort, especially amongst school-aged children. In addition, it can present a serious challenge for caregivers. Various approaches to manage this condition have been described in the literature. Submandibular duct relocation allows salivary flow and is the surgical approach undertaken by the authors.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to share our experience with the surgical approach to drooling children and to evaluate clinical outcomes and long-term caregiver satisfaction outcomes.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective study with a review of the medical records of 43 children and adolescents who had been submitted to submandibular duct relocation in the Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, between January 2003 and December 2017. The authors analyzed the clinical history, bibs used per day before and after surgery, and caregivers' satisfaction was assessed by interview using a questionnaire. The results of this procedure, technical considerations and outcomes are presented in this work.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (15 girls and 28 boys), between the ages of 3 and 18 at time of surgery (mean age of 9), underwent bilateral submandibular duct transposition for drooling. All children have neurological disorders, with cerebral palsy being the predominant diagnosis. The majority were hospitalized for 1-2 days and no surgical complications were observed. The number of bib or clothing changes fell from more than ten in 23 patients (53%) pre-operatively to less than five in 33 patients (77%) post-operatively. 30% of caregivers were satisfied and 53% were very satisfied with the results of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that submandibular duct relocation is an effective method in the resolution of uncontrolled drooling in children, contributing to the improvement of children's quality of life. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical results is in agreement with the published international studies, proving once again the effectiveness of the surgical technique implemented in our Hospital.

The impact of submandibular duct relocation on drooling and the well-being of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a reduction in drooling after bilateral submandibular duct relocation (SMDR) with sublingual gland excision on daily life and care, as well as social and emotional consequences in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 72 children and adolescents (46 males, 26 females) with moderate to severe drooling, and their caregivers. Mean age at the time of surgery was 15 years 2 months (SD 4y 3mo). Fifty-two children were diagnosed with cerebral palsy and 20 had other non-progressive developmental disabilities. A caregiver questionnaire to document the impact of drooling on daily care and economic consequences, social interaction and emotional development and self-esteem was administered before, and 8 and 32 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

Following bilateral SMDR the mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100) scores demonstrated a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in the severity of drooling from 81 at baseline to 28 and 36 after 8 and 32 weeks, respectively. This was accompanied by a decrease in the amount of daily care required and reduced economic consequences. In addition, an increase in social contact with other children and adults was reported by caregivers after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral SMDR with sublingual gland excision provides a significant positive reduction in daily care of children suffering from drooling. Caregivers also report positive changes in their child's social interaction and sense of self-esteem.

Otorhinolaryngology/maxillofacial disorders

●

Upper respiratory infections are ubiquitous

●

Voice changes may herald laryngeal cancer

Interventions for drooling in children with cerebral palsy

BACKGROUND

Drooling is a common problem for children with cerebral palsy (CP). This can be distressing for these children as well as for their parents and caregivers. The consequences of drooling include risk of social rejection, damp and soiled clothing, unpleasant odour, irritated chapped skin, mouth infections, dehydration, interference with speech, damage to books, communication aids, computers, and the risk of social isolation (Blasco 1992; Van der Burg 2006). A range of interventions exist that aim to reduce or eliminate drooling. There is a lack of consensus regarding which interventions are most effective for children with CP.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of interventions aimed at reducing or eliminating drooling in children with cerebral palsy. (2) To provide the best available evidence to inform clinical practice. (3) To assist with future research planning.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to December 2010 : Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Medline via Ovid; EMBASE; CINAHL; ERIC; Psych INFO; Web of Science; Web of Knowledge; AMED; SCOPUS; Dissertation Abstracts.We searched for ongoing clinical trials in the Clinical Trials web site (http://clinicaltrials.gov.) and in the Current Controlled Trials web site (http://www.controlled-trials.com/). We hand searched a range of relevant journals and conference proceeding abstracts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by MW, MS and LP and differences resolved through discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Four of these studies were trials using botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) and two were trials on the pharmacological interventions, benztropine and glycopyrrolate. No RCTs or CCTs were retrieved on surgery, physical, oro-motor and oro-sensory therapies, behavioural interventions, intra-oral appliances or acupuncture. In the studies eligible for review, there was considerable heterogeneity within and across interventions and a meta-analysis was not possible. A descriptive summary of each study is provided. All studies showed some statistically significant change for treatment groups up to 1 month post intervention. However, there were methodological flaws associated with all six studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It was not possible to reach a conclusion on the effectiveness and safety of either BoNT-A or the pharmaceutical interventions, benztropine and glycopyrrolate. There is insufficient evidence to inform clinical practice on interventions for drooling in children with CP. Directions for future research are provided.

Interventions for drooling in children with cerebral palsy

BACKGROUND

Drooling is a common problem for children with cerebral palsy (CP). This can be distressing for these children as well as for their parents and caregivers. The consequences of drooling include risk of social rejection, damp and soiled clothing, unpleasant odour, irritated chapped skin, mouth infections, dehydration, interference with speech, damage to books, communication aids, computers, and the risk of social isolation (Blasco 1992; Van der Burg 2006). A range of interventions exist that aim to reduce or eliminate drooling. There is a lack of consensus regarding which interventions are most effective for children with CP.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of interventions aimed at reducing or eliminating drooling in children with cerebral palsy. (2) To provide the best available evidence to inform clinical practice. (3) To assist with future research planning.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to December 2010 : Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Medline via Ovid; EMBASE; CINAHL; ERIC; Psych INFO; Web of Science; Web of Knowledge; AMED; SCOPUS; Dissertation Abstracts.We searched for ongoing clinical trials in the Clinical Trials web site (http://clinicaltrials.gov.) and in the Current Controlled Trials web site (http://www.controlled-trials.com/). We hand searched a range of relevant journals and conference proceeding abstracts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by MW, MS and LP and differences resolved through discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Four of these studies were trials using botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) and two were trials on the pharmacological interventions, benztropine and glycopyrrolate. No RCTs or CCTs were retrieved on surgery, physical, oro-motor and oro-sensory therapies, behavioural interventions, intra-oral appliances or acupuncture. In the studies eligible for review, there was considerable heterogeneity within and across interventions and a meta-analysis was not possible. A descriptive summary of each study is provided. All studies showed some statistically significant change for treatment groups up to 1 month post intervention. However, there were methodological flaws associated with all six studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It was not possible to reach a conclusion on the effectiveness and safety of either BoNT-A or the pharmaceutical interventions, benztropine and glycopyrrolate. There is insufficient evidence to inform clinical practice on interventions for drooling in children with CP. Directions for future research are provided.

Surgical treatment of dysphagia

The role of surgery in the management of dysphagia is clear in some areas and controversial in others. Evaluation for the causes of dysphagia can elucidate conditions in which surgery can improve safety, quality of life, or both. Surgical therapy, when indicated, is safe and effective for many causes of dysphagia. This article includes a general overview of the causes of dysphagia that can be addressed successfully with surgery as well as a discussion of why surgery may be less appropriate for other conditions associated with dysphagia.

Treatment of sialorrhea in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating progressive disease of all voluntary muscles. Bulbar symptoms with reduced ability to swallow occur frequently and may also be an early symptom. For some patients drooling may represent a severe social problem.

AIM

To review the literature on treatment of sialorrhea in ALS and describe possible treatments.

METHOD

PubMed was searched combining the words amyotrophic or ALS with sialorrhea or drooling. Publications more recent than 2000 were selected.

RESULTS

A total of 31 publications were found. Of these, 22 are from 2000 or later. Thirteen of the 22 most recent publications are original papers whereas 9 are review articles. Of the original articles, four describe treatment of sialorrhea with radiotherapy, five describe effects of botolinum toxin injections into the salivary grands and two describe serious side-effects of botolinum toxin injections for sialorrhea in ALS. The remaining original articles are case descriptions or practice surveys.

DISCUSSION

The treatment of sialorrhea in ALS is discussed in the view of current knowledge.