Concomitant Craniorachischisis Andomphalocele in a Male Fetus: Prenatal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings and Literature Review

Ultrasonographic evidence of persistent hyperextension of the fetal neck: is it a true sign? A diagnostic and prognostic challenge

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical evolution, structural anomalies associated and neonatal outcomes of fetal neck hyperextension in two cases with prenatal ultrasound diagnosis in two different gestational ages.

METHODS

In 2019, two cases of fetal hyperextension came to our attention. Follow-up information was obtained from hospital medical records and obstetrical care providers.

RESULTS

Two woman were investigated in our institution for the presence of fetal abnormalities in the II and III trimester, respectively. In both cases, fetal attitude presented persistent fetal neck hyperextension. One of the two fetuses had a mild ventriculomegaly and suspected for micrognathia. Both had an amniotic fluid increase. One of two had no movement in the lower and upper limbs in ultrasound scans associated with club foot and suspected scoliosis. Both were born by cesarean section with pretty different prognosis: one healthy baby had a retarded psychomotor development and the other one died after 6 months. A precise diagnosis was possible only in one case.

CONCLUSION

The early identification of a fetus with persistent hyperextension of the fetal head should require a detailed ultrasound exam for structural abnormalities and a careful prenatal counseling due to possible postnatal outcome.

A review of genetic factors underlying craniorachischisis and omphalocele: Inspired by a unique trisomy 18 case

Very few cases of craniorachischisis (CRN) with concomitant omphalocele (OMP) in the setting of trisomy 18 are reported in literature. Solitary midline closure defects are estimated to be more prevalent in trisomy 18 compared to the general population. Neurulation defect comparisons include anencephaly 0-2% versus 0.0206%, spina bifida 1-3% versus 0.0350%, and encephalocele 0-2% versus 0.0082% [Parker et al. (2010); Birth Defects Research. Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 88:1008-1016; Springett et al. (2015); American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 167A:3062-3069]. The solitary anterior malformation OMP has been reported as high as 6% with trisomy 18 [Springett et al. (2015); American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 167A:3062-3069]. We report the third published case of CRN with concomitant OMP observed in a likely trisomy 18 fetus that screened positive by noninvasive prenatal screening. Furthermore, we review and analyze the current literature to augment understanding of the genetic basis for anterior and posterior closure defects such as CRN and OMP. Although the current genetic lexicon lacks any definitive association with the simultaneous defects presented, previous research elucidated various genes related to anterior or posterior closure interruption individually. By consolidating current research, the authors advance knowledge of interconnected genetic pathology and direct future genetic mapping efforts.

Limb-body wall defect: experience of a reference service of fetal medicine from Southern Brazil

BACKGROUND

Limb-body wall defect is a rare condition characterized by a combination of large and complex defects of the ventral thorax and abdominal wall with craniofacial and limb anomalies.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to describe the experience of our fetal medicine service, a reference from Southern Brazil, with prenatally diagnosed patients with a limb-body wall defect in a 3 years period. Only patients who fulfilled the criteria suggested by Hunter et al. (2011) were included in the study. Clinical data and results of radiological and cytogenetic evaluation were collected from their medical records.

RESULTS

Our sample was composed of 8 patients. Many of their mothers were younger than 25 years (50%) and in their first pregnancy (62.5%). It is noteworthy that one patient was referred due to suspected anencephaly and another due to a twin pregnancy with an embryonic sac. Craniofacial defects were verified in three patients (37.5%), thoracic/abdominal abnormalities in 6 (75%) and limb defects in eight (100%). Congenital heart defects were observed in five patients (62.5%). One of them presented a previously undescribed complex heart defect.

CONCLUSION

The results disclosed that complementary exams, such as MRI and echocardiography, are important to better define the observed defects. Some of them, such as congenital heart defects, may be more common than previously reported. This definition is essential for the proper management of the pregnancy and genetic counseling of the family. The birth of these children must be planned with caution and for the prognosis a long survival possibility, despite unlikely and rare, must be considered.

Prenatal imaging of amniotic band sequence: utility and role of fetal MRI as an adjunct to prenatal US

BACKGROUND

Amniotic band sequence and its US manifestations have been well-described. There is little information, however, regarding the accuracy and utility of fetal MRI.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the MRI findings in amniotic band sequence and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prenatal MRI and US studies were retrospectively reviewed in 14 consecutive pregnancies with confirmed amniotic band sequence. Both studies were evaluated for amniotic band visualization, body part affected, type of deformity, umbilical cord involvement and vascular abnormality.

RESULTS

Amniotic bands were confidently identified with MRI in 8 fetuses (57%), suggested with MRI in 3 fetuses (21%) and confidently seen by US in 13 fetuses (93%). Neither modality detected surgically proven bands on one fetus. Both techniques were equally able to define the body part affected and the type of deformity. At least one limb abnormality was visualized in all cases and truncal involvement was present in two cases. Cord involvement was identified in seven cases, with one case detected only by MRI.

CONCLUSION

Fetal MRI is able to visualize amniotic bands and their secondary manifestations and could be complementary to prenatal US when fetal surgery is contemplated.