Role of radiation dosimetry in radioimmunotherapy planning and treatment dosing

SPECT performance evaluation on image of Yttrium 90 - Bremsstrahlung using Monte Carlo simulation

Yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) is one of the most widely used radionuclides in Nuclear Medicine practice. However, characteristic energy of this beta emitter constitutes a difficulty for dose planning using SPECT imaging. This work aimed to study bremsstrahlung X-rays effects produced by ⁹⁰Y beta particles during SPECT image acquisition using Monte Carlo code MCNPX. Several simulations were carried out to evaluate different aspects that could affect SPECT image quality, such as: collimator type, source-collimator distance and composition of each interacting material. Two configurations of ⁹⁰Y sources were simulated: a point source in several spheres of different materials (soft tissue, water, articular cartilage, and bone) and dimensions with radius ranging from 1 to 20 mm; and a uniformly distributed source in a Lucite cylindrical phantom filled with water. It was evaluated the bremsstrahlung photon emission generated inside different materials; for this was considered the number photons that passing through every different sphere's surface for each radii and material. In case of cylindrical phantom filled with water, in order to obtain the energy deposited over NaI (Tl) crystal detector; there was considered Median Energy General Purpose (MEGP) and Low Energy High Resolution (LEHR) collimators. Moreover, using TMESH routine available in the MCNPX Monte Carlo code, energy distribution images according to the collimator type and the source-collimator distance were obtained. The simulation was validated by comparing with the spectral distribution of the ⁹⁰Y bremsstrahlung X-rays obtained experimentally from an acrylic cylindrical phantom. Results corroborated the importance of Monte Carlo simulation method to evaluate a performance of SPECT image acquisition with ⁹⁰Y. The best resolution was obtained with MEGP collimator independent of source-collimator distance.

Biological evaluation of new potential anticancer agent for tumour imaging and radiotherapy by two methods: 99mTc-radiolabelling and EPR spectroscopy

Recently, a new class of in vitro and ex vivo radiotracers/radioprotectors, the nitroxyl-labelled agent 1-ethyl-1-nitroso-3-[4-(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl)]-urea (SLENU), has been discovered. Our previous investigations demonstrated that SLENU is a low-molecular-weight stable free radical which is freely membrane permeable, easily crosses the blood brain barrier and exhibited in/ex vivo the lowest general toxicity and higher anticancer activity against some experimental tumour models. Further investigation was aimed to develop a 99mTc-labelled SLENU (97%) as a chelator and evaluate its labelling efficiency and potential use as a tumour seeking agent and for early diagnosis. Tissue biodistribution of 99mTc-SLENU was determined in normal mice at 1, 2 and 24 h (n = 4/time interval, route of administration i.v.). The distribution data were compared using male albino non-inbred mice and electron paramagnetic resonance investigation. The imaging characteristics of 99mTc-SLENU conjugate examined in BALB/c mice grafted with Ehrlich Ascitis tumour in the thigh of hind leg demonstrated major accumulation of the radiotracer in the organs and tumour. Planar images and auto-radiograms confirmed that the tumours could be visualized clearly with 99mTc-SLENU. Blood kinetic study of radio-conjugate showed a bi-exponential pattern, as well as quick reduced duration in the blood circulation. This study establishes nitroxyls as a general class of new spin-labelled diagnostic markers that reduce the negative lateral effects of radiotherapy and drug damages, and are appropriate for tumour-localization.

Treatment planning in molecular radiotherapy

In molecular radiotherapy a radionuclide or a radioactively labelled pharmaceutical is administered to the patient. Treatment planning therefore comprises the determination of activity to administer. This administered activity should maximize tumour cell sterilization while minimizing normal tissue damage. In this work we present different approaches that are frequently used for determining the suitable activity. These approaches may be cohort- based as in chemotherapy, or patient-specific using dosimetry based on individual biokinetics. The approaches are different with respect to the input complexity, the corresponding costs and - in consequence - the quality of the therapy. In addition, a general scheme for data collection and analysis is proposed. To develop an effective and safe treatment, elaborate data need to be obtained. The main challenges, however, are collecting these complex data and analyse them properly.

Dosimetric considerations in radioimmunotherapy and systemic radionuclide therapies: a review

Radiopharmaceutical therapy, once touted as the “magic bullet” in radiation oncology, is increasingly being used in the treatment of a variety of malignancies; albeit in later disease stages. With ever-increasing public and medical awareness of radiation effects, radiation dosimetry is becoming more important. Dosimetry allows administration of the maximum tolerated radiation dose to the tumor/organ to be treated but limiting radiation to critical organs. Traditional tumor dosimetry involved acquiring pretherapy planar scans and plasma estimates with a diagnostic dose of intended radiopharmaceuticals. New advancements in single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography systems allow semi-quantitative measurements of radiation dosimetry thus allowing treatments tailored to each individual patient.

Myeloablative 131I-tositumomab radioimmunotherapy in treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison of dosimetry based on whole-body retention and dose to critical organ receiving the highest dose

Myeloablative radioimmunotherapy using (131)I-tositumomab (anti-CD20) monoclonal antibodies is an effective therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The amount of radioactivity for radioimmunotherapy may be determined by several methods, including those based on whole-body retention and on dose to a limiting normal organ. The goal of each approach is to deliver maximal myeloablative amounts of radioactivity within the tolerance of critical normal organs.

METHODS

Records of 100 consecutive patients who underwent biodistribution and dosimetry evaluation after tracer infusion of (131)I-tositumomab before radioimmunotherapy were reviewed. We assessed organ and tissue activities over time by serial gamma-camera imaging to calculate radiation-absorbed doses. Organ volumes were determined from CT scans for organ-specific dosimetry. These dose estimates helped us to determine therapy on the basis of projected dose to the critical normal organ receiving a maximum tolerable radiation dose. We compared organ-specific dosimetry for treatment planning with the whole-body dose-assessment method by retrospectively analyzing the differences in projected organ-absorbed doses and their ratios.

RESULTS

Mean organ doses per unit of administered activity (mGy/MBq) estimated by both methods were 0.33 for liver and 0.33 for lungs by the whole-body method and 1.52 for liver and 1.74 for lungs by the organ-specific method (P=0.0001). The median differences between methods were 0.92 mGy/MBq (range, 0.36-2.2 mGy/MBq) for lungs, 0.82 mGy/MBq (range, 0.28-1.67 mGy/MBq) for liver, and -0.01 mGy/MBq (range, -0.18-0.16 mGy/MBq) for whole body. The median ratios of the treatment activities based on limiting normal-organ dose were 5.12 (range, 2.33-10.01) for lungs, 4.14 (range, 2.16-6.67) for liver, and 0.94 (range, 0.79-1.22) for whole body. We found substantial differences between the dose estimated by the 2 methods for liver and lungs (P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Dosimetry based on whole-body retention will underestimate the organ doses, and a preferable approach is to evaluate organ-specific doses by accounting for actual radionuclide biodistribution. Myeloablative treatments based on the latter approach allow administration of the maximum amount of radioactivity while minimizing toxicity.

Clinical radionuclide therapy dosimetry: the quest for the "Holy Gray"

Introduction

Radionuclide therapy has distinct similarities to, but also profound differences from external radiotherapy.

Review

This review discusses techniques and results of previously developed dosimetry methods in thyroid carcinoma, neuro-endocrine tumours, solid tumours and lymphoma. In each case, emphasis is placed on the level of evidence and practical applicability. Although dosimetry has been of enormous value in the preclinical phase of radiopharmaceutical development, its clinical use to optimise administered activity on an individual patient basis has been less evident. In phase I and II trials, dosimetry may be considered an inherent part of therapy to establish the maximum tolerated dose and dose-response relationship. To prove that dosimetry-based radionuclide therapy is of additional benefit over fixed dosing or dosing per kilogram body weight, prospective randomised phase III trials with appropriate end points have to be undertaken. Data in the literature which underscore the potential of dosimetry to avoid under- and overdosing and to standardise radionuclide therapy methods internationally are very scarce.

Developments

In each section, particular developments and insights into these therapies are related to opportunities for dosimetry. The recent developments in PET and PET/CT imaging, including micro-devices for animal research, and molecular medicine provide major challenges for innovative therapy and dosimetry techniques. Furthermore, the increasing scientific interest in the radiobiological features specific to radionuclide therapy will advance our ability to administer this treatment modality optimally.

Radioimmunotherapy with [131I]cG250 in patients with metastasized renal cell cancer: dosimetric analysis and immunologic response

PURPOSE

A study was designed to define the therapeutic efficacy, safety, and toxicity of two sequential high-dose treatments of radioimmunotherapy with [131I]cG250 in patients with metastasized renal cell carcinoma. Here, we report the dosimetric analysis and the relationship between the development of a human antichimeric antibody response and altered pharmacokinetics.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients (n = 29) with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma received a low dose (222 MBq) of [131I]cG250 for dosimetric analysis, followed by the first radioimmunotherapy with 2,220 MBq/m2 [131I]cG250 (n = 27) 1 week later. If no grade 4 hematologic toxicity was observed, a second low dose of [131I]cG250 (n = 20) was given 3 months later. Provided that no accelerated blood clearance was observed, a second radioimmunotherapy of [131I]cG250 was administered at an activity-dose level of 1,110 MBq/m2 (n = 3) or 1,665 MBq/m2 (n = 16). After each administration, whole-body images were obtained and the pharmacokinetics and the development of human antichimeric antibody responses were determined. Radiation-absorbed doses were calculated for whole body, red marrow, organs, and metastases.

RESULTS

No correlation was found between hematologic toxicity and radiation-absorbed dose to the whole body or bone marrow, nor administered activity (MBq and MBq/kg). The tumor-absorbed doses varied largely. An inverse relation between tumor size and radiation-absorbed dose was found. Most tumor lesions received <10 Gy, whereas only lesions <5 g absorbed >50 Gy. A relatively high number of patients developed a human antichimeric antibody response (8 of 27) with altered pharmacokinetics, hampering additional radioimmunotherapies in four of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Dosimetric analysis did not adequately predict the degree of bone marrow toxicity. When human antichimeric antibody developed, the rapid clearance of radioactivity from the blood and body prohibited further treatment. According to the calculated absorbed dose in metastatic lesions, future radioimmunotherapy studies with radiolabeled cG250 should aim at treatment of small-volume disease or treatment in an adjuvant setting.

Establishing a clinically meaningful predictive model of hematologic toxicity in nonmyeloablative targeted radiotherapy: practical aspects and limitations of red marrow dosimetry

In either heavily pretreated or previously untreated patient populations, dosimetry holds the promise of playing an integral role in the physician's ability to adjust therapeutic activity prescriptions to limit excessive hematologic toxicity in individual patients. However, red marrow absorbed doses have not been highly predictive of hematopoietic toxicity. Although the accuracy of red marrow dose estimates is expected to improve as more patient-specific models are implemented, these model-calculated absorbed doses more than likely will have to be adjusted by parameters that adequately characterize bone marrow tolerance in the heavily pretreated patients most likely to receive nonmyeloablative radiolabeled antibody therapy. Models need to be established that consider not only absorbed dose but also parameters that are indicative of pretherapy bone marrow reserve and radiosensitivity so that a clinically meaningful predictive model of hematologic toxicity can be established.

Patient dosimetry in radionuclide therapy: the whys and the wherefores

The importance and methodology of contemporary patient dosimetry in well-established radionuclide therapies are reviewed. The different protocols used for radioiodine treatment of thyrotoxicosis are discussed. Special attention is paid to patient dosimetry in the largest safe dose approach for curative radioiodine therapy of thyroid remnants and metastases in the post-surgical treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. Nowadays, meta-[131I]iodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) therapy for neuroblastoma relies on bone marrow dose levels. Issues related to whole-body and tumour dosimetry in this type of radionuclide therapy, where, traditionally, dosimetry has played an important role, are discussed. A relatively large number of patients are treated with radiolabelled Lipiodol for hepatocellular carcinoma. Administered activities are restricted to 2.22 GBq (60 mCi) when using 131I-lipiodol because of the radioprotection measures to be taken. These radiation protection issues can be avoided by using 188Re labelled Lipiodol allowing further dose escalation. The follow-up of these patients also necessitates whole-body dosimetry. It is concluded that for treatment of malignant diseases reliable patient dosimetry is now a keystone of high quality radionuclide therapy. Where dosimetry of present medical applications focuses generally on the critical organs, in the near future accurate 3-dimensional tumour dosimetry also will become feasible by the introduction of the combined SPECT-CT and PET-CT imaging systems in the dosimetric methodology. This will allow treatment protocols based on tumour dose prescriptions as performed in external beam radiotherapy.

Accurate dosimetry: an essential step towards good clinical practice in nuclear medicine

In nuclear medicine, an increasing number of radiolabelled agents are under investigation for future use in diagnostic imaging and for applications in radionuclide therapy. All these studies require large amounts of human data to allow for statistical comparisons with existing and well established diagnostic or therapeutic methodologies. In the framework of a good clinical practice environment, clinical trials should be carried out according to international guidelines and regulations as described in the Declaration of Helsinki. Studies involving ionizing radiation, as is the case in nuclear medicine, require special consideration to comply with the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle. Special publications of the International Commission of Radiological Protection and the World Health Organization deal with this topic in medical research. From the legislation point of view, the 97/43/EURATOM Directive represents the reference to clinical research using ionizing radiation within the European Union. In order to keep the radiation dose of (healthy) volunteers as low as possible, predictive dosimetry studies based on in-vivo animal biokinetics are essential. On the other hand, patients included in dose-escalation radionuclide therapy trials should be monitored individually with respect to dosimetry of the tumour and the critical organs. In this paper the importance and methodology of contemporary patient dosimetry in diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine research are reviewed. It is concluded that reliable dosimetry is essential in performing scientific clinical studies according to the principle of good clinical practice.

Concepts in radioimmunotherapy and immunotherapy: Radioimmunotherapy from a Lym-1 perspective

Conventional chemotherapy regimens cure fewer than 50% of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and fewer than 5% of patients with indolent lymphomas. However, the majority of patients remain responsive to remarkably low doses of external beam radiotherapy. A logical strategy for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is radioimmunotherapy (RIT); systemic radiation targeted to tumor cells using monoclonal antibodies. RIT involves continuous exposure to low-dose-rate radiation, with the intensity of the dose decreasing over time, and as such is distinct from conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy. RIT has several advantages over monoclonal antibody therapy. For example, a functional immune system is not an absolute requirement to kill tumor cells, and, depending on the radiolabel used, beta-emissions are effective over 100 to 500 cell diameters, resulting in a crossfire effect on nearby tumor cells. The crossfire effect enables the eradication of cells that are not necessarily targeted by the antibody, but are affected by the radiation. The success of RIT depends on which antibody and radioisotope is used. This article examines how the antibody, radioisotope, chelator, and linker affect the safety and efficacy of RIT. The different approaches to dosing are also considered.

Feasibility study and dosimetric assessment of radiolabeled drugs injected to the coronary arterial wall to prevent restenosis

PURPOSE

Intramural delivery of a P-32 radiolabeled oligonucleotide (ODN) using an infiltrating catheter has been proposed recently to potentially reduce restenosis in coronary arteries and tested on a limited number of human subjects. However, because of the low efficiency of drug retention (approximately 2-5%) after the initial washout period from this technique, the dose levels to nontarget organs may be significant and thus may require a detailed investigation. The radiation dose distributions resulting from this technique is investigated using the MIRD formalism and Monte Carlo calculations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The total activity of the P-32 ODN to be injected during treatment to deliver a therapeutic dose of approximately 30 Gy to the arterial wall is estimated taking into account the drug delivery efficacy of the infiltrating device (approximately 2-5% typical). Using pharmacokinetic data for P-32 ODN, we estimate the dose to healthy organs resulting from the systemic fraction that is released into the circulatory system during washout (>95% typical). Variabilities in the biological parameters are also identified as important sources of error in the prescribed dose.

RESULTS

A limitation to this technique is the poor accuracy in delivering the prescribed dose due to variability in the amount of drug delivered. Dose to organs is also an important limitation. For example, our calculation indicate that approximately 37 MBq (1 mCi) of P-32 labeled ODN are needed to deliver 30 Gy to the arterial wall assuming a delivery efficiency of 2-5% and a 24-h residence time. This may result in doses of approximately 1 Gy to the spleen and 0.2-0.4 Gy to the liver, kidneys and lungs (95% confidence interval).

CONCLUSION

This novel therapy suffers from serious limitations. It is doubtful that a therapeutic dose can be delivered accurately, safely and effectively to the arterial wall because of the poor delivery efficacy and extreme variability found in drug delivery experiments. Also, dose levels to healthy organs appears to be too high to recommend the use of this technique in human experiments.

Long-Lived Positron Emitters Zirconium-89 and Iodine-124 for Scouting of Therapeutic Radioimmunoconjugates with PET

Antibody-PET imaging might be of value for the selection of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) candidates to confirm tumor targeting and to estimate radiation doses to tumor and normal tissues. One of the requirements to be set for such a scouting procedure is that the biodistributions of the diagnostic and therapeutic radioimmunoconjugates should be similar. In the present study we evaluated the potential of the positron emitters zirconium-89 ((89)Zr) and iodine-124 ((124)I) for this approach, as these radionuclides have a relatively long half-life that matches with the kinetics of MAbs in vivo (t(1/2) 3.27 and 4.18 days, respectively). After radiolabeling of the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)-selective chimeric antibody (cMAb) U36, the biodistribution of two diagnostic (cMAb U36-N-sucDf-(89)Zr and cMAb U36-(124)I) and three therapeutic radioimmunoconjugates (cMAb U36-p-SCN-Bz-DOTA-(88)Y-with (88)Y being substitute for (90)Y, cMAb U36-(131)I, and cMAb U36-MAG3-(186)Re) was assessed in mice with HNSCC-xenografts, at 24, 48, and 72 hours after injection. Two patterns of biodistribution were observed, one pattern matching for (89)Zr- and (88)Y-labeled cMAb U36 and one pattern matching for (124)I-, (131)I-, and (186)Re-cMAb U36. The most remarkable differences between both patterns were observed for uptake in tumor and liver. Tumor uptake levels were 23.2 +/- 0.5 and 24.1 +/- 0.7%ID/g for the (89)Zr- and (88)Y-cMAb U36 and 16.0 +/- 0.8, 15.7 +/- 0.79 and 17.1 +/- 1.6%ID/g for (124)I-, (131)I-, and (186)Re-cMAb U36-conjugates, respectively, at 72 hours after injection. For liver these values were 6.9 +/- 0.8 ((89)Zr), 6.2 +/- 0.8 ((88)Y), 1.7 +/- 0.1 ((124)I), 1.6 +/- 0.1 ((131)I), and 2.3 +/- 0.1 ((186)Re), respectively. These preliminary data justify the further development of antibody-PET with (89)Zr-labeled MAbs for scouting of therapeutic doses of (90)Y-labeled MAbs. In such approach (124)I-labeled MAbs are most suitable for scouting of (131)I- and (186)Re-labeled MAbs.

Advancing role of radiolabeled antibodies in the therapy of cancer

This review focuses on the use of radiolabeled antibodies in the therapy of cancer, termed radioimmunotherapy (RAIT). Basic problems concerned with the choice of antibody, radionuclide, and physiology of the tumor and host are discussed, followed by a review of the pertinent clinical publications of various radioantibody constructs in the treatment of hematopoietic and solid tumors of diverse histopathology, grade, and stage, and in different clinical settings. Factors such as dose rate delivered, tumor size, and radiosensitivity play a major role in determining therapeutic response, while target-to-nontarget ratios and, particularly, circulating radioactivity to the bone marrow determine the principal dose-limiting toxicities. RAIT appears to be gaining a place in the therapy of hematopoietic neoplasms, such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: several agents are advancing in clinical trials toward registration, and one has recently been approved by the FDA. Although RAIT of solid tumors has shown less progress, use of pretargeting strategies, such as an affinity-enhancement system consisting of bispecific antibodies separating targeting from delivery of the radiotherapeutic, appears to enhance tumor-to-nontumor ratios, and may increase radiation doses to tumors more selectively than directly labeled antibodies.

Options for radionuclide therapy: from fixed activity to patient-specific treatment planning

The therapeutic use of radioisotopes in medicine as unsealed sources has a long history dating back to the 1930s. The established and continuing objectives are to provide radiation dose to the target tissue at the desired cytotoxic level while avoiding or minimizing toxic effects. Selected radionuclide therapy protocols including 32P for polycythemia vera, 131I for Graves' disease, and 131I for postsurgical ablation of thyroid remnants in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer are presented for historical review with the focus on protocols for administering the radiopharmaceuticals and the role played by dosimetry. The discussion also includes consideration of complications and the assessment of outcome for these diseases. The vista for radionuclide therapy today is reviewed along with the options for determining the administered activity. Patient specific dosimetry encompasses a number of levels ranging from basic measurement of relevant biokinetic parameters and use of standard models to calculate (and extrapolate) radiation dose to sophisticated three-dimensional techniques employing fusion of physiologic and high-resolution anatomic images coupled with advanced 3-D voxel patient representation and Monte Carlo techniques for use in radiation dose calculation. The role of patient specific dosimetry in clinical trials (Phase I, II, III trials) along with its utility in treatment planning, follow-up evaluation, and elucidation of dose-response relationships is discussed. The challenge ahead for those who advocate patient specific dosimetry is to assemble the outcome data and perform the analysis to support this contention.