Short course radiation therapy for elderly cancer patients. Evidences from the literature review

Non-stereotactic radiotherapy in older cancer patients

Old or very old oncological patients represent a heterogeneous and frail population due to concomitant comorbidities. Whether radiotherapy alone or in combination with novel cancer drugs may provide a clear benefit in this setting of patients is still a matter of debate.

The aim of our review is to analyze the evaluation process and the different therapeutic possibilities in older cancer patients, focusing on the different and most disparate applications of radiotherapy. We reviewed the most recent literature on radiotherapy in older patients providing clinical evidence of treatment related toxicity, tolerance and outcomes using standard fractionated and/or hypofractionated irradiation alone or in combination with chemotherapy, targeted and immunotherapy.

In older cancer patients unfit for systemic therapy or surgery, radiotherapy represents a valid therapeutic approach, both with curative and palliative intents, ensuring excellent patient compliance in terms of local toxicity and adherence to therapy.

Ultra-hypofractionated whole breast adjuvant radiotherapy in the real-world setting: single experience with 271 elderly/frail patients treated with 3D and IMRT technique

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the toxicity, local control, overall and disease-free survival of elderly breast cancer (BC) patients treated with adjuvant once-weekly ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) either with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) or 3D conformal RT (3DCRT).

METHODS

From July 2011 to July 2018, BC patients receiving 5.7 Gy once a week for 5 weeks to the whole breast after breast-conserving surgery were considered for the study. Inclusion criteria were: T1-T3 invasive BC, no or limited axillary involvement, age ≥ 65 years or women with commuting difficulties or disabling diseases.

RESULTS

A total of 271 patients were included in the study. Median age was 76 (46-86) years. Most of BC were T1 (77%), while the remaining were T2 (22.2%) and T3 (0.4%). Axillary status was negative in 68.3% of the patients. The only severe acute toxicity (G3) at the end of RT was erythema (0.4%), registered in the 3DCRT group; no G3 edema or epitheliolysis was recorded. With 18 months of median follow-up, severe early-late toxicity (G3) was reported in terms of fibrosis and breast retraction, both with an incidence of 1.4%, mostly in the 3DCRT group. Oncological outcomes at a median follow-up of 2.9 years reported 249/271 (91.9%) patients alive and free from any event and 5 (1.8%) isolated locoregional recurrences. At 3 years, disease-free survival and overall survival were 94.9% and 97.8%, respectively. Breast volume > 500 cm³ was reported as predictive for moderate-severe (≥ G2) acute toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly ultra-hypofractionated whole breast RT seems feasible and effective. Toxicity was mild, local control was acceptable, and overall survival was 97.8% at 3 years. Rates of severe toxicity were reduced with the IMRT technique.

Weekly radiotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients: a comparison between two hypofractionation schedules

PURPOSE

Weekly irradiation in breast cancer in elderly patients is a treatment option, whose tolerance may be influenced by the fractionation used. The objective of this study is to compare the tolerance and long-term side effects of two different fractionations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

47 elderly patients were recruited after conservative or radical treatment that also received irradiation with a dose per fraction of 6.25 Gy or 5 Gy for one session per week, 6 sessions in total. The long-term tolerance results are compared by assessing toxicity using CTCAE version 5.0 scales for dermatitis, telangectasia, fibrosis and pain of the irradiated breast. In addition, objective parameters of skin status (erythema, hyperpigmentation, elasticity and hydration) by a multi-probe MultiSkin Test-Center system were obtained and compared between groups.

RESULTS

After an average follow-up of 5 years, all patients were free of disease and with complete local control. A total of 20 patients with 6.25 Gy fractionation and 27 patients with 5 Gy fractionation have been included. Patients treated with lower fractionation had a lower incidence of dermatitis, telangectasia, fibrosis, or local pain. The decrease in elasticity measured by the multi-probe system was smaller with the fractionation of 5 Gy. No differences were observed in the other objective parameters.

CONCLUSION

Weekly irradiation with 5 Gy fractionation is better tolerated than with higher fractionation.

[Hypofractioned radiotherapy in elderly patient with glioblastoma]

Glioblastoma is the most frequent primary brain tumor, with more than half of all patients being at least 65 years old. The treatment of the elderly in this pathology represents therefore a considerable challenge for oncologists and radiation therapists. However, in most clinical trials, age is a non-eligible criterial. In the last ten years, geriatric therapeutic trials have been multiplied. The treatment of glioblastoma consists of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In elderly patients, the evaluation of performans status and the molecular characteristics of the tumor are important factors in order to propose the appropriate treatment in terms of efficacy and toxicity.

Once-Weekly Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer in Elderly Patients: Efficacy and Tolerance in 486 Patients

Purpose

Radiation therapy is a key treatment of breast cancer. Elderly patients with associated diseases that modify their performance status do not tolerate long periods of daily irradiation. The objective of this study is to analyze the results of weekly hypofractionated treatment in these patients.

Material and Methods

Between 1992 and 2016, we included 486 elderly patients presenting concomitant pathology or sociofamilial problems in which it was not feasible to propose conventional treatment. They were treated with conservative surgery or mastectomy and then adjuvant hypofractionated irradiation, administering 5 Gy or 6.25 Gy in 6 fractions, once a week (total dose 30–37.5 Gy) over 6 weeks.

Results

Breast cancer overall survival according to the Kaplan-Meier method at 5 years was 74.2% ± 2.3%; breast cancer disease-free survival was 90% ± 1.6%; local relapse-free survival was 96.5% ± 1% showing that patients die more from other causes and not from their neoplasia. Acute dermatitis was mild (75.6% of the patients grades I–III) and 30.6% had moderate chronic fibrosis.

Conclusions

The once-weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy is a feasible and convenient option for elderly patients with breast cancer. It is a safe treatment modality with similar survival and local control results compared to standard fractionation, while the side effects are acceptable.

Outcome of patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer not undergoing cystectomy after treatment with noncisplatin-based chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis

Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or combinations can be used in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) not undergoing cystectomy. Nevertheless, unfitness for cystectomy is frequently associated with unfitness for other therapeutic modalities. We report the outcome of patients with MIBC who did not undergo cystectomy and did not receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Selection criteria for the study were nonmetastatic MIBC, no cystectomy, no cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy should have been used aside from TURBT. Forty-nine patients (median age 79), managed between April 2001 and January 2012, were included in this analysis. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5, while 76% were unfit for cisplatin. Treatment included radiotherapy (n = 7), carboplatin-based chemotherapy (n = 25), carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (n = 10), and radiochemotherapy (n = 7). Five-year event-free rate was 26% (standard error [SE] = 7) for overall survival, 23% (SE = 7) for progression-free survival, and 30 (SE = 8) for cancer-specific survival (CSS). Patients who were treated with combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy had significantly longer CSS compared to those treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy only (5-year CSS rate: 16% [SE 8] vs. 63% [SE 15], P = 0.053). Unfit-for-cystectomy patients frequently receive suboptimal nonsurgical treatment. Their outcome was poor. Combining chemotherapy with radiotherapy produced better outcomes and should be prospectively evaluated.

Optimal management of the elderly patient with head and neck cancer: Issues regarding surgery, irradiation and chemotherapy

Head and neck cancer (HNC) represents the sixth most common malignancy and accounts for approximately 6% of new cancer cases annually worldwide. As life expectancy constantly increases, the onset of HNC in patients older than 65 years of age at diagnosis is not rare and up to one fourth of cases occurs in patients older that 70 years at age. Because elderly cancer patients are severely under-represented in clinical trials, there is a clear need to address the particular aspects of this specific patient group, especially in the context of novel multidisciplinary therapeutic approaches. The frailty of elderly patients with HNC is attributed to the high incidence of smoking and alcohol abuse in this malignancy and the presence of substantial cardiovascular, respiratory or metabolic comorbidities. In the current work, I provide an overview of current and emerging treatment approaches, in elderly patients with HNC. In particular, I discuss modern surgical approaches that improve radical excision rates while preserving functionality, the incorporation of modern radiotherapeutic techniques and the introduction of novel chemotherapeutic combinations and molecular targeted agents in an effort to reduce toxicity without compromising efficacy. Finally, there is an urgent need to increase accrual and active participation of elderly patients with HNC in clinical trials, including biomarker evaluation in biopsy specimens towards an individualized therapeutic approach.

Current clinical practice guidelines on chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive urothelial cancer: a systematic review and critical evaluation by the Hellenic Genito-Urinary Cancer Group (HGUCG)

Radical cystectomy is the treatment of choice in localized muscle-invasive urothelial cancer. Nevertheless, relapses are frequent and systemic chemotherapy has been employed in order to reduce this risk. In addition, bladder preservation strategies are appealing. During the last decade, there has been a difficulty in conducting and completing large-scale trials in urothelial cancer. This has resulted in relatively few changes in the existing guidelines. Recent studies have created renewed interest in certain fields, such as the role of chemo-radiotherapy and management of unfit patients. In addition, application of certain guidelines has been limited in everyday practice. We conducted a systematic review of the existing guidelines and recent randomized trials not included in these guidelines, and developed a treatment algorithm, regarding non-surgical therapies for non-metastatic, muscle-invasive urothelial cancer based predominantly on patients' fitness for the available therapeutic modalities.

The added challenges of bone metastases treatment in elderly patients

Most cancers occur in those older than the age of 65 years. As the population of the world ages and life expectancies continue to increase, it is important to address treatment challenges for elderly patients. This narrative review details the challenges of palliative radiotherapy treatment for elderly patients with bone metastases. We begin with the definition of elderly and its appropriateness, outlining recent demographic data of patients with cancer. The current status of elderly participation in clinical trials is discussed by reviewing the recent literature and clinical trial data. Factors affecting enrolment of the elderly are assessed, with a focus on palliative radiotherapy trials, and what we can do to improve accrual in this data-driven setting. At present, there is a lack of level 1 evidence that evaluates the optimal treatment for elderly patients with bone metastases. Therefore, a review of safety and efficacy is given based on previously published reports. Palliative radiotherapy for elderly patients is a worthwhile treatment and should be recommended regardless of age, as supported by available evidence. Patient, family and physician concerns about physical burden may be reduced as single treatments (that often can be done in a single visit) are as beneficial as multiple treatments for painful bone metastases. In elderly patients, radiotherapy may even be the best treatment for these cases as opioid-related adverse events are amplified in this group and often dosages are more difficult to titrate. Clinicians should continue to encourage the enrolment of elderly patients on to clinical trials as these data form the basis of optimal treatment guidelines. Radiation oncologists are encouraged to reduce the physical burden for elderly patients by offering single treatments where appropriate and completing consultation, treatment simulation and treatment in a single clinical visit.

When Palliative Treatment Achieves More Than Palliation: Instances of Long-term Survival after Palliative Radiotherapy

CONTEXT

Palliative radiotherapy aims at symptom alleviation and improvement of quality of life. It may be effective in conferring a reasonable quantum of local control, as well as possibly prolonging survival on the short term. However, there can be rare instances where long-term survival, or even cure, results from palliative radiotherapy, which mostly uses sub-therapeutic doses.

AIM

To categorize and characterize the patients with long-term survival and/or cure after palliative radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of hospital records of patients treated with palliative radiotherapy from 2001 to 2006 at the Regional Cancer Centre, Shimla.

RESULTS

Of the analyzed 963 patients who received palliative radiotherapy, 2.4% (n = 23) survived at least 5 years, with a large majority of these surviving patients (73.9%, n = 17) being free of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to providing valuable symptom relief, palliative radiotherapy utilizing sub-therapeutic doses may, in a small proportion of patients, bestow long-term survival, and possibly cure. Rationally, such a favorable, but rare outcome cannot be expected with supportive care alone.

Peculiaridades da radioterapia em idosos

É sabido que o envelhecimento da população do mundo durante o século XX e no início deste novo século constitui um desafio de primeira ordem para as nações, especialmente no campo socioeconômico. Um aspecto importante do envelhecimento populacional global é que, para grupos de idade mais avançada, a prevalência das doenças degenerativas também é maior, incluindo as doenças malignas. No universo de pacientes portadores de câncer, por outro lado, metade destes receberá radioterapia em algum momento de sua doença e suas características individuais podem influenciar, de alguma forma, o prognóstico, a indicação e as doses diárias de prescrição dos tratamentos. Neste contexto, a assistência à saúde do idoso portador de câncer deve ser vista como um importante desafio, principalmente devido a dois fatores: uma maior procura de tratamentos, em termos quantitativos, e características fisiológicas peculiares a esta população, que podem influenciar na tomada de decisões terapêuticas. Esta revisão propõe uma discussão sobre alguns aspectos relevantes tanto da fisiologia dos idosos, que pode influenciar o curso do tratamento irradiante, quanto de alguns avanços técnicos da radioterapia, que podem, por sua vez, beneficiar estes pacientes, oferecendo menor toxicidade e maior eficiência e rapidez, por exemplo.

Genes within the MHC region have a dramatic influence on radiation-enhanced atherosclerosis in mice

BACKGROUND

C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice develop much smaller atherosclerotic lesions than C57BL/6 (B6) mice when deficient in apolipoprotein E (apoE⁻(/)⁻) or fed an atherogenic diet. The 2 strains differ in H2 haplotypes, with B6 having H2(b) and C3H having H2(k). C3.SW-H2(b)/SnJ (C3.SW) is a congenic strain of C3H/HeJ in which H2(k) is replaced with H2(b).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed bone marrow transplantation and found that atherosclerosis-resistant C3.SW.apoE⁻(/)⁻ mice reconstituted with bone marrow from either C3.SW.apoE⁻(/)⁻ or B6.apoE⁻(/)⁻ mice after lethal irradiation had significantly larger atherosclerotic lesions than B6.apoE⁻(/)⁻ mice receiving identical treatments and much larger lesions than C3H.apoE⁻(/)⁻ mice reconstituted with syngeneic bone marrow. For syngeneic transplantation, C3.SW.apoE⁻(/)⁻ mice exhibited a 21-fold increase in lesion size over C3H.apoE⁻(/)⁻ mice (152 800±21 937 versus 7060±2290 μm²/section) and a near 4-fold increase over B6.apoE⁻(/)⁻ mice (40 529±4675 μm²/section). C3.SW.apoE⁻(/)⁻ mice reconstituted with syngeneic marrow exhibited enhanced lesion formation relative to those reconstituted with B6 marrow (152 800±21 937 versus 107 000±9374 μm²/section; P=0.067). Sublethal irradiation led to a 6-fold increase of lesion size in C3.SW.apoE⁻(/)⁻ mice (9795±2804 versus 1550±607 μm²/section; P=0.008). Wild-type C3.SW mice reconstituted with apoE(+/+) or apoE⁻(/)⁻ bone marrow had significantly larger atherosclerotic lesions than C3H mice receiving identical treatments on an atherogenic diet.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that gene(s) within the H2 region have a dramatic impact on radiation-enhanced atherosclerosis, and their effect is conveyed partially through bone marrow-derived cells.

Elderly patients with painful bone metastases should be offered palliative radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of palliative radiotherapy (RT) in relieving metastatic bone pain in elderly patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The response to RT for palliation of metastatic bone pain was evaluated from a prospective database of 558 patients between 1999 and 2008. The pain scores and analgesic intake were used to calculate the response according to the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party palliative RT endpoints. Subgroup analyses for age and other demographic information were performed.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in the response rate in patients aged >or=65, >or=70, and >or=75 years compared with younger patients at 1, 2, or 3 months after RT. The response was found to be significantly related to the performance status.

CONCLUSION

Age alone did not affect the response to palliative RT for bone metastases. Elderly patients should be referred for palliative RT for their painful bone metastases, regardless of age, because they receive equal benefit from the treatment.