Present achievements in the medical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Constitutional genetic variants as predictors of antiangiogenic therapy outcome in renal cell carcinoma

The development of specific angiogenesis inhibitors has drastically improved renal cancer treatment in recent years. Currently, four VEGF receptor inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib and axitinib), one anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab) and two inhibitors of the mTOR pathway (temsirolimus and everolimus) have been approved to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and several other molecules are under investigation. However, lack of response to antiangiogenic drugs and adverse drug reactions leading to treatment suspension are critical clinical problems that need to be solved. Because antiangiogenic drugs act on nonmalignant endothelial cells, the genetic background of the patient may play a crucial role determining the efficacy of these drugs. This article focuses on the identification of polymorphisms associated with antiangiogenic drugs outcome in RCC patients. It reviews and summarizes our current knowledge on this area and discusses future strategies to identify new biomarkers that could be used to personalize RCC management.

[Surgical treatment for renal cancer metastases]

Complete removal of metastatic lesions can contribute to improve clinical prognosis of renal cancer. Nowadays, it is accepted that surgical extirpation of solitary metastases for patients with renal cancer is the only potential for long-term survival. Provided that the metastases could be technical and functionally resected. This review addresses the current evidence about resecable renal cancer metastases at lung, liver, bone, kidney and other organs. The criteria to consider a patient as candidate for resection of metastases are: control of primary tumor, surgical extirpation feasibility and lack of systemic disease. In patients with synchronous metastases, the surgical extirpation should be performed at the same time than nephrectomy. The clinical prognosis is worse when metastases are asynchronous. After the introduction of novel anti-angiogenic agents, surgery is also justified in patients with good responses. Although, this approach remains in the field of investigation.

Update on the medical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

CONTEXT

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has long been treated only by immunotherapy with good results only in a small population of patients. In recent years, major improvements in treatment possibilities have occurred with the advent of anti-angiogenic drugs. In the past 2 yr, pivotal phase III trials have confirmed this major breakthrough by increasing the progression-free survival rates and/or overall survival rates provided by sunitinib, sorafenib, and bevacizumab, and more recently by the mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus.

OBJECTIVE

To update the previous review on smart drugs published in the European Journal in 2006 (Patard JJ, et al. Understanding the importance of smart drugs in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2006; 49:633-43).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Critical review of published literature 2006-2008 (Pubmed website search words: renal cell carcinoma and/or targeted therapy and prospective trials) and more recent meeting abstracts (American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007). Quality assessment included prospective phase I-III trials and critical evaluations with low numbers of patients, retrospective analyses, and slide presentations of meeting abstracts.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

This review presents the current situation and provides more recent data on sequential treatment, the association of targeted drugs, and the treatment of non-clear-cell histologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of mRCC with targeted therapy centers on at least two major pathways: angiogenesis and mTOR involving inhibiting drugs that may be used alone, in combination, or sequentially.

PET Scans for Decision-Making in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Institution Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic decision-making in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) is based on conventional radiological evaluation. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans may modify this strategy.

METHODS

Patients with MRCC for whom a therapeutic decision had been made underwent an FDG-PET scan in order to complete the standard radiological evaluation.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients and 26 FDG-PET scans were eligible. In 18 patients, metastatic disease was evaluable on the computed tomography (CT) scan; the FDG-PET scan was positive in 16 patients and negative in 10. In 2 patients, the FDG-PET scan was positive while they were considered disease free on radiological evaluation. In 5 patients (20.8%), the previous therapeutic decision was changed. Thirteen patients had a pathological evaluation for 19 sites. One patient out of 13 had a false-positive FDG-PET scan, while 4 sites out of 6 were false-negative. The sensitivity was 75% (95% CI: 47.6-92.7) and the predictive positive value was 92.3% (95% CI: 64-99.8). With a median follow-up of 24 months, 3 patients developed new metastatic sites.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that, when positive, an FDG-PET scan may modify the decision made; when negative, it should not modify decision-making especially for surgery, owing to its sensitivity.

Interferon alpha for the treatment of advanced renal cancer

This paper is an overview on the place of IFN-alpha in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC). After a presentation of MRCC and the mode of action of IFN-alpha, the results of studies including IFN-alpha alone or in combination with IL-2, chemotherapy and other biological modifiers are presented. Finally, new trends for new drugs, including antiangiogenic therapies, are discussed.

Identification of human renal cell carcinoma associated genes by suppression subtractive hybridization

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are frequently chemo- and radiation resistant. Thus, there is a need for identifying biological features of these cells that could serve as alternative therapeutic targets. We performed suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) on patient-matched normal renal and RCC tissue to identify variably regulated genes. 11 genes were strongly up-regulated or selectively expressed in more than one RCC tissue or cell line. Screening of filters containing cancer-related cDNAs confirmed overexpression of 3 of these genes and 3 additional genes were identified. These 14 differentially expressed genes, only 6 of which have previously been associated with RCC, are related to tumour growth/survival (EGFR, cyclin D1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 and a MLRQ sub-unit homologue of the NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase complex), angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor, endothelial PAS domain protein-1, ceruloplasmin, angiopoietin-related protein 2) and cell adhesion/motility (protocadherin 2, cadherin 6, autotaxin, vimentin, lysyl oxidase and semaphorin G). Since some of these genes were overexpressed in 80-90% of RCC tissues, it is important to evaluate their suitability as therapeutic targets.

T-helper cell-response to MHC class II-binding peptides of the renal cell carcinoma-associated antigen RAGE-1

Recently, epitope prediction software for HLA-DR binding sequences has become available. In view of the importance of T helper (Th) cell activation in immunotherapy of cancer and evidences supporting immunogenicity of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we have tested 4 peptides of RAGE-1 binding promiscuously to HLA-DR molecules for induction of an immune response. The peptides predicted by the TEPITOPE program using a stringent threshold were derived from the open reading frame 2 and 5 of RAGE-1. Induction of response was evaluated by culturing peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in the presence of peptide-loaded dendritic cells (DC) to determine proliferative activity and cytokine expression. Two out of 5 donors did not respond to any of the 4 peptides, 2 donors responded to one peptide and one donor responded to two other peptides. Notably, as revealed by blocking studies and T cell subtype definition, peptides bound to MHC class II molecules and peptide pulsed DC exclusively activated CD4+ T cells, which were of the Th1 subtype. With respect to clinical application it is important that (un)responsiveness of individual donors' PBMC was a very consistent feature. Though we have not tested explicitly whether these peptides correspond to naturally processed peptides, the possibility to define those patients whose Th might respond to in silico predicted peptides of RAGE-1, by an in vitro assay, could well be a helpful step towards setting up a RAGE-1 based immunotherapeutic protocol.

Early depressive symptoms in cancer patients receiving interleukin 2 and/or interferon alfa-2b therapy

PURPOSE

Depressive symptomatology is frequently associated with interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon alfa-2b (INFalpha-2b) therapy in cancer patients. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the depressive and anxiety symptoms induced by IL-2 and/or INFalpha-2b in cancer patients during the first days of cytokine immunotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 48 patients with renal cell carcinoma or melanoma. Patients were treated either with subcutaneous IL-2, alone (n = 20) or in combination with INFalpha-2b (n = 6); or with INFalpha-2b alone, administered subcutaneously at a low dose (n = 8) or intravenously at a high dose (n = 14). Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the Covi scale. Evaluations were performed just before initiation of treatment (day 1) and on days 3 and 5 of treatment.

RESULTS

Patients treated with IL-2 alone or in association with INFalpha-2b had significantly higher MADRS scores after 5 days of cytokine therapy, and patients who received both cytokines had increased scores on day 3. In contrast, patients treated with INFalpha-2b alone did not have varying MADRS scores during the course of treatment. Cytokine therapy had no effect on anxiety, except in patients treated with IL-2 in combination with INFalpha-2b. In these patients, the enhancement in anxiety scores that was observed on day 5 was mainly attributable to increased somatic complaints.

CONCLUSION

IL-2 and INFalpha-2b have differential effects on mood, and IL-2 therapy induces depressive symptoms early in treatment.