Electroencephalography as a Localizing Tool

Interictal attenuation in pediatric electrocorticography can be reliably detected by EEG readers

Intraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG) helps to demarcate epileptogenic cortex, but a commonly observed feature, interictal attenuation, has received little attention. This may limit its use in the determination of the resection margin. In order to test how reliably EEGers can discern attenuation, we assessed how well EEGers agree with each other and with an objective, quantified measure of attenuation. ECoG segments (n=34) were evaluated for attenuation by two EEGers independently and in consensus, and by an amplitude spectral analysis-based quantitative method. A third EEGer divided the 34 ECoG segments into 3 subgroups-physiologic field present, physiologic field uncertain, and physiologic field absent-based on the clustering patterns of the attenuated electrodes. Inter-rater agreement between two independent EEGers (kappa=0.56) was moderate, and between consensus EEGers and the quantitative method (kappa=0.71) was substantial. These agreements were especially good among the physiologic field present subgroup where the attenuation clearly involved contiguous electrodes, and thus, more likely pathologic (kappa=0.64 for two independent EEGers and kappa=0.78 for consensus EEGers and quantitative method). Our results suggest that interictal attenuation, especially when involving contiguous electrodes, is an ECoG marker that can be consistently and reliably discerned by trained EEGers.

Intracranial EEG seizure-offset termination patterns: relation to outcome of epilepsy surgery in temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE

Studies using stereo-EEG (SEEG) and electrocorticography (ECoG) should not only identify a patient's epileptogenic zone, but also should provide prognostic information for surgical outcome. In this respect, seizure-offset patterns have so far been the subject of only one study, in which they were shown to be associated with poor outcome when recorded over cortical areas outside the temporal lobe of seizure onset. To clarify whether seizure-offset patterns are reliable in predicting seizure outcome, we studied SEEG/ECoG in a similar group of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

METHODS

SEEG/ECoG records of 44 patients with refractory TLE were analyzed. The areas of seizure termination were classified as ipsilateral or contralateral (mesial and/or lateral) temporal, (temporal and) frontal, and diffuse/bilateral. Patients were classified with respect to seizure outcome as either seizure-free (UCLA class 1a) or not seizure free (UCLA class 2-4); both groups were correlated with specific seizure-offset categories using Fisher's exact probability test and analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients, the majority (n = 36) had at least part of their seizure offsets in the ipsilateral temporal lobe, whereas 8 patients manifested no seizure offsets in this lobe. Only 9 patients (20%) showed exclusive offsets in the ipsilateral temporal lobe. No statistically significant difference was evident between patients with all seizure offsets in the ipsilateral temporal lobe and those with offsets elsewhere. Similarly, no statistically significant difference was evident between patients with a diffuse seizure offset and those with seizure offsets of a different category.

CONCLUSIONS

Seizure-offset patterns in SEEG/ECoG are unreliable in predicting seizure outcome after resective activity surgery for TLE.