Iatrogenic Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Microfibrillar collagen hemostat-induced necrotizing granulomatous inflammation developing after craniotomy: a pediatric case series

OBJECT

Microfibrillar collagen hemostat (MCH; trade name Avitene) is a partially water-insoluble acid salt of purified bovine corium collagen. This agent has been widely used to control hemorrhage at surgery, and especially during pediatric neurosurgeries at the authors' institution. Despite its effectiveness, rare case reports detailing adverse inflammatory reactions to MCH have been documented. Based primarily on MR imaging, postoperative reactions have most commonly elicited clinical differential diagnoses of tumor recurrence or abscess. According to the literature, MCH induces a very characteristic mixed inflammatory response that is rich in eosinophils; in light of these observations, many authors have suggested an allergy-based pathogenesis.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed 3 pediatric neurosurgical cases treated at their institution, wherein a common histomorphological inflammatory reaction to MCH was elicited at the site of prior craniotomy.

RESULTS

Case 1 is that of a 10-year-old girl whose diagnosis was a right temporal lobe ganglioglioma, classified as WHO Grade I. Case 2 is that of a 9-year-old boy whose diagnosis was a left parietal lobe anaplastic ependymoma, classified as WHO Grade III. Finally, Case 3 is that of a 15-year-old girl whose diagnosis was focal cortical dysplasia Type IIA affecting the left occipital lobe. Each patient presented with new or recurrent seizures 5–6 weeks after the initial resection. The postsurgical reactions incited by MCH mimicked the radiological appearance of either an abscess (Cases 2 and 3) or recurrent tumor (Case 1). Histologically, the mixed inflammatory infiltrate was typified by the presence of MCH-centric necrotizing granulomas that were surrounded by a palisade of macrophages and often several eosinophils.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings are in keeping with previous case reports describing the clinicopathological features of adverse reactions occurring due to MCH. Based on the authors' observations, the possibility of an idiopathic inflammatory reaction to MCH should be considered when either seizures, a typical radiological appearance (that is, consistent with tumor recurrence or abscess formation), or both arise shortly after initial surgery. A conservative treatment approach to this type of inflammatory lesion appears to be the most appropriate management strategy.

Stroke in the postoperative period

Stroke in the postoperative period requires a certain level of sophistication in dealing not only with the patient, but also with the family and significant others. The consultant who is called in to assess the patient must deal with the delicate matter of addressing a presumably unforeseen complication; this often requires political deftness when the surgeon is reluctant to acknowledge that anything possibly could go awry. It is the ultimate hope of all involved that the patient will have a speedy and full recovery. It is important for the patient to be evaluated properly and thoroughly in an effort to prevent a minor, reversible deficit from becoming a major, irreversible neurologic disability. Family members should have all findings and the implications of such findings thoroughly explained to them. Efforts to minimize the potential ramifications of a postoperative stroke generally are not well received and can lead to questions about the integrity of the surgical team as well as the quality of care.