Complications of temporomandibular joint surgery

"Does the Exploration of the Temporomandibular Joint Using a Deep Subfascial Technique Result in a Superior Operative Outcome?"

PURPOSE

The literature is replete with various approaches for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), each with its own distinct advantages and disadvantages. None of these approaches, however, have been associated with superior operative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to measure the efficacy of three operative approaches to TMJ, namely superficial, subfascial, and deep subfascial approaches. The aim was to contrast selected intraoperative and postoperative outcomes among these surgical approaches.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized clinical trial of subjects presenting to outpatient department. The primary predictor variables were three dissection planes of TMJ: Group-I (superficial), Group-II (subfascial), and Group-III (deep subfascial). The primary outcome variables were quality of surgical field employing fromme scale, dissection time in minutes, amount of blood loss in milliliters, and facial nerve function (FNF) using House-Brackmann scale. The secondary outcome variables were postoperative pain using visual-analog scale and swelling in millimeters measured on 1st, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days and quality of life using facial clinimetric evaluation questionnaire at 6-month follow-up. Age, gender, side, diagnosis, and type of surgery were the covariates. The data were analyzed using descriptive, comparative, and regression analysis. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULT

The study included thirty subjects (8 males and 22 females) with various TMJ disorders ranging in age from 8 years to 65 years (mean 27.83 ± 10.52). On evaluation of intraoperative parameters, subfascial approach had statistically significant superior quality of surgical field (Group-I: 1.90 ± 0.57; Group-II: 1.10 ± 0.32; Group-III: 1.40 ± 0.52; P value = .006), statistically significant shortest dissection time (Group-I: 18.30 ± 3.74 min; Group-II: 13.240 ± 1.96 min; Group-III: 16.20 ± 1.99 min; with P value = .03), and statistically significant lower amount of blood loss compared with other groups (Group-I: 92.40 ± 4.74 ml: Group-II: 82.30 ± 3.77 ml; Group-III: 84.60 ± 3.06 ml; P value<.001). On assessment of postoperative parameters, only FNF of temporal branch showed statistically significant difference from 24 hours till 3 months with better outcome in deep subfascial approach. Mean scores of FNF at 24 hours and 1-week (Group-I: 4.20 ± 2.39; Group-II: 2.40 ± 2.27; Group-III: 1.50 ± 1.58 P = .02) and 1-month and 3-month (Group-I: 2.70 ± 1.82; Group-II: 1.20 ± 0.63; Group-III: 1.00 ± 0.00 P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

The subfascial approach significantly improved intraoperative outcomes and deep subfascial approach was comparatively safe with fewer incidence of facial nerve injury.

Effect of two fascial incision options for access to the temporomandibular joint on facial nerve function: objective investigation

This study was performed to compare the effects on facial nerve (FN) function of the deep supra-temporalis muscle subfascial approach (DSFA) and traditional fascial approach (TFA) for access to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), via qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Thirty patients requiring open TMJ surgery were randomly allocated to one of two groups: group A patients underwent the DSFA approach, while group B patients underwent the TFA approach. The TMJ was accessed via modified endaural incision with temporal extension. Clinical examinations, FN conduction tests, and electromyography (EMG) of the frontalis and orbicularis oculi muscles were used to assess FN function. A FN function deficit was noted in 50% of the whole sample population immediately after surgery, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.082). Overall, 37.5% of the total study population experienced temporary loss of frontalis muscle activity, while zygomatic nerve injury was seen only in 25% of group A. Within 2-6 months, normal function returned in both groups. Nerve conduction studies showed no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of nerve amplitude or latency after surgery. However, EMG of orbicularis oculi activity showed a significant difference between the groups after 6 months (P = 0.010). The results suggest that the traditional dissection approach is more protective of the FN, especially the zygomatic branch, than the deeper dissection technique.

Proximity of the maxillary artery to the neck of the mandibular condyle: anatomical study

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the anatomical distance of the maxillary artery, the most superior portion of the condyle and subcondyle in standardized coronal sections, acquired from 16 hemifaces in 8 cadavers.

METHODS

Measurements were taken to evaluate the distance between the uppermost portion of the mandibular condyle and the height of the maxillary artery (AB) and between the lateral (CD) and medial (EF) sides of the condylar neck to the artery.

RESULTS

The mean for AB was 21.1 mm hemiface right and 22.9 mm left on the anterior face, 22.5 mm and 20.7 mm, respectively, on the rear face. The CD measurement presented 6.7 mm right side in the anterior face and 6.3 mm left, and the posterior face was 6.3 mm right side and 5.4 mm left; EF presented a mean of 2.2 mm right and 1.5 mm left on the anterior face and 1.6 mm for both sides on the posterior face.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistically significant difference between hemifaces. The proximity of the maxillary artery to the medial face of the neck of the mandibular condyle is millimetric and presents risks of severe hemorrhage for interventions in the infratemporal fossa.

Reoperative temporomandibular joint surgery

TMJ surgeries are not always successful. Many potential pitfalls can occur during any phase of the treatment and can lead to complications, less than desirable results, and short- or long-term failures. Unsatisfactory results can occur for multiple reasons, including misdiagnosis of the original pathologic condition, incorrect selection of surgical technique, technical failures, complications, systemic disease, and unrealistic expectations. This article focuses on the reoperation of the TMJ primarily in cases of internal derangement and discusses TMJ arthrocentesis, arthroscopy, modified condylotomy, and open joint procedures.