Open Versus Closed Reduction of Mandible Fractures

Can Fracture Reduction be Attempted Through a 3D-Printed Guide Template Without Maxillomandibular Fixation?

BACKGROUND

Computer-aided design and manufacturing is widely used in clinical practice. This technology may change existing methods for mandibular fracture management.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in-vitro study was to determine if the reduction for mandibular symphysis fracture is performed without maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) using 3-dimensional (3D)-printed template.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE

This was an in-vitro study and had the character of a proof-of-concept study. The study was planned using the existing 20 pairs of intraoral scan and computed tomography data. The mandibular model STL file was created by merging the STL file obtained for the bimaxillary dentitions with the computed tomography DICOM file, and this was set as the original model. In the original model, STL file of fracture model of mandibular symphysis was created using computer-aided design. A template similar to a wafer or an implant guide was manufactured from restoring the own occlusion, and the mandibular fracture model was reduced and fixed using the 3D-printed template and wire, and this was set as the experimental group. The 3D coordinate system error was measured at 6 landmarks and statistically compared using scan data between models of the groups.

PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLES

Reduction techniques with MMF or without MMF using guide template for mandibular fracture model.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S)

The 3D coordinate system error (mm).

COVARIATES

The position of landmarks.

ANALYSES

The Mann-Whitney U test, student's t-test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to analyze the coordinate errors between the landmarks. A P value of < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The 3D error value of the control and experimental group were 1.06 ± 0.63 mm (range: 0.11 to 2.92 mm) and 0.96 ± 0.48 mm (range: 0.2 to 2.95 mm), respectively. There was no statistical difference between the control and experimental group. There was a statistically significant difference in the lower 2 and lower 3 landmarks compared to the upper 1 (P = .001 and .000, respectively) before and after the reduction in the experimental group.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates that the reduction using a 3D-printed guide template for the mandibular symphysis fracture could be possible even without the MMF.

In Vitro Evaluation of the Effects of Different Fixation Methods on Stabilization of Mandibular Body Fractures

PURPOSE

Mandibular body fractures are considered to be one of the most affected fracture sites in the maxillofacial region. Although the rates of fracture in this region are high, biomechanical evaluations related to this region are rare. The purpose of this investigation was to reveal the effects of different treatment methods onmandibular body fractures.

METHOD

Twenty-five synthetic polyurethane hemi-mandibles were used in this study. The hemi-mandibles, which simulated simple unfavorable mandibular body fractures, were divided into 5 groups (n = 5/group) according to the treatment method. The bone segments were fixed using different osteosynthesis methods and 2.0 mm miniplate/screw systems. The groups consisted of locking or conventional systems, 5 or 11 mm long screws and 4 or 6 holes. The hemi-mandibles were loaded vertically with compressive strength until they reached 120 N.

RESULTS

The results were analyzed using Tamhane's T2 post hoc test, and the significance level was 0.05. Group 1 had the lowest mechanical resistance of all groups and group 5 had the highest. No significant differences were observed in group 2 or 3.

CONCLUSION

The locking system miniplate group showed better fixation stability than the conventional systems for the same screw length, and the number of holes and screw length seemed to be effective for stabilization.

Long-term outcome assessment of closed treatment of mandibular fractures

Mandibular fractures are among the most common trauma injuries of the craniomaxillofacial region. This study evaluated the late results of mandibles fractures treated with arch bar. Forty-nine patients were examined clinically and by questionnaires for late results of arch bar treatment. Demographic data (age, sex, etc), trigeminal nerve sensation (Weber test), temporomandibular joint evaluation, masticatory muscle function, and occlusion were recorded. The data were analyzed by χ test using Sigma Stat 2.0 software. Fifty-one percent of the patients with angular fractures complained of sensory disturbances. Condylar and angular fractures demonstrated higher levels of pain. According to Pearson χ test, a statistically significant relation between angular fracture and tenderness of the internal pterygoid muscles (P = 0.047), angular fracture and cross-bite (P = 0.021), parasymphysial fracture and pain upon wind blowing (P = 0.026), and body fracture and mastication discomfort (P = 0.038) was found. In closed reduction therapy, fracture location of the mandible seems to be more likely correlated in producing particular long-term complications. Regular follow-ups for functional treatments and physiotherapy of chewing muscles and temporomandibular joint, along with removal of occlusal abnormalities, should be considered following arch bar reduction of mandibular fractures.

Closed reduction of the mandibular fracture

The search for the ideal method of treatment for mandibular fractures has continued for thousands of years. These injuries have unique and problematic features for adequate reliable wound healing. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons must learn and master several techniques for mandibular fracture treatment. The age-old successful management of these injuries using closed reduction techniques always should be considered when mandibular trauma presents. The closed reduction remains a mainstay of mandibular fracture treatment. An adequate knowledge of anatomy, multiple closed reduction techniques, and the physiology of fracture healing must be adequately understood and technically mastered by the oral and maxillofacial surgical team for the present and future of mandibular fracture management.

Fractures of the mandibular condyle: A review of 466 cases. Literature review, reflections on treatment and proposals

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of condylar fractures is high. Condylar fractures can be extracapsular (condylar neck or subcondylar) or intracapsular, undisplaced, deviated, displaced or dislocated. Treatment depends on the age of the patient, the co-existence of other mandibular or maxillary fractures, whether the condylar fracture is unilateral or bilateral, the level and displacement of the fracture, the state of dentition and the dental occlusion, and the surgeon's experience.

PURPOSE

This report presents the experience acquired in the treatment of 466 condylar fractures over 7 years, reviews the pertinent literature and proposes guidelines for treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The archives of KAT, General District Hospital between 1995 and 2002 were scrutinized and the condylar fractures were recorded. The aetiology, age, sex, level of fracture, degree of displacement, associated facial fractures, malocclusion, and type of treatment were noted.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-six condylar fractures were admitted, the male:female ratio was 3.5:1. Road traffic accidents were the main cause and most fractures were unilateral, displaced, subcondylar, occurred on the left side and were treated conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Early mobilization is the key in treating condylar fractures. Whilst rigid internal fixation provides stabilization and allows early mobilization, conservative treatment is the treatment of choice for the majority of fractures. Children and intracapsular fractures are treated conservatively with or without maxillo-mandibular fixation. Open reduction is recommended in selected cases to restore the occlusion, in severely displaced and dislocated fractures, in cases of loss of ramus height, and in edentulous patients. It may be considered in those with 'medical problems' where intermaxillary fixation is not recommended.

Mandibular condyle fractures: determinants of treatment and outcome

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to analyze the principal variables that determine the choice of the method of treatment and the outcome in condylar fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 104 mandibular condyle fractures to analyze and determine the relation between the principal clinical variables and the postoperative results. All patients underwent a clinic-radiologic investigation focusing on fracture remodeling, evolution, dental occlusion, and symmetry of the mandible. We analyzed the influence of the preoperative clinical variables (level of fracture, treatment, postoperative physical therapy, displacement and dislocation, comminution, loss of ramus height, patient age, gender, etiology, occlusion, status of dentition, and presence of facial and mandibular fractures) over the postoperative results and outcome.

RESULTS

The principal factors that determined the treatment decision were the level of the fracture and the degree of displacement. The level of the fracture influenced the degree of preoperative coronal and sagittal displacement (neck fractures had greater medial and anterior displacement than head and subcondylar fractures) and the treatment applied. The functional improvement obtained by open methods was greater than that obtained by closed treatment. Open treatment increased the incidence of postoperative condylar deformities and mandibular asymmetry.

CONCLUSION

The variables that influenced the method of treatment and predicted the prognosis are the level of fracture, degree and direction of displacement of the fractured segments, age, medical status of the patient, concomitant injuries, and status of dentition.

Fractures of mandible: is spontaneous healing possible? Why? When?

Closed and open reduction of fractures of the mandible constitutes an endless debate, and it is interesting that modern times have not brought a conclusion to this controversy. From 1995 to 1997 in the Plastic Surgery Department of Argerich Hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina, 23 patients were evaluated with different fractures of the mandible in which neither closed nor open reduction was performed. Seventeen patients (74%) presented associated fractures in different areas of the mandible and 6 (26%) only had one fracture; 2 of them (9%) were edentulous. Three (13%) of the 23 patients had more than two fractures in different areas. Condylar fractures were the only lesion in 8 patients (35%), and they were associated with body fractures in another 6 patients (26%). Spontaneous healing of the fractures occurred in all 23 patients. No complications were found in any of them. All fractures presented the following characteristics: 1) Fractured fragments were aligned without displacement (or light displacement), 2) Occlusion was normal (or pretraumatic occlusion), 3) Facial symmetry was maintained, 4) Radiography demonstrated fractures without displacement, 5) Minor edema and hematoma were present in the area of the fracture, and 6) There was only pain during masticatory movements. The treatment was as follows: 1) Soft food and liquid diet (solid food was avoided 30 days after trauma), 2) Opening of the mouth was not permitted, 3) Oral antibacterial cleaning, and 4) Analgesic therapy. Spontaneous healing was produced by secondary bone repair mechanism as a "natural" process.