Evaluation of beta-endorphin/beta-lipotropin immunoreactivity content in the CSF of patients affected by deafferentation pain syndromes

Opioids in chronic pain

The advance in our understanding of the biogenesis of various endogenous opioid peptides, their anatomical distribution, and the characteristics of the multiple receptors with which they interact open a new avenue for understanding the role of opioid peptide systems in chronic pain. The main groups of opioid peptides: enkephalins, dynorphins and beta-endorphin derive from proenkephalin, prodynorphin and proopiomelanocortin, respectively. Recently, a novel group of peptides has been discovered in the brain and named endomorphins, endomorphin-1 and -2. They are unique in comparison with other opioid peptides by atypical structure and high selectivity towards the mu-opioid receptor. Another group, which joined the endogenous opioid peptide family in the last few years is the pronociceptin system comprising the peptides derived from this prohormone, acting at ORL1 receptors. Three members of the opioid receptor family were cloned in the early 1990s, beginning with the mouse delta-opioid receptor (DOR1) and followed by cloning of mu-opioid receptor (MOR1) and kappa-opioid receptor (KOR1). These three receptors belong to the family of seven transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors, and share extensive structural homologies. These opioid receptor and peptide systems are significantly implicated in antinociceptive processes. They were found to be represented in the regions involved in nociception and pain. The effects of opioids in animal models of inflammatory pain have been studied in great detail. Inflammation in the periphery influences the central sites and changes the opioid action. Inflammation increased spinal potency of various opioid receptor agonists. In general, the antinociceptive potency of opioids is greater against various noxious stimuli in animals with peripheral inflammation than in control animals. Inflammation-induced enhancement of opioid antinociceptive potency is characteristic predominantly for mu opioid receptors, since morphine elicits a greater increase in spinal potency of mu- than of delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists. Enhancement of the potency of mu-opioid receptor agonists during inflammation could arise from the changes occurring in opioid receptors, predominantly in affinity or number of the mu-opioid receptors. Inflammation has been shown to alter the expression of several genes in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Several studies have demonstrated profound alterations in the spinal PDYN system when there is peripheral inflammation or chronic arthritis. Endogenous dynorphin biosynthesis also increases under various conditions associated with neuropathic pain following damage to the spinal cord and injury of peripheral nerves. Interestingly, morphine lacks potent analgesic efficacy in neuropathic pain. A vast body of clinical evidence suggests that neuropathic pain is not opioid-resistant but only that reduced sensitivity to systemic opioids is observed in this condition, and an increase in their dose is necessary in order to obtain adequate analgesia. Reduction of morphine antinociceptive potency was postulated to be due to the fact that nerve injury reduced the activity of spinal opioid receptors or opioid signal transduction. Our recent study with endogenous ligands of the mu-opioid receptor, endomorphins, further complicates the issue, since endomorphins appear to be effective in neuropathic pain. Identification of the involved differences may be of importance to the understanding of the molecular mechanism of opioid action in neuropathic pain, as well as to the development of better and more effective drugs for the treatment of neuropathic pain in humans.

Theoretical review: altered pain regulatory systems in chronic pain

This review synthesizes the existing literature regarding the relationship between resting blood pressure and pain sensitivity, and the literature indicating possible endogenous opioid dysfunction in chronic pain. Adaptive interactions between the cardiovascular and pain regulatory systems occur in healthy individuals, with greater blood pressure associated with decreased acute pain sensitivity. Endogenous opioids appear necessary for full expression of this relationship. There is ample evidence indicating diminished endogenous opioid CSF/plasma levels in chronic pain patients, yet little is known about the functional effects of these opioid changes. A theoretical model is proposed based upon the literature reviewed suggesting progressive dysfunction in endogenous opioid systems with increasing chronic pain duration. This dysfunction is hypothesized to result in dysregulation of normally adaptive relationships between the cardiovascular and pain regulatory systems, resulting in increased chronic pain intensity and increased acute pain sensitivity among chronic pain patients. Preliminary data are consistent with the hypothesis of progressive opioid changes resulting in dysfunctional alterations in the adaptive blood pressure-pain relationship. Clinical implications of this theory are discussed.

Beta-endorphin in the brain. A role in nociception

We have known the endogenous opioid peptide beta-endorphin for 20 years. Surprisingly, our knowledge of the physiological role of this peptide and its receptors in modulation of pain perception is still fragmentary. Whereas most studies have tried to elucidate the physiological role of beta-endorphin by reversing evoked responses by the opioid antagonist naloxone, this review focuses on quantification of release of beta-endorphin in the brain as the approach to define physiological and pathophysiological roles of beta-endorphin in relation to nociception. Using a lateral ventricle-cisterna magna perfusion model in the anesthetized rat, it was shown that depolarization of neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, where beta-endorphin in produced, was followed by release of beta-endorphin to the cerebrospinal fluid compartment. Intense activation of spinal nociceptive pathways by intrathecal capsaicin injections also led to beta-endorphin release. It is concluded that there may still be good reason to quantify beta-endorphin in human cerebrospinal fluid to elucidate the role of beta-endorphin in pain perception.

Cerebrospinal fluid beta-endorphin in models of hyperalgesia in the rat

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) obtained by acute percutaneous puncture of the cisternal membrane of the halothane anesthetized rat has low but measurable concentrations of beta-endorphin-like immunoreactivity (beta-EPir: 32.8 +/- 3.0 pmol/l). Chromatographic separation of beta-EPir showed that authentic beta-endorphin1-31 was the main component of beta-EPir in cisternal CSF. Subcutaneous injection of 5% formalin in the hind paws did not increase beta-EPir in cisternal CSF. Rats with tactile paw hyperalgesia evoked by unilateral ligation of the L5/6 nerve roots 2 weeks earlier had beta-EPir concentrations that did not differ from sham operated or unoperated control animals. In contrast, capsaicin injected in the hindpaws increased the mean beta-EPir concentration compared to saline injections (P = 0.006) 45 min after emerging from anesthesia following injection. These results show that acute activation of C fibers (by capsaicin) will evoke the release of beta-endorphin into the CSF, suggesting activation of the beta-endorphin terminal systems in the brain/midbrain. The failure of formalin injections to release beta-EPir to CSF may be due to specificity of the afferent stimulus evoking beta-EPir release, a lower stimulus intensity, and/or the duration of the stimulus generated by formalin. The normal concentrations of beta-EPir found in the hyperalgesic state following nerve injury suggest that the supraspinal beta-endorphin system does not display tonic changes under such conditions.

Release into ventriculo-cisternal perfusate of beta-endorphin- and Met-enkephalin-immunoreactivity: effects of electrical stimulation in the arcuate nucleus and periaqueductal gray of the rat

To examine the resting and evoked release of the endogenous opioid peptides beta-endorphin and Met-enkephalin from brain, we examined the levels of the respective immunoreactivities in the lateral ventricle-cisterna magna perfusate of the halothane-anesthetized rat. Ten Hz but not 100 Hz stimulation in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) of the hypothalamus released beta-endorphin immunoreactivity (beta-EPir) to the perfusate, whereas 100 Hz but not 10 Hz stimulation in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) of the mid brain released Met-enkephalin immunoreactivity (MEir). MEir was not released by stimulation in ARC and beta-EPir was not released by stimulation in PAG. Characterization of the released beta-EPir and MEir by high performance liquid chromatography showed that authentic beta-endorphin and Met-enkephalin were the major constituents of beta-EPir and MEir, respectively. Systemic administration of the dopaminergic antagonist haloperidol increased plasma, but not perfusate levels of beta-EPir. Both the opioid antagonist naloxone and the NMDA antagonist MK-801 failed to affect beta-EPir or MEir release. ARC and PAG stimulated inhibited a nociceptive reflex (tail-dip in 52.5 degrees C water), and naloxone did not reliably reverse this inhibition. These data support the previously suggested possibility of opioid mediation of stimulation induced analgesia, although we were unable to confirm the theory by naloxone reversibility in this study. Furthermore, the data support the assumption that measurement of opioid peptides in cerebrospinal fluid is a relevant approach in research aimed at elucidating the physiological and pathophysiological roles of endogenous opioid peptides.

Release of beta-endorphin and methionine-enkephalin into cerebrospinal fluid during deep brain stimulation for chronic pain. Effects of stimulation locus and site of sampling

The authors systematically studied the release of the endogenous opioid peptides beta-endorphin and methionine (met)-enkephalin into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during deep brain stimulation in patients suffering from otherwise intractable chronic pain. Nine patients were included in the study; six had stimulation electrodes placed in both the periventricular gray matter (PVG) and the thalamic nucleus ventralis posterolateralis (VLP) and three in the PVG only. Immunoreactivity of beta-endorphin and met-enkephalin (beta-EPir and MEir, respectively) was measured by radioimmunoassays in ventricular and lumbar CSF samples obtained before, during, and after stimulation. Prestimulation concentrations of beta-EPir and MEir were lower in ventricular than in lumbar CSF (6.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 13.7 +/- 1.0 pmol/liter, p = 0.0001, for beta-EPir; 33.6 +/- 5.1 vs. 48.3 +/- 3.2 pmol/liter, p < 0.05, for MEir). Ventricular CSF concentrations of both beta-EPir and MEir increased significantly during PVG stimulation, whereas VPL stimulation was without effect. No changes were seen in lumbar CSF levels of the peptides during stimulation in either site. A significant inverse relationship was found between the "during:before stimulation" ratios of visual analog scale ratings and beta-EPir levels during PVG stimulation. The beta-EPir and MEir concentration during:before stimulation ratios were positively correlated, whereas no correlation was present in prestimulation samples from ventricular or lumbar CSF. High-performance liquid chromatography of ventricular CSF pools obtained during PVG stimulation revealed that major portions of beta-EPir and MEir eluted as synthetic beta-endorphin and met-enkephalin, respectively, thus documenting the release of beta-endorphin and met-enkephalin into ventricular CSF during PVG stimulation. The finding of a direct relationship between beta-EPir release and pain alleviation may suggest a role for beta-endorphin in the analgesic mechanism of PVG stimulation.

CSF neuropeptides in cancer pain: effects of spinal opioid therapy

The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of the opioid peptides met-enkephalin (ME), beta-endorphin (BE) and dynorphin (DYN) as well as the putative sensory neuropeptides substance P (SP), somatostatin (SOM), calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) were determined in 10 patients with severe nociceptive pain due to malignancy, before and after initiation of spinal opioid therapy, and in 10 control patients. Pain intensity, evaluated by means of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), was reduced from 39 +/- 9 to 18 +/- 10 for continuous pain and from 70 +/- 10 to 10 +/- 8 for intermittent pain (means +/- s.e.mean). Lumbar CSF immunoreactive ME and DYN concentrations were significantly increased (P = 0.05) and BE and VIP were significantly decreased (P < or = 0.05) in the pain patients. A slight, but non-significant (P = 0.06) decrease in SP-like immunoreactivity was found after initiation of spinal opioid therapy. Visceral pain seemed to be associated with low immunoreactive SP and ME concentrations compared to somatic pain. A highly significant correlation was found between SP and ME (P < 0.001) and to a lesser extent also between other peptides. We conclude that the concentrations of the endogenous opioids were more affected by nociceptive pain states than the non-opioid peptides. The origin of pain may also influence the results. The postulated inhibition of peptide release by spinal opioid application seemed to be present for SP, but could otherwise not be confirmed.

Effects of dorsal root entry zone lesions on CSF and plasma neuropeptides and catecholamines

Effects of dorsal root entry zone lesions (DREZLs) on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma concentrations of neuropeptides, catecholamines, and cyclic nucleotides were studied in 9 patients with intractable chronic pain. Contents of beta-endorphin-like-material in CSF decreased in all patients 12-17 days following DREZLs during which complete to good pain relief was achieved. Contents of beta-endorphin-like-material in CSF increased again about one month after DREZLs in two and remained unchanged in one of three patients tested, who complained of partial reappearance of pain. Contents of beta-endorphin-like-materials in plasma showed no significant changes after DREZLs. Substance P, noradrenaline, adrenaline, and cyclic nucleotide levels in both CSF and plasma were variable among the subjects and did not change significantly following the operations. Thus, the results suggest that production of beta-endorphin-like-material in the central nervous system is decreased by DREZL, though the increase in its turn-over might not be neglected. The mechanisms of the decrease in contents of beta-endorphin-like-material in CSF after DREZLs were discussed in terms of our current knowledge of pain and pain inhibitory systems.