Bioelectromagnetic Applications for Multiple Sclerosis

Extremely Low-Frequency Pulsed Magnetic Fields and Multiple Sclerosis: Effects on Neurotransmission Alone or Also on Immunomodulation? Building a Working Hypothesis

This paper outlines the current state of knowledge on the pathology and treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) and critically analyses the vast clinical experience of Sandyk in the use of pulsed magnetic fields of 5 Hz at 7.5 pT to treat many symptoms of MS. A complete regression of symptoms, or at least a major improvement, is sometimes so rapid as to suggest that ELF fields exert a greater effect on axonal and synaptic neurotransmission than on the processes leading to demyelination. Pulsed magnetic fields of 50–100 Hz and a few mT (whose flux intensity is 109 times greater than that of the fields used by Sandyk) have been seen to induce profound morphological changes (the Marinozzi effect) in the plasma membrane of several cell types, including Raji human lymphoblastoid cells. These observations underlie the author's hypothesis on the possible use of such fields in the treatment of MS. Indeed, these fields should induce the functional arrest of the cells (B- and T-lymphocytes, macrophages, microglia, dendritic cells) of the MS plaque, thereby providing an ‘electromagnetic immunomodulatory boost’ to the effects of drug therapy. To test this working hypothesis, it is suggested that preliminary experimental research be carried out to ascertain: 1) the Marinozzi effect in vivo; 2) the Marinozzi effect on microglia and dendritic cells; and 3) the duration of the membrane changes and their relaxation rate. ELF magnetic fields in the picotesla and millitesla ranges are aimed at improving neurotransmission and correcting local immune pathology, respectively. Both types of field might find application in the treatment of MS patients who no longer respond to or tolerate currently used drugs.

Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation modulates autoimmunity and immune responses: a possible immuno-modulatory therapeutic effect in neurodegenerative diseases

Increasing evidence shows that extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) stimulation is able to exert a certain action on autoimmunity and immune cells. In the past, the efficacy of pulsed ELF-EMFs in alleviating the symptoms and the progression of multiple sclerosis has been supported through their action on neurotransmission and on the autoimmune mechanisms responsible for demyelination. Regarding the immune system, ELF-EMF exposure contributes to a general activation of macrophages, resulting in changes of autoimmunity and several immunological reactions, such as increased reactive oxygen species-formation, enhanced phagocytic activity and increased production of chemokines. Transcranial electromagnetic brain stimulation is a non-invasive novel technique used recently to treat different neurodegenerative disorders, in particular Alzheimer's disease. Despite its proven value, the mechanisms through which EMF brain-stimulation exerts its beneficial action on neuronal function remains unclear. Recent studies have shown that its beneficial effects may be due to a neuroprotective effect on oxidative cell damage. On the basis of in vitro and clinical studies on brain activity, modulation by ELF-EMFs could possibly counteract the aberrant pro-inflammatory responses present in neurodegenerative disorders reducing their severity and their onset. The objective of this review is to provide a systematic overview of the published literature on EMFs and outline the most promising effects of ELF-EMFs in developing treatments of neurodegenerative disorders. In this regard, we review data supporting the role of ELF-EMF in generating immune-modulatory responses, neuromodulation, and potential neuroprotective benefits. Nonetheless, we reckon that the underlying mechanisms of interaction between EMF and the immune system are still to be completely understood and need further studies at a molecular level.

Neuronal outgrowth of PC-12 cells after combined treatment with nerve growth factor and a magnetic field: Influence of the induced electric field strength

In view of possible therapeutic applications of magnetic fields, the effect of an enhancement of neuronal outgrowth at higher figures of flux density and induced field strength was investigated. On the average sinusoidal magnetic field treatment at 100 microTrms/50 Hz did not change nerve growth factor (NGF) induced neurite outgrowth to a statistically significant extent. These results suggest that further increasing the induced field strength by using either higher flux densities and/or more sophisticated wave forms might be necessary to cause the neuronal response of PC-12 cells, as seen in other experiments.

Exposure to pulsed magnetic fields enhances motor recovery in cats after spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Animal model study of eight healthy commercial cats was conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether pulsed electromagnetic field (PMF) stimulation results in improvement of function after contusive spinal cord injury in cats.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PMF stimulation has been shown to enhance nerve growth, regeneration, and functional recovery of peripheral nerves. Little research has been performed examining the effects of PMF stimulation on the central nervous system and no studies of PMF effects on in vivo spinal cord injury (SCI) models have been reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PMF stimulation was noninvasively applied for up to 12 weeks to the midthoracic spine of cats with acute contusive spinal cord injury. The injury was produced using a weight-drop apparatus. Motor functions were evaluated with the modified Tarlov assessment scale. Morphologic analyses of the injury sites and somatosensory-evoked potential measurements were conducted to compare results between PMF-stimulated and control groups.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in locomotor recovery between the PMF-stimulated and control groups. Although not statistically significant, PMF-stimulated spinal cords demonstrated greater sparing of peripheral white matter and smaller lesion volumes compared to controls. Somatosensory-evoked potential measurements indicated that the PMF-stimulated group had better recovery of preinjury waveforms than the control group; however, this observation also was not statistically significant because of the small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study indicates that pulsed magnetic fields may have beneficial effects on motor function recovery and lesion volume size after acute spinal cord injury.