Complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

No infections in 1300 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with vancomycin pre-soaking of hamstring grafts

PURPOSE

To investigate the pre-soaking of hamstring grafts in topical vancomycin, in addition to IV prophylaxis, during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to reduce the incidence of post-operative infection, and to describe an evidence-based diagnostic and treatment algorithm to facilitate early diagnosis and appropriate management of possible knee sepsis post-operatively after ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

This study is a controlled observational series comprising of 1585 individuals who underwent ACL reconstruction over a 13-year period. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon at the same hospital. Group 1 consisted of 285 patients who received pre-operative IV antibiotics without topical graft pre-soaking. Group 2 consisted of 1300 individuals who received IV antibiotics and graft pre-soaking in a vancomycin solution of 5 mg/mL.

RESULTS

In group 1, a total of four patients suffered a post-operative joint infection (1.4 %). Three out of the four were culture positive for Staphylococcus species. The fourth was culture negative but was managed as an acute infection. Group 2 suffered no post-operative infections (0 %). Statistical analysis of the vancomycin pre-soak with IV antibiotics group, compared with IV antibiotics-alone group, revealed a significantly reduced post-operative infection rate using a Fisher's exact test (P = 0.0011) and Chi-square test with Yates' correction (P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-soaking of hamstrings grafts with topical vancomycin reduced the rate of post-operative infection when compared to IV antibiotics alone. This technique should be utilised by surgeons to reduce the overall incidence of knee sepsis post-ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Reproducibility of anatomic tibial landmarks for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

We evaluated the reproducibility of landmarks used for accurate anatomic placement of the tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Landmarks evaluated were the medial tibial eminence, the posterior cruciate ligament, the "over-the-back" position, the true posterior border of the tibia, and the posterior border of the lateral meniscus. Forty-two pairs of cadaveric knees were dissected, and anatomic measurements were made regarding the anterior cruciate ligament insertion and these various landmarks. Statistical analysis was used to confirm reproducibility and significance. Measurements based on the medial tibial eminence and posterior border of the meniscus were particularly erratic. The most reproducible anatomic landmark was the posterior cruciate ligament. The anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament was consistently 6.7 mm posterior to the posterior border of the anterior cruciate ligament and 10.9 mm posterior to the central sagittal insertion point of the anterior cruciate ligament. The over-the-back position was consistently in contact with the anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament if the knee was flexed with a posterior-directed force applied. In this position, the over-the-back position was equally reproducible as compared with the posterior cruciate ligament. Measurements gauged from the true posterior border of the tibia gave a second rigid bony landmark but with a wider standard deviation than the posterior cruciate ligament-based landmarks. The relative anterior-posterior dimension of the tibia did not correlate with the relationship between the anterior cruciate ligament and other anatomic landmarks.

Why grafts fail

Significant advances in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery have been made in the past decade and, as a result, the number of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive procedures being done have increased. Unfortunately, graft failure continues to occur and has resulted in an emphasis on revision surgery. Successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is dependent on a number of factors including: patient selection, surgical technique, postoperative rehabilitation, and associated secondary restraint ligamentous instability. A particular emphasis both in scientific and clinical research has been placed on surgical technique. Errors in graft selection, tunnel placement, tensioning, or fixation methods chosen may lead to graft failure. Improper postoperative rehabilitation may lead to graft failure; however, current protocols seem to minimize its occurrence. Finally, failure to recognize or treat a significant secondary restraint instability can place excessive stress on the anterior cruciate ligament graft which may lead to failure. Care must be taken at every step of the process to ensure graft failure does not occur, because revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery results are not as predictable as primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Definitive landmarks for reproducible tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The purpose of this prospective study was to define constant anatomic intraarticular and extraarticular landmarks that can be used as definitive reference points to reproducibly create a tibial tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction that (1) results in an impingement-free graft in full extension without an intercondylar roofplasty; (2) positions the tibial tunnel's intraarticular orafice sagittally central in the original ACL insertion without visually guessing; (3) positions the tibial tunnel such that the sagittal tunnel-plateau angle is parallel with the sagittal intercondylar roof-plateau angle in full extension to minimize shear seen by the graft at the tibial tunnel inlet, and by doing so; (4) maximizes tunnel length to avoid patellar tendon graft-tunnel length mismatch allowing for endosteal interference screw fixation on both sides of the joint. Anatomic dissections in 50 knees showed the ACL sagittal central insertion point on the intercondylar floor averages 7 mm (range 7 to 8 mm) sagittally anterior to the anterior margin of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with the knee flexed 90 degrees such that the PCL may be used as a reliable reference landmark for locating the ACL sagittal central insertion. This constant relationship was found to be independent of knee size. Extraarticularly, beginning the tibial tunnel sagittally 1 cm above the superior (sartorial) border of the pes anserinus insertion and coronally 1.5 cm posteromedial from the medial margin of the tibial tubercle along the superior surface of the pes, directed toward the sagittal central ACL insertion, led to a sagittal tunnel-plateau angle that averaged 68 degrees (range 64 degrees to 72 degrees) with a corresponding tunnel length that averaged 58 mm (range 50 to 65 mm) in 23 knees. This data correlated well with data obtained clinically in a series of 50 consecutive ACL reconstructions using intraarticular PCL and extraarticular pes anserine-medial tibial tubercle referenced tibial tunnels in which postoperative full extension lateral radiographs confirmed a sagittal tunnel-plateau angle parallel or near parallel with the intercondylar roof-plateau angle in all cases averaging 68 degrees +/- 3.8 degrees. Tibial tunnel length averaged 60 mm (range 52 to 66 mm) and in no case was there a patellar tendon autograft-tunnel length mismatch.

Graft-tunnel mismatch in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a new technique of intraarticular measurement and modified graft harvesting

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of bitunnel interference fixation and accurate femoral insertion site targeting using a modified technique of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Thirty-four consecutive central-third bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft modified endoscopic ACL reconstructions were prospectively studied. A new technique was used intraoperatively to directly measure (a) intraarticular (graft) distance (IAD) and (b) patellar tendon graft length, thereby allowing calculation of optimal tibial tunnel length for each case. Accuracy of guide pin placement through this tibial tunnel into the proposed femoral insertion site was assessed, as was the ability to achieve interference fixation in both tunnels (minimum of 20 mm bone interference fixation within the tibial tunnel). A new technique for patellar tendon-bone harvesting and proximal graft fixation to address graft mismatch is described. The average IAD from tibial origin to femoral ACL insertion measured 26.3 +/- 3.0 mm (range 21-33). The average patellar tendon length (LP) was 48.4 +/- 6.0 mm (range 40-63). The average calculated tibial tunnel length (TT) necessary to achieve bitunnel fixation (TT > or = LP + 20 - IAD) was 42.1 +/- 5.3 mm (range 36-57). Establishment of the calculated tibial tunnel length was achieved in 25 cases (74%) (no graft-tunnel mismatch). Graft-tunnel mismatch, in which the tibial tunnel could not be established to the length calculated necessary to accommodate a minimum of 20 mm of bone graft, occurred in nine cases (26%). Graft-tunnel mismatch occurred more frequently in patients whose patellar lengths were > or = 50 mm (p < 0.005), but was not found to correlate specifically to IAD. Recession of the graft up into the femoral tunnel allowed accommodation of the mismatched graft (bitunnel interference screw fixation) in these nine cases, averaging 22.0 +/- 2.98 mm (range 16-29 mm) of available distal bone block fixation. Tibial tunnel fixation of > or = 20 mm was achieved in 30 patients (88%), 18 mm in two, 17 mm in one, and 16 mm in one. Measurement error resulted in inadequate distal graft accommodation in four patients in whom error averaged 3 mm. Targeting of the femoral insertion site guide pin was achieved without requiring any knee manipulation for all cases. Patellar tendon graft protrusion through the tibial tunnel and potentially suboptimal graft fixation poses a frequent problem during endoscopic ACL reconstruction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)