Partial flexor digitorum profundus lacerations

Is conservative management of partial zone II flexor tendon laceration possible? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Background: There is still no consensus on managing zone II level partial flexor tendon lacerations, and the management of zone II partial flexor tendon injuries is controversial. No reliable large cohort studies or metaanalysis papers on partial flexor tendon laceration management are available in PubMed or Embase.Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Insight, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for primary research articles investigating outcomes of patients with partial flexor tendon injuries. The initial search was limited to human studies that were published from 1970-2021 and indexed as randomized controlled or clinical trials or observational, cross-sectional, or cohort studies. We used statistical package R version 4.1.2 for this meta-analysis.Results: The Standardised mean difference (SMD) of the common effects model was 2.020 (95% CI; 1.583-2.457; P < 0.0001), indicating that the results of conservative treatment without surgical intervention are similar to surgical intervention or better in some articles. The SMD of the random effect model was 7.093 (95% CI; 1.090-13.096; P < 0.0206), indicating the same result. Higgins' I2 value was 97.6%, indicating serious heterogeneity.Conclusions: In this first meta-analysis on flexor zone II conservative treatment, five papers with publication bias were analyzed. It is meaningful to verify the result of conservative treatment statistically. Even though this is a heterogeneous paper, conservative treatment seems to have a lot of benefits for the patient, including offering a fairly solid longterm prognosis with very few complications.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Evaluations of Zone II Partial Flexor Tendon Lacerations: A Cadaveric Study

OBJECTIVES

Surgical intervention for zone II high-grade partial flexor tendon lacerations is often required when more than half of the tendon width is torn. Reliable noninvasive tests are critical for optimizing clinical decision making. Our team previously investigated the use of ultrasound (US) for identification of high-grade zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations. In this study, we compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to US for the evaluation of high-grade partial flexor tendon lacerations in cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

Dissection of 32 digits in 8 fresh-frozen upper extremity cadaveric specimens was performed. The flexor digitorum profundus tendons were randomized into 3 groups: intact, low-grade laceration, and high-grade laceration. A dynamic US examination was performed by a blinded musculoskeletal radiologist. The same specimens underwent hand coil MRI, which was read by the same blinded radiologist. Magnetic resonance imaging test performance metrics were calculated and compared to those computed for the US evaluation.

RESULTS

For US evaluation of high-grade lacerations, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.5 and 1.0, with positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) values of ∞ and 0.50, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for MRI evaluation were 0.2 and 1.0, with LR+ and LR- values of ∞ and 0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

Both US and MRI are adequate at determining the presence of a high-grade laceration. Magnetic resonance imaging was more specific than US in identification of high-grade partial flexor tendon lacerations. Although less specific, US is a reasonable and less-expensive alternative to MRI when evaluating for clinically significant high-grade partial flexor tendon lacerations.

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Zone II Partial Flexor Tendon Lacerations of the Fingers: A Cadaveric Study

OBJECTIVES

Accurate assessment of zone II partial flexor tendon lacerations in the finger is clinically important. Surgical repair is recommended for lacerations of greater than 50% to 60%. Our goal was to evaluate ultrasonographic test characteristics and accuracy in identifying partial flexor tendon lacerations in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

From fresh-frozen above-elbow human cadaveric specimens, 32 flexor digitorum profundus tendons were randomly selected to remain intact or receive low- or high-grade lacerations involving 10% to 40% and 60% to 90% of the radioulnar width within Verdan Zone II, respectively. Static and dynamic ultrasonography using a linear array 14-MHz transducer was performed by a blinded musculoskeletal radiologist. Sensitivities, specificities, and other standard test performance metrics were calculated. Actual and measured percentages of tendon laceration were compared by the paired t test.

RESULTS

After randomization, 24 tendons were lacerated (12 low- and 12 high-grade), whereas 8 remained intact. The sensitivity and specificity in detecting the presence versus absence of a partial laceration were 0.54 and 0.75, respectively, with positive and negative likelihood ratio values of 2.17 and 0.61. For low-grade lacerations, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.25 and 0.85, compared to 0.83 and 0.85 for high-grade lacerations. Ultrasonography underestimated the percentage of tendon involvement by a mean of 18.1% for the study population as a whole (95% confidence interval, 9.0% to 27.2%; P < .001) but accurately determined the extent for correctly diagnosed high-grade lacerations (-6.7%; 95% confidence interval, -18.7% to 5.2%; P = .22).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonography was useful in identifying and characterizing clinically relevant high-grade zone II partial flexor digitorum profundus lacerations in a cadaveric model.

The Management of Partial Zone II Intrasynovial Flexor Tendon Lacerations: A Literature Review of Biomechanics, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications

BACKGROUND

Penetrating trauma or lacerations within zone II of the flexor sheath may result in partial tendon injury. The proper management of this injury is controversial; the literature contains differing indications for surgical treatment and postoperative rehabilitation.

METHODS

A literature review of the Cochrane, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases was performed using the following search criteria: partial, flexor, tendon, and laceration. All English language studies that evaluated biomechanical strength, complications, and outcomes after partial tendon injury in human and animal studies were included and reviewed by two of the authors.

RESULTS

Animal and cadaveric biomechanical studies have demonstrated that partial lacerations involving up to 95 percent of the tendon cross-sectional area can safely tolerate loads generated through unresisted, active finger flexion. Suture tenorrhaphy of partial tendon injury is associated with decreased tendon tensile strength, increased resistance, and decreased tendon gliding. Complications of nonsurgical management include triggering and entrapment, which can be managed by tendon beveling or pulley release. Late rupture is extremely uncommon (one report).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial tendon lacerations involving 90 percent of the cross-sectional area can be safely treated without surgical repair and immediate protected active motion. Indications for exploration and treatment include concern for complete injury, triggering of the involved digit, or entrapment of the tendon. Surgical treatment for tendon triggering or entrapment with less than 75 percent cross-sectional injury is beveling of the tendon edges and injuries greater than 75 percent should be repaired with a noncircumferential, simple epitendinous suture. All patients should be allowed to perform early protected active motion after surgery.

A biomechanical assessment of repair versus nonrepair of sheep flexor tendons lacerated to 75 percent

PURPOSE

The benefit of repairing a 75% partial flexor tendon laceration remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the degree of gap formation with and without repair when the 75% lacerated tendon is subjected to cyclic loading. Repair with only a peripheral suture was compared to that using a core and peripheral repair technique.

METHODS

Sixteen deep flexor tendons from sheep hind limbs were lacerated to 75% of the tendon diameter. The cut tendons were loaded for 100 cycles from 3 N up to 30 N and then back to 3 N, at a rate of 0.2 Hz. Gap formation was measured at 0 and 100 cycles. Tendons were then randomized into 2 repair groups of 8 each: group 1 was repaired with only a simple, running peripheral suture (6-0 polypropylene monofilament), whereas group 2 was repaired with a modified Kessler core suture (4-0 silicone-coated braided polyester) plus a peripheral suture (6-0 polypropylene monofilament). Repaired tendons were tested for 500 cycles, and the gap was measured at 0, 100, and 500 cycles. After cycling, gap was measured at 100 N load, and the peak loads were determined on static failure testing.

RESULTS

The 75% partially lacerated tendons had >2 mm gap at 100 cycles. This gap was significantly reduced by peripheral or peripheral plus core repairs (p < .001). There was no difference in gap formation between tendons with peripheral repair only and those with both peripheral and core repairs. Gap formation in repaired tendons remained <or=1 mm at 500 cycles. After cycling, neither gap formation at 100 N load or the peak loads on failure testing differed between the 2 repair groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a large gap when an unrepaired 75% partial laceration is cyclically loaded. This gap is significantly reduced with a peripheral repair whether or not a core suture is used.