1998 ISEK Congress Keynote Lecture: Multi-muscle control in human movements. International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology

Postural adjustments to self-triggered perturbations under conditions of changes in body orientation

We studied anticipatory and compensatory postural adjustments (APAs and CPAs) associated with self-triggered postural perturbations in conditions with changes in the initial body orientation. In particular, we were testing hypotheses on adjustments in the reciprocal and coactivation commands, role of proximal vs. distal muscles, and correlations between changes in indices of APAs and CPAs. Healthy young participants stood on a board with full support or reduced support area and held a standard load in the extended arms. They released the load in a self-paced manned with a standard small-amplitude arm movement. Electromyograms of 12 muscles were recorded and used to compute reciprocal and coactivation indices between three muscle pairs on both sides of the body. The subject's body was oriented toward one of three targets: straight ahead, 60° to the left, and 60° to the right. Body orientation has stronger effects on proximal muscle pairs compared to distal muscles. It led to more consistent changes in the reciprocal command compared to the coactivation command. Indices of APAs and CPAs showed positive correlations across conditions. We conclude that the earlier suggested hierarchical relations between the reciprocal and coactivation command could be task-specific. Predominance of negative or positive correlations between APA and CPA indices could also be task-specific.

Effects of bilateral Achilles tendon vibration on postural orientation and balance during standing

OBJECTIVE

Altering proprioceptive information in the lower limbs by vibration produces direction-specific falling and postural instability, which can persist after vibration stops. The objectives of this study were to describe the changes in trunk and lower limbs postural orientation and muscles activities during and after the end of bilateral Achilles tendon vibration (TV).

METHODS

Twelve healthy young subjects were exposed to 30s periods of TV while blindfolded. Whole-body kinematics, kinetics and EMG of eight lower limb and trunk muscles were recorded prior, during and 5 or 25s after TV.

RESULTS

TV during quiet standing produced a whole-body backward shift characterized by greater extension in the trunk and lower limbs. Five seconds after TV, two trends of recovery could be observed, either an overcorrection or undercorrection of the initial position.

CONCLUSIONS

A continuum of postural orientations are adopted during and after vibration and the movements are not restricted to the ankle joints, despite the local nature of the proprioceptive stimulation.

SIGNIFICANCE

The widespread influence of vibration as a proprioceptive stimulation when assessing its effects on posture and balance needs to be considered. Further studies should include whole-body analyses to document more thoroughly the postural strategies for balance maintenance during vibration.

Threshold position control of arm movement with anticipatory increase in grip force

The grip force holding an object between fingers usually increases before or simultaneously with arm movement thus preventing the object from sliding. We experimentally analyzed and simulated this anticipatory behavior based on the following notions. (1) To move the arm to a new position, the nervous system shifts the threshold position at which arm muscles begin to be recruited. Deviated from their activation thresholds, arm muscles generate activity and forces that tend to minimize this deviation by bringing the arm to a new position. (2) To produce a grip force, with or without arm motion, the nervous system changes the threshold configuration of the hand. This process defines a threshold (referent) aperture (R(a)) of appropriate fingers. The actual aperture (Q(a)) is constrained by the size of the object held between the fingers whereas, in referent position R(a), the fingers virtually penetrate the object. Deviated by the object from their thresholds of activation, hand muscles generate activity and grip forces in proportion to the gap between the Q(a) and R(a). Thus, grip force emerges since the object prevents the fingers from reaching the referent position. (3) From previous experiences, the system knows that objects tend to slide off the fingers when arm movements are made and, to prevent sliding, it starts narrowing the referent aperture simultaneously with or somewhat before the onset of changes in the referent arm position. (4) The interaction between the fingers and the object is accomplished via the elastic pads on the tips of fingers. The pads are compressed not only due to the grip force but also due to the tangential inertial force ("load") acting from the object on the pads along the arm trajectory. Compressed by the load force, the pads move back and forth in the gap between the finger bones and object, thus inevitably changing the normal component of the grip force, in synchrony with and in proportion to the load force. Based on these notions, we simulated experimental elbow movements and grip forces when subjects rapidly changed the elbow angle while holding an object between the index finger and the thumb. It is concluded that the anticipatory increase in the grip force with or without correlation with the tangential load during arm motion can be explained in neurophysiological and biomechanical terms without relying on programming of grip force based on an internal model.

Threshold position control and the principle of minimal interaction in motor actions

The answer to the question of how the nervous system controls multiple muscles and body segments while solving the redundancy problem in choosing a unique action from the set of many possible actions is still a matter of controversy. In an attempt to clarify the answer, we review data showing that motor actions emerge from central resetting of the threshold position of appropriate body segments, i.e. the virtual position at which muscles are silent but deviations from it will elicit activity and resistive forces (threshold position control). The difference between the centrally-set threshold position and the sensory-signaled actual position is responsible for the activation of neuromuscular elements and interactions between them and the environment. These elements tend to diminish the evoked activity and interactions by minimizing the gap between the actual position and the threshold position (the principle of minimal interaction). Threshold control per se does not solve the redundancy problem: it only limits the set of possible actions. The principle of minimal interaction implies that the system relies on the natural capacity of neuromuscular elements to interact between themselves and with the environment to reduce this already restricted set to a unique action, thus solving the redundancy problem in motor control. This theoretical framework appears to be helpful in the explanation of the control and production of a variety of actions (reaching movements, specification of different hand configurations, grip force generation, and whole-body movements such as sit-to-stand or walking). Experimental tests of this theory are provided. The prediction that several types of neurons specify referent control variables for motor actions may be tested in future studies. The theory may also be advanced by applying the notion of threshold control to perception and cognition.

The role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reaching

Although important differences exist between learning a new motor skill and adapting a well-learned skill to new environmental constraints, studies of force field adaptation have been used frequently in recent years to identify processes underlying learning. Most of these studies have been of reaching tasks that were each hand position was specified by a unique combination of joint angles. At the same time, evidence has been provided from a variety of tasks that the central nervous system takes advantage of the redundancy available to it when planning and executing functional movements. The current study attempted to determine whether a change in the use of joint motion redundancy is associated with the adaptation process. Both experimental and control subjects performed 160 trials of reaching in each of four adaptation phases, while holding the handle of a robot manipulandum. During the first and last adaptation phases, the robot motors were turned off. During phases 2 and 3 the motors produced a velocity-dependent force field to which experimental subjects had to adapt to regain relatively straight line hand movements during reaching to a target, while the motors remained off for the control group. The uncontrolled manifold (UCM) method was used to partition the variance of planar clavicle-scapular, shoulder, elbow and wrist joint movements into two orthogonal components, one (V(UCM)) that reflected combinations of joint angles that were equivalent with respect to achieving the average hand path and another (V(ORT)) that took the hand away from its average path. There was no change in either variance component for the control group performing 640 non-perturbed reaches across four 'pseudo-adaptation' phases. The experimental group showed adaptation to reaching in the force field that was accompanied initially by an increase in both components of variance, followed by a smaller decrease of V(UCM) than V(ORT) during 320 practice reaches in the force field. After initial re-adaptation to reaching to the null field, V(UCM) was higher in experimental than in control subjects after performing a comparable number of reaches. V(UCM) was also larger in the experimental group after re-adaptation when compared to the 160 null field reaching trials performed prior to initial force field introduction. The results suggest that the central nervous system makes use of kinematic redundancy, or flexibility of motor patterns, to adapt reaching performance to unusual force fields, a fact that has implications for the hypothesis that motor adaptation requires learning of formal models of limb and environmental dynamics.

Threshold control of arm posture and movement adaptation to load

We addressed the fundamental questions of which variables underlie the control of arm movement and how they are stored in motor memory, reproduced and modified in the process of adaptation to changing load conditions. Such variables are defined differently in two major theories of motor control (internal models and threshold control). To resolve the controversy, these theories were tested (experiment 1) based on their ability to explain why active movement away from a stable posture is not opposed by stabilizing mechanisms (the posture-movement problem). The internal model theory suggests that the system counteracts the opposing forces by increasing the muscle activity in proportion to the distance from the initial posture (position-dependent EMG control). In contrast, threshold control fully excludes these opposing forces by shifting muscle activation thresholds and thus resetting the stabilizing mechanisms to a new posture. Subjects were sitting, holding the vertical handle of a double-joint manipulandum with their right hand and were facing a computer screen on which the handle and target to be reached were displayed. In response to an auditory signal, subjects quickly moved the handle from an initial position to one of two (frontal and sagittal) targets. No load was applied during the movement but in separate trials, a brief perturbation was applied to the handle by torque motors controlling the manipulandum. Perturbations were applied prior to or 3 s after movement offset, in the latter case in one of eight directions. The EMG activity of the majority of the seven recorded muscles was at zero level before movement onset and returned to zero level after movement offset. Those muscles that remained active before or after the movement could be made silent whereas previously silent muscles could be activated after a small passive displacement (several millimeters) elicited by perturbations in appropriate directions. Results showed that the activation thresholds of motoneurons of arm muscles were reset from the initial to a final position and that EMG activity was not position-dependent. These results were inconsistent with the internal model theory but confirmed the threshold control theory. Then the ability of threshold control theory to explain rapid movement adaptation to a position-dependent load was investigated (experiment 2 and 3). Subjects produced fast movement to the frontal target with and without a position-dependent load applied to the handle. Trials were organized in blocks alternating between the load and no-load condition (20 blocks in total, with randomly chosen number of five to ten trials in each). Subjects were instructed "do not correct" in experiment 2 and "correct" movement errors during the trial in experiment 3. Five threshold arm configurations underlying the movement production and adaptation were identified. When instructed "do not correct", movement precision was fully restored on average after two trials. No significant improvement was observed as the experiment progressed despite the fact that the same load condition was repeated after one block of trials. Thus, in each block, the adaptation was made anew, implying that subjects relied on short-term memory and could not recall the threshold arm configurations they specified to accurately reach the same target in the same load condition in previous blocks. When instructed to "correct" within each trial, precision was restored faster, on average after one trial. Major aspects of the production and adaptation of arm movement (including the kinematics, movement errors, instruction-dependent behavior, and absence of position-related EMG activity) are explained in terms of threshold control.

Basic elements of arm postural control analyzed by unloading

To address the question of how arm posture is controlled, we analyzed shoulder-elbow unloading responses in the horizontal plane for different directions of the initial load. The initial load, produced by a double-joint manipulandum, was suddenly diminished to 1of 12 randomly presented levels (60 to -10% of the initial load; in 6 out of 12 cases the final load direction varied by +/-20 degrees ). Subjects were instructed "not to intervene" in response to unloading. Neither the unloading onset nor the final load level was predictable and we assumed that the responses to rapid unloading were involuntary. Unloading elicited a smooth hand movement characterized by a bell-shaped velocity profile. The changes in hand position, joint angles, and joint torques generally increased with greater amounts of unloading. For each direction of the initial load, tonic electromyographic activity of the shoulder and elbow muscles also changed, depending on the amount of unloading. The shoulder and elbow joint torques before and after unloading were a function of the difference between the actual configuration of the arm and its referent configuration (R) described by the angles at which each joint torque was zero. The R configuration changed depending on the direction of the initial load. Our electromyographic data imply that these changes result from a central modification of muscle activation thresholds. The nervous system may thus control the R configuration in a task-specific way by leaving it unchanged to generate involuntary responses to unloading or modifying it to accommodate a new load direction at the same initial position. It is concluded that the R configuration is a major variable in both intentional and involuntary control of posture.

Control of double-joint arm posture in adults with unilateral brain damage

It has been suggested that multijoint movements result from the specification of a referent configuration of the body. The activity of muscles and forces required for movements emerge depending on the difference between the actual and referent body configurations. We identified the referent arm configurations specified by the nervous system to bring the arm to the target position both in healthy individuals and in those with arm motor paresis due to stroke. From an initial position of the right arm, subjects matched a force equivalent to 30% of their maximal voluntary force in that position. The external force, produced at the handle of a double-joint manipulandum by two torque motors, pulled the hand to the left (165 degrees ) or pushed it to the right (0 degrees ). For both the initial conditions, three directions of the final force (0 degrees , +20 degrees , and -20 degrees ) with respect to the direction of the initial force were used. Subjects were instructed not to intervene when the load was unexpectedly partially or completely removed. Both groups of subjects produced similar responses to unloading of the double-joint arm system. Partial removal of the load resulted in distinct final hand positions associated with unique shoulder-elbow configurations and joint torques. The net static torque at each joint before and after unloading was represented as a function of the two joint angles describing a planar surface or invariant characteristic in 3D torque/angle coordinates. For each initial condition, the referent arm configuration was identified as the combination of elbow and shoulder angles at which the net torques at the two joints were zero. These configurations were different for different initial conditions. The identification of the referent configuration was possible for all healthy participants and for most individuals with hemiparesis suggesting that they preserved the ability to adapt their central commands-the referent arm configurations-to accommodate changes in external load conditions. Despite the preservation of the basic response patterns, individuals with stroke damage had a more restricted range of hand trajectories following unloading, an increased instability around the final endpoint position, altered patterns of elbow and shoulder muscle coactivation, and differences in the dispersion of referent configurations in elbow-shoulder joint space compared to healthy individuals. Moreover, 4 out of 12 individuals with hemiparesis were unable to specify referent configurations of the arm in a consistent way. It is suggested that problems in the specification of the referent configuration may be responsible for the inability of some individuals with stroke to produce coordinated multijoint movements. The present work adds three findings to the motor control literature concerning stroke: non-significant torque/angle relationships in some subjects, narrower range of referent arm configurations, and instability about the final position. This is the first demonstration of the feasibility of the concept of the referent configuration for the double-joint muscle-reflex system and the ability of some individuals with stroke to produce task-specific adjustments of this configuration.

Governing coordination: behavioural principles and neural correlates

The coordination of movement is governed by a coalition of constraints. The expression of these constraints ranges from the concrete--the restricted range of motion offered by the mechanical configuration of our muscles and joints; to the abstract--the difficulty that we experience in combining simple movements into complex rhythms. We seek to illustrate that the various constraints on coordination are complementary and inclusive, and the means by which their expression and interaction are mediated systematically by the integrative action of the central nervous system (CNS). Beyond identifying the general principles at the behavioural level that govern the mutual interplay of constraints, we attempt to demonstrate that these principles have as their foundation specific functional properties of the cortical motor systems. We propose that regions of the brain upstream of the motor cortex may play a significant role in mediating interactions between the functional representations of muscles engaged in sensorimotor coordination tasks. We also argue that activity in these "supramotor" regions may mediate the stabilising role of augmented sensory feedback.

A three-dimensional, six-segment chain analysis of forceful overarm throwing

A three-dimensional, six-segment model was applied to the pitching motion of three professional pitchers to analyze the kinematics and kinetics of the hips, upper trunk, humerus and forearm plus hand of both the upper limbs. Subjects were filmed at 250 frames per second. An inverse dynamics approach and angular momentum principle with respect to the proximal endpoint of a rigid segment were employed in the analysis. Results showed considerable similarities between subjects in the kinetic control of trunk rotation about the spine's longitudinal axis, but variability in the control of trunk lean both to the side and forward. The kinetics of the throwing shoulder and elbow joint were comparable between subjects, but the contribution of the non-throwing upper limb was minimal and variable. The upper trunk rotators played a key role in accelerating the ball to an early, low velocity near stride foot contact. After a brief pause they resumed acting strongly in a positive direction, though not enough to prevent trunk angular velocity slowing, as the musculature of the arm applied a load at the throwing shoulder. The interaction moment from the proximal segments assisted the forearm extensor in slowing flexion and producing rapid elbow extension near ball release. The temporal onset of muscular torques was not in a strictly successive proximal-to-distal sequence.

Anticipatory postural adjustments associated with lateral and rotational perturbations during standing

We studied the role of different leg and trunk muscle groups in the generation of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) prior to lateral and rotational perturbations associated with predictable and self-triggered postural perturbations during standing. Postural perturbations were induced by a variety of manipulations including catching and releasing a load with the right hand extended either in front of the body or to the right side, performing bilateral fast shoulder movements in different directions, and applying brief force pulses with a hand against the wall. Perturbations in a frontal plane ("lateral perturbations") were associated with significant asymmetries in APAs seen in the right and left distal (soleus and tibialis anterior) muscles; these asymmetries dependent on the direction of the perturbation. Rotational perturbations about the vertical axis of the body generated by fast movements of the two shoulders in the opposite directions were also associated with direction-dependent asymmetries in the APAs in soleus muscles. However, rotational perturbations generated by an off-body-midline force pulse application were accompanied by direction-dependent asymmetries in proximal muscle groups, but not in the distal muscles. We conclude that muscles controlling the ankle joint play an important role in the compensation of lateral and rotational perturbations. The abundance of muscles participating in maintaining vertical posture allows the control system to use different task-dependent strategies during the generation of APAs in anticipation of rotational perturbation.