Contrast Material–enhanced, Moving-Table MR Angiography versus Digital Subtraction Angiography for Surveillance of Peripheral Arterial Bypass Grafts

Chapter II: Diagnostic methods

Non-invasive vascular studies can provide crucial information on the presence, location, and severity of critical limb ischaemia (CLI), as well as the initial assessment or treatment planning. Ankle-brachial index with Doppler ultrasound, despite limitations in diabetic and end-stage renal failure patients, is the first-line evaluation of CLI. In this group of patients, toe-brachial index measurement may better establish the diagnosis. Other non-invasive measurements, such as segmental limb pressure, continuous-wave Doppler analysis and pulse volume recording, are of limited accuracy. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO(2)) measurement may be of value when rest pain and ulcerations of the foot are present. Duplex ultrasound is the most important non-invasive tool in CLI patients combining haemodynamic evaluation with imaging modality. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are the next imaging studies in the algorithm for CLI. Both CTA and MRA have been proven effective in aiding the decision-making of clinicians and accurate planning of intervention. The data acquired with CTA and MRA can be manipulated in a multiplanar and 3D fashion and can offer exquisite detail. CTA results are generally equivalent to MRA, and both compare favourably with contrast angiography. The individual use of different imaging modalities depends on local availability, experience, and costs. Contrast angiography represents the gold standard, provides detailed information about arterial anatomy, and is recommended when revascularisation is needed.

Improved detection of in-stent restenosis by blood pool agent-enhanced, high-resolution, steady-state magnetic resonance angiography

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess whether visualisation of in-stent changes can be improved with high-resolution, steady-state, blood pool contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with first-pass MR angiography. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) served as the reference standard.

METHODS

Twenty patients after stent placement in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) underwent MRA prior to reintervention. MRA of the SFA includes first-pass MRA as well as 3D high-resolution MRA in the steady state (SS-MRA) after injection of Gadofosveset trisodium. Sensitivity and specificity values for the detection of significant in-stent lesions by means of SS-MRA were calculated at the proximal, middle and distal stent segments in comparison to DSA. Kappa statistics were used to determine agreement between the two techniques.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity values for the detection of significant stenosis with SS-MRA reached 95% in the proximal, 100% in the middle and 100% in the distal stent segment. Kappa coefficients between SS-MRA and DSA were 0.789, 0.797 and 0.859 for the proximal, middle and distal segments, whereas the Kappa coefficients for FP-MRA were 0,211, 0,200 and 0,594 in these segments, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Detection of in stent stenosis is significantly improved using SS MRA, in comparison to state-of-the-art FP-MRA.

Assessment of aortic pathology and peripheral arterial disease using multidetector computed tomographic angiography

The development of multidetector computed tomography represents a remarkable diagnostic advancement because this imaging modality has been widely used in the evaluation of the cardiovascular system. With scanner-adjusted image acquisition and contrast medium administration, multidetector computed tomographic angiography provides a cost-effective and accurate imaging assessment in patients with aortic pathologies or peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography is associated with several advantages, including high image spatial resolution and rapid imaging acquisition speed. This diagnostic methodology allows accurate detection of a variety of intravascular lesions in the carotid artery, thoracic and abdominal aorta, renal arteries, and peripheral arterial systems. This article provides an overview of multidetector computed tomographic angiography in the assessment of arterial disease and reviews current literature about this diagnostic technology in the evaluation of aortic and peripheral arterial pathologies.

MR angiography of the lower extremities

OBJECTIVE

Current MRI technology and postprocessing tools have enabled 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) to evolve into a first-line noninvasive diagnostic tool to evaluate vascular disorders.

CONCLUSION

In this article, 3D MRA techniques, bolus timing issues, new IV contrast agents allowing a steady-state acquisition, principals of postprocessing, and unenhanced MRA techniques are reviewed and how to effectively use 3D gadolinium-enhanced MRA for peripheral arterial imaging is described.

Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal and lower extremity vasculature

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has evolved over the past years from an experimental imaging modality to a technique that is now widely applied in clinical practice. This article reviews the fundamentals of the different magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and how they can be applied for abdominal and peripheral arterial imaging. Currently, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), whereby a luminogram is obtained during initial arterial passage of contrast material, is the most widely used technique. With current hardware and software, high-spatial resolution images of the abdominal aorta and proximal visceral branches can be obtained that are equivalent to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA). High-quality imaging of the renal arteries demands isotropic voxels and reformations orthogonal to the vessel axis for evaluation. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vascular tree is now a highly accurate technique and has replaced diagnostic intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography and duplex ultrasonography in many hospitals.

Postoperative evaluation of complex aortovisceral and aortorenal reconstructions by magnetic resonance angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the ability of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate complex vascular bypass reconstructions of the abdominal aorta and its major branches in the postoperative period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen patients with bypass grafts connecting the aorta to visceral, renal, and lower limb inflow vessels were evaluated with MRA. Three of these patients were also studied with digital subtraction angiography soon after MRA was completed. MRA was evaluated for its ability to detect the grafts and to determine the degree of stenosis in the graft conduit or at the anastomoses to native vessels.

RESULTS

Detection of graft conduits and anastomotic sites by MRA was 100% and 99%, respectively. Comparison with digital subtraction angiography in a subset of the patients showed a 100% agreement between the two modalities in their description of stenotic disease in graft conduits and 95% agreement in stenosis characterization at graft anastomotic sites.

CONCLUSION

MRA of complex aortic reconstructions with bypass grafts to its major abdominal branches arteries accurately describes the resulting complicated vascular anatomy and likely has a high degree of correlation to digital subtraction angiography in describing the disease within the bypass grafts.