Precise placement of tract anesthesia for percutaneous biliary drainage and nephrostomy

The feasibility of regional anesthesia in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy with supracostal approach and its comparison with general anesthesia

There are various approaches for the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Supracostal approach is a well known technique for doing of it. This approach is being done commonly under general anesthesia (GA). In this retrospective study, we evaluated the feasibility of supracostal PCNL under regional anesthesia (RA) and compared it with the same procedure under GA. Since March 2000 to March 2005, a total of 123 renal stone cases underwent PCNL with supracostal access in our center. GA was selected in 69 cases (56 %) (Group 1), spinal anesthesia (SA) in 45 cases (36.5 %), and epidural anesthesia (EA) in 9 cases (7.5 %) (Group 2). The operative time, success rate, hospital stay, and ensuing complications were compared between group 1 and group 2. There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2 among surgical parameters, including age, stone area, anesthesia time, and hospitalization time (P > 0.05). There was no difference in the rate of complications or success rate between GA and RA cases (P > 0.05). Overall complete stone free rate, regardless of stone size, in relation to type of anesthesia was as follows: 88.4 % for GA, 88.9 % for EA, and 91.1 % for SA (P > 0.05). Conversion to GA was not needed in any patient with RA. The results showed that the supracostal PCNL with regional anesthesia was feasible but without evident advantages versus general anesthesia in this population, and possible advantages of the procedure in patients with pulmonary co-morbidities have still to be evaluated. The anesthesia related complications of RA were negligible and easily controllable.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under a multimodal analgesia regime

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the possibility of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under a multimodal analgesia regime.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During a period of 3 years, 51 patients requiring PCNL were enrolled in the study. All patients received a multimodal analgesic regime that included paracetamol, a COX(2) inhibitor, epidural morphine, and infiltration of the surgical field with local anesthetics. Percutaneous renal tract access was created with ultrasound guidance. All patients were informed about the possibility of experiencing short periods of discomfort or pain, and all patients completed a visual analog pain scale questionnaire postoperatively.

RESULTS

All 51 patients completed the study, and the procedure was well tolerated. Intraoperative problems or postoperative complications were attributed mainly to the procedure itself (PCNL) rather than to the analgesic regimen administered. We observed no morphine-related side effects. Patients were transferred directly back to the ward immediately after the operation. The use of analgesics postoperatively was minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of our multimodal analgesia regime is a well-tolerated and safe alternative to general or regional anesthesia for patients undergoing PCNL.

Feasibility of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy under Assisted Local Anaesthesia: A Prospective Study on Selected Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local anaesthesia in selected patients.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with unilateral renal obstruction due to pelvic stones > or =2.0 cm were enrolled in our study. First a percutaneous nephrostomy to decompress the obstructed kidney was performed using local anaesthesia (lignocaine). A 16-Fr nephrostomy tube was left in place for 1 wk, and then the second stage was carried out. After having infiltrated the tract and the renal parenchyma with lignocaine, dilatation of the nephrostomy tract was performed. Subsequently, PCNL was done using a 24-Fr rigid nephroscope and a ballistic lithotripter. All patients were premedicated with pethidine HCl intramuscularly 30 min before the beginning of both stages. Diazepam was given (0.1mg/kg orally) to patients before the second stage. Pain scores were collected using 10-cm linear visual analogue scale (VAS) after the completion of both procedures.

RESULTS

The procedure was well tolerated. One patient needed further treatment with midazolam during PCNL. The mean VAS score was 38 mm (range: 17-60 mm) for the first stage and 36 mm (13-69 mm) for the second stage. The mean operative time, including both stages, was 127 min (85-155 min). No anaesthesia-related complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that PCNL under assisted local anaesthesia is safe and effective in selected patients.