Treatment of infrapopliteal occlusive disease by high-speed rotational atherectomy: initial and mid-term results

Vessel Preparation in Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Infrapopliteal lesions are generally complex to treat due to small vessel diameter, long lesion length, multilevel disease, and severe calcification. Therefore, different vessel preparation devices have been developed to contribute to better peri- and postprocedural outcomes. This systematic review aims to compare different vessel preparation techniques prior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty with POBA or DCB alone in infrapopliteal arterial disease.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2022 assessing the value of adjunctive vessel preparation in infrapopliteal arterial disease. The primary outcomes were 12-month primary patency and limb salvage.

RESULTS

A total of 1685 patients with 1913 lesions were included in 11 POBA studies. Methodological quality was assessed as poor to moderate in these studies. Only 2 studies with 144 patients assessed vessel preparation in conjunction with DCB angioplasty. These randomized trials were assessed as high quality and found no significant benefit of adjunctive atherectomy to DCB angioplasty. The pooled Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12-month primary patency and limb salvage in the POBA studies were 67.8% and 80.9% for POBA, 62.1% and 86.4% for scoring balloons, 67.9% and 79.6% for mechanical atherectomy (MA), and 79.7% and 82.6% for laser atherectomy, respectively. Within the pooled data only scoring balloons and MA demonstrated significantly improved 12-month limb salvage compared to POBA.

CONCLUSIONS

Different forms of adjunctive vessel preparation demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes compared to POBA and DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal disease, with the exception of improved 12-month limb salvage in scoring balloons and MA. However, since the included studies were heterogeneous and assessed as poor to moderate methodological quality, selection bias may have played an important role. Main conclusion is that this systematic review found no additional value of standard use of vessel preparation.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Infrapopliteal arterial disease is associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and generally complex to treat due to small vessel diameter, long lesion length, multilevel disease and severe calcification. A wide range of vessel preparation devices have been developed to contribute to improved peri- and postprocedural outcomes in these complex lesions. This systematic review aims to compare different vessel preparation techniques prior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty with POBA or DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal arterial disease. Different forms of adjunctive vessel preparation demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes compared to POBA and DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal disease, with the exception of improved 12-month limb salvage in scoring balloons and mechanical atherectomy (MA). However, since the included studies were heterogeneous and assessed as poor to moderate methodological quality, selection bias may have played an important role. Main conclusion is that this systematic review found no additional value of standard use of vessel preparation.

United States Investigational Device Exemption study of the Revolution™ Peripheral Atherectomy System

OBJECTIVE

Atherectomy has become commonplace as an adjunct to interventional treatments for peripheral arterial disease, but the procedures have been complicated by risks including distal embolization and arterial perforation. This study aimed to examine the safety and effectiveness of a novel atherectomy system to treat femoropopliteal and below-knee peripheral arterial disease.

METHODS

The Revolution Peripheral Atherectomy System (Rex Medical LP, Conshohocken, Pa) was studied in 121 patients with 148 femoropopliteal and below-knee lesions, enrolled at 17 United States institutions. Technical success was defined when the post-atherectomy angiographic stenosis was ≤50%, as assessed by an independent core laboratory. Major adverse events were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee.

RESULTS

Among 148 site-identified target lesions in 121 patients, 21.4% were in the superficial femoral artery, 13.7% involved the popliteal artery, and 67.9% were in tibial arteries; 3.1% involved more than one segment. Technical success was 90.2%, with stenoses decreasing from 73% ± 19% at baseline to 42% ± 14% after atherectomy. Adjunctive treatment after atherectomy included angioplasty with uncoated balloons in 91%, drug-coated balloons in 11%, bare stent deployment in 8%, and drug-eluting stent placement in 3%. Procedural success (<30% residual stenosis) was achieved in 93.7% of target lesions. Complications during the procedure included one target vessel perforation and two distal embolizations; each of which were adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee as unrelated to the device and were not visualized angiographically by the core laboratory. Freedom from major adverse events was 97.3% through 30 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency were 81.6%, 87.7%, and 91.6% at 6 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the Revolution Peripheral Atherectomy System was associated with few procedural complications and a high rate of success at the index procedure and through 6 months.

Optimal use of atherectomy in critical limb ischemia

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe and debilitating form of peripheral arterial disease and is associated with high rates of limb loss and cardiovascular mortality. The unique physical environment of tibial occlusive disease underlying most CLI cases limits treatment options and long-term durability, with resulting frequent rates of persistent obstruction, restenosis, and reintervention. Atherectomy represents a potential strategy to improve acute and late results when treating patients with CLI. Available atherectomy devices each have specific performance characteristics, evidentiary rationale, and limitations that mandate a clear understanding of the optimal albeit evolving use of this category of interventional tools.

Critical limb ischemia: endovascular strategies for limb salvage

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents the most severe clinical manifestation of peripheral arterial disease, defined as the presence of chronic ischemic rest pain, ulcers, or gangrene attributable to objectively proven arterial occlusive disease. The dominant pathology underlying CLI is atherosclerosis, distributed at multiple levels along the length of the lower extremity and with a propensity for involvement of the tibial vessels in the leg and the small vessels of the foot. To achieve limb salvage in patients with CLI, revascularization of the affected limb is generally required. In contemporary practice, endovascular techniques are rapidly replacing surgical bypass as the first option for revascularization for CLI based on high technical success rates and low rates of procedure-related morbidity and mortality. This review will describe the clinical strategy of the authors who have adopted an endovascular-first approach to revascularization in treating patients with CLI and summarize the clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy in this population.

Plaque Excision in Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease with the SilverHawk Atherectomy Catheter

Atherectomy, the removal of plaque from diseased vessels, is theoretically appealing with respect to various procedures used for revascularization of lower extremity vessels. Instead of damaging the native vessel by pushing aside plaque with a balloon or stent, the plaque is removed. Many atherectomy devices have been designed in attempts to achieve this goal. The SilverHawk device is the latest percutaneous device employing this treatment strategy. We discuss patient selection, technical considerations, and strategies for both above and below the knee revascularization, as well as pitfalls in each location based on our experience with over 200 patients.

Rotational atherectomy of a severely calcified superficial femoral artery stenosis after failed balloon passage — Case report

Rotational atherectomy (RA) in peripheral circulation is an advanced revascularization procedure, often used in cases where traditional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is inadequate and bypass grafting is either unavailable or undesired. We report on a case, where RA was successfully performed after failed traditional PTA. The case highlights the importance of RA in peripheral cases where severe calcification occurs and the lesion is not suitable for PTA (cannot be passed with balloon or is undilatable).

Drilling through impacted ureteral stones: use of the atherectomy rotablator device for urolithiasis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Rotablator is an angioplasty device that is passed over a wire. It uses a high-speed rotational "burr" (2 mm in diameter) that is coated with microscopic diamond particles and cooled by saline. It rotates at high speed (approximately 200,000 rpm) breaking up endovascular blockage into minute (smaller than red blood cells) fragments. We investigated, in vitro and ex vivo, the possible use of the Rotablator for urinary stone disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human stones of different sizes and composition were used for the experiment. Stone impaction in vitro was modeled by wedging the stones into the proximal part of a 16F silicone Foley catheter. Likewise, an ex-vivo study was performed on stones placed into a freshly harvested swine ureter using a nitinol basket. Data regarding the drill time, remaining stone size, and ureteral damage were collected.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 stones were treated (10 in vitro and 5 ex vivo). The device successfully drilled through all the stones, along the path of the guidewire, allowing complete passage of the burr. The pretreatment mean stone size for the silicone and ureteral testing was 65 mm(3) and 34 mm(3), respectively (both P < 0.01). The post-treatment size was 54 mm(3) and 24 mm(3), respectively. Average treatment time was 100 seconds. No visual macroscopic ureteral damage or perforation was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro, the Rotablator is capable of drilling through stones with minimal damage. Drilling, however, occurred alongside the stone in which the guidewire was located and, thus, stone fragmentation appears to be minimal. Further studies are necessary to investigate other burr configurations and the use of the Rotablator for the fluoroscopic-guided passage of ureteral impaction in difficult clinical settings.

[Percutaneous mechanical atherectomy for treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease]

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) is still an extremely important politico-economic disease. Diverse treatment procedures exist but the pillars of therapy are changes in lifestyle, such as nicotine abstinence and walking exercise as well as drug therapy. Further therapy options are considered after conventional procedures have been exhausted. These further options consist of improvement of the blood supply by surgical or minimally invasive procedures. The latter therapy options include balloon dilatation and stenting as the most widely used techniques. More recent techniques also used are cryoplasty, laser angioplasty, drug-coated stents or balloons as well as brachytherapy or atherectomy, whereby this list makes no claims to completeness. The multitude of different treatment methods emphatically underlines the fact that no resounding success can be achieved with one single method. The long-term results of both balloon dilatation and stenting techniques show a need for improvement, which elicited the search for additional methods for the treatment of PAOD. Atherectomy represents such an alternative method for treatment of PAOD. Basically, the term atherectomy means the removal of atheroma tissue. For percutaneous atherectomy, in contrast to surgical procedures, it is not necessary to create surgically access to the vessel but accomplishes the atherectomy by means of dedicated systems via a minimally invasive access. There are two basic forms of mechanical atherectomy: directional and rotational systems.

An evidence-based approach to the use of rotational and directional coronary atherectomy in the era of drug-eluting stents: when does it make sense?

Advances in percutaneous interventions have profoundly changed the way we manage patients with coronary and peripheral arterial disease. Though the use of stents, particularly drug-eluting stents, is the preferred method for revascularization because of ease of use and lower restenosis rates, there are many short comings. Ostial and bifurcation lesions as well as heavily calcified and tortuous arteries remain problematic. Mechanical debulking with rotational and direct coronary atherectomy may be beneficial in these situations. In this review, we present the general concepts of mechanical debulking and attempt to summarize the available data on its use in the setting of drug-eluting stents. In addition, we will discuss its special role in the management of peripheral arterial disease.

Treatment of severe infrapopliteal vascular disease using a novel atherectomy device: a case report

We report two first in man cases of percutaneous revascularization for severe intrapopliteal arterial disease using the novel PV atherectomy device.