Pleurx tunneled catheter in the management of malignant ascites

Tunneled Uncuffed Pigtail Drainage Catheter Placement in Patients with Refractory Ascites or Pleural Effusion: A Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE

No evidence exists to support the use of tunneled non-cuffed pigtail drainage catheters in patients with refractory ascites or pleural effusion. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of non-cuffed tunneled pigtail drainage catheters in patients with refractory ascites or pleural effusions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 5, 2020 and May 25, 2021, 34 pigtail catheters were implanted in 27 patients (17 males, 10 females; average age: 65.66 ± 12.04 years) under either ultrasound or computed-tomography guidance (19 catheters for ascites, 15 catheters for pleural effusion). Twenty-eight catheters (82.35%) were implanted for malignant etiologies, and 6 catheters (17.65%) were implanted for benign etiologies. The catheters (size: 8-14 French) were implanted through a subcutaneous tunnel. Complication rate and factors related to complications were analyzed. Catheter lifetime was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Patency ranged from 3 to 211 days. None of the patients experienced a major complication (e.g., peritonitis and empyema). Meanwhile, 8 minor complications were observed including 3 catheter occlusion, 3 ascites leakage, 1 peri-catheter local skin infection, 1 peri-catheter local skin reaction. None of the etiologies were related to the catheter complications. However, the 8-F catheter was associated with a significantly higher complication rate (odds = 5.5, p = 0.044). The estimated mean [CI] dwelling time of a catheter was 59.18 [32.97, 85.39] days.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided insertion of tunneled peritoneal or pleural pigtail external drainage catheters achieved with a 100% technical success rate and resulted in an acceptable complication rate and catheter lifetime for the management of refractory ascites or pleural effusion.

Tunnelled Peritoneal Catheter for Malignant Ascites-An Open-Label, Prospective, Observational Trial

Treatment of recurrent malignant ascites in cancer patients is a challenge. Evidence based guidelines regarding the best treatment strategy are lacking. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a tunnelled peritoneal catheter (PleurX) in cancer patients with symptomatic ascites. Patients with symptomatic, diuretics-refractory ascites and indication for the implantation of a tunnelled peritoneal PleurX catheter were prospectively enrolled between August 2018 and July 2020. The number of catheter days, complications, amount of drained ascites and ascites-associated symptoms and hospitalization rate pre- and post-PleurX insertion were analysed. 51 Patients (64.7% male) were prospectively enrolled. The mean age was 66.6 (±7.9) years. The most common cause of ascites was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 10) followed by cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 9) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 8). The technical success rate of PleurX implantation was 100%. The mean volume of weakly drained ascites was 5.44l (±4.08). Major complications included cellulitis (n = 2), peritonitis and drainage dislocation (each n = 1). The mean catheter days per patient was 59.8 (±107.4) (Min 4, Max 668). Abdominal discomfort, impaired mobility, dyspnoea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting were significantly reduced 30 days after PleurX insertion (p < 0.05). Moreover, hospitalization rate was significantly reduced (p < 0.001; 27.08% of days preimplantation vs. 11.27% postimplantation). We conclude that implantation of a tunnelled ascites catheter is a safe and effective method for the treatment of refractory ascites in cancer patients with advanced disease. Serious complications are rare. Burdensome ascites-associated symptoms and hospitalization rates can be significantly reduced over a longer period of time.

Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter for Refractory Ascites in Cirrhosis: A Randomized Case-Series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Refractory ascites markedly worsens prognosis in cirrhosis. Large volume paracentesis (LVP) is standard treatment, but complications are common. In a randomized controlled case-series, we assessed a permanent tunneled peritoneal catheter versus LVP in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Random allocation was computer-generated, and concealment used opaque envelopes. Patients were included from January 2017 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria were cirrhosis and recurrent ascites and expected survival of more than 3 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were enrolled (PleurX =6 versus LVP = 7). Seven were female, ranging in age from 51 to 80 years. No procedure-related complications occurred. Two patients died due to variceal bleeding (PleurX-group) and sepsis (LVP-group). One patient was withdrawn due to hyponatremia (PleurX-group). Two patients were withdrawn due to bacterial peritonitis and infection of unknown origin (control-group). In the PleurX-group, all patients colonized the catheter, two developed bacterial peritonitis. The most common bacterial colonization was Staph. Epidermidis (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients, the PleurX catheter mobilizes ascites and may be an alternative to LVP. The risk of infection should be considered in each case. The impact of colonization and risk of infections needs further investigation. The present trial does not allow for statistical conclusions.

Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter Placement in Palliation of Malignant Ascites: A Study with Two Different Types of Catheters

Objective(s)

Malignant ascites (MA) is abnormal accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity and has negative effects on the quality of life. The purpose of this retrospective study is to explore feasibility, safety and efficacy of tunneled peritoneal catheter placement using both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis catheters in the palliation of MA.

Methods

Between October 2013-June 2016, thirty patients with resistent MA underwent tunneled peritoneal catheterisation in our interventional radiology department. Tunneled peritoneal catheter (TPC) was placed in 22 (n=22/30; %73) patients, tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) was placed in 8 patients (n=8/30; %27). Routine visits were scheduled for months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 of the catheterization, and the records were evaluated retrospectively.

Results

The overall duration of catheterization varied from 2 to 334 days (mean 66.4 ± 68.5, median: 57 days). Catheters remained intact in 29 patients (96.7%) until the endpoint. There was one (3.3%) malfunctioning catheter among both groups. Overall, four patients developed infection, which were classified into major (n=2/30, %6.7) and minor (n=2/30, %6.7) complications according to SIR criteria.

Conclusion

Tunneled peritoneal catheterization using both TPCs and THCs provided a safe method with relatively high patency, and low infection and systemic complication rates in the palliation of MA.

Patients' perspectives towards malignant ascites: results of a prospective observational trial regarding expectations, characteristics and quality of life-a study of the North-Eastern-German Society of Gynecological Oncology

PURPOSE

Malignant ascites (MA) is a frequent and common symptom in (gyneco-) oncological patients. The present trial evaluated and assessed patients' characteristics, clinical features and the possible influence of MA on QoL measurements.

METHODS

A prospective observational trial was conducted from Oct 2013 until Nov 2016. Therefore an interdisciplinary questionnaire was developed. Overall 250 patients with histological confirmed MA were included with different cancer entities (gynecological, gastrointestinal). The correlation of MA caused symptoms and QoL measurements was assessed using Kendall's tau b. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to analyze the risks of symptoms or severe limitation in daily activities.

RESULTS

125 questionnaires could be analyzed. The majority of patients with MA had diagnosis of ovarian cancer (68.8%) and were under current cancer treatment (57.6%), mostly chemotherapy. Over 50% reported abdominal tension as major symptom, around 56% of the patients had MA when cancer was firstly diagnosed. Regression analysis showed that patients with MA above 2l were significantly more likely to be harmed in everyday activities. However, the age, gender, type of malignancy and the current treatment (chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy) had no significant influence.

CONCLUSION

MA has a significantly impact on QoL measurements in cancer patients and might influence everyday activities including basic needs like eating, walking and body care. There is a high need for more information and education of patients with MA.

Symptomatic Fluid Drainage: Tunneled Peritoneal and Pleural Catheters

Malignant ascites and pleural effusion are significant contributors to patient symptoms such as shortness of breath, abdominal distension, and nausea in the setting of cancer. There are numerous methods employed to control such symptoms such as serial drainages, pleurodesis, and tunneled drainage catheters. Tunneled drainage catheters are a safe, effective, and a minimally invasive procedure to palliate the symptoms of malignant ascites and pleural effusion.

Efficacy of Cell-Free and Concentrated Ascites Reinfusion Therapy for Palliative Care in a Patient with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Case Report

Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) is recognized as a useful treatment to improve the symptoms caused by refractory ascites. Recently, a few clinical studies have reported the effects of CART for malignant ascites, especially in gynecological and gastrointestinal cancers. We report the case of malignant ascites in a patient with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) whose symptoms were relieved by CART. A 59-year-old Japanese male with MPM who had undergone pleural decortication had pleural and peritoneal recurrence. His general status deteriorated as he developed massive ascites due to peritoneal metastases. With the initiation of CART, he recovered well enough to receive cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy. Repeated use of CART contributed to the maintenance of his good general condition and enabled him to undergo successive systemic chemotherapy, which might have lengthened his life. This is the first report that demonstrates the efficacy of CART for palliative care in a patient with MPM. Our experience indicates that CART should be considered as a treatment option to control refractory malignant ascites regardless of the type of cancer.

Drainage of malignant ascites: patient selection and perspectives

Malignant ascites (MA) is a sign of advanced cancer and poor prognosis. MA can result in impairment in quality of life (QOL) and significant symptoms. As a supportive treatment, ascites can be drained by paracentesis (PC), percutaneously implanted catheters (tunneled, untunneled, central venous catheters), or peritoneal ports, or peritoneovenous shunts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of different drainage methods for the management of MA. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and 32 original articles met the inclusion criteria. Patients selected for permanent drain insertion demonstrated symptoms related to MA and had undergone repeated PC. The primary focus of the reviewed articles was procedural safety issues. The rate of technical success of drainage device installation was 100%. Most patients experienced improvements in symptom control after ascites drainage. When analyzed together, 19.7% (255/1297) of patients experienced any complication and 6.2% (81/1297) experienced serious adverse events during MA drainage. Complications were reported for every drainage method; however, the least occurred after PC or central venous catheter, while the most serious occurred after peritoneovenous shunts. Adverse events were as follows: catheter obstruction: 4.4%, infection: 4.1%, leakage: 3.5%, catheter dislodgment: 2.3%, hypotension: 0.6%, injuries during device insertion: 0.6%, renal impairment: 0.5%, electrolyte imbalance: 0.2%, other: 3.6%. PRO and QOL endpoints were available for 12 studies. When PRO were measured using an interview, a significant improvement in symptom control and QOL was reported in almost all patients. Once standardized questionnaires were used, improvements in symptomatic scores and role functioning were observed. Deterioration was observed in cognitive and emotional subscales. MA drainage is a safe and effective method to control symptoms associated with ascites, and should be perceived as a supportive care, that can be applied for those who need it at any time of their cancer trajectory. Patient selection should be performed using a thorough assessment of symptoms and QOL, and should not be delayed.

Pancreas Adenocarcinoma: Ascites, Clinical Manifestations, and Management Implications

BACKGROUND

Ascites develops in a subset of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) at presentation or as the disease advances. Limited data exist on the prognostic importance of malignant ascites in PAC. Our hypothesis is that this information will provide an understanding of the natural history and facilitate management decisions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 180 patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center diagnosed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2014, with PAC and with ascites either at presentation or that developed during the disease course.

RESULTS

For the 180 patients, the overall survival was 15 months. The time from diagnosis to ascites presentation was 11 months, and the survival time after ascites development was 1.8 months (range, 1.6-2.3 months; 95% confidence interval). Of 62 patients (34%) who had ascitic fluid analyzed, 36 (58%) had positive cytology. Fifty-one (82%) patients had a serum ascites albumin gradient ≥ 1, and 11 (18%) had serum ascites albumin gradient < 1. Sixty-four (36%) patients had their ascites managed solely by serial paracenteses. A total of 116 patients required a catheter; of these, 108 (93%) had a Tenckhoff catheter, 4 (3%) a Pleurx catheter, 4 (3%) a pigtail catheter, and 1 (1%) a Denver catheter. Eight (7%) patients required 2 catheters to be placed, and in 6 (5%), Tenckhoff catheters had to be removed. The main observed complications were spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in 7 (11%) managed with paracenteses versus 26 (23%) who had a catheter placed, catheter malfunction in 8 (7%), and acute renal failure in 6 (3%). After ascites development, 79 (44%) patients received active anti-cancer therapy, and 101 (56%) patients were managed with supportive care alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PAC who presented with or developed ascites, serial paracenteses and indwelling catheters are common methods used for providing symptomatic relief. The complication rate was higher with indwelling catheters, primarily related to infection (eg, bacterial peritonitis). Overall, ascites has a significantly negative prognostic import with a short median survival.

Permanent catheters for recurrent ascites-a critical and systematic review of study methodology

PURPOSE

Management of refractory ascites traditionally includes medical treatment with diuretics or intermittent paracentesis. Patients with recurrent ascites may benefit from the use of permanent intra-abdominal catheters with more frequent drainage without hospitalization. The objective was to systematically asses the methodology of factors and endpoints reported in studies investigating permanent catheters for recurrent ascites treatment.

METHODS

Using a systematic search strategy, we critically assessed the methodology when treating refractory ascites using a permanent catheter. Studies critically assessed included both retro- and prospective studies.

RESULTS

A total of 715 unique articles were found via PubMed, The Cochrane Library and Embase. Twenty-nine studies (tunnelled catheter = 12, peritoneal ports = 6 and peritoneovenous shunts = 11) with three distinct types of permanent catheters fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Only three studies reported technical success less than 100 %. Data on complications and treatment were not available in all papers; peritonitis (48 %), cellulitis (41 %), prophylactic antibiotics (48 %) and complications to catheter insertion were difficult to distinguish from advanced co-morbidity of patients. Thirteen studies (45 %) reported some type of evaluating patient experience or functional outcome, but only three studies used validated reproducible scales when assessing outcomes. Fifteen of the 29 studies included 30 patients or less.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge is limited because complications and outcomes are poorly defined. The expected increase in catheter treatment of refractory ascites necessitates comparative studies, using validated patient-related outcomes, and the reporting of unambiguous complications. A proposal of variables to include in future studies is presented.

Tenckhoff tunneled peritoneal catheter placement in the palliative treatment of malignant ascites: technical results and overall clinical outcome

Background

To assess the technical and clinical outcome of percutaneous insertion of tunneled peritoneal catheters in the palliative treatment of refractory malignant ascites and to determine the safety and feasibility of intraperitoneal administration of cytotoxic drugs through the tunneled catheter.

Materials and methods

Consecutive patients palliatively treated with a tunneled peritoneal catheter to drain the malignant ascites were identified. Patients’ medical history, procedural and clinical follow-up data, including complications and estimated survival, were reviewed. Additionally, a sub analysis of the patients with widespread ovarian cancer and refractory ascites treated with or without intraperitoneal administration of cytotoxic drugs was made.

Results

In all 94 patients it was technically feasible to insert the peritoneal drainage catheter and to drain a median of 3260 cc (range 100 cc – 8500 cc) of malignant ascitic fluid. Post procedural complications included catheter infection (n = 2; 2%), fluid leakage around the entry site (n = 4; 4%), catheter occlusion (n = 2; 2%), sleeve formation around the catheter tip (n = 1; 1%) and accidental loss of the catheter (n = 1; 1%). There was no increase in catheter infection rate in patients treated with or without intraperitoneal administration of cytotoxic drugs. Median overall survival after catheter insertion is 1.7 months.

Conclusions

Percutaneous insertion of a tunneled Tenckhoff catheter for the palliative drainage of malignant ascites and intraperitoneal infusion of cytotoxic drugs is feasible and associated with a very low complication rate, including catheter infection. These tunneled peritoneal lines are beneficial for symptomatic palliative treatment of refractory ascites and allow safe intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Repeat Large-Volume Paracentesis Versus Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter Placement for Malignant Ascites: A Cost-Minimization Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the point in time at which tunneled peritoneal catheter placement becomes less costly than repeat large-volume paracentesis (LVP) for patients with malignant ascites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Procedure costs were based on 2013 Medicare reimbursement rates. Rates for specific complications were obtained from the literature and were assigned costs. A decision tree-based Markov chain Monte Carlo model was designed with 11 cycles of 10 days, to simulate 4000 subjects per trial. Patients were grouped according to initial treatment decision (LVP vs catheter placement), and the total cost at the end of each 10-day cycle was calculated. The point at which catheter placement became less costly than LVP was determined. Additional simulations were used for bivariate analyses of all cost and probability variables and for trivariate analysis of cycle length and volume of fluid drained per cycle.

RESULTS

Individual input probabilities were not significantly different from corresponding simulation outcomes (p value range, 0.068-0.95). When complications were included in the model, the cost curves crossed at a mean (± SD) of 82.8 ± 3.6 days (range, 75.8-89.6 days), corresponding to a time between the performance of the ninth and 10th LVP procedures. Intersection occurred earlier in simulations with a shorter cycle length and less fluid per cycle, but it was minimally affected by changing individual complication probabilities and costs.

CONCLUSION

For patients with malignant ascites, LVP becomes more costly once the procedure is performed nine or 10 times or at approximately 83 days, if paracentesis is repeated every 10 days, with 5 L of fluid removed each time. Use of a tunneled peritoneal catheter improves the cost advantage for patients who receive LVP more frequently or patients who have less than 5 L of fluid drained per procedure.

The Impact of Tunneled Catheters for Ascites and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis on Patient Rehospitalizations

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to assess patient outcomes, complications, impact on rehospitalizations, and healthcare costs in patients with malignant ascites treated with tunneled catheters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 84 patients with malignant ascites (mean age, 60 years) were treated with tunneled catheters. Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and malignant ascites treated with tunneled drain catheter placement over a 3-year period were studied. Overall survival from the time of ascites and catheter placement were stratified by primary cancer and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Complications were graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). The differences between pre- and post-catheter admissions, hospitalizations, and Emergency Department (ED) visits, as well as related inpatient expenses were compared using paired t tests.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in gender, age, or race between different primary cancer subgroups. One patient (1%) developed bleeding (CTCAE-2). Four patients (5%) developed local cellulitis (CTCAE-2). Three patients (4%) had prolonged hospital stay (between 7 and 10 days) to manage ascites-related complications such as abdominal distention, discomfort, or pain. Comparison between pre- and post-catheter hospitalizations showed significantly lower admissions (-1.4/month, p < 0.001), hospital stays (-4.2/month, p = 0.003), and ED visits (-0.9/month, p = 0.002). The pre- and post-catheter treatment health care cost was estimated using MS-DRG IPPS payment system and it demonstrated significant cost savings from decreased inpatient admissions in post-treatment period (-$9535/month, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tunneled catheter treatment of malignant ascites is safe, feasible, well tolerated, and cost effective. Tunneled catheter treatment may play an important role in improving patients' quality of life and outcomes while controlling health care expenditures.

Malignant ascites in patients with terminal cancer is effectively treated with permanent peritoneal catheter

Background

Malignant ascites is a pathological condition caused by intra- or extra-abdominal disseminated cancer. The object of treatment is palliation. In search of an effective and minimally invasive palliative treatment of malignant ascites placement of a permanent intra peritoneal catheter has been suggested.

Purpose

To evaluate our experiences with treatment of malignant ascites by implantation of a permanent PleurX catheter.

Material and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted, comprising 20 consecutive patients with terminal cancer, who had a permanent PleurX catheter implanted because of malignant ascites in the period from February to November 2014. Using the patients’ medical records, we retrieved data on patients and procedures.

Results

The technical success rate was 100%. Catheter patency was 95.2%, one catheter was removed due to dislocation. Ten patients (50.0%) experienced minor adverse events. No procedural difficulties were reported and there was no need for additional treatment of malignant ascites after catheter implantation. Median residual survival after catheter implantation was 27 days.

Conclusion

Implantation of a permanent PleurX catheter is a minimally invasive and effective procedure with only minor adverse events and a high rate of catheter patency in patients with malignant ascites caused by terminal cancer disease.

Central venous pressure catheter for large-volume paracentesis in refractory ascites

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

About 10 % of cirrhotic patients are unresponsive to sodium restriction and diuretics and develop refractory ascites. Such patients usually require recurrent large-volume paracentesis and lots of hospital admissions. Hereby, we introduce a method applying a central vein (CV) catheter for large-volume paracentesis in patients with refractory ascites in up to 4 days associated with sodium restriction and high dose of diuretics.

METHODS

Non-tunneled triple lumen CV catheter was used to drain the ascites fluid of 30 cirrhotic patients. After precise percussion, the point of highest fluid accumulation was marked for puncture. Then, the skin and subcutaneous tissue were anesthetized. CV catheter set guide wire was entered into the peritoneal cavity and the dilator of the CV catheter set was passed through the guide wire and extracted after some rotations around its insertion site on the skin. The catheter was passed over the guide wire and the guide wire was extracted gradually from one of the lumens and fixed to the skin.

RESULTS

Nineteen males and 11 females with mean (±SD) age of 59.4 ± 11.7 years old underwent the procedure. A minimum of 9 and maximum of 29 L (12 ± 6.6 L) ascites fluid drained during a minimum of 2 and maximum of 5 days of hospital stay. All catheters were patent during the drainage. None of the patients developed hemodynamic instability. Number of re-hospitalizations for paracentesis was 1.9 times during the following year. No complication occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique is a simple noninvasive method that can be performed in the endoscopy unit or even at the patient's bedside and may reduce the need for repeated admissions.

[A case of successful endoscopic clipping for iatrogenic colon perforation induced by peritoneal catheter insertion]

Advanced cancer patients with refractory ascites often do not respond to conventional treatments including dietary sodium restriction, diuretics, and repeated large volume paracentesis. In these patients, continuous peritoneal drainage by an indwelling catheter may be an effective option for managing refractory ascites with a relative low complication rate. Peritoneal catheter-induced complications include hypotension, hematoma, leakage, cellulitis, peritonitis, and bowel perforation. Although bowel perforation is a very rare complication, it can become disastrous and necessitates emergency surgical treatment. Herein, we report a case of a 57-year-old male with refractory ascites due to advanced liver cancer who experienced iatrogenic colonic perforation after peritoneal drainage catheter insertion and was treated successfully with endoscopic clipping.

Safety and efficacy of the PleurX catheter for the treatment of malignant ascites

BACKGROUND

Malignant ascites is a common complication seen in association with various types of neoplastic processes. Due to high recurrence rates, patients may require multiple paracenteses, which have associated complications such as increased risk of bleeding, infection, pain, and volume and electrolyte depletion.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the management of malignant ascites by placement of the PleurX® tunneled catheter system at a single center.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 38 patients who underwent PleurX catheter placement for refractory malignant ascites between February 2006 and March 2012 at our institution. Pretreatment characteristics and outcome measures were reported using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The population included 21 males and 17 females with a mean age of 60.6 years (range, 36-79 years) diagnosed with metastatic disease from a variety of primary malignancies, the most common of which was pancreatic cancer (10 patients). In 84% of patients (32/38) who were not lost to follow-up, mean survival time was 40.7 days (range 4-434 days). Technical success rate of catheter placement was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The PleurX catheter can be used to manage malignant ascites in severely ill patients with metastatic cancer, with a high rate of procedural success and a low incidence of potentially serious adverse events, infections, or catheter-related complications.

Tunneled peritoneal drainage catheter placement for refractory ascites: single-center experience in 188 patients

PURPOSE

To assess the success and safety of tunneled peritoneal drainage catheters for the management of ascites refractory to medical management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 188 consecutive patients (83 male, 105 female; average age 59 y) with refractory ascites were treated with tunneled peritoneal drainage catheters from January 1, 2006, to August 10, 2012. A combination of fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance was used to insert all catheters. Patient history, procedural records, and clinical follow-up documents were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data (malignancy, renal disease, chemotherapy, neutropenia, albumin levels) were compared with respect to patency and complication rates with the use of odds ratios. Catheter survival curves were generated with the Kaplan-Meier method and life-table analysis for the cumulative and infection-free survival of primary and secondary catheters.

RESULTS

A total of 193 catheter placements or interventions were performed in 188 patients with refractory ascites: 170 catheters (93%) were placed for malignant etiologies and 13 (7%) for nonmalignant etiologies. The most common malignancies were ovarian (22%), pancreatic (12%), and breast (11%). The most common nonmalignant etiologies were end-stage liver disease (n = 7) and heart failure (n = 6). There was a 100% technical success rate for catheter insertion; no procedure-related deaths or major placement complications were identified. Catheter survival ranged from 0 to 796 days (mean, 60 d), with a total of 11,936 cumulative catheter-days. Fourteen postplacement complications were identified: five patients experienced catheter malfunction, four had leakage of ascites at the incisional site requiring suture placement, three had cellulitis of the tunnel tract, and two developed peritonitis. The annual complication event rate was 0.43 events per year (ie, 0.12 events per 100 catheter-days). Pancreatic malignancy was associated with a significantly increased rate of catheter malfunction (ie, occlusion).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiologic insertion of tunneled peritoneal drainage catheters demonstrated a 100% technical success rate for insertion and an acceptable complication rate for the management of refractory ascites.

Outcomes of permanent peritoneal ports for the management of recurrent malignant ascites

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ascites complicates many advanced malignancies, resulting in abdominal pain, discomfort, anorexia, nausea, and dyspnea. Percutaneous drainage relieves symptoms in the vast majority of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the course and outcomes in a consecutive series of patients with recurrent ascites managed with permanent peritoneal ports.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal descriptive study from 2006 to 2011, involving patients treated at the Sydney Cancer Center (New South Wales, Australia).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A total of 155 drainages were performed in 24 patients; 26% of drainages (n=40) in the patient's home and the remainder in the ambulatory care clinic. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occured in less than 25% of all draining procedures. An improvement in symptoms was demonstrated in almost half of all individual drainage procedures. Our findings suggest that peritoneal ports are efficacious, safe, and are associated with symptomatic relief in most patients.

PleurX peritoneal catheter drainage system for vacuum-assisted drainage of treatment-resistant, recurrent malignant ascites: a NICE Medical Technology Guidance

The PleurX peritoneal drainage catheter for drainage of malignant ascites in a community setting has been evaluated by the NICE Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme. This article outlines the evidence included in the Sponsor's submission, the independent critique by the External Assessment Centre (EAC) and the recommendations made by the Medical Technologies Advisory Committee (MTAC). In accordance with the scope issued by NICE, the intervention technology was the indwelling PleurX peritoneal catheter drainage system, the comparator was large-volume paracentesis (LVP; inpatient or outpatient) and the population was patients with treatment-resistant, recurrent malignant ascites. Nine studies (ten papers) were identified with a total of 180 PleurX-treated patients; six were case series with more than four patients that, despite being low in the hierarchy of evidence, provided useful safety information. Technical success of the initial PleurX placement procedure was 100% across five studies which reported this outcome. One study reported equal complication rates between patients treated with indwelling PleurX catheters (40 patients and 40 catheters) and those receiving repeated LVPs (67 patients and 392 procedures), 7.5% (3/40; 95% CI 1.6, 20) and 7.5% (5/67; 95% CI 2.2, 15), respectively. All remaining studies were single-arm and reported complication rates of between 0% and 59%; this wide range was largely due to variation in the definition of complications and adverse events. Using validated tools, one case series reported improvements in several ascites-related symptoms after placement of the PleurX catheter; however, an overall quality-of-life improvement at 12 weeks was not demonstrated. Positive patient opinions relating to improved symptom control and convenience were reported in a qualitative study. Cost analysis demonstrated that PleurX offered savings to the NHS when compared with repeated LVPs performed in an inpatient setting. This saving of £679 per patient was driven primarily by reducing hospital bed days (year 2009-2010 values), but would require 23.5 additional community nurse visits. Advice from clinical experts was that additional home visits were overestimated as many patients would receive such visits regardless of whether a PleurX drain had been fitted. The model demonstrated that PleurX would be more expensive than LVP procedures performed in a setting where one or less hospital bed days were used (e.g. day case or outpatient). There was uncertainty surrounding the number of patients for whom insertion of a PleurX drain would be appropriate as well as the point in the care pathway at which such treatment should be administered. MTAC supported the case for adoption and considered that the available evidence showed PleurX was clinically effective, has low complication rates, can improve quality of life and is less costly than inpatient LVP. In Medical Technology Guidance 9 (MTG9), NICE recommended that PleurX peritoneal catheter drainage system be considered for use in patients with treatment-resistant, recurrent malignant ascites.

[Pathogenesis and management of refractory malignant ascites]

Malignant ascites are the cancer-associated accumulation of fluids in the peritoneal cavity. The neoplasms most frequently associated with ascites are ovarian, breast, colon, stomach and pancreas adenocarcinomas. Symptoms are abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, dyspnea and limbs oedemas. Several pathophysiological mechanisms might be implicated such as peritoneal carcinomatosis, lymphatic vessels' obstruction, portal hypertension or heart failure. Its diagnosis is most often performed in a context of already known neoplasia. Malignant ascites are associated with a pejorative evolution. Ascites which cannot be mobilized or show early recurrence and cannot be prevented by medical treatment are defined as refractory ascites. Therefore, management of refractory malignant ascites takes place in the context of palliative care and aims at improving the quality of life of these patients. This review lists the current data reported on the pathophysiology of malignant ascites and describes the present and future options for refractory malignant ascites management.

Percutaneous management of malignant fluid collections

The development of a pleural effusion or ascites in patients with underlying malignancy typically heralds end-stage disease and often results in a significant reduction in the patient&'s quality of life. The goal of treatment is the safe and effective palliation of symptoms with minimal inconvenience to the patient. Malignant fluid collections in the chest and abdomen are amenable to percutaneous management with either intermittent thoracentesis or paracentesis or by placement of temporary or permanent drainage catheters.

PleurX drain use in the management of malignant ascites: safety, complications, long-term patency and factors predictive of success

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article was to assess the success, safety, complication profile and factors associated with long-term patency of tunnelled peritoneal drains (PleurX) in the treatment of refractory malignant ascites.

METHODS

Over a 4-year period, 28 consecutive patients (32 drain insertions) with refractory malignant ascites were treated with a PleurX drain. The study group comprised 7 males and 21 females (mean age, 61 years). A combination of fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance was used to insert 4 drains; the remaining 28 drains were inserted under ultrasound guidance alone. Patient history, biochemical profiles, pathological and procedural records and clinical follow-up until death were reviewed. Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves (p<0.05 was considered significant).

RESULTS

There was a 100% technical success rate for the insertion of the drain; there were no procedure-related deaths and no major complications. Only minor complications were reported: three (10%) immediate; three (10%) early; and two (7%) late. Factors significantly associated with these complications included current chemotherapy, low haemoglobin levels, low albumin levels, high white cell count and high c-reactive protein levels. The length of time the drains remained in situ, and therefore patent, ranged from 5 to 365 days (mean, 113 days). Out of the original 28 tunnelled drains, 24 (86%) remained in situ and functioning until the patients' death. Four (14%) drains dislodged and a subsequent PleurX drain was inserted on the opposite side of the abdominal wall. These new drains remained patent until the patient's death. The annual event rate was 0.45 events per year. A comorbid diagnosis of renal disease or chemotherapy was significantly related to a decreased length of patency.

CONCLUSION

The use of tunnelled peritoneal drains is safe and effective and we would advocate their use as a first-line approach in patients with refractory malignant ascites. Care and regular follow-up is indicated following insertion of the drain in all patients, especially those on chemotherapy and those with a pre-procedure diagnosis of renal disease.

[Permanent tunneled drainage for malignant ascites: initial experience with the PleurX® catheter]

OBJECTIVE

The most common treatment in recurrent malignant ascites is generally temporary peritoneal drainage. We present our experience in placing permanent tunneled catheters in a series of patients and analyze the safety and efficacy of the treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used total aseptic measures in the interventional ultrasonography suite to place permanent tunneled catheters in 10 patients under ultrasonographic guidance and local anesthesia.

RESULTS

The catheters remained patent for a median of 52 days in the nine patients who died. In one of these, the catheter was withdrawn while still patent due to generalized sepsis. At the end of the study, one patient still had a permeable catheter 124 days after placement.

CONCLUSION

Although the low number of patients in our series precludes generalizations, tunneled peritoneal catheters seem to be a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for malignant ascites in terminal oncologic patients. This approach facilitates the draining of the ascites at home, obviating the need for repeated hospital visits and punctures and the risks involved therein. Nevertheless, further experience and prospective randomized trials are necessary.

Indwelling catheters for the management of refractory malignant ascites: a systematic literature overview and retrospective chart review

The safety and efficacy of indwelling intraperitoneal (IP) catheters for the management of refractory malignant ascites is unclear. A systematic literature overview and retrospective chart review of patients with malignant refractory ascites who underwent indwelling IP catheter placement was performed. Standardized literature abstraction and chart review templates were used to ensure that consistent information was collected. Fifteen publications met literature search criteria, representing 221 patients. Tenckhoff (Quinton Instrument Company, Seattle, WA, USA), Pleurex (Denver Biomedical Inc., Golden, CO, USA), and peritoneal catheters were used, along with IP ports. A median 5.9% of cases (range: 2.5%-34%) had documented peritonitis. In the literature, untunneled catheters were most commonly associated with infections. Our chart review added 19 cases from two academic institutions to this literature (median age: 60 years [range: 31-85]; females: 17 [89%]; gynecological malignancies: 14 [73%]). Palliative management before catheter placement included diuretics (n=4 [21%]) and multiple paracenteses (n=11 [58%] had two or more taps [range: 2-8]). Median time from diagnosis to catheter placement was 25 months (range: 1-77). Interventions were: French pigtail catheters (n=16 [84%]), Tenckhoff catheter (n=1 [5%]), and Port-A-Caths (Smith Medical MD, St. Paul, MN, USA) (n=2; 11%). Four (21%) catheters were tunneled. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in six cases (32%). Two cases (11%) had documented infections, seven catheters (37%) became occluded, and two leaked (11%). The median time from catheter until death was 36 days (range: 4-660). Nine patients (47%) were admitted to hospice. In these retrospective studies, indwelling IP catheters appear to be a safe and effective palliative strategy to manage refractory malignant ascites, without overwhelming infection rates.

Prospective evaluation of the PleurX catheter when used to treat recurrent ascites associated with malignancy

PURPOSE

To prospectively assess the safety of the PleurX catheter in the management of recurrent ascites in patients with advanced abdominal malignancy and the consequent quality of life among these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, prospective study of PleurX catheters implanted between March 2004 and April 2005 for control of nonhepatic abdominal ascites associated with malignancy. A total of 34 subjects were included (age range, 40-81 years; mean age, 64.3 y) who underwent 440 drainage sessions. Subjects kept records of volume and frequency of ascites drainage and recorded any difficulties encountered with use of the device. Subjects assessed symptoms before device insertion and weekly for as long as 12 weeks. Serum laboratory values reflecting overall volume status were tracked.

RESULTS

All catheter insertions were successful without major procedural complications. Twenty-nine (85%) required no catheter intervention or separate therapeutic paracentesis during 12 weeks observation or until the patient's death. Three needed a total of 13 interventions to restore catheter function. Before 12 weeks, 26 subjects died. Five discontinued catheter use as a result of catheter function despite the presence of ascites. Ascites resolved in five patients. Bloating and abdominal discomfort were significantly reduced at 2 and 8 weeks (P < .05). At weekly follow-up, 83%-100% of subjects reported their ascites to be well controlled. There were no significant changes in blood chemistry results between baseline and 12 weeks. One case of peritonitis at 10 weeks resolved with antibiotic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In terminally ill patients, PleurX catheter use resulted in improvement of ascites-related discomfort and was associated with low rates of serious adverse clinical events and catheter failure.

Percutaneous peritoneovenous shunt for treatment of refractory ascites

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of a percutaneously placed peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) in patients with refractory ascites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Under fluoroscopic and ultrasonographic (US) guidance, the authors placed a PVS in 55 patients (39 men and 16 women; mean age, 56 years) with refractory ascites and symptomatic abdominal distention. The cause of ascites was liver cirrhosis (n = 36), carcinomatosis (n = 17), ruptured cysts with polycystic kidney disease (n = 1), and idiopathic refractory ascites (n = 1). The authors retrospectively evaluated technical feasibility, shunt patency, complications, and clinical outcomes of each patient.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%, and symptomatic improvement was achieved in all but one patient. Complications occurred in 17 of the 55 patients (31%): five patients had variceal bleeding; three patients had ascites leakage; two patients each had disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, transient abdominal pain, shunt infection, and venous thrombosis; and one patient had pulmonary thromboembolism. Thirty patients (54%) died 2-690 days after the procedure (mean, 117 days), and their lifetime shunt patency was 84%. Eight patients were lost to follow-up. Seventeen patients were alive for 60-1,200 days, and their shunt patency was 71%. There was no significant difference in shunt patency between the two groups with benign and malignant ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

The percutaneous placement of a PVS was a technically feasible and effective method for symptomatic relief of refractory ascites.

Treatment of malignant ascites

OPINION STATEMENT

The management of malignant ascites is a significant challenge in gastrointestinal medical oncology. Current treatment strategies include diuretic therapy, paracentesis, peritoneal drains, and venous shunts. However, there are no established evidence-based guidelines, and there is a lack of randomized controlled trials identifying optimal therapy. Newer therapies are emerging and will need further study. By summarizing published studies, this review is intended to add some clarity to currently available strategies for the management of malignant ascites associated with hepatobiliary cancers. Notably, however, much of the available data for the management of malignant ascites comes from the gynecologic oncology experience, specifically from studies in ovarian cancer. Therefore, successful approaches used in this malignancy may be lead candidates for development in hepatobiliary cancer-associated ascites and are reviewed in this paper.

Percutaneous placement of peritoneal port-catheter in patients with malignant ascites

We report our experience with a radiologically placed peritoneal port-catheter in palliation of malignant ascites. Port-catheters were successfully placed under ultrasonographic and fluoroscopic guidance in seven patients (five women, two men) who had symptomatic malignant ascites. The long-term primary patency rate was 100%. The mean duration of catheter function was 148 days. Seven patients had a total of 1040 port-days. Two patients received intraperitoneal chemotherapy via the port-catheter. There were no procedure-related mortality and major complications. Minor complications such as ascitic fluid leakage from the peritoneal entry site, migration of the catheter tip to the right upper quadrant, and reversal of the port reservoir occurred in four patients. None of these complications affected the drainage and required port explantation. In patients with symptomatic malignant ascites, a peritoneal port-catheter can provide palliation and eliminate multiple hospital visits for repeated paracentesis with high patency and low complication rates.

Surgical Management of Metastatic Peritoneal or Pleural Disease

The surgeon's role in the treatment of malignant peritoneal disease has expanded over time, stemming from a better understanding of tumor biology. For the majority of patients, carcinomatosis is a terminal process with surgical intervention being reserved for palliation of bowel obstruction or symptomatic ascites. However, for select patients with favorable tumor biologies, aggressive surgical approaches may result in long-term survival. This review describes the patterns of peritoneal tumor dissemination, surgical palliation of malignant bowel obstruction or ascites, and the principles, indications, toxicities, and overall results of cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. On the other hand, long-term survival is rarely expected for malignant pleural disease unless the causal tumor is highly responsive to systemic chemotherapy. There are controversies and considerable geographic variations in the management of malignant pleural effusions. However, less invasive ambulatory palliative treatments for patients so afflicted are gaining popularity.

Ovarian cancer and ascites: A questionnaire on current management in the United kingdom

A questionnaire on ovarian cancer ascites management was sent to members of the British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS), the National Gynaecological Oncology Nurses, and the Assoication of Palliative Medicine. Questions were asked on diuretics, hematologic investigations, paracentesis, and duration of stay. Nine hundred ninety-five questionnaires were distributed, of which 492 replies were received (49% response rate). Fifty-five percent of responders used paracentesis as first-line management of ovarian cancer ascites (15% diuretics). Seventy-five percent performed some blood tests in relation to paracentesis. Ultrasound was used by 43.6% during paracentesis (15.7% for direct visualization, 27.9% to mark an entry site). Seventy-seven percent used a Bonanno catheter. Eighty-three percent used no intravenous fluids during paracentesis, and there was a wide variation in the amount and rate of drainage of ascites (1 L maximum up to free drainage of all ascites, median 5 L; 0.5 L per hour to free drainage). Gynecologists tended to use more interventions (paracentesis, ultrasound, and intravenous fluids) than palliative care physicians or medical oncologists, while palliative care physicians used fewer interventions but admitted patients for longer periods of time. This identified several areas for future study: the value of hematologic investigations, the use of outpatient management for paracentesis, and the use of ultrasound and the rate of drainage of ascites.

Palliating Patients Who Have Unresectable Colorectal Cancer: Creating the Right Framework and Salient Symptom Management

The last phases of colorectal malignant illness may be the most challenging and saddening for all involved, but they offer opportunities to become the most rewarding. This transformation of hopelessness to fulfillment requires a willingness by surgeon, patient, and patient's family to trust one another to realistically set goals of care, stick together, and not let the treatment of the disease become a surrogate for treating the suffering that characterizes grave illness.

Long-term semi-permanent catheter use for the palliation of malignant ascites

BACKGROUND

Malignant ascites is a common complication of advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer and multiple other neoplasms, causing significant patient morbidity as well as a large treatment obstacle for the physician. While multiple methods of peritoneal drainage have been reported, including large volume therapeutic paracentesis, peritoneogastric, peritoneourinary, and peritoneovenous shunting procedures, peritoneal port-a-catheter placement and hemodialysis catheter drainage, all have their associated limitations and adverse effects.

CASE

We report off label semi-permanent catheter placement in a patient for treatment of malignant ascites that functioned effectively with drainage of 2 l daily for approximately 18 months, the longest reported use in the literature.

CONCLUSION

Long-term semi-permanent catheter use is a potentially valuable modality for the palliation of malignant ascites.

Palliative care for patients with end-stage liver disease ineligible for liver transplantation

The proportion of patients with ESLD who will be managed without liver transplantation will increase in the near future, largely as a result of the increasing age of the population. Patients with ESLD are subject to many physical and psychosocial symptoms that negatively affect health-related quality of life. Sleep quality should be maximized by controlling pruritus and leg cramps. Many frequently used therapies are not supported by a strong evidence base. Advance directives should be addressed with all patients with ESLD, preferably in the outpatient setting before an acute deterioration. Medicare provides a hospice benefit for patients with ESLD, and referral to a hospice is appropriate for patients with an expected survival of 6 months or less.

Palliation of malignant ascites

The management of recurrent, symptomatic malignant ascites can be problematic for physicians and patients. The most common, low-risk method is large-volume paracentesis. Patient disease progression often leads to rapid reaccumulation of ascites, which requires frequent return visits to the hospital for symptom management. Other techniques have been developed to achieve palliation of symptoms, including tunneled external drainage catheters, peritoneal ports, and peritoneovenous

Peritoneal Ports for Treatment of Intractable Ascites

PURPOSE

To present clinical data for a new peritoneal port for minimally invasive treatment of intractable ascites that can be used for aspiration in a patient's home.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight consecutive peritoneal ports were placed in 27 patients with intractable ascites. Ascites etiology was malignancy in 22 patients, cirrhosis in three, pancreatic duct injury in one, and unknown in one. Technical and clinical success and complications were evaluated until the time of death or the end of the study.

RESULTS

All ports were inserted successfully with removal of all ascites, and all patients had immediate and complete symptom relief. Ascites was managed by periodic drainage, typically by a visiting nurse in the patient's home. The long-term clinical success rate was 96%, with 26 of 27 patients exhibiting maintained relief of symptoms until death or the end of the study. The long-term patency rate was 100% after 1,810 patient-days. Only one patient (4%) had a major complication. This was a port leak that required port exchange. Subsequently, the patient developed bacterial peritonitis.

CONCLUSION

Peritoneal ports appear to be a safe, effective, minimally invasive treatment for intractable ascites. This device allows for reliable ascites aspiration in the patient's home.

Comparison of Percutaneous Management Techniques for Recurrent Malignant Ascites

The Pleurx subcutaneous tunneled catheter is approved for repeated, long-term drainage of malignant pleural effusions; however, there is limited literature describing its use in malignant ascites. The authors compared the safety and efficacy of two percutaneous drainage methods: large volume paracentesis and Pleurx catheter placement over a 41-month period. The Pleurx catheter provided effective palliation with a complication rate similar to that for large volume paracentesis, while preventing the need for frequent trips to the hospital for repeated percutaneous drainage.