Angioplasty for the treatment of visceral ischemia

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in the management of chronic mesenteric angina: A single center experience

INTRODUCTION

The objective of our study was to review the results of percutaneous angioplasty (PTA)/stenting in the treatment of patients who presented with symptoms and angiographic findings of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 13 consecutive patients from a single institution who underwent PTA/stenting for the treatment of symptoms suggestive of CMI.

RESULTS

All 13 patients in our study were men, and most common presenting symptoms were weight loss and postprandial pain. Atherosclerosis was the most common cause. PTA and stenting was performed in 9 patients and PTA alone was done in 4 patients. Primary technical success rate was 92% with complete resolution of symptoms within 2 weeks in all patients. No statistical difference was noted in primary clinical success rate based on the number of vessels treated or the method of treatment. However, in patients whom SMA was treated had longer duration of symptom-free survival as compared to other vessels.

CONCLUSION

PTA and stenting are very effective therapeutic options for patients presenting with CMI symptoms. It should be considered as the first-line of management in such patients.

Chronic Visceral Ischemia: Symptom-Free Survival After Open Surgical Repair

A retrospective review of patients treated with a history of chronic visceral ischemia (CVI) was made to determine primary patency of open surgical repair and estimated symptom-free survival. Patients with CVI between 1990 and 2003 were reviewed. Included were those with chronic symptoms alone (C-CVI) and acute-on-chronic symptoms (A-CVI). Data were obtained from a vascular database. Symptom-free survival and graft patency were estimated by using product limit estimates. Fifty-eight patients (13 men, 45 women; mean age: 63 years) were treated surgically for C-CVI (34 patients) and A-CVI (24 patients). All patients had postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss (mean: 17 kg). One fourth reported food fear. Preoperative imaging demonstrated disease of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) (100%; 64% occluded), celiac axis (89%; 37% occluded), and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (54%; 60% occluded). Multiple vessels were involved in 95% of patients (mean: 2.3 vessels/patient). Operative management included antegrade revascularization of 80 vessels. Combined aortic and/or renal procedures were performed in 7 patients. Patient demographics and visceral disease did not differ for C-CVI and A-CVI; however, perioperative mortality differed significantly (10% for C-CVI vs 54% for A-CVI [p<0.001]). Intestinal gangrene at presentation was associated with perioperative (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.6; 95% CI: 2.7–21.6; p=0.0002) and follow-up death (HR: 7.8; CI 2.8–21.9; p< 0.0001). Follow-up (mean: 34 months) was complete for 54/68 vessels (79%). Estimated primary and primary assisted patency at 5 years were 81% and 89% respectively. Estimated symptom-free survival for hospital survivors was 57% at 70 months. Open antegrade methods of visceral artery repair for CVI were durable and associated with 57% symptom-free survival at 70 months. Patient demographics and distribution of visceral artery anatomy were similar; however, perioperative mortality for C-CVI and A-CVI differed dramatically. Improved outcomes for A-CVI require recognition and treatment of CVI before onset of intestinal gangrene.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia: critical review and guidelines for management

BACKGROUND

CMI is caused by chronic occlusive disease of mesenteric arteries. In such an uncommon disease, clear recommendations are strongly needed. Unfortunately, treatment options for symptomatic CMI are still controversial and no guidelines exist.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of the last 25-years was conducted through MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Review/Trials register to identify studies reporting on CMI treatment with more than 10 patients. Primary outcomes were perioperative mortality and morbidity rates. Secondary outcomes were survival rates, primary and secondary patency rates, vessels treated, CMI recurrence, follow-up (FU), technical success (TS), and in-hospital length of stay (InH-LOS). Patients were divided into endovascular treatment (ET) or open treatment (OT) groups. Subsequently, primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed by study publication year for the interval periods 1986-2000 ("A") and 2001-2010 ("B"). Differences were assessed using the t-test and the χ(2) test.

RESULTS

Forty-three articles with 1,795 patients were included. Perioperative mortality and morbidity rates were lower in the ET group. No difference in survival rate was observed. Primary and secondary patencies were superior in the OT group. A greater number of vessels were revascularized in the OT group. CMI recurrence was more frequent in the ET group. FU was longer in the OT group. TS was superior in the OT group and InH-LOS was shorter in the ET group. A higher number of patients were treated by ET in the period "A." No differences in mortality and morbidity were observed between period "A" and "B" in ET and OT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the lower periprocedural mortality and morbidity after ET, this approach should be considered as the first treatment option in most CMI patients, especially in those with severe malnutrition. Primary OT should be restricted to cases that do not qualify for ET or good surgical risk patients with long life expectancy. Considering better long-term results of OT, ET treatment should be considered as a bridge therapy to OT in some patients requiring retreatment if ET does not preclude subsequent OT.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia: diagnosis and management

Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is the most common vascular disorder involving the intestines, however it is unusual in clinical practice. The redundancy of the visceral circulation with multiple interconnections between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is the most likely explanation for the infrequent occurrence of CMI in clinical practice. Atherosclerosis is by the far the most common etiology of CMI. The increased utilization of diagnostic abdominal cross-sectional imaging has increased the recognition of atherosclerotic mesenteric stenoses. CMI is a clinical diagnosis, based upon symptoms and consistent anatomic findings. The classic setting for CMI is a female patient presenting with post-prandial abdominal discomfort that results in significant weight loss. Endovascular therapy with stenting has become the most common method chosen for revascularization having replaced open surgery with its associated morbidity and mortality.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia

Clinical manifestations of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) can range from vague abdominal pain to debilitating states of intestinal angina resulting in significant weight loss and morbidity. Once the condition has been diagnosed, treatment usually is elective, except in rare cases of rapid progression to acute mesenteric ischemia. Medical management of CMI is mostly supportive. However, in disorders of coagulation, antiplatelet agents and warfarin may be helpful to prevent further thrombosis, and these disorders may require lifelong therapy. For decades, the mainstay of therapy for CMI has been surgery. Extensive disease often requires complete revascularization, although bypass of the superior mesenteric artery alone also has been shown to be effective. Multiple variations of surgical bypass have been advocated but require further evaluation to determine efficacy. Transaortic endarterectomy is a viable option for limited disease. Minimally invasive vascular procedures such as percutaneous endovascular angioplasty and stenting are proving to be effective for short-segment atherosclerotic stenosis, particularly near the origin of the vessels. Although endovascular therapy has less long-term durability compared with open surgical procedures, these treatments prove simpler, with shortened hospital stays and reduced morbidity. Furthermore, angiographic therapy is a feasible alternative for patients in whom surgery is deemed precarious.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia: endovascular versus open revascularization

To review 20 years of literature on chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI), examining its complex clinical presentation and comparing open and endovascular treatment options.

METHODS

The PubMed and EBSCOHost electronic databases were queried to identify English-language articles published over the last 20 years. Scrutiny of the retrieved articles identified 1939 patients (mean age 65 years). Of these, 1163 patients underwent open surgery: 714 between 2000 and 2009 and 449 between 1990 and 1999. Of the 776 patients undergoing endovascular repairs, the majority (684) were performed between 2000 and 2009; 92 patients were treated between 1990 and 1999. Data were entered in an electronic database and were pooled for categorical analysis.

RESULTS

No major differences were seen among open surgeries or among endovascular surgeries performed when comparing the 2 time periods. On comparing open and endovascular surgeries performed between 2000 and 2009, symptom improvement was 2.4 times more likely after open compared to endovascular surgery (95% CI 1.5 to 3.6, p<0.001). Five-year primary patency and 5-year assisted primary patency were 3.8 (95% CI 2.4 to 5.8, p<0.001) and 6.4 (95% CI 1.3 to 30.1, p = 0.02) times greater in the open group. Freedom from symptoms at 5 years was 4.4 times greater for open versus endovascular (95% CI 2.8 to 7.0, p<0.001). The complication rate for open versus endovascular surgery was 3.2 times greater (95% CI 2.5 to 4.2, p<0.001). The difference in mortality was not statistically significant (p = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that open revascularization surpasses endovascular procedures in long-term vessel patency and control of symptoms. Patients undergoing open procedures do, however, develop increased complications perioperatively. The preferred revascularization approach used in treating this condition should be tailored to the anatomy and physiology of each patient.

Endovascular treatment of chronic arterial mesenteric ischemia: a changing perspective?

Endovascular treatment for chronic mesenteric ischemia is growing in popularity because of its lower periprocedural morbidity and mortality than open surgery. It is especially suitable for the high-risk surgical candidate and for those who have a poor nutritional state, although endovascular surgery may not be possible in patients with ostial occlusions or heavily calcified vessels. A positive response to angioplasty is helpful to secure a diagnosis in patients with slightly atypical symptoms. There are little data at present to suggest that primary stenting is better than angioplasty alone, but insertion of a stent may be valuable as a rescue procedure following dissection, vascular recoil, or thrombosis during angioplasty. The superior mesenteric artery is probably the most important vessel to treat but, where this is impossible, celiac or inferior mesenteric artery dilatation may have therapeutic benefit. However, there is some evidence at present favoring multiple, as opposed to single-vessel, angioplasty or stenting. Long-term patency is better after mesenteric bypass, which may be preferred in the younger and fitter patient. Treatment of the celiac artery compression syndrome is primarily surgical, but stent insertion may have a role as a secondary procedure where there is a residual stenosis after median arcuate ligament division.

Open or percutaneous revascularization for chronic splanchnic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Treatment of chronic splanchnic syndrome remains controversial. In the past 10 years, endovascular repair (ER) has replaced open repair (OR) to some extent. This evidence summary reviews the available evidence for ER or OR of chronic splanchnic syndrome.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE database was performed to identify all studies that evaluated treatment of chronic splanchnic syndrome between 1988 and 2009.

RESULTS

The best available evidence consists of prospectively accumulated but retrospectively analyzed data with a high risk for confounding. Only a few of these studies incorporated functional tests to assess splanchnic ischemia before or after treatment. ER has the advantage of low short-term morbidity but the disadvantage of decreased long-term primary patency compared with OR. ER and OR have similar rates of secondary patency, although the reintervention rate after ER is higher.

CONCLUSION

ER appears to be preferential in the treatment of elderly patients and in patients with comorbidity, severe cachexia, or hostile abdomen. Long-term results after OR are excellent. OR can still be proposed as the preferred option for relatively young and fit patients.

Open and endovascular revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: tabular review of the literature

Chronic mesenteric ischemia is an uncommon disease in vascular surgery practice worldwide. Open revascularization remains the best treatment for low-risk patients due to durability and efficacy. Endovascular revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia was primarily indicated for elderly and higher-risk patients, but this has changed over the past 10 years due to development of more precise devices and lower morbidity and mortality rates despite the higher recurrence and restenosis rates. Our purpose was to summarize the data on endovascular and open revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia in a schematic tabular presentation.

Management of chronic mesenteric ischemia. The role of endovascular therapy

Chronic mesenteric ischemia is an uncommon disorder manifested most commonly as abdominal pain. Surgical revascularization has traditionally been the treatment of choice. Endovascular management of this entity was originally attempted as an alternative for high-risk patients. Improvements in stent technology, refinement in technique, and increased efficiency of antiplatelet regimens have, over time, increased the popularity of this minimally invasive approach. We present a review of the available series on endovascular treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia, with emphasis on short- and long-term outcome and morbidity and mortality results. Principles of operative technique and controversial issues and topics of interest are also discussed.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia: stenting of mesenteric arteries

This article focuses on stent placement in mesenteric arteries in patients with the rare diagnosis of chronic mesenteric ischemia. We present a survey from the initial stage of recognition of this gastrointestinal disorder and its manifestations to treatment by stenting to avoid further ischemic episodes and bowel infarction and necrosis. The advantages of stent placement in splanchnic arteries are discussed in comparison to open surgical revascularization.

A clinical survey of vascular stents

As a result of the many different potential locations to be treated, it is still difficult to evaluate the indications for efficacy and safety of non-coronary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting versus surgical methods, such as endarterectomy or bypass grafts. This paper reviews pertinent data published in the last 5-10 years and gives an overview of the main peripheral minimally invasive vascular interventional fields.

Update in management of mesenteric ischemia

Mesenteric ischemia disorders are precipitated by a circulation insufficiency event that deprives one or several abdominal organs of adequate respiration to meet metabolic demands. Although mesenteric ischemia occurs infrequently, the mortality rate is from 60% to 100%, depending on the source of obstruction. The successful outcome is dependent upon a high index of suspicion and prompt management. We briefly review the pathophysiology and presentation of the various ischemic entities and review the current state of the art in diagnosis and treatment. Despite advances in both diagnosis and treatment, prompt diagnosis and supportive care remain critical for successful outcome. New imaging techniques, endovascular therapy and emerging research may improve our approach to this deadly condition.

Stent Placement with the Monorail Technique for Treatment of Mesenteric Artery Stenosis

PURPOSE

To analyze the immediate and midterm success of stenting of mesenteric arteries by a monorail technique in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective case series, 19 patients (11 male, 8 female; mean age, 62.9 +/- 10.4 y; range, 36-82 y) with 23 symptomatic stenoses of mesenteric arteries were treated with stent placement by a monorail technique in a radiologic intervention center over a period of 4.5 years. Clinical examinations and duplex sonography were used to evaluate the stents' patency and clinical success. Kaplan-Meier graphs were calculated to analyze the patency and freedom-from-symptom rate.

RESULTS

Initial technical success rate was 22/23 (96%). Mean follow-up was 17 months (range, 1-58 mo). Primary patency and primary clinical success rates were 82% and 78%, respectively. According to Kaplan-Meier tables, the patency rates were 96%, 87%, 76%, and 61% at 0, 1, 15, and 24 months, respectively, and the freedom-from-symptom rates were 95%, 90%, 72%, and 54% at 0, 1, 24, and 30 months, respectively. No peri-interventional complications occurred. Two patients died of cardiac failure in the hospital within 30 days after intervention; deaths were not related to the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent placement by a monorail technique in mesenteric arteries is an effective and safe treatment for symptomatic stenoses in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia after a mean follow-up of 17 months.

Percutaneous management of chronic mesenteric ischemia: outcomes after intervention

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and durability of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/stent placement for treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients treated from January 1986 to August 2003 was conducted. Twenty-nine patients (mean age, 62 years) were treated for clinical symptoms consistent with CMI. Clinical diagnosis was verified with angiographic assessment and PTA with or without stent placement was performed based on angiographic and/or pressure gradient findings. Outcomes were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 63 interventions were performed in 29 patients during the study period. Of these 63 interventions, 46 PTA and 17 stent implantation procedures were performed. Thirty-four interventions were performed for SMA stenosis/occlusion, 17 interventions for celiac artery stenosis/occlusion, and four interventions were performed on aorto-mesenteric graft stenoses. Technical success was 97%, and clinical success (defined as clinical resolution of symptoms) was 90% (26 of 29 patients). Mean duration of follow-up was 28.3 months. Primary patency for all interventions at 3, 6, and 12 months was 82.7% (95% CI: 68.7-96.7), 78.9% (66.7-91.1), and 70.1% (55.1-85.6), respectively. Primary assisted patency for all interventions at 3, 6, and 12 months was 87.9% (79.0-95.3), 87.9% (79.2-95.1), and 87.9% (77.3-98.3), respectively. An average of 1.9 interventions per patient was required. One major complication occurred (3.4%). There were three minor complications (10.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous intervention for CMI is safe with durable early and midterm clinical success. However, repeated intervention is often required for improved primary assisted patency.

Spontaneous Recanalization of Superior Mesenteric Artery Occlusion Following Angioplasty and Stenting of Inferior Mesenteric Artery

An 84-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and coronary artery disease was admitted with a progressively worsening diffuse abdominal pain. Computed tomography scan of the abdomen and angiography revealed occlusion of the origin and proximal portion of superior mesenteric artery. Aortography also showed severe origin stenosis of inferior mesenteric artery and that the distal part of the superior mesenteric artery was supplied by a prominent marginal artery of Drummond. Patient was effectively treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of the inferior mesenteric artery. Follow-up imaging studies demonstrated patency of the stent and spontaneous recanalization of superior mesenteric artery occlusion.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia

Chronic mesenteric ischemia is an unusual but important cause of abdominal pain. Although this condition accounts for only 5% of all intestinal ischemic events, it can have significant clinical consequences. Among its many causes, atherosclerotic occlusion or severe stenosis is the most common. This disorder has an indolent course that results in extensive collateral vascular formation. Thus, symptoms occur when at least two of the three main splanchnic vessels are affected. Intestinal angina, weight loss, and sitophobia are common clinical features. Diagnosis can often be made by noninvasive methods such as computerised axial tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and duplex ultrasonography as well as by invasive catheter angiography. Therapy of chronic mesenteric ischemia depends on the extent and location of vascular disease. Alternatives to traditional surgical bypass are becoming more common including embolectomy, thrombolysis, and percutaneous angioplasty with vascular stenting. Early intervention is vital as the natural course of this illness can be debilitating. Furthermore, this has potential to develop into life-threatening acute mesenteric ischemia with subsequent bowel infarction and death. Long-term studies have shown that the risk of developing symptoms from asymptomatic but significant mesenteric vascular disease is 86% with overall 40% mortality rate. The recognition and management of this unusual but important cause of abdominal pain is discussed in detail in this review.

Endovascular Recanalisation in Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia—Feasibility and Early Results

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a single centre experience of endovascular treatment of mesenteric ischemia caused by vascular occlusion.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2002 17 patients (12 females; mean age 61 years) with symptoms of bowel ischemia were treated endovascularly for arterial occlusion. Vessels were evaluated with angiography and pressure gradient measured. A mean gradient of > 20 mmHg or a stenosis of > 50% was considered significant. Patient data were recorded prospectively and follow-up was supplemented with retrospective chart review. Fifteen patients had follow up imaging, median 10 months (3-29 months) postoperatively. Median clinical follow up was 14 months (5-42 months).

RESULTS

Recanalisation was successful in 16 patients (94%). The average number of stents used was 1.6 per patient. For one patient recanalisation failed with subsequent SMA dissection. A celiac artery stenosis was stented but symptoms remained postoperatively. Perioperative mortality was 5.8% (n = 1). 14/17 patients (82%) displayed symptom relief/improvement. Six patients required secondary endovascular intervention; PTA (n = 3); stent/stentgraft (n = 3). Two of these patients required a third procedure. 4/6 patients that underwent secondary intervention were asymptomatic and of recurrent stenosis > 75% and a gradient > 15 mmHg mean pressure gradient on imaging. Two patients were treated because of a combination of angiographic findings and/or significant pressure gradient combined with clinical symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment of mesenteric ischemia due to vessel occlusion is feasible with acceptable short-term results and limited complications. Most patients experience relief/improvement of symptoms. A significant number of patients might need endovascular re-intervention because of restenosis.

Endovascular treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia: results in 14 patients

We evaluated immediate and long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stent placement to treat stenotic and occluded arteries in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia. Fourteen patients were treated by 3 exclusive celiac artery (CA) PTAs (2 stentings), 3 cases with both Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) and CA angioplasties, and 8 exclusive SMA angioplasties (3 stentings). Eleven patients had atheromatous stenoses with one case of an early onset atheroma in an HIV patient with antiphospholipid syndrome. The other etiologies of mesenteric arterial lesions were Takayashu arteritis (2 cases) and a postradiation stenoses (1 case). Technical success was achieved in all cases. Two major complications were observed: one hematoma and one false aneurysm occurring at the brachial puncture site (14.3%). An immediate clinical success was obtained in all patients. During a follow-up of 1-83 months (mean: 29 months), 11 patients were symptom free; 3 patients had recurrent pain; in one patient with inflammatory syndrome, pain relief was obtained with medical treatment; in 2 patients abdominal pain was due to restenosis 36 and 6 months after PTA, respectively. Restenosis was treated by PTA (postirradiation stenosis), and by surgical bypass (atheromatous stenosis). Percutaneous endovascular techniques are safe and accurate. They are an alternative to surgery in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia due to short and proximal occlusive lesions of SMA and CA.

Angioplasty/stenting of the superior mesenteric artery and celiac trunk: early and late outcomes

PURPOSE

To analyze the early results and durability of angioplasty/stenting of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and celiac trunk (CT).

METHODS

Twenty-two patients (19 women; mean age 69.2 years, range 52-88) with 24 symptomatic SMA or CT stenotic lesions were treated with dilation/stenting over a recent 4.5-year period. Two patients had lesions in both the SMA and CT treated. Clinical follow-up and duplex exams were done to evaluate long-term patency. Kaplan-Meier life-table analyses estimated the freedom from recurrent stenosis and recurrent symptoms, as well as survival rates.

RESULTS

The initial technical and clinical success rates were 96% (23/24) and 95% (21/22), respectively, with no perioperative mortality or major morbidity. During a mean follow-up of 26 months (range 1-54), the primary late clinical success rate was 61% (11/18; 4 lost to follow-up), and freedom from recurrent stenosis (> or =70%) was 30% (6/20). The freedom from recurrent stenosis at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 65%, 47%, 39%, and 13%; freedom from recurrent symptoms was 67% at all 4 intervals. The survival rates were 93%, 93%, 80%, and 53% at 1 to 4 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Angioplasty/stenting of SMA and CT stenoses has a high initial technical success rate and acceptable early and late clinical outcomes; however, it is associated with a high incidence of late restenosis based on strict Doppler criteria.

Intestinal ischemia

Ischemic injury to the gastrointestinal tract can threaten bowel viability with potential catastrophic consequences, including intestinal necrosis and gangrene. The presenting symptoms and signs are relatively nonspecific and diagnosis requires a high index of clinical suspicion. AMI often results from an embolus or thrombus within the SMA, although a low-flow state through an area of profound atherosclerosis may also induce severe ischemia. Because most laboratory and radiologic studies are nonspecific in early ischemia an aggressive approach to diagnosis with imaging of the splanchnic vasculature by mesenteric angiography is advocated. Various therapeutic approaches, including the infusion of vasodilators and thrombolytics, may then be used. Proper diagnosis and management of patients with AMI requires vigilance and a readiness to pursue an aggressive course of action.

Endovascular treatment of celiac and mesenteric arteries stenoses: Applications and results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and assess the role of endovascular therapy in a variety of conditions related to celiac and mesenteric vascular occlusive disease. Patients and methods Our retrospective study population included 25 consecutive patients (mean age, 66 years), in whom 28 procedures were performed on 26 stenosed or occluded mesenteric vessels (superior mesenteric artery [SMA] or celiac artery [CA]). Indications included chronic mesenteric ischemia (21 patients), including 2 patients who underwent stenting prior to a planned operative repair of a juxtamesenteric AAA. Three liver transplantation patients underwent stenting of an associated CA stenosis. One patient with a splenorenal bypass underwent stenting on an associated CA stenosis. The technical and clinical success rates and the incidence of complications were determined. Follow-up parameters included maintained patency on duplex sonography and sustained clinical benefit. The need for additional interventions was noted.

RESULTS

All procedures but one were technically successful (96%). Major complications occurred in three patients (one transient contrast-induced nephrotoxicity and two pseudoaneurysms). Immediate clinical success was achieved in 22 patients (88%). The three clinical failures included two patients with an excellent angiographic outcome, but with single-vessel moderate severity disease. Survival table analysis of delayed clinical outcome showed primary and primary-assisted clinical benefits at 11 months of 85% and 91%, respectively. Primary and primary-assisted stent patencies, as assessed by duplex sonography and/or angiography, at 6 months were both 92%. Angiographically documented restenosis occurred in three patients. Restenosis in two patients with CA stents was due to extrinsic compression, and it was without symptoms in one patient and was treated satisfactorily by restenting in the other patient. Restenosis in one patient with an SMA stent was successfully treated by restenting.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience suggests a potential role for endovascular therapy of celiac and mesenteric arterial occlusive disease in a variety of clinical scenarios, with a low incidence of complications and a high technical success rate.

Outcome of splanchnic blood flow determination in patients with suspected chronic intestinal ischaemia. A retrospective survey

BACKGROUND

Different diagnostic examinations have been applied in the management of patients with suspected intestinal ischaemia. In some centres, invasive determination of a meal-induced increase in splanchnic blood flow is used in the diagnostic process and in the selection of patients for surgery. However, no studies have evaluated the impact of splanchnic blood flow determination on therapy in such patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was therefore to analyse the outcome of splanchnic blood flow determination in patients with suspected chronic intestinal ischaemia.

METHODS

Seventy-three consecutive patients with suspected intestinal ischaemia were included during a 5-year period. Splanchnic blood flow was determined at baseline and after a standardized meal. The patients were classified into three groups according to the level of meal-induced increase in splanchnic blood flow: A, normal response (splanchnic blood flow > or = 200 ml/min); B, possible abnormal response (splanchnic blood flow 51-199 ml/min); and C, definitive abnormal response (splanchnic blood flow < or = 50 ml/min). Where surgery took place, the type of operation was noted.

RESULTS

Forty patients had a normal meal-induced response, 23 patients had a possible abnormal response and 10 patients had a definitive abnormal response, which gave evidence of chronic intestinal ischaemia. In the total patient population, the increase in splanchnic blood flow was significantly correlated to an increase in hepatic oxygen uptake (r = 0.38, P < 0.002) and to body weight (r = 0.36, P < 0.01). A total of seven patients (10%) underwent successful revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten of the patients with suspected chronic intestinal ischaemia had abnormal meal-induced splanchnic blood flow and 30% of these patients underwent angioplasty. Future studies are needed to validate the determination of splanchnic blood flow in relation to splanchnic angiography and other imaging modalities in patients with chronic intestinal ischaemia.

Endovascular treatment as first choice in chronic intestinal ischemia

The purpose of this study was to define the place of endovascular treatment in chronic intestinal ischemia (CII). We report here a series of 19 consecutive patients treated with percutaneous angioplasty of the intestinal arteries. We excluded patients with acute ischemia, from the study. From January 1, 1989 to December 31, 2001, 19 patients with symptomatic CII were treated by endovascular techniques. This study group included 11 men and 8 women with a mean age of 59 years (range 30 to 90 years). The clinical presentation included postprandial pain in 16 patients, weight loss in 14 patients, with a mean weight loss of 7.4 kg (range 0 to 30 kg); and gastroparesis in 2 patients. Stenoses were significant in the single superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in 2 patients and in two arteries in 17 patients, including the celiac artery (CA) and SMA (n = 13), CA and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (n = 1), and SMA and IMA (n = 3). Balloon angioplasty was performed in only one of the arteries in each patient, 15 times in the SMA and 4 times in the CA. In 7 patients, angioplasty required stenting because of recoil (n = 5) or dissection (n = 1). In one patient the lesion was stented primarily, because of adjacent thrombus on the stenosis. Our results showed that initial treatment of CII can be endovascular. Focus on one artery only, seems to be reasonable and efficient in the short and long term.

Recent advances in peripheral angioplasty and stenting

Utilization of percutaneous interventions for arterial and venous occlusive lesions continue to increase. With the progression of the technology supporting these therapeutic measures, the results of these interventions may be expected to improve. In general, a comparison of techniques for revascularization demonstrates similar initial technical success rates for surgery and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Angioplasty is often associated with lower procedural morbidity and mortality rates. Conversely, surgery frequently provides greater long-term patency. Late failure of percutaneous therapies may often be treated successfully with reintervention, however. The continued accumulation of experience with PTA and stenting will ultimately define its role in the management of occlusive disease.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia: imaging and percutaneous treatment

Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is rare and is often diagnosed late. Fatal malabsorption-related complications or acute ischemic events occur in the absence of treatment. Diagnosis depends on careful acquisition of a medical history and elimination of other conditions. No sensitive and specific tests are available for functional diagnosis of CMI. If other causes of abdominal pain and weight loss have been confidently ruled out, evidence of visceral artery occlusion at noninvasive imaging (Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomographic angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography) suggests CMI. Until the 1990s, open surgery was considered the treatment of choice; percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was reserved for patients for whom surgery carried a high risk. However, open surgery carries a nonnegligible risk of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, PTA with stent placement has been recognized as a minimally invasive means of obtaining good long-term results with an acceptable recurrence rate and consequently has been suggested for primary treatment of CMI. New treatments including administration of fibrinolytic agents before PTA of chronic occlusions, routine revascularization of one or more arteries, and stent placement will probably be validated in the near future. Similarly, new data on selection of the best approach will become available soon.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia: results and longterm followup

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to review the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), stenting, or both in the treatment of patients who present with symptoms and angiographic findings most consistent with chronic mesenteric ischemia.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of 33 consecutive patients from a single institution who underwent PTA, stenting, or both for treatment of symptoms most characteristic of chronic mesenteric ischemia was performed.

RESULTS

There were 12 men and 21 women with a mean age of 63 years (range 40 to 89 years). Median weight loss was 28 lb (range 6 to 80 lb). Postprandial pain was present in 88% of the patients (29 of 33). All lesions treated were stenoses. PTA alone was performed in 21 patients (32 vessels), and PTA and stenting were performed in 12 patients (15 vessels). PTA was technically successful in 26 of 32 vessels (81.3%); PTA plus stenting was technically successful in 15 of 15 vessels (100%) (p = 0.073). Complete alleviation of symptoms occurred immediately in 27 of the patients (82%), and 2 patients (6%) had significant improvement in symptoms. There were four immediate clinical failures (12%): two patients were found to have occult malignancy and one had immediate relief of symptoms after surgical release of the median arcuate ligament. Followup data were obtained in all patients with clinically successful procedures (mean 38 months, median 25 months, range 1 to 123 months). Angiographic followup was available in 52% of the patients (15 of 29), at a mean of 20 months. The primary longterm clinical success rate was 83.3% (24 of 29). Four of the five patients with recurrent symptoms were successfully retreated with endovascular therapy. The primary assisted longterm clinical success rate was 96.6% (28 of 29). The 5-year survival rate was 76.1%. Major complications occurred in 13% of the procedures, with a 30-day mortality rate of 0%.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular therapy for treatment of mesenteric arterial stenoses is effective in the treatment of patients with symptoms and angiographic findings characteristic of chronic mesenteric ischemia.

Mesenteric arterial ischaemia: diagnosis and therapeutic options

Ischaemia of the bowel may arise from a number of causes affecting the arterial and venous compartments of the vascular tree. This article addresses the causes and consequences of arterial obstruction, which may compromise the supply of oxygenated blood to the bowel. These events may occur as an acute phenomenon, or they may present in a chronic fashion. The therapeutic options available to treat this condition are largely dependent on the mode of presentation and the amount of time that is available before irreversible damage occurs to the bowel integrity. In the acute phase, the viability of the bowel is in doubt, and this necessitates an open operative approach to assess the amount of bowel infarction which has already occurred. A variety of operative procedures are then available to limit this bowel loss and to secure the viability of the remaining bowel. In the more chronic phase there are alternative, less invasive procedures that may be appropriate for the patient, who may have suffered a prolonged period of undernourishment and dehydration. In such cases the immediate bowel viability is not in doubt, but the medium/long-term survival is compromised. Treatment options appropriate to each clinical scenario are discussed, along with the major technical issues associated with these treatments. A team approach to the most appropriate management plan is stressed, and the published outcomes reviewed.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia: diagnosis and treatment

Chronic mesenteric ischemia is an uncommon manifestation of atherosclerotic disease. The presentation of chronic mesenteric ischemia is often confusing and the diagnosis is usually not made until late in the course of the disease. Selective angiography is considered the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of chronic mesenteric ischemia. The treatment options for patients presenting with symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischemia include various surgical approaches to revascularization and catheter-based interventions.

Transcatheter interventions for the treatment of peripheral atherosclerotic lesions: part I

Transcatheter endovascular procedures are increasingly used to treat symptomatic peripheral atherosclerosis. This two-part review identifies the existing evidence supportive of the application of transcatheter treatments for peripheral atherosclerotic lesions. The first part addresses the treatment of obstructive lesions that cause limb claudication and critical ischemia, renovascular hypertension and azotemia, and mesenteric ischemia. Studies were identified via a search of MEDLINE (January 1993 through April 1999) and reference lists of identified articles. When multicenter prospective randomized trials or other high-quality studies were unavailable, a preference was given to studies with at least 50 patients per treated group and a minimum mean follow-up duration of 6 months. Data presented in tables are proportionally weighted averages from included studies. For each application, the authors assessed the quality of evidence (QOE; efficacy, safety, and, where available, cost-effectiveness) and made recommendations with appropriate caveats. There is higher QOE supporting the more established treatments such as lower limb percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with stent placement and thrombolysis. Treatments such as renal artery PTA and stent placement and mesenteric and brachiocephalic PTA are in wide use, but high QOE supporting general application is lacking. Blanket recommendations based on established efficacy and cost-effectiveness cannot be made. However, the use of transcatheter therapies can be supported in specific circumstances based on an expected reduction in procedure-related morbidity and/or mortality rates. It is hoped that the identification of deficiencies in the literature will inform and inspire critically needed research in this area.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia: open surgery versus percutaneous angioplasty and stenting

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous angioplasty and stenting (PAS) in comparison with traditional open surgical (OS) revascularization for the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia.

METHODS

Over a 3.5-year period, 28 patients (32 vessels) underwent PAS (balloon angioplasty alone, 5 [18%] of 28; angioplasty and stenting, 23 [82%] of 28) for symptoms of chronic mesenteric ischemia. These patients were compared with a previously published series of 85 patients (130 vessels) treated with OS (bypass grafting, 60 [71%] of 85; transaortic endarterectomy, 19 [22%] of 85; or patch angioplasty, 6 [7%] of 85).

RESULTS

The PAS and OS groups were similar with respect to baseline comorbidities, duration of symptoms (median: 6.7 vs 10.5 months, P =.52), and the number of vessels involved, but the patients differed in their age at presentation (median: 72 vs 65 years, P =.005). Fewer vessels were revascularized per patient in the PAS group (1.1 +/- 0.4) compared with the OS group (1.5 +/- 0.6, P =.001). Overall, 85.7% (24/28) had one vessel and 14.3% (4/28) had two vessels revascularized in the PAS group versus 48.2% (41/85) with one-vessel and 47.1% (40/85) with two-vessel revascularization in the OS group. No difference was noted in the early in-hospital complications (median: 17.9% [PAS] vs 32.9% [OS], P =.12) or mortality rate (10.7% [PAS] vs 8.2% [OS], P =.71). A reduced length of hospital stay in the PAS patients did not attain statistical significance (median: 5 days [PAS] vs 13 days [OS], P =.08). Although the 3-year cumulative recurrent stenosis (P =.62) and mortality rate (P =.99) did not differ, the PAS treatment group had a higher incidence of recurrent symptoms (P =.001).

CONCLUSION

Although the results of PAS and OS were similar with respect to morbidity, death, and recurrent stenosis, PAS was associated with a significantly higher incidence of recurrent symptoms. These findings suggest that OS should be preferentially offered to patients deemed fit for open revascularization.

AGA technical review on intestinal ischemia. American Gastrointestinal Association

This literature review and the recommendations therein were prepared for the American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee. The paper was approved by the committee on September 25, 1999, and by the AGA Governing Board on November 25, 1999.

Stent placement for treatment of mesenteric artery stenoses or occlusions

PURPOSE

To evaluate stent placement in the treatment of mesenteric ischemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients (eight women, four men; mean age, 63 years) with chronic mesenteric ischemia underwent stent placement for stenoses or occlusions during a 5.5-year period. Nine patients with 10 stenoses (three celiac arteries, seven superior mesenteric arteries) and three patients with three chronic occlusions (two superior mesenteric arteries, one aortosuperior mesenteric artery bypass graft) were treated.

RESULTS

Initial technical success was achieved in 11 of the 12 patients (92%), including all three patients with chronic occlusions. There were no technical complications. There was one postprocedural death (<30 days) due to bowel ischemia and infarction, despite a technically successful procedure. Clinical follow-up was available in all 12 patients, with a mean follow-up of 15.7 months (range, 0-38.5 months). Primary and primary-assisted patency up to 18 months was 74% (standard error [SE], 13%) and 83% (SE, 11%), respectively. Secondary patency was 83% (SE, 11%) at 3 years. All three patients (100%) with chronic occlusions had relief of clinical signs and symptoms at a mean follow-up of 22 months (range, 13-38.5 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Stent placement is safe and clinically effective as an adjunctive therapy to angioplasty or as a primary method of treatment for chronic mesenteric ischemia in patients with focal visceral artery stenoses or occlusions.

Intestinal (mesenteric) vasculopathy. I. Acute superior mesenteric arteriopathy and venopathy

Intestinal vasculopathy is not rare, comprising about 1 per 1000 hospital admissions. Primary mesenteric vasculopathy causes cardiovascular disease, whereas secondary mesenteric ischemia causes extrinsic vascular compression or vascular trauma. Acute superior mesenteric arteriopathy is caused by a mesenteric embolus, thrombus, or vasospasm (i.e., nonocclusive vasculopathy). Acute superior mesenteric venopathy is caused by a thrombus, which is often associated with a hypercoagulopathy. The clinical presentation of both diseases is often subtle and nonspecific at an early stage and becomes overt and specific only when advanced and severe, when ischemia progresses to necrosis. The mortality of acute superior mesenteric arteriopathy is still very high, whereas superior mesenteric venopathy is less rapidly progressive and has a lower, but still significant, mortality. Early diagnosis and aggressive therapy significantly reduces the mortality of these life-threatening diseases.

Intestinal (mesenteric) vasculopathy. II. Ischemic colitis and chronic mesenteric ischemia

Ischemic colitis accounts for approximately half of all cases of mesenteric vasculopathy. The clinical presentation varies depending on underlying cause, extent of vascular obstruction, rapidity of ischemic insult, degree of collateral circulation, and presence of comorbidity. Ischemic colitis is usually diagnosed by colonoscopy. Only approximately 20% of patients require surgery because of signs or laboratory findings of peritonitis or because of clinical deterioration. Approximately 20% of patients develop chronic colitis from irreversible colonic ischemic injury, which manifests clinically as persistent diarrhea, rectal bleeding, or weight loss and endoscopically as a colonic stricture or mass. Chronic mesenteric ischemia is almost always caused by significant atherosclerotic stenosis involving at least two mesenteric arteries, usually the superior mesenteric artery and celiac axis. The classic symptomatic triad of postprandial pain, fear of eating, and involuntary weight loss occurs with advanced disease.

Abdominal vascular catastrophes

Abdominal vascular catastrophes are due to rupture of arterial aneurysms or arterial occlusion leading to end organ ischemia. In this article, we will discuss rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms and visceral artery aneurysms. Arterial occlusion secondary to embolism, thrombosis and dissection will be presented. Mesenteric ischemia secondary to low flow states, venous thrombosis and other conditions will also be covered. These uncommon, but frequently fatal pathological processes, are of interest to both general and vascular surgeons.

Percutaneous transluminal mesenteric angioplasty

The endovascular treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia remains in its infancy. This state is most certainly related to the small patient population affected by this devastating condition and the surgeon's limited desire to pursue percutaneous options for this group. Surgical trepidation is not unwarranted because in many facets mesenteric angioplasty is similar to percutaneous carotid intervention. Interventions in these vessels represent manipulation of terminal and unduplicated arterial systems. Complications compromising flow to either vascular bed can yield rapid grave outcomes. Despite this risk, early experience with mesenteric angioplasty for chronic ischemia suggests that it is a viable treatment alternative and that it can be performed with relative safety. A randomized prospective trial of mesenteric angioplasty with operative bypass grafting appears to be the next logical step.

Mesenteric revascularization during aneurysmectomy

The most important association between aortic aneurysm surgery and the mesenteric circulation is the potential for inadvertent compromise to the mesenteric trunks and their end organs. Preservation of visceral blood flow is a critical objective in each case, using methods that have been developed as techniques for suprarenal abdominal and thoracoabdominal aneurysmectomy have evolved. Beyond simply preserving what existed, revascularization by endarterectomy or bypass has a role in selected cases to improve the natural history of advanced mesenteric occlusive disease, although the rationale for such prophylactic surgery must remain relatively weak until more is learned about disease progression in the visceral arteries. Finally, a small number of patients with mesenteric ischemic symptoms at the time of aneurysmectomy clearly benefit from combined surgery.