Percutaneous retrieval of two Wallstent endoprostheses from the heart through a single jugular sheath

Stent Migration and Bail-out Strategies

Stent migration is an inherent complication of stent deployment. A number of factors are responsible for this dreaded complication. The stent may eventually migrate to the heart or lungs or in the process of migration damage structures en route to its final destination. A number of techniques are available to bail out interventionalists if such a situation should arise. Occasionally a wait and watch approach may be prudent.

Endovascular caudal retraction of the cranial end of a misplaced Viatorr TIPS prior to liver transplantation

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) extension far into the inferior vena cava (IVC) or the right atrium may complicate or preclude orthotopic liver transplantation depending on the space available for placement of a hemostatic clamp in the suprahepatic IVC. Until 2004, most TIPS were performed with bare metal stents, which integrate into the vessel wall, making percutaneous or intraoperative repositioning uncertain. Most TIPS are currently created with stent grafts that have an outer fabric to increase shunt patency and prevent endothelial ingrowth. We describe the first known manipulation of a covered stent graft prior to transplantation. The stent graft, which extended well into the IVC, was snared from a femoral approach and deflected caudally in order to document feasibility and nonadherence to the vein wall prior to definitive surgical planning of liver transplantation. Provisions were made for endovascular retraction during actual transplant surgery 9 weeks later, but this became unnecessary when manual retraction of the exposed liver enabled suprahepatic IVC clamping. Due to the nonadherent nature of the outer graft material, compared with a bare metal stent, extension of a stent graft into the IVC or right atrium may not preclude transplantation, and intraoperative endovascular retraction may be considered.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt-related complications and practical solutions

Despite the clinical complexity of patients with severe liver disease and the technical demands associated with the creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), the major complication rate of this procedure is less than 5%. Delayed recognition and treatment of complications related to TIPS can have life-threatening consequences. This article provides an overview of the spectrum of periprocedural and delayed complications related to the performance of TIPS and offers the reader pearls for both avoiding and managing those complications.

Massage-induced delayed venous stent migration

Catheter-directed therapies in chronic deep vein thromboses can help improve leg function by mechanically addressing residual obstruction in lower extremity or pelvic veins, although the reported use of stents in leg veins is relatively unusual. The author reports a case of this type with long-term patency and clinical success, culminating in asymptomatic delayed venous migration of a stent to the right atrium after 3 years. Open heart surgery was required to remove the embedded stent fragments. The attributed mechanism was deep tissue massage of the thigh.

Comparison of Two Foreign Body Retrieval Devices with Adjustable Loops in a Swine Model

The purpose of the study was to compare two similar foreign body retrieval devices, the Texan (TX) and the Texan LONGhorn (TX-LG), in a swine model. Both devices feature a < or = 30-mm adjustable loop. Capture times and total procedure times for retrieving foreign bodies from the infrarenal aorta, inferior vena cava, and stomach were compared. All attempts with both devices (TX, n = 15; TX-LG, n = 14) were successful. Foreign bodies in the vasculature were captured quickly using both devices (mean +/- SD, 88 +/- 106 sec for TX vs 67 +/- 42 sec for TX-LG) with no significant difference between them. The TX-LG, however, allowed significantly better capture times than the TX in the stomach (p = 0.022), Overall, capture times for the TX-LG were significantly better than for the TX (p = 0.029). There was no significant difference between the total procedure times in any anatomic region. TX-LG performed significantly better than the TX in the stomach and therefore overall. The better torque control and maneuverability of TX-LG resulted in better performance in large anatomic spaces.

Comparison of the Texan Foreign Body Retrieval Device and the Amplatz Goose Neck Snare in Vivo and in Vitro

PURPOSE

To compare the capturing ability of the Texan foreign body retrieval device with that of the Amplatz gooseneck snare in a swine model and to analyze their capturing mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Texan device with a < or = 30-mm adjustable loop was compared with the 5-mm, 15-mm, and 35-mm Amplatz snares for retrieval of foreign bodies from the iliac vein, infrarenal aorta, inferior vena cava, and stomach. Capture times by two investigators were compared.

RESULTS

All 24 attempts with the Texan device were successful, as were 21 of 23 attempts with the Amplatz snare; two attempts with the 5-mm Amplatz snare were abandoned, and the failures were attributed to the suboptimal size of the snare. Other than the two abandoned attempts, there was no difference between the capturing performances of the Texan device and the 5-mm, 15-mm, and 35-mm Amplatz snares when they were compared side by side. In all vascular interventions, however, the Texan device performed significantly better in capture times than did the 5-mm and 15-mm Amplatz snare (P = .015). In all interventions, the Texan device performed significantly better in capture times than did all three sizes of the Amplatz snare (P= .012).

CONCLUSION

The overall performance of the Texan device based on its capturing ability was significantly better than that of the Amplatz snares. The adjustability of the loop and the more versatile capturing technique made capture and retrieval of foreign bodies easier.

Stent Migration Complicating Treatment of Inferior Vena Cava Stenosis after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

A case of inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis after orthotopic liver transplantation was treated with balloon angioplasty and Wallstent placement. There was stent migration into the right atrium (RA), and percutaneous removal of the stent was attempted without success. Open cardiac surgery was required for stent removal and repair of aortic/RA fistula. Months later, recurrent IVC stenosis was successfully treated with placement of large Z stents after additional failed surgical repair. At 2 years follow-up, the patient is asymptomatic and Doppler ultrasonography demonstrated the stent to be patent and well-positioned.

Management of Central Venous Stent Migration in a Patient with a Permanent Inferior Vena Cava Filter

Stent embolization is a rare complication in the treatment of central venous stenoses in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis. The authors report a case of nitinol stent embolization into the right atrium in which the stent could not be repositioned across an indwelling permanent inferior vena cava (IVC) filter. The migrated stent was managed by advancing the stent to the superior margin of the IVC filter and then deploying a second suprarenal IVC filter to prevent repeat embolization.

Liver transplantation with simultaneous removal of an intracardiac transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and a vena cava filter without the utilization of cardiopulmonary bypass

Transjugular intrahepatic shunts (TIPSs) are widely used in the management of portal hypertension complications including variceal bleeding, refractory ascites, and hepatic hydrothorax. Vena cava filters (VCFs) are an important therapeutic modality in the prevention of pulmonary emboli in patients suffering deep venous thrombosis and clinical contraindications for anticoagulation. Stent and filter misplacement or migration may occur, complicating liver transplantation (LT) surgery. We describe the intraoperative management of a patient with cirrhosis, who had a TIPS extending into the right atrium (RA) and a retrohepatic VCF. Stent and filter removals were deferred until the time of LT. Both procedures were performed successfully by complete cava and portal reconstruction. In conclusion, careful assessment and surgical management of patients with stent and filters permits successful LT.

Atrial Septal Perforation From TIPS Stent Migration

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are safe and effective for the treatment of portal hypertension. Cardiac complications are unusual. This study reports a case of TIPS stent migration to the right atrium causing perforation of the atrial septum in a patient with end-stage liver disease. The shunt was removed transvenously but attempts at transvenous occlusion of the septal perforation were unsuccessful. The patient went on to undergo combined open-heart surgery with septum repair and liver transplantation. The case highlights a rare complication of TIPS and methods for treatment including transvenous removal, transvenous repair, and combined cardiotomy-liver transplantation surgery.

Percutaneous techniques for managing maldeployed or migrated stents

PURPOSE

To report our experience in the percutaneous management of dislocated endovascular stents.

METHODS

During a 6-year period, 28 (2.7%) patients with a maldeployed or migrated endovascular stent (20 Palmaz, 5 Wallstent, 2 Memotherm, and 1 AVE) were recognized among 1021 patients undergoing noncardiac vascular stent procedures. Percutaneous stent management was performed using balloon catheters, gooseneck snares, grasping forceps, or additional stent implantation on the basis of the stent type, degree of expansion, mechanical characteristics, and location of the stent.

RESULTS

Three stents that embolized into the pulmonary artery were left in situ, but percutaneous management was successful in 23 (92%) of the remaining 25 dislocated stents (12 venous and 13 arterial stents). Twelve stents were repositioned in an alternate, stable position or the primarily intended location; 4 stents were anchored by a second stent, and 7 stents were removed percutaneously. In the 2 failed cases, the stents were retrieved using a minor surgical procedure. There were 2 minor groin hematomas but no secondary complications during a median follow-up of 26.2 months (range 1-62).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous management of migrated or maldeployed endovascular stents is highly effective with few complications. On the basis of our findings, these techniques should be considered the therapy of choice.

Percutaneous Retrieval of Lost or Misplaced Intravascular Objects

OBJECTIVE

We report on our experience with percutaneous interventional techniques for retrieval of intravascular foreign bodies or repositioning of misplaced endovascular prostheses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a period of 6 years, we attempted percutaneous treatment of intravascular foreign bodies in 45 patients. The 45 foreign objects consisted of 12 endovascular stents, 14 catheter fragments, 11 embolization coils, four guidewire fragments, three vena cava filters, and one cardiac valve fragment. Percutaneous extraction was performed using a combination of multipurpose catheters and nitinol snare loop or grasping forceps. Depending on their composition, misplaced or dislodged intravascular stents were either repositioned or percutaneously removed.

RESULTS

Percutaneous intervention was successful in 41 (91.1%) of 45 patients. Of 38 patients on whom we performed percutaneous removal, the procedure was successful in 34 patients (89.5%), including 13 of the 14 patients with catheter fragments, all four of the patients with guidewire fragments, 10 of the 11 patients with misplaced or dislodged embolization coils, four of the five patients with misplaced or dislodged endovascular stents, and all three of the patients with misplaced or dislodged vena cava filters. The procedure was not successful in the one patient with a cardiac valve fragment. All seven of the percutaneous repositioning procedures we performed resulted in the endovascular stent being successfully repositioned in a stable intravascular position. Most of the retrieval procedures (77.7%) were performed using the nitinol snare as the primary instrument. No late complications were registered during the follow-up period, which ranged from 9 to 68 months (mean, 42.4 months overall).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous techniques for the extraction of intravascular foreign objects or for repositioning of dislocated endovascular stents are highly effective with a low rate of complications and should always be the primary method of choice.

Open cardiotomy for removal of migrating transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stent combined with liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic shunts are widely used for the management of variceal bleeding. Complications such as stent misplacement or migration may occur.

METHODS

We describe the management of a transjugular intrahepatic shunts stent that migrated across the tricuspid valve in a patient with Child-Pugh category C cirrhosis.

RESULTS

An attempt at percutaneous retrieval of the stent was unsuccessful. Due to the unacceptably high risk for mortality from open heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in the setting of cirrhosis, stent removal was deferred until the time of orthotopic liver transplantation. The procedures were performed successfully, and the patient made a good recovery.

CONCLUSION

Surgical stent extraction and valve repair can be performed safely along with orthotopic liver transplantation in carefully selected patients with end-stage liver disease.

Management of misplaced or migrated endovascular stents

PURPOSE

To report experience with techniques for management of misplaced or migrated endovascular stents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 5-year period, percutaneous management of 27 misplaced or migrated endovascular stents (16 Palmaz, 11 Wallstents) in 25 patients was attempted. The 17 venous and 10 arterial stents were rescued from the aorta (n = 9), inferior vena cava (IVC) (n = 4), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt/IVC (n = 2), right atrium (n = 3), right ventricle (n = 2), pulmonary artery (n = 2), iliac vein (n = 2), iliac artery (n = 1), superior vena cava (n = 1), and superior mesenteric vein (n = 1).

RESULTS

Stent management was successful in 26 of 27 cases (96%). Eleven stents were removed percutaneously, two were repositioned and removed with a minor surgical procedure, and 13 were repositioned and deployed in a stable alternate location. The only complication was the development of tricuspid insufficiency in the single case in which the procedure failed (4% complication rate). This patient's stent was eventually surgically removed from the right ventricle.

CONCLUSION

Misplaced or migrated endovascular Palmaz and Wallstents can be effectively managed with few complications by using a variety of percutaneous techniques.