Clinical experience with adaptive support ventilation for fast-track cardiac surgery

Managing the Chronically Ventilated Critically Ill Population

Advances in intensive care over the past few decades have significantly improved the chances of survival for patients with acute critical illness. However, this progress has also led to a growing population of patients who are dependent on intensive care therapies, including prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV), after the initial acute period of critical illness. These patients are referred to as the "chronically critically ill" (CCI). CCI is a syndrome characterized by prolonged mechanical ventilation, myoneuropathies, neuroendocrine disorders, nutritional deficiencies, cognitive and psychiatric issues, and increased susceptibility to infections. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality as well as a significant increase in healthcare costs. In this article, we will review disease burden, outcomes, psychiatric effects, nutritional and ventilator weaning strategies as well as the role of palliative care for CCI with a specific focus on those requiring PMV.

Adaptive Support Ventilation Attenuates Ventilator Induced Lung Injury: Human and Animal Study

Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is a closed-loop ventilation, which can make automatic adjustments in tidal volume (V_T) and respiratory rate based on the minimal work of breathing. The purpose of this research was to study whether ASV can provide a protective ventilation pattern to decrease the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury in patients of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In the clinical study, 15 ARDS patients were randomly allocated to an ASV group or a pressure-control ventilation (PCV) group. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate and respiratory parameters between these two groups, suggesting the feasible use of ASV in ARDS. In animal experiments of 18 piglets, the ASV group had a lower alveolar strain compared with the volume-control ventilation (VCV) group. The ASV group exhibited less lung injury and greater alveolar fluid clearance compared with the VCV group. Tissue analysis showed lower expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and higher expression of claudin-4 and occludin in the ASV group than in the VCV group. In conclusion, the ASV mode is capable of providing ventilation pattern fitting into the lung-protecting strategy; this study suggests that ASV mode may effectively reduce the risk or severity of ventilator-associated lung injury in animal models.

Automation of Mechanical Ventilation

Closed loop control of mechanical ventilation is routine and operates behind the ventilator interface. Reducing caregiver interactions is neither an advantage for the patient or the staff. Automated systems causing lack of situational awareness of the intensive care unit are a concern. Along with autonomous systems must come monitoring and displays that display patients' current condition and response to therapy. Alert notifications for sudden escalation of therapy are required to ensure patient safety. Automated ventilation is useful in remote settings in the absence of experts. Whether automated ventilation will be accepted in large academic medical centers remains to be seen.

Adaptive Support Ventilation: A Translational Study Evaluating the Size of Delivered Tidal Volumes

Purpose

Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is a microprocessor-controlled, closed-loop mode of mechanical ventilation that adapts respiratory rates and tidal volumes (VTs) based on the Otis least work of breathing formula. We studied calculated VTs in a computer simulation model, and VTs delivered in a test lung setting as well as in clinical practice.

Materials and Methods

In a computer simulation model using the Otis formula, VTs were calculated for increasing predicted body weights (from 50 to 80 kg) and increasing minute volumes (from 0.7 to 1.5 ml/kg). Different compliance-resistance combinations were chosen to mimic “acute lung injury (ALI)” (compliance 27 ml/cmH2O, resistance 20 cmH20 l/s), “ALI using an open lung approach” (compliance 50 ml/cmH2O, resistance 20 cmH20 l/s), “healthy lungs” (compliance 65 ml/cmH2O, resistance 20 cmH20 l/s) and “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)” (compliance 80 ml/cmH2O, resistance 50 cmH2O l/s). In a test setting using a human ventilator connected to a test lung set to mimic similar pulmonary conditions, VTs delivered by the ASV were studied. In a series of stable intensive care unit patients after cardiothoracic surgery, the delivered VTs were collected and analyzed.

Results

VTs with the Otis formula resembled those in the test setting. With ALI, the ventilator delivered VTs between 6 and 8 ml/kg. With ALI using an open lung approach and with healthy lungs, the ventilator delivered VTs between 8 and 10 ml/kg. With COPD, all VTs were above 10 ml/kg. In patients after coronary artery bypass surgery ASV delivered VTs between 7 and 9 ml/kg and VTs never exceeded 10 ml/kg.

Discussion

The ASV performed as intended, bearing in mind that the ASV algorithm was originally designed to provide VTs between 8 and 12 ml/kg. However, the VTs that were calculated and delivered were frequently higher than those presently recommended in the guidelines. Considering the size of VT delivered in the setting of ALI using an open lung approach as well as in the setting of COPD, we feel caution should be taken when applying ASV in patients with these conditions.

Hemodynamic challenge to early mobilization after cardiac surgery: A pilot study

Background:

Active mobilization is a key component in fast-track surgical strategies. Following major surgery, clinicians are often reluctant to mobilize patients arguing that circulatory homeostasis would be impaired as a result of myocardial stunning, fluid shift, and autonomic dysfunction.

Aims:

We examined the feasibility and safety of a mobilization protocol 12–24 h after elective cardiac surgery.

Setting and Design:

This observational study was performed in a tertiary nonacademic cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit.

Materials and Methods:

Over a 6-month period, we prospectively evaluated the hemodynamic response to a two-staged mobilization procedure in 53 consecutive patients. Before, during, and after the mobilization, hemodynamics parameters were recorded, including the central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂), lactate concentrations, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), right atrial pressure (RAP), and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO₂). Any adverse events were documented.

Results:

All patients successfully completed the mobilization procedure. Compared with the supine position, mobilization induced significant increases in arterial lactate (34.6% [31.6%, 47.6%], P = 0.0022) along with reduction in RAP (−33% [−21%, −45%], P < 0.0001) and ScvO₂ (−7.4% [−5.9%, −9.9%], P = 0.0002), whereas HR and SpO₂ were unchanged. Eighteen patients (34%) presented a decrease in MAP > 10% and nine of them (17%) required treatment. Hypotensive patients experienced a greater decrease in ScvO₂ (−18 ± 5% vs. −9 ± 4%, P = 0.004) with similar changes in RAP and HR. All hemodynamic parameters, but arterial lactate, recovered baseline values after resuming the horizontal position.

Conclusions:

Early mobilization after cardiac surgery appears to be a safe procedure as far as it is performed under close hemodynamic and clinical monitoring in an intensive care setting.

Comparing the Effect of Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) and Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (SIMV) on Respiratory Parameters in Neurosurgical ICU Patients

BACKGROUND

Various modes of mechanical ventilation have different effects on respiratory variables. Lack of patients' neuro-ventilatory coordination and increasing the work of breathing are major disadvantages in mechanically ventilated patients.

OBJECTIVES

This study is conducted to compare the respiratory parameters differences in Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) modes in neurosurgical ICU patients.

METHODS

In a crossover study, patients under mechanical ventilation in neurosurgical ICU were enrolled. The patients alternatively experienced two types of ventilations for 30 minutes (adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation). The respiratory parameters (tidal volume, respiratory rate, airway pressure, lung compliance, end-tidal carbon dioxide, peripheral oxygenation and respiratory dead space), hemodynamic variables, every 10 minutes and arterial blood gas analysis at the end of each 30 minutes were recorded. Results were compared and analyzed with SPSS v.19.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were involved in this study. In ASV mode, values including peak airway pressure (P-peak), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), tidal volume and respiratory dead space were significantly lower than SIMV mode. Although the mean value for dynamic compliance had no significant difference in the two types of ventilation, it was better in ASV mode.

CONCLUSIONS

ASV mode compared with SIMV mode can lead to improve lung compliance and respiratory dead space.

Comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Background:

Different modes of mechanical ventilation are used for respiratory support after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). This study aimed to compare the effect(s) of using adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) on the length of mechanical ventilation (intubation duration) and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Materials and Methods:

In a randomized control trial, 64 patients were ventilated with ASV as the experiment group or with SIMV as the control group after CABG surgery in Chamran Hospital of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The time of tracheal intubation and the length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed and described using statistical analysis (independent t-test).

Results:

The mean time of intubation duration was significantly lower in ASV group compared with SIMV group. (4.83 h vs 6.71 h, P < 0.001). The lengths of hospital stay in the ASV and the SIMV groups were 140.6 h and 145.1 h, respectively. This difference was significant between the two groups (P = 0.006).

Conclusions:

According to the results of this study, using ASV mode for mechanical ventilation after CABG led to a decrease in intubation duration and also hospital stay in comparison with the SIMV group. It is recommended to use ASV mode on ventilators for respiratory support of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

A randomized controlled trial of 2 protocols for weaning cardiac surgical patients receiving adaptive support ventilation

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of weaning with adaptive support ventilation (ASV) incorporating progressively reduced or constant target minute ventilation in the protocol in postoperative care after cardiac surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A randomized controlled unblinded study of 52 patients after elective coronary artery bypass surgery was carried out to determine whether a protocol incorporating a decremental target minute ventilation (DTMV) results in more rapid weaning of patients ventilated in ASV mode compared to a protocol incorporating a constant target minute ventilation.

RESULTS

Median duration of mechanical ventilation (145 vs 309 minutes; P = .001) and intubation (225 vs 423 minutes; P = .005) were significantly shorter in the DTMV group. There was no difference in adverse effects (42% vs 46%) or mortality (0% vs 0%) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a DTMV protocol for postoperative ventilation of cardiac surgical patients in ASV mode results in a shorter duration of ventilation and intubation without evidence of increased risk of adverse effects.

Discontinuous versus Continuous Weaning in Stroke Patients

Background: An increasing number of stroke patients have to be supported by mechanical ventilation in intensive care units (ICU), with a relevant proportion of them requiring gradual withdrawal from a respirator. To date, weaning studies have focused merely on mixed patient groups, COPD patients or patients after cardiac surgery. Therefore, the best weaning strategy for stroke patients remains to be determined. Methods: Here, we designed a prospective randomized controlled study comparing adaptive support ventilation (ASV), a continuous weaning strategy, with biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) in combination with spontaneous breathing trials, a discontinuous technique, in the treatment of stroke patients. The primary endpoint was the duration of the weaning process. Results: Only the 40 (out of 54) patients failing in an initial spontaneous breathing trial (T-piece test) were included into the study; the failure proportion is considerably larger compared to previous studies. Eligible patients were pseudo-randomly assigned to one of the two weaning groups. Both groups did not differ regarding age, gender, and severity of stroke. The results showed that the median weaning duration was 10.7 days (±SD 7.0) in the discontinuous weaning group, and 8 days (±SD 4.5) in the continuous weaning group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical study to show that continuous weaning is significantly more effective compared to discontinuous weaning in mechanically ventilated stroke patients. We suppose that the reason for the superiority of continuous weaning using ASV as well as the bad performance of our patients in the 2 h T-piece test is caused by the patients' compliance. Compared to patients on surgical and medical ICUs, neurological patients more often suffer from reduced vigilance, lack of adverse-effects reflexes, dysphagia, and cerebral dysfunction. Therefore, stroke patients may profit from a more gradual withdrawal of weaning.

Adaptive support ventilation: State of the art review

Mechanical ventilation is one of the most commonly applied interventions in intensive care units. Despite its life-saving role, it can be a risky procedure for the patient if not applied appropriately. To decrease risks, new ventilator modes continue to be developed in an attempt to improve patient outcomes. Advances in ventilator modes include closed-loop systems that facilitate ventilator manipulation of variables based on measured respiratory parameters. Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is a positive pressure mode of mechanical ventilation that is closed-loop controlled, and automatically adjust based on the patient's requirements. In order to deliver safe and appropriate patient care, clinicians need to achieve a thorough understanding of this mode, including its effects on underlying respiratory mechanics. This article will discuss ASV while emphasizing appropriate ventilator settings, their advantages and disadvantages, their particular effects on oxygenation and ventilation, and the monitoring priorities for clinicians.

Adaptive support ventilation with and without end-tidal CO2 closed loop control versus conventional ventilation

PURPOSE

Our aim was to compare adaptive support ventilation with and without closed loop control by end tidal CO2 (ASVCO2, ASV) with pressure (PC) and volume control ventilation (VC) during simulated clinical scenarios [normal lungs (N), COPD, ARDS, brain injury (BI)].

METHODS

A lung model was used to simulate representative compliance (mL/cmH2O): resistance (cmH2O/L/s) combinations, 45:5 for N and BI, 60:7.7 for COPD, 15:7.7 and 35:7.7 for ARDS. Two levels of PEEP (cmH2O) were used for each scenario, 12/16 for ARDS, and 5/10 for others. The CO2 productions of 2, 3, 4 and 5 mL/kg predicted body weight/min were simulated. Tidal volume was set to 6 mL/kg during VC and PC. Outcomes of interest were end tidal CO2 (etCO2) and plateau pressure (P Plat).

RESULTS

EtCO2 levels in N and BI and COPD were similar for all modes. In ARDS, etCO2 was higher in ASVCO2 than in other modes (p < 0.001). Under all mechanical conditions ASVCO2 revealed a narrower range of etCO2. P Plat was similar for all modes in all scenarios but ARDS where P Plat in ASV and ASVCO2 were lower than in VC (p = 0.001). When P Plat was ≥ 28 cmH2O, P plat in ASV and ASVCO2 were lower than in VC and PC (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

All modes performed similarly in most cases. Minor differences observed were in favor of the closed loop modes. Overall, ASVCO2 maintained tighter CO2 control. The ASVCO2 had the greatest impact during ARDS allowing etCO2 to increase and protecting against hypocapnia evident with other modes while ensuring lower P plat and tidal volumes.

Effort-adapted modes of assisted breathing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New developments in mechanical ventilation have focused on increasing the patient's control of the ventilator by implementing information on lung mechanics and respiratory drive. Effort-adapted modes of assisted breathing are presented and their potential advantages are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adaptive support ventilation, proportional assist ventilation with load adjustable gain factors and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist are ventilatory modes that follow the concept of adapting the assist to a defined target, instantaneous changes in respiratory drive or lung mechanics. Improved patient ventilator interaction, sufficient unloading of the respiratory muscles and increased comfort have been recently associated with these ventilator modalities. There are, however, scarce data with regard to outcome improvement, such as length of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay or mortality (commonly accepted targets to demonstrate clinical superiority).

SUMMARY

Within recent years, a major step forward in the evolution of assisted (effort-adapted) modes of mechanical ventilation was accomplished. There is growing evidence that supports the physiological concept of closed-loop effort-adapted assisted modes of mechanical ventilation. However, at present, the translation into a clear outcome benefit remains to be proven. In order to fill the knowledge gap that impedes the broader application, larger randomized controlled trials are urgently needed. However, with clearly proven drawbacks of conventional assisted modes such as pressure support ventilation, it is probably about time to leave these modes introduced decades ago behind.

Adaptive support ventilation versus conventional ventilation for total ventilatory support in acute respiratory failure

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term effects of adaptive support ventilation (ASV), an advanced closed-loop mode, with conventional volume or pressure-control ventilation in patients passively ventilated for acute respiratory failure.

DESIGN

Prospective crossover interventional multicenter trial.

SETTING

Six European academic intensive care units.

PATIENTS

Eighty-eight patients in three groups: patients with no obvious lung disease (n = 22), restrictive lung disease (n = 36) or obstructive lung disease (n = 30).

INTERVENTIONS

After measurements on conventional ventilation (CV) as set by the patients' clinicians, each patient was switched to ASV set to obtain the same minute ventilation as during CV (isoMV condition). If this resulted in a change in PaCO(2), the minute ventilation setting of ASV was readjusted to achieve the same PaCO(2) as in CV (isoCO(2) condition).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Compared with CV, PaCO(2) during ASV in isoMV condition and minute ventilation during ASV in isoCO(2) condition were slightly lower, with lower inspiratory work/minute performed by the ventilator (p < 0.01). Oxygenation and hemodynamics were unchanged. During ASV, respiratory rate was slightly lower and tidal volume (Vt) slightly greater (p < 0.01), especially in obstructed patients. During ASV there were different ventilatory patterns in the three groups, with lower Vt in patients with restrictive disease and prolonged expiratory time in obstructed patients, thus mimicking the clinicians' choices for setting CV. In three chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients the resulting Vt was unacceptably high.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison between ASV and CV resulted either in similarities or in minor differences. Except for excessive Vt in a few obstructed patients, all differences were in favor of ASV.

Advanced closed loops during mechanical ventilation (PAV, NAVA, ASV, SmartCare)

New modes of mechanical ventilation with advanced closed loops are now available, and in the future these could assume a greater role in supporting critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs) for several reasons. Two modes of ventilation--proportional assist ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist--deliver assisted ventilation proportional to the patient's effort, improving patient-ventilator synchrony. Also, a few systems that automate the medical reasoning with advanced closed-loops, such as SmartCare and adaptive support ventilation, have the potential to improve knowledge transfer by continuously implementing automated protocols. Moreover, they may improve patient-ventilator interactions and outcomes, and provide a partial solution to the forecast clinician shortages by reducing ICU-related costs, time spent on mechanical ventilation, and staff workload. Preliminary studies are promising, and initial systems are currently being refined with increasing clinical experience. A new era of mechanical ventilation should emerge with these systems.

Adaptive support ventilation for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position: bringing ICU modes of mechanical ventilation to the operating room

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to test the efficacy of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) to automatically adapt the ventilatory settings to the changes in the respiratory mechanics that occur during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position in gynaecological surgeries.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 22 ASA I women scheduled for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position. After intravenous induction of general anaesthesia, patients were ventilated with ASV, a closed-loop mode of mechanical ventilation based on the Otis formula, designed to automatically adapt the ventilatory settings to changes in the patient's respiratory system mechanics, while maintaining preset minute ventilation. Respiratory mechanics variables, ventilatory setting parameters and analysis of blood gases were recorded at three time points: 5 min after induction (baseline), 15 min after pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning (Pneumo-Trend) and 15 min after pneumoperitoneum withdrawal (final).

RESULTS

A reduction of 44.4% in respiratory compliance and an increase of 29.1% in airway resistance were observed during the Pneumo-Trend period. Despite these changes in respiratory mechanics, minute ventilation was kept constant. ASV adapted the ventilatory settings by automatically increasing inspiratory pressure by 3.2 +/- 0.9 cmH(2)O (+19%), P < 0.01, respiratory rate by 1.3 +/- 0.5 breaths per minute (+9%) and the inspiratory to total time ratio (T(i)/T(tot)) by 43.3%. At final time, these parameters returned towards their baseline values. Adequate gas exchange was maintained throughout all periods. PaCO(2) increased moderately (+13%) from 4.4 +/- 0.6 (baseline) to 5.0 +/- 0.9 kPa (Pneumo-Trend), P < 0.01; and decreased slightly at final time (4.7 +/- 0.8 kPa), P < 0.05. Clinician's intervention was needed in only one patient who showed a moderate hypercapnia (PaCO(2) 6.9 kPa) during pneumoperitoneum.

CONCLUSION

In healthy women undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy, ASV automatically adapted the ventilatory settings to the changes in the respiratory mechanics, keeping constant the preset minute ventilation, providing an adequate exchange of respiratory gases and obviating clinician's interventions.

Adaptive support ventilation with percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy: a clinical study

We determined the need for changes in minute ventilation with adaptive support ventilation after percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy under endoscopic guidance in 34 intensive care unit patients. During the procedure, minute ventilation was not changed; only maximum pressure limits were adjusted, if necessary. After insertion of the tracheotomy, cannula minute ventilation was adjusted only if Paco(2)-values changed >or=0.5 kPa from baseline. In 74% of patients, adaptive support ventilation was unable to maintain minute ventilation during the use of the endoscope, mandating pressure limitation adjustments. In a minority of patients (26%), minute ventilation had to be adjusted to achieve similar Paco(2) values.

Determinants of tidal volumes with adaptive support ventilation: a multicenter observational study

INTRODUCTION

In the present study, we investigated the behavior of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) in patients after cardiothoracic surgery. We determined tidal volumes (Vt) and factors that influence Vt with this mode of microprocessor-controlled mechanical ventilation (MV).

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study in three Dutch intensive care units over a 5-mo period. MV data were collected during steady-state after arrival in the intensive care unit.

RESULTS

Data were collected for 346 consecutive patients after cardiothoracic surgery: 262 patients weaned with ASV, and 84 patients weaned with pressure-controlled/pressure-support MV. With ASV the mean (+/- sd) Vt expressed per kilogram actual body weight was 7.1 +/- 1.6 mL. Expressed per kilogram ideal body weight (IBW), Vt was 8.3 +/- 1.5 mL. In patients with a correctly set body weight (SBW) (i.e., the IBW), Vt was 8.1 +/- 1.4 mL/kg. With pressure-controlled/pressure-support-MV Vt was 7.3 +/- 1.4 mL/kg IBW (P < 0.001 vs ASV). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed Vt with ASV to be dependent on only two parameters: respiratory rate and the correctness of SBW.

CONCLUSIONS

Vt with ASV seems to be dependent on two parameters: respiratory rate and the correctness of SBW. The first factor is not clinically important because respiratory rate is automatically chosen by the microprocessor. The second factor is clinically important because it is the only factor that can be influenced by the operator. Our data show the importance of setting the correct weight with ASV. With ASV, Vt are >8 mL/kg IBW in a substantial number of patients. Randomized clinical trials should be performed to compare ASV with other ventilation modes.

Automating the weaning process with advanced closed-loop systems

BACKGROUND

Limiting the duration of invasive ventilation is an important goal in caring for critically ill patients. Several clinical trials have shown that compared to traditional care, protocols can reduce the total duration of mechanical ventilation. Computerized or automated weaning has the potential to improve weaning, while decreasing associated workload, and to transfer best evidence into clinical practice by integrating closed-loop technology into protocols that can be operationalized continuously.

DISCUSSION

In this article, we review the principles of automated systems, discuss automated systems that can be used during weaning, and examine the best-current evidence from randomized trials and observational studies supporting their use. We highlight three commercially available systems (Mandatory Minute Ventilation, Adaptive Support Ventilation and SmartCare) that can be used to automate the weaning process. We note advantages and disadvantages associated with individual weaning systems and differences among them.

CONCLUSIONS

We discuss the potential role for automation in complimenting clinical acumen, reducing practice pattern variation and facilitating knowledge translation into clinical practice, and underscore the need for additional high quality investigations to evaluate automated weaning systems in different practice settings and diverse patient populations.

Efficacy of adaptive servoventilation in treatment of complex and central sleep apnea syndromes

BACKGROUND

Complex sleep apnea syndrome (CompSAS) is recognized by the concurrence of mixed or obstructive events with central apneas, the latter predominating on exposure to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Treatment of CompSAS or central sleep apnea (CSA) syndrome with adaptive servoventilation (ASV) is now an option, but no large series exist describing the application and effectiveness of ASV.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of the first 100 patients who underwent polysomnography using ASV at Mayo Clinic Sleep Center.

RESULTS

ASV titration was performed for CompSAS (63%), CSA (22%), or CSA/Cheyne Stokes breathing patterns (15%). The median diagnostic sleep apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was 48 events per hour (range, 24 to 62). With CPAP, obstructive apneas decreased, but the appearance of central apneas maintained the AHI at 31 events per hour (range, 17 to 47) [p = 0.02]. With bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) in spontaneous mode, AHI trended toward worsening vs baseline, with a median of 75 events per hour (range, 46 to 111) [p = 0.055]. BPAP with a backup rate improved the AHI to 15 events per hour (range, 11 to 31) [p = 0.002]. Use of ASV dramatically improved the AHI to a mean of 5 events per hour (range, 1 to 11) vs baseline and vs CPAP (p < 0.0001). ASV also resulted in an increase in rapid eye movement sleep vs baseline and CPAP (18% vs 12% and 10%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Overall, 64 patients responded to the ASV treatment with a mean AHI < 10 events per hour. Of the 44 successful survey follow-up patients contacted, 32 patients reported some improvement in sleep quality.

CONCLUSION

The ASV device appears to be an effective treatment of both CompSAS and CSA syndromes that are resistant to CPAP.

Closed-loop ventilation: an emerging standard of care?

The rational for using closed loop ventilation is becoming strong and stronger. Studies are now available supporting the hypothesis that patient outcome is improved by using closed loop ventilation. In the highly sophisticated ICU world driven by the triumvirate of cost-efficiency, quality, and safety, closed loop ventilation will become definitely unavoidable. The challenge is how to make that change effortless, "friendly" and as fast as possible. Introducing novel graphical user interfaces and providing data displays that are pertinent, integrative and dynamic will reduce cognitive resources of the clinician and have the potential to make ventilation safer. They may be the key to adopt closed loop ventilation in everyday practice.

Implementation of a weaning algorithm in postoperative cardiac ICU: simple enough to be implemented in a ventilator software

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a respiratory weaning algorithm (WA) in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. This algorithm was made simple enough to be implemented in medium-end ventilator software.

PATIENTS

Twenty consecutive postoperative patients who underwent scheduled cardiac surgery with normal postoperative haemodynamic and respiratory status.

METHODS

A 3 step WA (Controlled Mode Ventilation, Pressure Support (PS) at +20 cmH2O and at +10 cmH2O) was applied every 15 minute by the same investigator. A 15 minute period of respiratory stability at one step led to commute to a step ahead until patient was judged "ready for extubation" (RFE, i.e. stable during 15 min under PS +10 cmH2O). Once reaching this time, the patient was left under PS +10 until nurse and doctors in charge decided extubation according to our routine clinical criteria.

RESULTS

the patients were routinely extubated, in average 187+/-169 min later than when judged RFE by the algorithm. Heart rate (P<0.05) and mean arterial pressure rose when they reached the time of effective extubation, by comparison to the RFE time point.

CONCLUSION

A WA has clinical advantage in cardiac surgery as it reduces respiratory weaning duration. It helps to avoiding haemodynamic stress related to delayed extubation. Such an algorithm is simple enough to be implemented in medium-end ventilators.

How to choose a mechanical ventilator

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide some practical and clinical considerations that may guide users through the decision process when choosing mechanical ventilators

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the complexity of mechanical ventilators is steadily increasing, the importance of many devices developed over the course of the technical evolution is still a matter of discussion. Recent data demonstrate that the technical performance of equivalent ventilators (ie, machines of the same generation and category) is pretty similar, suggesting that the different manufacturers keep in step with new developments. Thus, other factors than technical limitations will probably influence the choice of ventilators. Among them the ability of the staff to understand the rationale of the different devices and controls as well as deal with the complexity of the ventilator may be particularly important.

SUMMARY

Choosing mechanical ventilators should begin by defining the algorithms of how to ventilate a patient. Once this is done, a ventilator should allow the transformation of specific strategies into practice and the adaptation of the mechanical support to the needs of the individual patient. This procedure is crucially important, because ventilator therapy should always be determined by the physician and based on solid physiologic rationales rather than by the technical features of the machine.