Cardiorespiratory response of intravenous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalaprilat in hypertensive cardiac surgery patients

Perioperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers for preventing mortality and morbidity in adults

BACKGROUND

Perioperative hypertension requires careful management. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) have shown efficacy in treating hypertension associated with surgery. However, there is lack of consensus about whether they can prevent mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically assess the benefits and harms of administration of ACEIs or ARBs perioperatively for the prevention of mortality and morbidity in adults (aged 18 years and above) undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the current issue of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2014, Issue 12), Ovid MEDLINE (1966 to 8 December 2014), EMBASE (1980 to 8 December 2014), and references of the retrieved randomized trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing perioperative administration of ACEIs or ARBs with placebo in adults (aged 18 years and above) undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia. We excluded studies in which participants underwent procedures that required local anaesthesia only, or participants who had already been on ACEIs or ARBs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs with a total of 571 participants in the review. Two of the seven trials involved 36 participants undergoing non-cardiac vascular surgery (infrarenal aortic surgery), and five involved 535 participants undergoing cardiac surgery, including valvular surgery, coronary artery bypass surgery, and cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. The intervention was started from 11 days to 25 minutes before surgery in six trials and during surgery in one trial. We considered all seven RCTs to carry a high risk of bias. The effects of ACEIs or ARBs on perioperative mortality and acute myocardial infarction were uncertain because the quality of the evidence was very low. The risk of death was 2.7% in the ACEIs or ARBs group and 1.6% in the placebo group (risk ratio (RR) 1.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 5.85). The risk of acute myocardial infarction was 1.7% in the ACEIs or ARBs group and 3.0% in the placebo group (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.14 to 2.26). ACEIs or ARBs may improve congestive heart failure (cardiac index) perioperatively (mean difference (MD) -0.60; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.50, very low-quality evidence). In terms of rate of complications, there was no difference in perioperative cerebrovascular complications (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.18 to 1.28, very low-quality evidence) and hypotension (RR 1.95; 95% CI 0.86 to 4.41, very low-quality evidence). Cardiac surgery-related renal failure was not reported. ACEIs or ARBs were associated with shortened length of hospital stay (MD -0.54; 95% CI -0.93 to -0.16, P value = 0.005, very low-quality evidence). These findings should be interpreted cautiously due to likely confounding by the clinical backgrounds of the participants. ACEIs or ARBs may shorten the length of hospital stay, (MD -0.54; 95% CI -0.93 to -0.16, very low-quality evidence) Two studies reported adverse events, and there was no evidence of a difference between the ACEIs or ARBs and control groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this review did not find evidence to support that perioperative ACEIs or ARBs can prevent mortality, morbidity, and complications (hypotension, perioperative cerebrovascular complications, and cardiac surgery-related renal failure). We found no evidence showing that the use of these drugs may reduce the rate of acute myocardial infarction. However, ACEIs or ARBs may increase cardiac output perioperatively. Due to the low and very low methodology quality, high risk of bias, and lack of power of the included studies, the true effect may be substantially different from the observed estimates. Perioperative (mainly elective cardiac surgery, according to included studies) initiation of ACEIs or ARBs therapy should be individualized.

Postoperative Care of the Cardiac Surgical Patient

The subspecialty of interventional cardiology began in 1977. Since then, the discipline of interventional cardiology has matured rapidly, particularly with regards to ischemic heart disease. As a result, more patients are undergoing percutaneous catheter interventional therapy for ischemic heart disease and fewer patients are undergoing surgical myocardial revascularization. Those patients referred for surgical revascularization are generally older and have more complex problems. Furthermore, as the population ages more patients are referred to surgery for valvular heart disease. The result of these changes is a population of surgical patients older and sicker than previously treated.

Perioperative hypertension management

Perioperative hypertension is commonly encountered in patients that undergo surgery. While attempts have been made to standardize the method to characterize the intraoperative hemodynamics, these methods still vary widely. In addition, there is a lack of consensus concerning treatment thresholds and appropriate therapeutic targets, making absolute recommendations about treatment difficult. Nevertheless, perioperative hypertension requires careful management. When treatment is necessary, therapy should be individualized for the patient. This paper reviews the pharmacologic agents and strategies commonly used in the management of perioperative hypertension.

Beneficial hemodynamic and renal effects of intravenous enalaprilat following coronary artery bypass surgery complicated by left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are an effective therapy for all stages of heart failure due to reduced systolic left ventricular function. Because sufficient data on intravenous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors following coronary artery bypass surgery complicated by postoperative left ventricular dysfunction are unavailable, the efficacy and safety of intravenously administered enalaprilat were evaluated.

DESIGN

A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind protocol.

SETTING

Postoperative intensive care unit at the German Heart Institute Berlin.

PATIENTS

Forty patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% following coronary artery bypass surgery on the second postoperative day or after weaning from intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.

INTERVENTIONS

A loading dose of enalaprilat 0.625 mg infused over 1 hr was followed by 5 mg/24 hrs administered continuously for up to 72 hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamic variables, blood gases, hormonal variables, renal function, and electrolytes were measured before and repeatedly during therapy. Acute effects were as follows: At 1 hr, enalaprilat increased the cardiac index (p <.001), stroke volume index (p <.001), and right ventricular stroke work index (p <.03) compared with placebo, whereas mean arterial pressure (p <.008) and both systemic (p <.001) and pulmonary (p <.02) vascular resistance decreased. Continuous effects were as follows: Over 72 hrs, enalaprilat decreased diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (p <.019), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (p <.02), and central venous pressure (p <.02). The cardiac and stroke volume indexes were consistently higher in the enalaprilat group, whereas systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances were lower. The arterial blood-pressure lowering effect was blunted and heart rate remained unchanged. Mixed venous oxygenation (p <.02) was higher and arterial oxygenation was not modified. Finally, enalaprilat increased creatinine clearance (p <.002) and decreased creatinine (p <.02) and urea (p <.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous enalaprilat safely and effectively improves cardiac and renal function following coronary artery bypass surgery complicated by postoperative left ventricular dysfunction.

Treatment of hypertension in the perioperative patient

OBJECTIVE

To review studies and drug therapy relating to the treatment of hypertension in perioperative patients.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were selected from a MEDLINE search (1966-August 1998), and several textbooks on hypertension and surgery were reviewed. In addition, bibliographies of all articles and textbook chapters were studied for articles not found in the computerized searches.

STUDY SELECTION

Clinical studies involving hypertension in the perioperative setting were included. The initial search was limited to studies conducted in humans and published in English.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information regarding drug therapy was reviewed and guidelines were constructed for managing surgical patients with acute blood pressure elevations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Although nitroprusside and nitroglycerin, with their short onset of action and duration of effect, are indicated for hypertensive emergencies, a variety of agents are available for hypertensive urgencies. An algorithm that can be used as a template for the development of intrainstitutional guidelines is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the scarcity of comparative trials, decisions involving agents for the treatment of perioperative hypertension must often be made based on combined efficacy, toxicity, cost, and convenience considerations.

The effects of preoperative therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on clinical outcome after cardiovascular surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of preoperative therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on clinical outcome after cardiovascular surgery.

STUDY

Inception cohort.

SETTING

A tertiary care 54-bed cardiothoracic ICU.

PATIENTS

All admissions to an ICU over a 42-month period after cardiovascular surgery.

INTERVENTION

Extraction of preoperative, operative, and ICU data from a database.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of acute organ dysfunction, length of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and death after cardiovascular surgery.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of four groups: normal or moderately impaired left ventricular function control (group A, n=6,400); normal or moderately impaired left ventricular function treated with ACE inhibitors (group B, n=1,375); severe left ventricular dysfunction control (group C, n=1,905); and severe left ventricular dysfunction treated with ACE inhibitors (group D, n=1,650). The incidence of three or more organ dysfunction was similar on comparison of group A vs group B (5% vs 6%) or group C vs group D (15% vs 13%). There were no differences in the total duration of mechanical ventilation or length of stay in the ICU in group A vs group B or group C vs group D. Death occurred in 2% of groups A and B, and at 6% in groups C and D. Preoperative severe left ventricular dysfunction in both groups C and D was associated with an increased incidence of three or more organ dysfunction, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU, and death after surgery. Multivariate analysis indicated that therapy with ACE inhibitors did not affect the clinical outcome after cardiovascular surgery.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative therapy with ACE inhibitors did not influence the clinical outcome after cardiac surgery. It is unlikely that therapy with ACE inhibitors can alter the clinical sequelae of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac surgical procedures performed in high-risk patients because of underlying severe left ventricular dysfunction.

DA1-receptor stimulation by fenoldopam in the treatment of postcardiac surgical hypertension

BACKGROUND

Besides adequate analgesia, sedation and ventilation, postcardiac surgical hypertension has to be treated frequently with vasoactive drugs to avoid possible complications. In this study the hemodynamic effects of the DA1-receptor agonist fenoldopam (F) are compared to those of the Ca-channel antagonist nifedipine (N).

METHODS

Postoperatively, 64 CABG-patients with a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of more than 105 mmHg over 10 min were investigated. Patients with compromised ventricular function, insufficient surgical repair, arrhythmia or an ECG unable to detect myocardial ischemia were excluded. The study drugs (initial dosage: F: 0.8; N: 0.3 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) were given continuously via a central venous catheter to reduce and to maintain the MAP between 80 and 95 mmHg. Hemodynamic parameters were determined using thermodilution technique.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of the MAP (F: from 121 +/- 11 to 83 +/- 4, N: from 119 +/- 8 to 82 +/- 9 mmHg) and of the calculated systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (F: 2110 +/- 500 to 970 +/- 200, N:1980 +/- 660 to 1020 +/- 300 dyn.s.cm-5) were noted in both groups, whereby in the F group the therapeutic goal could be achieved more quickly with the dosage regimen chosen. As a result, a marked increase of heart rate, cardiac index and stroke volume index could be observed, which was more pronounced due to the initially stronger decrease of SVR with F. There was also a stronger decrease of pulmonary vascular resistance in the F group, but the indices of right ventricular function did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Fenoldopam seems to be an efficient alternative to nifedipine, especially because of its more rapid onset of action.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition has no effect on blood pressure and splanchnic perfusion after cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to study the effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, enalaprilat, on blood pressure and splanchnic perfusion after cardiac surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients were studied after coronary artery bypass grafting. After admission to the intensive care unit, a 30-minute baseline measurement of systemic hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and gastric tonometry was performed. In 6 of 10 patients receiving enalaprilat and in each of 6 control patients, regional (splanchnic and leg) blood flows were measured also. After the baseline measurement period, 10 patients received a 0.5 mg bolus of enalaprilat and thereafter an incremental infusion of enalaprilat up to a total dose of 10 mg (mean 8.3; range 4 to 10 mg) was continued to reduce the mean arterial pressure (MAP) to 70 to 80 mm Hg. A 30-minute measurement period was repeated 2 to 3 hours after the first measurement period. In the control group, the second measurement was performed at corresponding time points.

RESULTS

Though MAP decreased in the enalaprilat group (enalaprilat 99 +/- 14 mm Hg v 89 +/- 21 mm Hg, P < .05; control 95 +/- 13 mm Hg v82 +/- 10 mm Hg, P = NS) in only 4 of 10 patients was the targeted MAP reduction achieved. No significant changes were observed either in systemic or regional blood flows. Systemic, pulmonary, and femoral vascular resistance indices decreased significantly in both groups. Gastric-arterial PCO2 difference did not change in either groups. Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity decreased in the enalaprilat group (10.0 +/- 2.3 v 1.3 +/- 0.3 U x l(-1), P < .01), but plasma renin and endothelin-1 concentrations did not change in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of enalaprilat on blood pressure was poor and it had no beneficial effects on splanchnic circulation. Renin-angiotensin activation is not a major factor in hypertension and splanchnic perfusion after cardiac surgery.