Magnesium substitution in elective coronary artery surgery: a double-blind clinical study

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Literature and Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia to occur after cardiac surgery, with an incidence of 10% to 50%. It is associated with postoperative complications including increased risk of stroke, prolonged hospital stays and increased costs. Despite new insights into the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation, no specific etiologic factor has been identified as the sole perpetrator of the arrhythmia. Current evidence suggests that the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation in general, as well as after cardiac surgery, is multifactorial. Studies have also shown that new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery is associated with a higher risk of short-term and long-term mortality. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that prophylactic medical therapy decreases the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Of note, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation has not changed during the last decades despite the numerous preventive strategies and operative techniques proposed, although the perioperative and postoperative care of cardiac patients as such has improved.

Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Following Cardiac Surgery: From Pathogenesis to Potential Therapies

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a major complication after cardiac surgery which can lead to high rates of morbidity and mortality, an enhanced length of hospital stay, and an increased cost of care. POAF is postulated to be a multifactorial phenomenon; however, some major pathogeneses have been proposed, including inflammatory pathways, oxidative stress, and autonomic dysfunction. Genetic studies also showed that inflammatory pathways, beta-1 adrenoreceptor variants, G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 gene variants, and non-coding single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the 4q25 chromosomal locus are involved in this phenomenon. Moreover, several predisposing factors lead to the development of POAF, consisting of pre-, intra-, and postoperative contributors. The main predisposing factors comprise age, prior history of major cardiovascular risk factors, and ischemia-reperfusion injury during surgery. The management of POAF is based on the usual therapies used for non-surgical AF, including medications for either rate control or rhythm control in hemodynamically unstable patients. The perioperative administration of β-blockers and some antiarrhythmic agents has been recommended in major international guidelines. In addition, upstream therapies consisting of colchicine, magnesium, statins, and antioxidants have attenuated the incidence of POAF; however, some uncomfortable side effects developed in large randomized trials. The use of anticoagulation has also resulted in less mortality in patients with POAF at higher risk of thromboembolic events. Despite these recommendations, the actual regimen for the prevention of POAF remains controversial. In this review, we highlight the pathogenesis, predisposing factors, and potential therapeutic options for the management of patients at risk for or with POAF following cardiac surgery.

Evaluating the effect of magnesium supplementation and cardiac arrhythmias after acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial and ventricular cardiac arrhythmias are one of the most common early complications after cardiac surgery and these serve as a major cause of mortality and morbidity after cardiac revascularization. We want to evaluate the effect of magnesium sulfate administration on the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias after cardiac revascularization by doing this systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The search performed in several databases (SID, Magiran, IranDoc, IranMedex, MedLib, PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar) for published Randomized controlled trials before December 2017 that have reported the association between Magnesium consumption and the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. This relationship measured using odds ratios (ORs) with a confidence interval of 95% (CIs). Funnel plots and Egger test used to examine publication bias. STATA (version 11.1) used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies selected as eligible for this research and included in the final analysis. The total rate of ventricular arrhythmia was lower in the group receiving magnesium sulfate than placebo (11.88% versus 24.24%). The same trend obtained for the total incidence of supraventricular arrhythmia (10.36% in the magnesium versus 23.91% in the placebo group). In general the present meta-analysis showed that magnesium could decrease ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias compared with placebo (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.49; p < 0.001 and OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.65; p < 0.001, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that the effect of magnesium on the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias was not affected by clinical settings and dosage of magnesium. Meta-regression analysis also showed that there was no significant association between the reduction of ventricular arrhythmias and sample size.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis study suggest that magnesium sulfate can be used safely and effectively and is a cost-effective way in the prevention of many of ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias.

Magnesium status and magnesium therapy in cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on arrhythmia prevention

PURPOSE

To investigate magnesium as prophylaxis or treatment of postoperative arrhythmias in cardiac surgery (CS) patients. To assess impact on biochemical and patient-centered outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL and EMBASE electronic databases from 1975 to October 2015 using terms related to magnesium and CS. English-Language RCTs were included involving adults undergoing CS with parenterally administered magnesium to treat or prevent arrhythmias, compared to control or standard antiarrythmics. We extracted incidence of postoperative arrhythmias, termination following magnesium administration and secondary outcomes (including mortality, length of stay, hemodynamic parameters, biochemistry).

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included, with significant methodological heterogeneity. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was most commonly reported, followed by ventricular, supraventricular and overall arrhythmia frequency. Magnesium appeared to reduce AF (RR 0.69, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.56-0.86, p=0.002), particularly postoperatively (RR 0.51, 95%CI 0.34-0.77, p=0.003) for longer than 24h. Maximal benefit was seen with bolus doses up to 60mmol. Magnesium appeared to reduce ventricular arrhythmias (RR=0.46, 95%CI 0.24-0.89, p=0.004), with a trend to reduced overall arrhythmias (RR=0.80, 95%CI 0.57-1.12, p=0.191). We found no mortality effect or significant increase in adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnesium administration post-CS appears to reduce AF without significant adverse events. There is limited evidence to support magnesium administration for prevention of other arrhythmias.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation: incidence, mechanisms, and clinical correlates

Atrial fibrillation is the most commonly encountered arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. Although usually self-limiting, it represents an important predictor of increased patient morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Numerous studies have attempted to determine the underlying mechanisms of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) with varied success. A multifactorial pathophysiology is hypothesized, with inflammation and postoperative β-adrenergic activation recognized as important contributing factors. The management of POAF is complicated by a paucity of data relating to the outcomes of different therapeutic interventions in this population. This article reviews the literature on epidemiology, mechanisms, and risk factors of POAF, with a subsequent focus on the therapeutic interventions and guidelines regarding management.

Pharmacologic prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: a systematic review

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia occurring after cardiac surgery. Its incidence varies depending on type of surgery. Postoperative AF may cause hemodynamic deterioration, predispose to stroke and increase mortality. Effective treatment for prophylaxis of postoperative AF is vital as reduces hospitalization and overall morbidity. Beta-blockers, have been proved to prevent effectively atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery and should be routinely used if there are no contraindications. Sotalol may be more effective than standard b-blockers for the prevention of AF without causing an excess of side effects. Amiodarone is useful when beta-blocker therapy is not possible or as additional prophylaxis in high risk patients. Other agents such as magnesium, calcium channels blocker or non-antiarrhythmic drugs as glycose-insulin--potassium, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, N-acetylcysteine and statins have been studied as alternative treatment for postoperative AF prophylaxis.

Prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulphate in addition to oral {beta}-blockade does not prevent atrial arrhythmias after coronary artery or valvular heart surgery: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Atrial arrhythmias (AA) are an important cause of morbidity after cardiac surgery. Efforts at prevention of postoperative AA have been suboptimal. Perioperative beta-blocker administration is the standard of care at many centers. Although prophylactic administration of magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) has been recommended, review of all previously published trials of MgSO(4) reveals conflicting results. This study was designed to address methodological shortcomings from previous studies and is the largest randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous (IV) MgSO(4) for the prevention of AA after coronary artery bypass grafting or cardiac valvular surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 927 nonemergent cardiac surgery patients were stratified into 2 groups: isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (n=694), or valve surgery with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (n=233), and randomized to receive either 5g IV MgSO(4) or placebo on removal of the cross-clamp, followed by daily 4-hour infusions, from postoperative day 1 until postoperative day 4. All patients were treated according to an established oral beta-blocker protocol. Postoperative serum Mg levels were checked and standard of care was to administer IV MgSO(4) for low serum levels. The primary end point was AA lasting > or =30 minutes or requiring treatment for hemodynamic compromise. There were no differences in the incidence of AA between patients who received IV MgSO(4) or placebo (26.4% versus 24.3%, respectively). The results were similar when broken down according to stratified groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated with a protocol for postoperative oral beta-blocker after nonemergent cardiac surgery, the addition of prophylactic IV MgSO(4) did not reduce the incidence of AA.

Increased Ca(2+) sparks and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) stores potentially determine the spontaneous activity of pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes

Pulmonary veins (PVs) contain cardiomyocytes with spontaneous activity that may be responsible for PV arrhythmia. Abnormal Ca(2+) regulation is known to contribute to PV arrhythmogenesis. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether PV cardiomyocytes with spontaneous activity have different intracellular Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)](i)) transients, Ca(2+) sparks and responses to isoproterenol and ryanodine receptor modulators (magnesium and FK506) than do PV cardiomyocytes without spontaneous activity and left atrial (LA) cardiomyocytes. Through fluorescence and confocal microscopy, we evaluated the [Ca(2+)](i) transients and Ca(2+) sparks in isolated rabbit PV and LA cardiomyocytes. PV cardiomyocytes with spontaneous activity had larger [Ca(2+)](i) transients and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) stores than PV cardiomyocytes without spontaneous activity or LA cardiomyocytes. PV cardiomyocytes with spontaneous activity also had a higher incidence and frequency of Ca(2+) sparks, and had Ca(2+) sparks with larger amplitudes than other cardiomyocytes. Magnesium (5.4 mM) reduced the [Ca(2+)](i) transient amplitude and beating rate in PV cardiomyocytes with spontaneous activity. However, in contrast with other cardiomyocytes, low doses (1.8 mM) of magnesium did not reduce the [Ca(2+)](i) transients amplitude in PV cardiomyocytes with spontaneous activity. FK506 (1 microM) diminished the SR Ca(2+) stores in PV cardiomyocytes with spontaneous activity to a lesser extent than that in other cardiomyocytes. Isoproterenol (10 nM) increased the [Ca(2+)](i) transient amplitude to a lesser extent in LA cardiomyocytes than in PV cardiomyocytes with or without spontaneous activity. In conclusion, our results suggest that enhanced [Ca(2+)](i) transients, increased Ca(2+) sparks and SR Ca(2+) stores may contribute to the spontaneous activity of PV cardiomyocytes.

Prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia occurring after heart surgery. Its prevalence after coronary artery bypass surgery is 17-33%. Atrial fibrillation requires additional treatment, lengthens hospitalization and increases the overall expenses of cardiac surgery. Atrial fibrillation can cause hemodynamic problems, predispose to congestive heart failure and increase the risk of stroke. Beta-blockers have been shown to effectively prevent atrial fibrillation, and beta-blockers should be a part of the medication of every patient undergoing cardiac surgery, if there are no contraindications. Amiodarone therapy can also be considered for especially high-risk patients.

Pharmacologic Prophylaxis

New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs frequently in patients after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to review the published trials and to provide clinical practice guidelines for pharmacologic prophylaxis against postoperative AF. Trials of pharmacologic prophylaxis against AF after heart surgery were identified by searching MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the bibliographies of published reports. Evidence grades and clinical recommendation scores were assigned to each prophylactic drug based on published evidence. Ninety-one trials were identified. The primary study design was a randomized, controlled trial of one drug vs placebo/usual care. Pharmacologic therapies that are reviewed include Vaughan-Williams class II agents (ie, beta-receptor antagonists) [29 trials; 2,901 patients], Vaughan-Williams class III agents (ie, sotalol and amiodarone) [18 trials; 2,978 patients], Vaughan-Williams class IV agents (ie, verapamil and diltiazem) [5 trials; 601 patients], and Vaughan-Williams class I agents (ie, quinidine and procainamide) [3 trials; 246 patients], as well as digitalis (10 trials; 1,401 patients), magnesium (14 trials; 1,853 patients), dexamethasone (1 trial; 216 patients), glucose-insulin-potassium (3 trials; 102 patients), insulin (1 trial; 501 patients), triiodothyronine (2 trials; 301 patients), and aniline (1 trial; 32 patients). A consistent finding in this review is that antiarrhythmic drugs with beta-adrenergic receptor-blocking effects (ie, class II beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone) demonstrated successful prophylaxis. Furthermore, those therapies that did not inhibit beta-receptors generally failed to demonstrate a decreased incidence in postoperative AF. While sotalol and amiodarone have been shown in some studies to be effective, their safety and the incremental prophylactic advantage in comparison with beta-blockers has not been conclusively demonstrated. On the basis of evidence that has been reviewed and graded for quality, it is recommended that strong consideration should be given to the prophylactic administration of Vaughan-Williams class II beta-blocking drugs as a means of lowering the incidence of new-onset post-cardiac surgery AF.

Effects of magnesium on atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of the administration of magnesium as a method for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) and to evaluate its influence on hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality.

METHODS

Literature search and meta-analysis of the randomised control studies published since 1966.

RESULTS

20 randomised trials were identified, enrolling a total of 2490 patients. Study sample size varied between 20 and 400 patients. Magnesium administration decreased the proportion of patients developing postoperative AF from 28% in the control group to 18% in the treatment group (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 0.75). Data on LOS were available from seven trials (1227 patients). Magnesium did not significantly affect LOS (weighted mean difference -0.07 days of stay, 95% CI -0.66 to 0.53). The overall mortality was low (0.7%) and was not affected by magnesium administration (odds ratio 1.22, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.77).

CONCLUSION

Magnesium administration is an effective prophylactic measure for the prevention of postoperative AF. It does not significantly alter LOS or in-hospital mortality.

Magnesium prophylaxis for arrhythmias after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Magnesium supplementation may reduce the incidence of arrhythmias, which often occur after cardiac surgery; however, recent findings of the effectiveness of magnesium prophylaxis have yielded discrepant results.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials of magnesium for the prevention of arrhythmias after cardiac surgery. The primary outcomes comprised the incidence of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, and the secondary outcomes comprised serum magnesium concentration, length of hospital stay, myocardial infarction, and mortality. Effect sizes were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials (n=2069 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled serum magnesium concentration at 24 hours after surgery in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group (weighted mean difference=0.45 mmol/L [1.1 mg/dL]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30 to 0.59 mmol/L [0.7 to 1.4 mg/dL]; P <0.001). Magnesium supplementation reduced the risk of supraventricular arrhythmias (relative risk [RR]=0.77; 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.93; P=0.002) and ventricular arrhythmias (RR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.87; P <0.0001), but had no effect on the length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference=-0.28 days; 95% CI: -0.70 to 1.27 days; P=0.48), the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (RR=1.03; 95% CI: 0.52 to 2.05; P = 0.99), or mortality (RR=0.97; 95% CI: 0.43 to 2.20; P=0.94).

CONCLUSION

Administration of prophylactic magnesium reduced the risk of supraventricular arrhythmias after cardiac surgery by 23% (atrial fibrillation by 29%) and of ventricular arrhythmias by 48%. Supplementation had no notable benefit with respect to length of hospitalization, incidence of myocardial infarction, or mortality.

Magnesium for the Treatment and Prevention of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias

Atrial tachyarrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation and flutter, occur frequently. Magnesium has been studied in the early conversion and prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias, as well as in prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Early conversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias and control of heart rate may be greater with magnesium than with common antiarrhythmic agents. Magnesium appears to be less useful for preventing recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias; however, discrepancies in study methodologies make interpretation of results difficult. The use of magnesium for prevention of postoperative atrial arrhythmias has produced conflicting results, likely due to differences in study design. From the limited data available, magnesium appears to have some inherent antiarrhythmic properties. Certain patient populations may derive benefit from magnesium for the treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias. However, further study is necessary to define the role of magnesium clearly for the treatment or prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias.

A comparison between oral antiarrhythmic drugs in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: the pilot study of prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation (SPPAF), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently occurs after cardiac surgical procedures, and beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone may reduce the frequency of AF after open heart surgery. This pilot trial was designed to test whether each of the active oral drug regimens is superior to placebo for prevention of postoperative AF and whether there are differences in favor of 1 of the preventive strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in which patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the absence of heart failure and without significant left ventricular dysfunction (n = 253; average age, 65 +/- 11 years) received oral amiodarone plus metoprolol (n = 63), metoprolol alone (n = 62), sotalol (n = 63), or placebo (n = 65). Patients receiving combination therapy (amiodarone plus metoprolol) and those receiving sotalol had a significantly lower frequency of AF (30.2% and 31.7%; absolute difference, 23.6% and 22.1%; odds ratios [OR], 0.37 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.77, P <.01 vs placebo] and 0.40 [0.19 to 0.82, P =.01 vs placebo]) compared with patients receiving placebo (53.8%). Treatment with metoprolol was associated with a 13.5% absolute reduction of AF (P =.16; OR, 0.58 [0.29 to 1.17]. Treatment effects did not differ significantly between active drug groups. Adverse events including cerebrovascular accident, postoperative ventricular tachycardia, nausea, and dyspepsia, in hospital death, postoperative infections, and hypotension, were similar among the groups. Bradycardia necessitating dose reduction or drug withdrawal occurred in 3.1% (placebo), 3.2% (combined amiodarone and metoprolol; P =.65 vs placebo), 12.7% (sotalol; P <.05 vs placebo), and 16.1% (metoprolol; P <.05 vs placebo). Patients in the placebo group had a nonsignificantly longer length of hospital stay as compared with the active treatment groups (13.1 +/- 8.9 days vs 11.3 +/- 7; P =.10), with no significant difference between the active treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral active prophylaxis with either sotalol or amiodarone plus metoprolol may reduce the rate of AF after cardiac surgery in a population at high risk for postoperative AF. Treatment with metoprolol alone resulted in a trend to a lower risk for postoperative AF.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: physiology and anaesthetic management †

Increasing interest is being shown in beating heart (off-pump) coronary artery surgery (OPCAB) because, compared with operations performed with cardiopulmonary bypass, OPCAB surgery may be associated with decreased postoperative morbidity and reduced total costs. Its appears to produce better results than conventional surgery in high-risk patient populations, elderly patients, and those with compromised cardiac function or coagulation disorders. Recent improvements in the technique have resulted in the possibility of multiple-vessel grafting in all coronary territories, with a graft patency comparable with conventional surgery. During beating-heart surgery, anaesthetists face two problems: first, the maintenance of haemodynamic stability during heart enucleation necessary for accessing each coronary artery; and second, the management of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia when coronary flow must be interrupted during grafting. The anaesthetic technique is less important than adequate management of these two major constraints. However, experimental and recent clinical data suggest that volatile anaesthetics have a marked cardioprotective effect against ischaemia, and might be specifically indicated. OPCAB surgery requires team work between anaesthetists and surgeons, who must be aware of each other's constraints. Some surgical aspects of the operation are reviewed along with physiological and anaesthetic data.

Magnesium-flush infusion into the aortic root just before reperfusion reduces the requirement for internal defibrillation and early post-perfusion arrhythmias

Pre- and post-operative administration of magnesium has beneficial effects on post-operative ischaemia and reperfusion arrhythmias, but few studies have examined whether intra-operatively administered magnesium can prevent the effects of intra-operative arrhythmias. The aim of this randomized, double-blind study was to compare the effects of intra-operative magnesium or placebo on intra-operative arrhythmias in patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting. Patients received a flush infusion of magnesium or placebo into the aortic root before cross-clamp removal. The results showed that rate of spontaneous resumption of a cardiac rhythm was significantly higher, and number of shocks for defibrillation, energy requirement for defibrillation and rate of intra-operative ventricular tachyarrhythmias were significantly lower in the magnesium group, compared with the placebo group. The differences in need for temporary pacing, and in serum magnesium levels, were not significant. Intra-operative administration of magnesium has beneficial effects on the outcome of surgery. Larger, multicentre clinical investigations should now be undertaken.

Intravenous magnesium sulfate prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE

Atrial fibrillation is a rhythm disorder commonly seen early after coronary artery bypass grafting, and it increases morbidity.

METHODS

To investigate the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate in the prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation, we conducted a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study on 200 consecutive patients in whom we performed elective and initial coronary artery bypass grafting operations. In each group 50% of patients underwent beating-heart operations. In the treatment group 100 patients (76 men and 24 women; mean age, 57.63 +/- 9.68 years) received 24.34 mEq (3 g) of magnesium sulfate in 100 mL of saline solution that was administered over 2 hours (50 mL/h) preoperatively, perioperatively, and at postoperative days 0, 1, 2, and 3. In the control group 100 patients (74 men and 26 women; mean age, 59.96 +/- 9.29 years) received only 100 mL of saline solution according to the same administration schedule as the treatment group.

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation developed in 15 patients from the treatment group and in 16 patients from the control group. The arrhythmia developed after 37.87 +/- 12.76 and 45.26 +/- 15.27 hours in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Although a significant relationship was found between low magnesium sulfate levels and increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (P <.05), when the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation is concerned, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups (P >.05). Also, no significant difference was found between operations with cardiopulmonary bypass and beating-heart operations in terms of atrial fibrillation incidence (P >.05). However, atrial fibrillation extended the duration of hospital stay in both groups (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that magnesium sulfate infusion alone is not sufficient for the prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation.

Correction of ionized plasma magnesium during cardiopulmonary bypass reduces the risk of postoperative cardiac arrhythmia

We conducted this randomized controlled trial to determine whether the intraoperative measurement and correction of ionized plasma magnesium can reduce the risk of cardiac arrhythmia after cardiopulmonary bypass. Eighty-five patients presenting for coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned either to the magnesium-corrected group, which received magnesium sulfate on the basis of measured levels of ionized plasma magnesium (n = 43), or to the control group, in which magnesium levels were identified but not corrected (n = 42). Ionized magnesium was determined with an ion-selective electrode with minimal delay, and further samples were taken for laboratory analysis of total plasma magnesium. All patients had Holter electrocardiogram monitoring for 72 h after surgery. Total hypomagnesemia (45 patients; 53% of all patients) was more common than ionized hypomagnesemia (11 patients; 13%) before cardiopulmonary bypass. Both total and ionized magnesium levels declined further during the course of cardiopulmonary bypass in the control group. The incidence of ventricular tachycardia in the first 24 h was less frequent in the magnesium-corrected group (3 patients; 7%) than the control group (12 patients, 30%; P < 0.01). Patients in the magnesium-corrected group were more likely to display continuous sinus rhythm (Lown Grade 0) in the first 24 h (14 patients; 34%) than patients in the control group (2 patients, 5%; P < 0.001). Our results suggest that the intraoperative correction of ionized magnesium is associated with a reduction in postoperative ventricular arrhythmia in cardiac surgical patients.

IMPLICATIONS

In this study the correction of ionized plasma magnesium during cardiopulmonary bypass was guided by measurements from an ion-selective electrode. This intervention resulted in a reduction in the incidence of postoperative ventricular tachycardia and an increased frequency of continuous sinus rhythm. Ion-selective electrodes constitute a convenient near-patient test, providing a basis for the targeted replacement of ionized plasma magnesium.

A beta-blocker, not magnesium, is effective prophylaxis for atrial tachyarrhythmias after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate magnesium as a sole or adjuvant agent with currently used prophylactic drugs in suppressing postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmias (POAT) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

DESIGN

Single-center prospective, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (n = 400) undergoing CABG surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized among 6 prophylaxis regimens: (1) control (no antiarrhythmics), (2) magnesium only, (3) digoxin only, (4) magnesium and digoxin, (5) propranolol only, and (6) magnesium and propranolol. Patients randomized to a regimen including magnesium received 12 g given during 96 hours postoperatively. Patients in a digoxin regimen received 1 mg after cardiopulmonary bypass and 0.25 mg daily. Patients in a propranolol regimen received 1 mg intravenously every 6 hours until able to take 10 mg orally 4 times a day. Prophylaxis regimens were discontinued after 4 days postoperatively.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was a sustained POAT or discharge from the hospital. Control patients had an incidence of POAT (38%) not significantly different from patients in magnesium-only (38%), digoxin-only (31%), and magnesium with digoxin (37%) regimens. Patients treated with propranolol had a significant reduction in POAT. Nearly identical POAT rates in the propranolol-only (18%) and propranolol with magnesium (19%) groups support the lack of efficacy of magnesium in this trial. Study design allowed analysis of and showed a beta-blocker withdrawal effect in addition to suppressive benefit of postoperative beta-blockers.

CONCLUSION

beta-Blocker prophylaxis is indicated to reduce the incidence of POAT in CABG surgery patients and to prevent a beta-blocker withdrawal effect in patients receiving these medications preoperatively. Digoxin and magnesium as sole or adjuvant agents do not offer suppressive or ventricular rate reduction benefits in POAT.

Postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass: a role for intraoperative magnesium supplementation

OBJECTIVE

To determine if intraoperative magnesium supplementation would be associated with a reduction in postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmias (POAT) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG surgery).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who had undergone off-pump CABG surgery (n = 124).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The charts of 124 patients who had undergone off-pump CABG surgery (64 by anterior thoracotomy and 60 by median sternotomy) were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data and perioperative care were recorded and compared among patients who did and did not experience POAT and among patients who did and did not receive intraoperative magnesium supplementation. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between magnesium supplementation and incidence of POAT, controlling for other covariables. Of the 124 patients, 16 had a prior history of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias and/or were receiving antiarrhythmic medications. Medical records of the remaining 108 patients were reviewed. Twenty-four patients (22%) had POAT. Forty-two patients (39%) received intraoperative magnesium. In patients receiving intraoperative magnesium, the incidence of POAT was significantly decreased (12% v 29%; p = 0.03). In these patients, initial postoperative serum magnesium was significantly higher (2.37 mEq/L v 1.86 mEq/L; p < 0.01). In patients not receiving intraoperative magnesium, 35% had hypomagnesemia (serum magnesium < 1.8 mEq/L) compared with 9% of patients receiving magnesium (p < 0.01). Patients who received intraoperative magnesium and beta-adrenergic blockers had a lower incidence of POAT (5%) than patients who received only one (19%) or neither (33%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative magnesium supplementation is associated with a decrease in POAT after off-pump CABG surgery. The combination of a beta-blocker and magnesium may reduce POAT further. It is recommended that intraoperative magnesium supplementation be part of the care of patients undergoing off-pump CABG surgery.

Atrial fibrillation after cardiac operation: risks, mechanisms, and treatment

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of cardiac operations that leads to increased risk for thromboembolism and excessive health care resource utilization. Advanced age, previous AF, and valvular heart operations are the most consistently identified risk factors for this arrhythmia. Dispersion of repolarization leading to reentry is believed to be the mechanism of postoperative AF, but many questions regarding the pathophysiology of AF remain unanswered. Treatment is aimed at controlling heart rate, preventing thromboembolic events, and conversion to sinus rhythm. Multiple investigations have examined methods of preventing postoperative AF, but the only firm conclusions that can be drawn is to avoid beta-blocker withdrawal after operation and to consider beta-blocker therapy for other patients who may tolerate these drugs. Preliminary investigations showing sotalol and amiodarone to be effective in preventing postoperative AF are encouraging, but early data have been limited to selective patient populations and have not adequately evaluated safety. Newer class III antiarrhythmic drugs under development may have a role in the treatment of postoperative AF, but the risk of drug-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia must be considered. Nonpharmacologic interventions under consideration for the treatment of AF in the nonsurgical setting, such as automatic atrial cardioversion devices and multisite atrial pacing, may eventually have a role for selected cardiac surgical patients.

Intravenous amiodarone for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery: the Amiodarone Reduction in Coronary Heart (ARCH) trial

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to test whether intravenous (i.v.) amiodarone would prevent atrial fibrillation and decrease hospital stay after open heart surgery.

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation commonly occurs after open heart procedures and is thought to be a significant determinant for prolongation of hospitalization. Oral amiodarone given preoperatively appears to reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation. This study was designed to test whether the more rapid-acting i.v. formulation of amiodarone given postoperatively would reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Three hundred patients undergoing standard open heart surgery were randomized in a double-blind fashion to i.v. amiodarone (1 g/day for 2 days) versus placebo immediately after open heart surgery. The primary end points of the trial were incidence of atrial fibrillation and length of hospital stay. Baseline clinical variables and mortality and morbidity data were collected.

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation occurred in 67/142 (47%) patients on placebo versus 56/158 (35%) on amiodarone (p = 0.01). Length of hospital stay for the placebo group was 8.2 +/- 6.2 days, and 7.6 +/- 5.9 days for the amiodarone group (p = 0.34). No differences were noted in baseline variables, morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose i.v. amiodarone was safe and effective in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation after heart surgery, but did not significantly alter length of hospital stay.

Prophylactic oral amiodarone compared with placebo for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurs in 20% to 40% of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and contributes to delayed recovery, increased length of stay, and increased hospital cost. Measures at preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation have had mixed results. We report a double-blind trial comparing oral amiodarone with placebo for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after CABG.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients undergoing CABG were considered eligible. Exclusion criteria included bradycardia (<50 beats/min), prior Atrial fibrillation, concurrent therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs, or concomitant valve surgery. Patients were given 2 g of amiodarone (73 patients) or placebo (70 patients) in divided doses 1 to 4 days before surgery and 400 mg daily for 7 days postoperatively. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 24.7% (18 of 43) of patients receiving amiodarone and 32. 8% (23 of 70) of patients receiving placebo (P =.30). Heart rate at onset of atrial fibrillation was 133.4 +/- 26.6 beats/min for amiodarone compared with 152.9 +/- 31.6 beats/min for placebo (P =. 04). Duration of atrial fibrillation was 10.2 +/- 8.1 hours for amiodarone compared with 16.2 +/- 27.5 hours for placebo (P =.67). Patients receiving both beta-blockade and amiodarone had a 16.7% incidence of atrial fibrillation compared with 31.9% in the remaining patients (P =.10). Atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased cost of $7011 compared with those who remained in sinus rhythm ($23,869 +/- $20,894 vs $16,857 +/- $5401 in sinus rhythm). Hospital cost of those taking amiodarone was $18,895 +/- $13,267 compared with $18,839 +/- $11,537.18 for placebo (P =.42).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative CABG atrial fibrillation is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased cost. Prophylactic oral amiodarone did not statistically alter the incidence or duration of atrial fibrillation after CABG, although favorable trends were noted. Hospital cost was not affected by therapy with amiodarone.

Pro: All patients should receive pharmacologic prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

In addition to the physiologic manifestations of atrial fibrillation (stroke, ventricular arrhythmia), patients with postoperative arrhythmias have subjective concerns because of symptoms (palpitations), and prolonged length of stay and hospital cost are significant sources of visceral morbidity to both patients and their physicians. Efforts to terminate this arrhythmia after its initiation are fraught with problems ranging from ineffectiveness to toxicity. Fortunately, a variety of pharmacologic strategies are now available to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. At a minimum, low-dose postoperative beta-adrenergic blockade is valuable for patients who receive these medications preoperatively and may be beneficial in all patients. Moreover, emerging data suggest that prophylaxis with antiarrhythmic compounds can significantly decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation, length of hospital stay, and cost. Future trials will be focused on evaluating the risks and benefits of the newer prophylactic therapies and defining which subpopulations benefit most from such therapy.

The new onset of atrial arrhythmias following major noncardiothoracic surgery is associated with increased mortality

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine the incidence and consequences of atrial arrhythmias in surgical ICU patients following major noncardiac, nonthoracic surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

University hospital surgical ICU.

PATIENTS

Four hundred sixty-two consecutive patients after noncardiothoracic surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Patients were assigned to one of three groups: group 1-new-onset atrial arrhythmias (n=47); group 2-history of atrial arrhythmias (n=58); and group 3-no atrial arrhythmias (n=357). New arrhythmias occurred in 10.2% of patients. Most began within the first 2 postoperative days. These patients had a higher mortality rate (23.4%), longer ICU stay (8.5+/-17.4 [SD] days), and extended hospital stay (23.3+/-23.6 days) than patients without atrial arrhythmias (mortality, 4.3%; ICU stay, 2.0+/-4.5 days; hospital stay; 13.3+/-17.7 days; p<0.02). Thirteen percent of patients had a history of atrial arrhythmias. They had a higher mortality rate (8.6%) and longer ICU stays (2.9+/-4.9 days; p<0.02) than patients without arrhythmias. Most deaths in the two arrhythmia groups were not due to cardiac problems, but to sepsis or cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients admitted to a surgical ICU after noncardiothoracic surgery with a history of or who developed new atrial arrhythmias had greater mortality and longer ICU stays than patients without arrhythmias. The incidence of new-onset arrhythmias was lower than reported after cardiac and thoracic surgery, but higher than in the general population. Atrial arrhythmias were not the cause of death and appear to be markers of increased mortality and morbidity.

Value of the signal-averaged P wave analysis in predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia occurring after cardiac surgery. Beside important implications regarding patient recovery, AF has been shown to substantially lengthen hospital stay--our recent study found a 3-day prolongation after adjusting for all other significant factors. Identification of those at highest risk of AF by clinical or noninvasive characteristics may be a useful strategy for targeted prophylactic therapy. Our data have shown that prolonged atrial conduction as assessed by analysis of the P wave duration from the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) imparts a four fold increase in risk for postoperative AF, independently of other measured variables. In addition, abnormal conduction was present on the preoperative P wave ECG (P-SAECG), implying a preexisting substrate that is triggered by surgery. The use of combination abnormal noninvasive variables (eg, abnormal P-SAECG and low left ventricular ejection fraction) can identify groups with a 50% risk of AF, which is nine times as high as when both tests are normal. Thus, the P-SAECG is a useful and accurate predictor of AF after cardiac surgery.