A comparison of prostacyclin and sodium nitroprusside for the treatment of heart failure after cardiac surgery

Effect of beraprost on pulmonary hypertension due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Beraprost is used to treat peripheral chronic arterial occlusive disease. However, the efficacy and safety of beraprost in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (PH-HFrEF) remains unknown. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effects of beraprost on PH-HFrEF.We prospectively recruited patients with PH-HFrEF as determined by echocardiography and right cardiac catheterization. Beraprost sodium was given orally (1 μg/kg/d) added to the usual treatment, and patients were evaluated at 1-year follow-up.Twenty-five patients were recruited with baseline systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) of 49.5 ± 10.8 mm Hg. Systolic PAP results at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 39.1 ± 8.1, 30.4 ± 5.2, 27.7 ± 3.0, and 27.0 ± 4.7 mm Hg, respectively, which were all significantly lower than systolic PAP at baseline (P < .05). Left ventricular ejection fraction results at 6 months (43.5 ± 7.0%), 9 months (47.0 ± 5.5%), and 12 months (48.2 ± 4.8%) were significantly higher than at baseline (34.7 ± 9.2%) (P < .05). Six-minute walking distance at 3 months (282.8 ± 80.6 m), 6 months (367.1 ± 81.2 m), 9 months (389.8 ± 87.1 m), and 12 months (395.7 ± 83.4 m) increased with time, and all were significantly higher than baseline (190.1 ± 75.5 m) (P < .05). One patient developed atrial fibrillation and recovered to sinus rhythm after intravenous administration of amiodarone. There were no instances of cardiac-related death, severe bleeding, or severe impairment of liver function.Routine oral administration of beraprost sodium added to the usual treatment may improve cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and exercise capacityin patients with PH-HFrEF.

Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) and low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) as complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF) or cardiac surgery are life-threatening conditions. While there is a broad body of evidence for the treatment of people with acute coronary syndrome under stable haemodynamic conditions, the treatment strategies for people who become haemodynamically unstable or develop CS remain less clear. We have therefore summarised here the evidence on the treatment of people with CS or LCOS with different inotropic agents and vasodilative drugs. This is the first update of a Cochrane review originally published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess efficacy and safety of cardiac care with positive inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies in people with CS or LCOS due to AMI, HF or cardiac surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CPCI-S Web of Science in June 2017. We also searched four registers of ongoing trials and scanned reference lists and contacted experts in the field to obtain further information. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in people with myocardial infarction, heart failure or cardiac surgery complicated by cardiogenic shock or LCOS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 13 eligible studies with 2001 participants (mean or median age range 58 to 73 years) and two ongoing studies. We categorised studies into eight comparisons, all against cardiac care and additional other active drugs or placebo. These comparisons investigated the efficacy of levosimendan versus dobutamine, enoximone or placebo, epinephrine versus norepinephrine-dobutamine, amrinone versus dobutamine, dopexamine versus dopamine, enoximone versus dopamine and nitric oxide versus placebo.All trials were published in peer-reviewed journals, and analysis was done by the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. Twelve of 13 trials were small with few included participants. Acknowledgement of funding by the pharmaceutical industry or missing conflict of interest statements emerged in five of 13 trials. In general, confidence in the results of analysed studies was reduced due to serious study limitations, very serious imprecision or indirectness. Domains of concern, which show a high risk of more than 50%, include performance bias (blinding of participants and personnel) and bias affecting the quality of evidence on adverse events.Levosimendan may reduce short-term mortality compared to a therapy with dobutamine (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.95; 6 studies; 1776 participants; low-quality evidence; NNT: 16 (patients with moderate risk), NNT: 5 (patients with CS)). This initial short-term survival benefit with levosimendan vs. dobutamine is not confirmed on long-term follow up. There is uncertainty (due to lack of statistical power) as to the effect of levosimendan compared to therapy with placebo (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.94; 2 studies; 55 participants, very low-quality evidence) or enoximone (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.14; 1 study; 32 participants, very low-quality evidence).All comparisons comparing other positive inotropic, inodilative or vasodilative drugs presented uncertainty on their effect on short-term mortality with very low-quality evidence and based on only one RCT. These single studies compared epinephrine with norepinephrine-dobutamine (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.77; 30 participants), amrinone with dobutamine (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.85; 30 participants), dopexamine with dopamine (no in-hospital deaths from 70 participants), enoximone with dobutamine (two deaths from 40 participants) and nitric oxide with placebo (one death from three participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Apart from low quality of evidence data suggesting a short-term mortality benefit of levosimendan compared with dobutamine, at present there are no robust and convincing data to support a distinct inotropic or vasodilator drug-based therapy as a superior solution to reduce mortality in haemodynamically unstable people with cardiogenic shock or LCOS.Considering the limited evidence derived from the present data due to a generally high risk of bias and imprecision, it should be emphasised that there remains a great need for large, well-designed randomised trials on this topic to close the gap between daily practice in critical care medicine and the available evidence. It seems to be useful to apply the concept of 'early goal-directed therapy' in cardiogenic shock and LCOS with early haemodynamic stabilisation within predefined timelines. Future clinical trials should therefore investigate whether such a therapeutic concept would influence survival rates much more than looking for the 'best' drug for haemodynamic support.

Nitrates for the Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes, A Systematic Review

Intravenous nitrates are widely used in the management of acute heart failure syndrome (AHFS) yet with lack of robust evidence to support their use. We therefore sought to analyze all randomized studies that evaluated the effects of nitrates on clinical outcomes in patients with AHFS. In total, 15 relevant trials comparing nitrates and alternative interventions in 1824 patients were identified. All but 3 were conducted before 1998. No trials demonstrated a beneficial effect on mortality, apart from 1 trial reporting a reduction in mortality, which was related to the time of treatment. Retrospective review suggests that there is a lack of data to draw any firm conclusions concerning the use of nitrates in patients with AHFS. More studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these agents in the modern era of guideline-directed use of heart failure therapy.

Iloprost improves ventricular function in the hypertrophic and functionally impaired right heart by direct stimulation

Right heart function is an important predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from pulmonary arterial hypertension and congenital heart diseases. We investigated whether the prostacyclin analog iloprost has a direct inotropic effect in the pressure-overloaded hypertrophic and dysfunctional right ventricle (RV). Rats were randomized to monocrotaline injection (60 mg/kg; [Formula: see text]), pulmonary trunk banding (PTB; [Formula: see text]), or a sham operation ([Formula: see text]). RV function was evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, and invasive pressure measurements at baseline, after intravenous administration of placebo, iloprost 10 ng/kg/min, or iloprost 100 ng/kg/min (Ilo100). Infusion of Ilo100 induced a [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) increase in stroke volume in the sham group and a [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) increase in the PTB group. RV [Formula: see text] was elevated by [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) in the sham group and by [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) in the PTB group. An elevation in cardiac output of [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) and an [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) increase in RV systolic pressure were found in the PTB group. Iloprost caused a decrease in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) in all groups of animals. An equal reduction in MAP induced by the arterial vasodilator nitroprusside did not improve any of the measured parameters of RV function. We conclude that iloprost has inotropic properties directly improving ventricular function in the hypertrophic and dysfunctional right heart of the rat.

Comparison of drugs for pulmonary hypertension reversibility testing: A meta-analysis

Multiple drugs are used for reversibility testing of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in advanced heart failure (HF), especially in the process of heart transplant evaluation. Effects of these drugs were never systematically compared. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare hemodynamic effects of different drugs. We identified 20 prospective studies reporting hemodynamic variables before and after acute pharmacologic testing for PH reversibility in patients with advanced HF. The data from individual studies were grouped by an outcome measure and analyzed. A mixed model meta-analysis was performed using SAS to give weighted mean effect of pre- and post-test change and inverse variance. The mean effects were weighted by the published sample size. Prostacyclin, inhaled or intravenous, and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) had the most potent effect on pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Sodium nitroprusside and nitroglycerin decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) better than other drugs. Sildenafil provided overall good hemodynamic outcomes but was not the strongest drug with regard to any particular outcome. PCWP, MPAP, and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure respond better to nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside than to other drugs in the setting of reversibility testing. Prostacyclin and PGE1 are superior to other drugs in their acute effects on PVR.

Pulmonary hypertension in heart failure

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension occurs in 60% to 80% of patients with heart failure and is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pulmonary artery pressure correlates with increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Therefore, pulmonary hypertension is a common feature of heart failure with preserved as well as reduced systolic function. Pulmonary hypertension is partially reversible with normalization of cardiac filling pressures. Pulmonary vasculature remodeling and vasoconstriction create a second component, which does not reverse immediately, but has been shown to improve with vasoactive drugs and especially with left ventricular assist devices.

CONCLUSION

Many drugs used for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension are being considered as treatment options for heart failure-related pulmonary hypertension. This is of particular significance in the heart transplant population. Randomized clinical trials with interventions targeting heart failure patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure would be justified.

Prostacyclin versus citrate in continuous haemodiafiltration: an observational study in patients with high risk of bleeding

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of prostacyclin (PGI2) and citrate (ACD) anticoagulation were observed and compared during continuous haemodiafiltration.

METHODS

Mechanically ventilated patients received either the PGI2 analogue epoprostenol (group A, n = 17) in escalating doses of 4.5-10.0 ng.kg(-1).min(-1) in combination with heparin (6 IU.kg(-1).h(-1)) or 2.2% ACD (group B, n = 15). Blood flow was set to match the circuit-filling volume per unit time equal to the intravascular half-life of PGI2.

RESULTS

Median filter lifetimes were 26 h (interquartile range 16-37) in group A (39 filters) and 36.5 h (interquartile range 23-50) in group B (56 filters; p < 0.01). In group A, 4 patients (23.5%, p < 0.05) had the dose reduced due to hypotension. The final mean dose of PGI2 was 8.7 +/- 2.4 ng.kg(-1).min(-1). Four patients in group A (23.5%, p < 0.05) were switched to ACD due to a decrease in platelet count. No bleeding episodes, decrease in platelet count or adverse haemodynamic effects were encountered in group B. The cost of epoprostenol plus low dose heparin (EUR 204.73 +/- 53.04) was significantly higher than the cost of ACD-based anticoagulation (EUR 93.92 +/- 45.2, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ACD offers longer filter survival, has no impact on platelet count and is less expensive. Increasing the dose of PGI2 up to the average of 8.7 ng.kg(-1).min(-1) did not increase the haemodynamic side effects.

The additive pulmonary vasodilatory effects of inhaled prostacyclin and inhaled milrinone in postcardiac surgical patients with pulmonary hypertension

Selective pulmonary vasodilation is an advantageous therapeutic strategy for cardiac surgical patients with increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and right ventricular failure. We hypothesized that milrinone, an adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP)-selective phosphodiesterase enzyme (PDE) inhibitor may, when nebulized and inhaled, cause selective pulmonary vasodilation and potentiate the vasodilation by inhaled prostacyclin (iPGI(2)). Consequently, we investigated the hemodynamic effects of inhaled milrinone or the combination iPGI(2) + inhaled milrinone in cardiac surgical patients with postoperative mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) >25 mm Hg and PVR >200 dynes. s(-1). cm(-5). During mechanical ventilation and using a conventional nebulizing system, 9 patients inhaled incremental concentrations of milrinone (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/mL) in subsequent 10-min periods (Study Part 1). In the same manner, 11 patients received iPGI(2) (10 microg/mL) followed by the combination of iPGI(2) (10 microg/mL) and inhaled milrinone (1 mg/mL) (Study Part 2). Inhaled milrinone reduced PVR with a maximal effect (-20%, P < 0.001) at the largest concentration. As compared with iPGI(2) alone, iPGI(2) + inhaled milrinone caused a further and prolonged reduction of PVR (-8%, P < 0.05) and increased stroke volume (+5%, P < 0.05). Systemic vascular resistance or mean arterial pressure was not affected by inhalation of either drug(s). The authors conclude that inhalation of the cAMP-selective PDE-inhibitor milrinone selectively dilates the pulmonary vasculature without systemic effects in cardiac surgical patients with pulmonary hypertension. Furthermore, inhaled milrinone appears to potentiate and prolong the pulmonary selective vasodilatory effect of iPGI(2). Inhaled milrinone alone or combined with iPGI(2) may be an important therapeutic option in the treatment of patients with pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure.

IMPLICATIONS

Pulmonary hypertension may cause or aggravate right heart failure. IV vasodilators reduce systemic blood pressure and might thereby further impair coronary perfusion and right heart performance. In the present study of cardiac surgical patients with pulmonary hypertension, selective pulmonary vasodilation without systemic effects was induced by nebulized, inhaled vasodilators.

Management of perioperative ventricular dysfunction

With the recognition of the clinical importance of the right ventricle; the development of new techniques for the perioperative evaluation of RV function, particularly transesophageal echocardiography; and new treatment modalities (pharmacologic and mechanical), clinicians will be able to more accurately diagnose and precisely manage patients who have sustained RV injury.

Effects of intravenous administration of prostacyclin on regional blood circulation in awake rats

1. The effects of intravenous infusion of prostacyclin (PGI2, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 1.0 microg kg(-1) min(-1) lasting 5 min) on regional blood flow and regional vascular resistance have been studied in awake rats using the radioactive microsphere method. 2. The control values of blood flow to the heart, kidney, small intestine, hind limb muscle, pericranial skin and brain as well as the corresponding vascular resistance were not modified by an i.v. infusion (0.1 ml min(-1)) of Tris-buffer (the vehicle of PGI2). 3. The i.v. infusion of PGI2 produced graded dose-dependent decreases of MAP (r=0.87, P<0.001; ED20=0.73 [0.13-2.55] microg kg(-1) min(-1)) as well as decreases of vascular resistance in the heart (r=0.83, P<0.001; ED30=0.17 [0.09-0.31] microg kg(-1) min(-1)), pericranial skin (r=0.88, P<0.001; ED30=0.28 [0.18-0.43] microg kg(-1) min(-1)) and small intestine (r=0.74, P<0.001; ED30=0.21 [0.11-0.39] microg kg(-1) min(-1)), which led to dose-related increases of blood flow to these territories. 4. On the contrary, PGI2 increased vascular resistance in skeletal muscle (r=0.73, P<0.001; ED30=0.20 [0.10-0.39] microg kg(-1) min(-1)) with corresponding reductions in blood flow. The low doses reduced renal blood flow but there were no significant changes during the high ones. Cerebral vessels did not dilate during any infusion of PGI2 and cerebral blood flow decreased as MAP fell (r=0.56, P<0.01). 5. We conclude that, in awake rats, the coronary vessels are extremely sensitive to the vasodilating effect of PGI2 and that the mesenteric vessels and those of the pericranial skin are very responsive too. Moreover, autoregulation is inefficient to maintain cerebral blood flow during infusion of PGI2.

Low-dose prostacyclin is superior to terbutaline and aminophylline in reducing capillary permeability in cat skeletal muscle in vivo

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and compare the capillary permeability-reducing effects of prostacyclin, terbutaline, and aminophylline.

DESIGN

A prospective, experimental study.

SETTING

A university laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Fourteen adult, anesthetized cats.

INTERVENTIONS

The study was performed on an autoperfused calf muscle preparation enclosed in a plethysmograph, with continuous recordings of tissue volume, arterial and venous blood pressures, and blood flow. The capillary filtration coefficient was used as a measure of capillary hydraulic permeability, and measured at different doses of intravenous infusions of prostacyclin, terbutaline, and aminophylline. These analyses were made from normal and from raised permeability levels, the latter by prior and simultaneous infusion of tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) or histamine. All three of the drugs analyzed were given at low doses, without vasodilator effect, and at doses with a clear vasodilator effect.

MAIN RESULTS

Prostacyclin infusion reduced capillary permeability to a value of about 25% below the initial control value, and this level was reached both from normal and increased permeability levels. The maximal reduction level was obtained at a low nonvasodilator dose of 2 ng/kg/min. Terbutaline and aminophylline had no significant effect on capillary filtration coefficient when tested from the initial control permeability level. From a TNF-alpha-raised permeability level (about 50% above control) and from a histamine-raised permeability level (about 60% above control), both drugs induced small reductions in the capillary filtration coefficient.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose prostacyclin effectively reduces hydraulic capillary permeability in cat skeletal muscle and is superior to terbutaline and aminophylline.

Effects of prostacyclin on myocardial hemodynamics and metabolism after coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of incremental infusion rates of prostacyclin on myocardial blood flow and metabolism and central hemodynamics shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting.

DESIGN

A pharmacodynamic dose-response study.

SETTING

A multi-institutional university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve patients with two- or three-vessel coronary artery disease and with an ejection fraction greater than 0.5 were studied in the operating room after sternal closure and elective coronary artery bypass grafting.

INTERVENTIONS

Prostacyclin was administered at infusion rates of 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 ng/kg/min. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and global (coronary sinus) as well as regional (great cardiac vein) myocardial blood flow and metabolic variables were measured.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Infusion rates of 10 and 20 ng/kg/min decreased mean arterial blood pressure (13% and 21%, respectively), systemic vascular resistance (31% and 42%), and pulmonary vascular resistance (11% and 33%), increased cardiac output (28% and 37%), heart rate (9% and 13%), and stroke volume (15% and 20%), but had no effect on central filling pressures. Prostacyclin caused no changes in great cardiac vein flow or coronary sinus flow. Furthermore, prostacyclin caused no changes in regional myocardial oxygen extraction, indicating that prostacyclin did not induce direct coronary vasodilation. There were no electrocardiographic or obvious metabolic signs of myocardial ischemia during prostacyclin infusion.

CONCLUSION

Prostacyclin may be a useful afterload-reducing compound after coronary artery bypass grafting because it has no direct coronary vasodilatory effect, which minimizes the risk of myocardial ischemia.