Lung mechanical behavior during one-lung ventilation

Body Position Alters Mechanical Power and Respiratory Mechanics During Thoracic Surgery

BACKGROUND

During thoracic surgery, patients are usually positioned in lateral decubitus and only the dependent lung ventilated. The ventilated lung is thus exposed to the weight of the contralateral hemithorax and restriction of the dependent chest wall. We hypothesized that mechanical power would increase during one-lung ventilation in the lateral position.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational, single-center study from December 2016 to May 2017. Thirty consecutive patients undergoing general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation (mean age, 68 ± 11 years; body mass index, 25 ± 5 kg·m) for thoracic surgery were enrolled. Total and partitioned mechanical power, lung and chest wall elastance, and esophageal pressure were compared in supine and lateral position with double- and one-lung ventilation and with closed and open chest both before and after surgery. Mixed factorial ANOVA for repeated measurements was performed, with both step and the period before or after surgery as 2 within-subject factors, and left or right body position during surgery as a fixed, between-subject factor. Appropriate interaction terms were included.

RESULTS

The mechanical power was higher in lateral one-lung ventilation compared to both supine and lateral position double-lung ventilation (11.1 ± 3.0 vs 8.2 ± 2.7 vs 8.7 ± 2.6; mean difference, 2.9 J·minute [95% CI, 1.4-4.4 J·minute] and 2.4 J·minute [95% CI, 0.9-3.9 J·minute]; P < .001 and P = .002, respectively). Lung elastance was higher during lateral position one-lung ventilation compared to both lateral and supine double-lung ventilation (24.3 ± 8.7 vs 9.5 ± 3.8 vs 10.0 ± 3.8; mean difference, 14.7 cm H2O·L [95% CI, 11.2-18.2 cm H2O·L] and 14.2 cm H2O·L [95% CI, 10.8-17.7 cm H2O·L], respectively) and was higher compared to predicted values (20.1 ± 7.5 cm H2O·L). Chest wall elastance increased in lateral position double-lung ventilation compared to supine (11.1 ± 3.8 vs 6.6 ± 3.4; mean difference, 4.5 cm H2O·L [95% CI, 2.6-6.3 cm H2O·L]) and was lower in lateral position one-lung ventilation with open chest than with a closed chest (3.5 ± 1.9 vs 7.1 ± 2.8; mean difference, 3.6 cm H2O·L [95% CI, 2.4-4.8 cm H2O·L]). The end-expiratory esophageal pressure decreased moving from supine position to lateral position one-lung ventilation while increased with the opening of the chest wall.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical power and lung elastance are increased in the lateral position with one-lung ventilation. Esophageal pressure monitoring may be used to follow these changes.

Acute effects of bilateral lung volume reduction surgery on lung and chest wall mechanical properties

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To characterize acute changes in the dynamic, passive mechanical properties of the lungs and chest wall, elastance (E) and resistance (R), caused by lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

DESIGN

Prospective data collection.

PATIENTS

Nine anesthetized/paralyzed patients with severe emphysema.

INTERVENTIONS

Bilateral LVRS.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

From measurements of airway and esophageal pressures and flow during mechanical ventilation throughout the physiologic range of breathing frequency (f) and tidal volume (VT), E and R of the total respiratory system (Ers and Rrs), lungs (EL and RL), and chest wall (Ecw and Rcw) immediately before and after LVRS were calculated. After surgery, Ers, EL, Rrs, and RL were all greatly increased at each combination off and VT (p<0.05). Ecw and Rcw showed no consistent changes (p>0.05). The increases in EL were greatest in those patients with the lowest residual volumes, highest FEV1 values, and highest maximum voluntary ventilations measured 3 months preoperatively (p<0.05); the increases in RL were greatest in those patients with the lowest preoperative residual volumes (p<0.05). The largest increases in RL were in those patients with the largest decreases in residual volume and total lung capacity, measured 3 months postoperatively, caused by LVRS (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Acute effects of LVRS are large increases in lung elastic tension and resistance; these increases need to be considered in immediate postoperative care, and can be predicted roughly from results of preoperative pulmonary function tests.