Quantification of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load by the hybrid capture assay allows for early detection of CMV disease in lung transplant recipients

Quantitative nucleic acid amplification methods and their implications in clinical virology

Recently, a number of techniques have been approved for quantification of viral nucleic acids in clinical samples. Viral load (VL) tests have considerable importance in the management of patients and are widely used in routine diagnosis. In clinical virology, VL testing are important to monitor the antiviral treatment, to initiate preemptive therapy, to understand pathogenesis, and to evaluate the infectivity. These tests have now become a part of many diagnostic and treatment guidelines. Considering the various challenges for in-house viral testing related to the standardization, validation, and precision; they are gradually being replaced by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) cleared tests. This review summarizes the various viral quantification methods and also discusses the clinical applicability of these in human immunodeficiency virus, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus, Cytomegalovirus, and Epstein Barr virus infected patients. Further the challenges and future perspectives of VL testing have also been discussed.

Risks and Epidemiology of Infections After Lung or Heart–Lung Transplantation

Nowadays, lung transplantation is an established treatment option of end-stage pulmonary parenchymal and vascular disease. Post-transplant infections are a significant contributor to overall morbidity and mortality in the lung transplant recipient that, in turn, are higher than in other solid organ transplant recipients. This is likely due to several specific factors such as the constant exposure to the outside environment and the colonized native airway, and the disruption of usual mechanisms of defense including the cough reflex, bronchial circulation, and lymphatic drainage. This chapter will review the common infections that develop in the lung or heart–lung transplant recipient, including the general risk factors for infection in this population, and specific features of prophylaxis and treatment for the most frequent bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. The effects of infection on lung transplant rejection will also be discussed.

Viral infections in lung transplant recipients

Viral infections, including beta-herpes viruses and community respiratory viruses, are frequent pathogens in lung transplant recipients. These pathogens have become increasingly recognized as having a significant role in long-term outcomes of lung transplantation, which has been limited by the frequent development of infections, and chronic allograft dysfunction. Community respiratory viruses, such as influenza and respiratory syncytial virus have been associated with both acute rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction, particularly if early treatment was not administered. beta-herpes viruses, particularly cytomegalovirus (CMV), have long been associated with increased mortality in lung transplant recipients, although the advent of effective antiviral strategies has led to improved morbidity and mortality. Because these pathogens have been associated with altered immune responses against the allograft, a better understanding of immunopathogenesis of viral infections may lead to a broader approach to limit the morbidity from these pathogens.

A multicenter study of valganciclovir prophylaxis up to day 120 in CMV-seropositive lung transplant recipients

Seventy-six cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive lung transplant recipients receiving valganciclovir (900 mg/day) for CMV prophylaxis were compared with a group of 87 patients receiving oral ganciclovir (3000 mg/day). Prophylaxis was administered to day 120 post-transplantation and follow-up was 1 year. In addition, a study was conducted on risk factors for CMV infection/disease. CMV disease incidence was 7.9% and 16.1% for valganciclovir and oral ganciclovir, respectively (p = 0.11). Patients receiving valganciclovir had fewer viral syndromes (2.6% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.05), a similar rate of tissue-invasive disease (5.2% vs. 4.6%, p = ns), longer time-to-onset of CMV infection/disease (197.5 vs. 155.2 days, p < 0.05), and a lower probability of infection/disease while on prophylaxis (1.3% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.01). Nonetheless, leukopenia incidence was higher with valganciclovir (15.8% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.01), as was the need for treatment withdrawal due to adverse effects (11.8% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01). CMV infection was similar in both groups (32.9% vs. 34.5%). Induction therapy with basiliximab and glucocorticosteroid treatment were independent risk factors for developing CMV infection/disease. In conclusion, valganciclovir prophylaxis results in a low incidence of CMV disease in lung transplant recipients and appears more effective than oral ganciclovir. Despite the comparatively higher incidence of adverse events with valganciclovir, the drug can be considered safe for prophylaxis.

Critical care perspective on immunotherapy in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is now a viable therapeutic option in the care of patients with advanced pulmonary parenchymal or pulmonary vascular disease. Lung transplantation, however, with chronic posttransplant immunosuppression, creates a uniquely vulnerable population of patients likely to experience significant life-threatening complications requiring intensive care. The introduction of several novel immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, in conjunction with more established agents such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus, has greatly increased treatment options for lung transplant recipients and likely contributed to improved short-term transplant outcomes. Modern transplant immunosuppression, however, is associated with a host of complications such as opportunistic infections, renal failure, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The main focus of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of modern immunotherapy in lung transplantation and to increase awareness of the serious and potentially life-threatening complications of these medications.

Preemptive Therapy With Intravenous Ganciclovir for the Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Lung Transplant Recipients

The most effective strategy for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in lung transplantation has not been conclusively established. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of preemptive ganciclovir therapy for this purpose. Twenty-five consecutive adult patients positive for CMV before transplantation and surviving more than 30 days after the procedure were studied. Mean follow-up was 732.2 days (range, 210-1125). All patients received intravenous (IV) ganciclovir prophylaxis for the first 21 days and subsequently underwent frequent CMV antigenemia monitoring: weekly for the first 3 months, every 15 days between 3 and 6 months, and monthly thereafter. IV ganciclovir was given when antigenemia results were greater than 10 infected cells per 100,000 polymorphonuclears. The study group was compared with a historical group of 30 consecutive patients who had received IV ganciclovir prophylaxis and continued on oral ganciclovir up to day 120 posttransplantation. Eighteen of the 25 patients (72.0%) presented episodes of CMV infection. Six of the 25 patients (24.0%) had CMV disease, including 3 viral syndromes and 3 cases of pneumonitis. Four patients debuted with CMV disease, 1 of them with pneumonitis. CMV resistance to ganciclovir was observed in 2 patients. The incidence of infection was higher than in the historical group (72.0% vs 46.7%; P < .05), but there were no significant differences in the incidence of CMV disease (24.0% vs 40.0%; P = not significant [NS]). Mean time before onset of the first episode of disease was lower in the preemptive therapy group than in the comparison patients (82.8 days; range, 42-240 vs 175 days; range, 90-243; P < .05). In conclusion, preemptive therapy for CMV disease is as effective a prevention strategy as oral ganciclovir prophylaxis. However, the early appearance of CMV disease with preemptive therapy can make this approach inadvisable.

Cytomegalovirus infection presenting as bronchial polyps in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most important opportunistic pathogen in lung transplant recipients and is associated with direct and indirect morbidity. Infection or disease with CMV is often diagnosed through detection of the virus in the blood, culture of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or histologic examination of lung tissue obtained on transbronchial biopsy. Endobronchial lesions involving the virus have received little attention, however.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 76 endobronchial biopsies obtained at our institution from January 1999 through October 2004 and performed a detailed examination of the specimens and clinical histories for all patients with biopsy evidence of bronchial CMV infection.

RESULTS

We identified three patients with endobronchial CMV infection, manifested in each case as an endobronchial polyp. On histologic examination of the endobronchial biopsy specimens, cells with cytopathic effects characteristic or suggestive of CMV infection were present in two cases, and immunohistochemical staining confirmed the presence of CMV in all three. All patients were clinically well with normal chest X-rays before biopsy. Two of three patients had multiple subsequent episodes of CMV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first report of endobronchial polypoid CMV disease in lung transplant recipients. Our results suggest that biopsy of endobronchial lesions in pulmonary allografts should be pursued to establish a definitive etiology.

C4d Staining of Pulmonary Allograft Biopsies: An Immunoperoxidase Study

BACKGROUND

The role of antibody-mediated/humoral rejection in lung allografts is not fully elucidated. In other organ systems, deposition of a specific complement product, C4d, is a sensitive and specific marker for humoral rejection. C4d can be evaluated in tissue biopsies by immunofluorescence or light microscopic immunohistochemical staining techniques. Using immunohistochemical staining techniques we sought to determine whether there was any specific staining pattern for C4d in lung allograft biopsies with or without the diagnosis of acute or chronic cellular or humoral rejection.

METHODS

A total of 68 lung transplant biopsies, performed at UCLA Medical Center from January 2002 to August 2004, were collected and the paraffin blocks were re-cut and stained for C4d by an immunoperoxidase technique. The cases were separated by the presence or absence of features of acute and/or chronic rejection based on the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection, revised 1995. The pattern of staining for C4d was then systematically examined.

RESULTS

Positive staining in a variable, focal non-specific pattern was observed. There was no consistent staining pattern within the different diagnostic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

C4d staining of paraffin-embedded lung allograft biopsies, using currently available techniques, does not identify acute or chronic cellular or humoral rejection in lung allograft tissue.

Recomendaciones GESITRA-SEIMC y RESITRA sobre prevención y tratamiento de la infección por citomegalovirus en pacientes trasplantados

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains an important complication of transplantation. The last decade has been characterized by improvements to management that has reduced its morbidity and mortality. The advance has been particularly important in the diagnosis and prevention. Several techniques have been developed that allow the increasingly rapid and sensitive diagnosis. The different preventive strategies include use of appropriate blood products, immune globulin, and antiviral agents either as prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy. The development of effective oral drugs as valganciclovir also represents a new advance. It is necessary to summarize these advances to facilitate the development of local policies reflecting recent changes. The Group of Study of Infections in Transplantation (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) has therefore produced actual recommendations in the management of CMV infection after transplantation.

Clinical utility of cytomegalovirus viral load in bronchoalveolar lavage in lung transplant recipients

The utility of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load (VL) by quantitative hybrid capture assay (Q-HCA) was investigated in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from lung transplant recipients and compared with BAL cultures and blood VL. Forty-three consecutive BAL samples from 27 lung transplant recipients were analyzed. All samples had shell vial (SV) cultures in addition to Q-HCA. Histopathology was done on all lung tissues, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in those with positive CMV cultures. Fifteen (56%) lung transplant recipients had both positive BAL SV cultures and BAL VL. Five of 15 had CMV pneumonitis with a VL in BAL >500 000 copies/mL (mean: 1638 450). Ten patients without CMV pneumonitis had VL in BAL <500 000 copies/mL (mean 81 820, p = 0.002). High VL in BAL and blood invariably meant CMV pneumonitis, but 2 patients with CMV pneumonitis had high BAL VL but relatively low blood VL. Initial CMV seronegativity was associated with pneumonitis (4/5 vs. 1/10; p = 0.004) and higher BAL CMV VL (p = 0.03). High CMV BAL or blood VL did not correlate with acute rejection or development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). High CMV VL in BAL in lung transplant recipients is strongly associated with CMV pneumonitis, and may be more predictive than peripheral blood viral load.

Following universal prophylaxis with intravenous ganciclovir and cytomegalovirus immune globulin, valganciclovir is safe and effective for prevention of CMV infection following lung transplantation

We prospectively determined the safety and efficacy of valganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in at-risk (donor positive/recipient negative [D+/R-] or R+) lung transplant recipients. We also determined the length of prophylaxis required to significantly decrease both CMV infection and disease. Consecutive lung transplant recipients surviving >30 days (n = 90) received combination prophylaxis with intravenous (i.v.) ganciclovir (GCV) 5 mg/kg/day and cytomegalovirus immune globulin (CMV-IVIG) followed by valganciclovir (450 mg twice-daily) to complete 180, 270 or 365 days of prophylaxis. This group was compared to a historical group (n = 140) who received high-dose oral acyclovir following i.v. GCV and CMV-IVIG. CMV disease was significantly lower in patients receiving valganciclovir compared to acyclovir (2.2% vs. 20%; p < 0.0001). Freedom from CMV infection and disease was significantly greater (p < 0.02) in patients receiving 180, 270 or 365 days of prophylaxis (90%, 95% and 90%, respectively) compared to those receiving 100-179 days (64%) or < 100 days (59%). No patient receiving valganciclovir died during the study. Following prophylaxis with i.v. GCV and CMV-IVIG, valganciclovir is safe and effective for prevention of CMV infection and disease in at-risk lung transplant recipients. The required length of prophylaxis was at least 180 days.

Cytomegalovirus and lung transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a serious problem in lung transplant recipients. Development of potent oral antiviral agents, molecular techniques for the detection of infection and its response to therapy and the emergence of isolates with antiviral resistance have had significant impacts on the approach to CMV in these patients. This article discusses the following issues as part of a comprehensive CMV management strategy in lung transplant recipients: (1) Prevention strategies in the era of potent oral antiviral agents, (2) the role of new diagnostic techniques in the management of CMV, (3) treatment regimens for established CMV infection or disease, (4) the potential impact of treatment of CMV on the indirect effects on long-term allograft function, and (5) the incidence, risk factors for and impact of ganciclovir resistance following lung transplantation.

Comparison of DNA amplification, mRNA amplification, and DNA hybridization techniques for detection of cytomegalovirus in bone marrow transplant recipients

A total of 676 specimens from 63 recipients of bone marrow allografts were tested for cytomegalovirus (CMV) by the following assays: CMV pp67 NucliSens (NS), AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR (RA), and the Digene CMV DNA test (DG). In a consensus analysis, the sensitivities and specificities were 60 and 99% (NS), 96 and 98% (RA), and 90 and 76% (DG), respectively; for detection of symptomatic CMV infection, they were 60 and 97% (NS), 65 and 97% (RA), and 95 and 77% (DG), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the major risk factor for symptomatic CMV infection was an increase in the viral load in the DG assay; in univariate analyses, maximum viral loads in both DG and RA assays and a rising viral load in the RA assay were also significant. The earliest detection of CMV replication was provided by the RA assay (mean, 39 days posttransplantation), followed by the DG assay (mean, 48 days) and the NS assay (mean, 58 days).