Should we still perform angioplasty and stenting of an unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in heart transplant patients? Two new cases and a review of the literature

Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of left main coronary artery for treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after orthotopic heart transplantation

The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) for the treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in consecutive unselected patients with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). PCI in patients with OHT and develop CAV has been associated with greater restenosis rates compared to PCI in patients with native coronary artery disease. A paucity of short- and long-term data is available from patients with OHT who have undergone PCI for ULMCA disease. The present retrospective, multicenter, international registry included 21 patients with OHT and CAV who underwent ULMCA PCI from 1997 to 2009. Angiographic success was achieved in all patients. Drug-eluting stents were used in 14 of the 21 patients. No major adverse cardiac events or repeat OHT occurred within the first 30 days. At a mean follow-up of 4.9 ± 3.2 years, 3 patients (14%) had died, myocardial infarction had occurred in 1 patient (5%), and target lesion revascularization had been required in 4 patients (19%). Follow-up angiography was performed in 16 patients (76%), and restenosis was observed in 4 (19%). No stent thrombosis of the ULMCA was observed. One patient (5%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, and 5 patients (24%) underwent repeat OHT. In conclusion, the results of our study have shown ULMCA PCI to be safe and reasonably effective in patients with OHT and represents a viable treatment strategy for CAV in these patients.

Treatment of allograft vasculopathy in heart transplantation

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy remains one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation, although its impact is becoming somewhat smaller as prophylactic measures are implemented. Advances in the understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the genesis and development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy are opening ways for new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Successful prophylaxis of the early stages of the disease has been demonstrated with the use of newer immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus and everolimus, that will probably be included in future protocols. For most patients with established cardiac allograft vasculopathy, currently available revascularisation methods and retransplantation are not appropriate options. Antiproliferative agents could provide significant improvement in terms of symptom relief and prognosis, but their definite value must be proven in well-designed trials.

Inflammatory Response and Re-stenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Heart Transplant Recipients and Patients With Native Atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in heart transplant recipients (HTRs) with coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) has been questioned. We investigated the degree of inflammatory reaction during PCI in CAV compared to patients with native atherosclerosis, and the possible relationship between PCI-induced inflammation and the degree of re-stenosis in these 2 patient groups.

METHODS

In 11 CAV patients and 10 patients with native atherosclerosis, blood samples were drawn before and 24 hours and 6 months after PCI, and analyzed with regard to hsCRP, MCP-1, components of complement activation, von Willebrand factor (vWf), soluble L-selectin and ICAM-1. Quantitative angiography was performed before and after PCI, and at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Baseline levels of hsCRP, vWf and MCP-1 were significantly elevated and levels of L-selectin and ICAM-1 and activation products of the alternative pathway of the complement system were decreased in CAV patients compared to those with native atherosclerosis. PCI induced significant increases of hsCRP in both groups as well as an increase in vWf in native atherosclerosis, whereas a decrease in L-selectin was observed in native atherosclerosis. Plasma levels of MCP-1 correlated with percent stenosis at follow-up in both groups, whereas a correlation between hsCRP and percent stenosis was evident only in patients with native atherosclerosis. There were no differences in rates of re-stenosis between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HTRs with CAV and patients with native atherosclerosis are characterized by different profiles of immune activation and respond differently to PCI. Nevertheless, an inappropriate inflammatory reactivity may predispose to re-stenosis after PCI in both groups of patients, with pre-procedural inflammation being of particular importance in CAV.

Treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis with a drug eluting stent in a heart transplant patient with allograft vasculopathy

High risk angioplasty with drug eluting stent placement into an unprotected left main coronary artery in a heart transplant recipient with allograft vasculopathy is reported. Ten month angiographic follow up is reported. The literature is reviewed and current methods of revascularisation are described in detail. This is the first report of drug eluting stent use in this clinical situation.