Efficacy of tacrolimus rescue therapy in refractory acute rejection after lung transplantation

Acute Rejection in the Modern Lung Transplant Era

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) remains a common complication after lung transplantation. Mortality directly related to ACR is low and most patients respond to first-line immunosuppressive treatment. However, a subset of patients may develop refractory or recurrent ACR leading to an accelerated lung function decline and ultimately chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Infectious complications associated with the intensification of immunosuppression can also negatively impact long-term survival. In this review, we summarize the most recent evidence on the mechanisms, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of ACR. We specifically focus on novel, promising biomarkers which are under investigation for their potential to improve the diagnostic performance of transbronchial biopsies. Finally, for each topic, we highlight current gaps in knowledge and areas for future research.

Desensitization and management of allograft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) limits the success of lung transplantation. Among the risk factors associated with CLAD, we recognize pretransplant circulating antibodies against the human leukocyte antigens (HLA), acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This review will summarize current data surrounding management of desensitization, ACR, AMR, and CLAD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Strategies in managing in highly sensitized patients waiting for lung transplant include avoidance of specific HLA antigens and reduction of circulating anti-HLA antibodies at time of transplant. Several multimodal approaches have been studied in the treatment of AMR with a goal to clear circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and to halt the production of new antibodies. Different immunosuppressive strategies focus on influence of the host immune system, particularly T-cell responses, in order to prevent ACR and the progression of CLAD.

SUMMARY

The lack of significant evidence and consensus limits to draw conclusion regarding the impact of specific immunosuppressive regimens in the management of HLA antibodies, ACR, and CLAD. Development of novel therapeutic agents and use of multicenter randomized clinical trials will allow to better define patient-specific treatments and improve the length and quality of life of lung transplant recipients.

Developments in lung transplantation over the past decade

With an improved median survival of 6.2 years, lung transplantation has become an increasingly acceptable treatment option for end-stage lung disease. Besides survival benefit, improvement of quality of life is achieved in the vast majority of patients. Many developments have taken place in the field of lung transplantation over the past decade. Broadened indication criteria and bridging techniques for patients awaiting lung transplantation have led to increased waiting lists and changes in allocation schemes worldwide. Moreover, the use of previously unacceptable donor lungs for lung transplantation has increased, with donations from donors after cardiac death, donors with increasing age and donors with positive smoking status extending the donor pool substantially. Use of ex vivo lung perfusion further increased the number of lungs suitable for lung transplantation. Nonetheless, the use of these previously unacceptable lungs did not have detrimental effects on survival and long-term graft outcomes, and has decreased waiting list mortality. To further improve long-term outcomes, strategies have been proposed to modify chronic lung allograft dysfunction progression and minimise toxic immunosuppressive effects. This review summarises the developments in clinical lung transplantation over the past decade.

Many developments have taken place in lung transplantation over the last decade: indications have broadened, donor criteria expanded, allocations systems changed, and novel therapeutic interventions implemented, leading to improved long-term survivalhttp://bit.ly/2vnpwc1

Acute cellular rejection in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is an important therapy for end-stage respiratory failure in patients who have exhausted other therapeutic options. The lung is unique among solid-organ transplants in that it is exposed to the outside environment, and undergoes continuous stimulation from infectious and non-infectious agents, which may play a part in upregulating the immune response to the allograft. Despite induction immunosuppression and the use of aggressive maintenance regimens, acute allograft rejection is still a major problem, especially in the first year after transplant, with important diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. As well as being responsible for early graft failure and death, acute rejection also initiates alloimmune responses that predispose patients to chronic lung allograft dysfunction, in particular bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Cellular responses to human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) on the allograft have traditionally been considered the main mechanism of acute rejection, although the influence of humoral immunity is increasingly recognised. Here, we present two cases of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in the early post-transplant period and review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, clinical presentation and treatment of ACR.

Acute rejection

Despite induction immunosuppression and the use of aggressive maintenance immunosuppressive regimens, acute allograft rejection following lung transplantation is still a problem with important diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. As well as causing early graft loss and mortality, acute rejection also initiates the chronic alloimmune responses and airway-centred inflammation that predispose to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), also known as chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which is a major source of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Cellular responses to human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) on the allograft have traditionally been considered the main mechanism of acute rejection, but the influence of humoral immunity is increasingly recognised. As with other several other solid organ transplants, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is now a well-accepted and distinct clinical entity in lung transplantation. While acute cellular rejection (ACR) has defined histopathological criteria, transbronchial biopsy is less useful in AMR and its diagnosis is complicated by challenges in the measurement of antibodies directed against donor HLA, and a determination of their significance. Increasing awareness of the importance of non-HLA antigens further clouds this issue. Here, we review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, clinical presentation and treatment of ACR and AMR in lung transplantation, and discuss future potential biomarkers of both processes that may forward our understanding of these conditions.

Acute rejection and humoral sensitization in lung transplant recipients

Despite the recent introduction of many improved immunosuppressive agents for use in transplantation, acute rejection affects up to 55% of lung transplant recipients within the first year after transplant. Acute lung allograft rejection is defined as perivascular or peribronchiolar mononuclear inflammation. Although histopathologic signs of rejection often resolve with treatment, the frequency and severity of acute rejections represent the most important risk factor for the subsequent development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a condition of progressive airflow obstruction that limits survival to only 50% at 5 years after lung transplantation. Recent evidence demonstrates that peribronchiolar mononuclear inflammation (also known as lymphocytic bronchiolitis) or even a single episode of minimal perivascular inflammation significantly increase the risk for BOS. We comprehensively review the clinical presentation, diagnosis, histopathologic features, and mechanisms of acute cellular lung rejection. In addition, we consider emerging evidence that humoral rejection occurs in lung transplantation, characterized by local complement activation or the presence of antibody to donor human leukocyte antigens (HLA). We discuss in detail methods for HLA antibody detection as well as the clinical relevance, the mechanisms, and the pathologic hallmarks of humoral injury. Treatment options for cellular rejection include high-dose methylprednisolone, antithymocyte globulin, or alemtuzumab. Treatment options for humoral rejection include intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, or rituximab. A greater mechanistic understanding of cellular and humoral forms of rejection and their role in the pathogenesis of BOS is critical in developing therapies that extend long-term survival after lung transplantation.

Alemtuzumab in the treatment of refractory acute rejection and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after human lung transplantation

Despite substantial improvements in early survival after lung transplantation, refractory acute rejection (RAR) and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) remain major contributors to transplant-related morbidity and mortality. We have utilized alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 antibody which results in potent lymphocyte depletion, in consecutive patients with RAR (n = 12) or BOS (n = 10). All patients failed conventional treatment with methylprednisolone and antithymocyte globulin and received strict infection prophylaxis. Alemtuzumab significantly improved histological rejection scores in RAR. Total rejection grade/biopsy was 1.98 +/- 0.25 preceding alemtuzumab versus 0.33 +/- 0.14 posttreatment, p-value <0.0001 (with a similar number of biopsies/patient per respective time interval). Freedom from BOS was observed in 65% of RAR patients 2 years after alemtuzumab treatment. Although there was no statistically significant change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) before and after alemtuzumab treatment in patients with BOS, a stabilization or improvement in BOS grade occurred in 70% of patients. Patient survival 2 years after alemtuzumab for BOS was 69%. Despite a dramatic decline in CD4 counts in alemtuzumab-treated patients, only one patient developed a lethal infection. Thus, we provide the first evidence that alemtuzumab is a potentially useful therapy in lung transplant recipients with RAR or BOS.

Emerging drugs in lung transplantation

The balance between immunosuppression to ensure graft tolerance while preventing emergence of infectious complications is key in lung transplantation. Although opportunistic infection may appear to be the most important of these complications, malignancies and severe drug toxicities significantly affect the short- and long-term outcomes of the patients. The present practice is combination therapy using drugs with complementary immunosuppressive action, to achieve synergistic immunosuppression with the lowest possible toxicity. Components of immunosuppression include induction and maintenance regimens. Primary graft failure remains an important cause of mortality and morbidity in the immediate post-transplant period. Acute rejection is a common complication after lung transplant, but responds well to augmented immunosuppression and immunomodulation. Chronic rejection still is the major cause of mortality in patients who survive the initial year post-transplantation. Several new drugs have shown promise in decreasing the rate of loss of graft function. This review discusses the current and emerging therapeutic regimens.

Pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients and design of Bayesian estimators using limited sampling strategies

OBJECTIVES

To: (i) test different pharmacokinetic models to fit full tacrolimus concentration-time profiles; (ii) estimate the tacrolimus pharmacokinetic characteristics in stable lung transplant patients with or without cystic fibrosis (CF); (iii) compare the pharmacokinetic parameters between these two patient groups; and (iv) design maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimators (MAP-BE) for pharmacokinetic forecasting in these patients using a limited sampling strategy.

METHODS

Tacrolimus blood concentration-time profiles obtained on three occasions within a 5-day period in 22 adult lung transplant recipients (11 with CF and 11 without CF) were retrospectively studied. Three different one-compartment models with first-order elimination were tested to fit the data: one with first-order absorption, one convoluted with a gamma distribution to describe the absorption phase, and one convoluted with a double gamma distribution able to describe secondary concentration peaks. Finally, Bayesian estimation using the best model and a limited sampling strategy was tested in the two groups of patients for its ability to provide accurate estimates of the main tacrolimus pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices.

RESULTS

The one-compartment model with first-order elimination convoluted with a double gamma distribution gave the best results in both CF and non-CF lung transplant recipients. The patients with CF required higher doses of tacrolimus than those without CF to achieve similar drug exposure, and population modelling had to be performed in CF and non-CF patients separately. Accurate Bayesian estimates of area under the blood concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC12), AUC from 0 to 4 hours, peak blood concentration (Cmax) and time to reach Cmax were obtained using three blood samples collected at 0, 1 and 3 hours in non-CF patients (correlation coefficient between observed and estimated AUC12, R2 = 0.96), and at 0, 1.5 and 4 hours in CF patients (R2 = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

A particular pharmacokinetic model was designed to fit the complex and highly variable tacrolimus blood concentration-time profiles. Moreover, MAP-BE allowing tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring based on AUC12 were developed.

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in lung transplantation: new strategies for monitoring

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (TAC) dosing in lung transplantation is traditionally based on blood trough levels (C0). The best sampling strategy for the estimation of total drug exposure (area-under-the-curve [AUC]) has not been determined.

METHODS

Thirty-one 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were studied in 15 patients (8 men and 7 women, 42.0 +/- 13 years) post-bilateral lung transplantation (7.3 +/- 3.7 months; range, 3-18 months). Twelve-hour AUC (AUC0-12) was calculated by trapezoidal rule. Relationships between individual concentration points or abbreviated kinetics (2-4 concentration points) and AUC0-12 were determined by linear regression analysis (R2; absolute prediction error [APE]).

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic profiles showed high variability, particularly in the absorption phase. AUC was 221 +/- 47.2 ng/ml (range, 156-329.3 ng/ml) at C0 10 to 15 ng/ml and was independent of TAC dose (R2 = 0.002). C0 was poorly predictive of AUC0-12 (R2 = 0.64; APE, 16.1% +/- 10.9%; range, 1.4%-37.8%). The predictive performance for AUC0-12 was highest with abbreviated kinetics using 4 (C0/C2/C3/C4: R(2) = 0.99; APE, 2.6% +/- 2.0%; range, 0.1%-7%) or 3 concentration points (C0/C2/C4: R2 = 0.98; APE, 2.6% +/- 2.1%; range, 0.1%-9.1%). Of the 2-point kinetics C2/C6 (R2 = 0.96; APE, 5.3% +/- 3.7%; range, 0.1%-12.7%), C2/C4 (R2 = 0.94, APE 6.7% +/- 4.8%; range 0.1%-14.6%) and C0/C4 (R2 = 0.94; APE 4.1% +/- 2.9%; range, 0.5%-11.4%) performed best. Single point strategies (best was C4: R2 = 0.94; APE 7.1% +/- 5.5%, range, 0.2%-24.1%) all had unacceptably high APE (range > 15%).

CONCLUSION

True TAC exposure shows high variability in stable lung transplant patients and is poorly predicted by C0. Abbreviated kinetics covering at least 2 concentration points between 0 and 4 hours post-drug intake are required for an accurate estimation of AUC.

Itraconazole Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus (FK 506): Efficacy and Drug Interaction

BACKGROUND

Itraconazole is often given for fungal prophylaxis to lung transplant recipients after transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of interaction between tacrolimus and itraconazole in lung transplant recipients and the efficacy of itraconazole prophylaxis.

METHODS

The study group included 40 lung transplant recipients followed for at least 12 months. All received prophylactic itraconazole, 200 mg twice a day, for the first 6 months after transplantation. Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared during and after itraconazole therapy. Rejection rate, fungal infection rate, and renal function were assessed. The mean cost per daily treatment of the itraconazole/tacrolimus combination and tacrolimus alone was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean tacrolimus dose during itraconazole treatment was 3.26 +/- 2.1 mg/day compared with 5.74 +/- 2.9 mg/day after itraconazole was stopped (p < 0.0001) for a mean total daily dose elevation of tacrolimus of 76%. When the cost of itraconazole was taken into account, the average total daily cost of the combined treatment was US5.86 dollars less than the treatment with tacrolimus alone. No differences in the rejection or fungal infection rate, or in renal toxicity, were observed between the periods with and without itraconazole treatment, although less positive fungal isolates were identified during itraconazole therapy.

CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis therapy with itraconazole is highly effective. Itraconazole reduces the dose of tacrolimus and therefore lowers the cost of therapy without causing an increase in rejection rate and with renal function preservation.

Allograft Rejection After Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation has become an accepted therapy for selected patients with advanced lung disease. One of the main limitations to successful lung transplantation is rejection of the transplanted organ. This article discusses the clinical presentation, treatment, and prevention of hyperacute, acute, and chronic rejection in the lung transplant recipient.

Use of cyclosporine in thoracic transplantation

The use of cyclosporine (CyA) in clinical thoracic transplantation has markedly improved the survival and quality of life of patients in the past 2 decades. In the mid-1990s a significant advance in formulation design took place with the introduction of Neoral. This new microemulsion formulation of CyA demonstrates reduced intersubject and intrasubject variability in absorption and improved oral bioavailability compared with the oil-based CyA formulation. Moreover, C2 measurements of CyA could result in an even better method to avoid overimmunosuppression. On the other hand, generic alternatives of CyA could potentially reduce costs to transplant recipients as well as to the general community. Since the initiation of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and rapamycin, slow but expanding variations of immunosuppressive protocols have taken place. Transplantation medicine is thus becoming an increasingly exciting and innovative field, in which CyA continues to play a central role as the core immunosuppressant of choice for the majority of patients.

An update on clinical outcomes in heart and lung transplantation

Much progress has been made in heart and lung transplantation over recent decades. The immune mechanisms that result in allograft rejection are now better understood, and the development of immunosuppressant therapies has decreased recipient mortality among transplant recipients. During the 1980s, immunosuppressant therapy primarily involved the use of corticosteroids and cyclosporine. However, while survival rates increased among transplant recipients, many patients experienced primary graft failures, acute and chronic rejection, as well as death. Until the introduction of tacrolimus in the early 1990s, all patients received the same immunosuppressant regimen, regardless of its effectiveness. Tacrolimus therapy has contributed much to the success rates of both heart and lung transplantation, and by 2001, it had become the preeminent immunosuppressant agent used in lung transplantation.

Critical care aspects of lung transplantation

Lung transplantation currently is the preferred treatment option for a variety of end-stage pulmonary diseases. Remarkable progress has occurred through refinements in technique and improved understanding of transplant immunology and microbiology. As a result, recipients are surviving longer after their transplant. Despite improvements in short- and intermediate-term survival, long-term success with lung transplantation remains limited by chronic allograft rejection, also known as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Despite its long-term limitations, lung transplantation remains the only hope for many with end-stage pulmonary disease, and during the past 20 years, it has become increasingly accepted and used. As a result, clinicians working in an intensive care unit (ICU) are more likely to be exposed to these patients both in the immediate postoperative period as well as throughout their remaining lives. It is thus important that the ICU team have a working knowledge of the common complications, when these complications are most likely to occur, and how best to treat them when they do arise. The main focus of this review is to address the variety of potential graft and life-threatening problems that may occur in lung transplant recipients. Because the ICU is also the most common setting where a potential donor is identified, donor issues will briefly be addressed.

Tacrolimus: a further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation

Extensive clinical use has confirmed that tacrolimus (Prograf) is a key option for immunosuppression after transplantation. In large, prospective, randomised, multicentre trials in adults and children receiving solid organ transplants, tacrolimus was at least as effective or provided better efficacy than cyclosporin microemulsion in terms of patient and graft survival, treatment failure rates and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute and corticosteroid-resistant rejection episodes. Notably, the lower incidence of rejection episodes after renal transplantation in tacrolimus recipients was reflected in improved cost effectiveness. In bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients, the incidence of tacrolimus grade II-IV graft-versus-host disease was significantly lower with tacrolimus than cyclosporin treatment. Efficacy was maintained in renal and liver transplant recipients after total withdrawal of corticosteroid therapy from tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with the incidence of acute rejection episodes at up to 2 years' follow-up being similar with or without corticosteroids. Tacrolimus provided effective rescue therapy in transplant recipients with persistent acute or chronic allograft rejection or drug-related toxicity associated with cyclosporin treatment. Typically, conversion to tacrolimus reversed rejection episodes and/or improved the tolerability profile, particularly in terms of reduced hyperlipidaemia. In lung transplant recipients with obliterative bronchiolitis, conversion to tacrolimus reduced the decline in and/or improved lung function in terms of forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Tolerability issues may be a factor when choosing a calcineurin inhibitor. Cyclosporin tends to be associated with a higher incidence of significant hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, hirsutism, gingivitis and gum hyperplasia, whereas the incidence of some types of neurotoxicity, disturbances in glucose metabolism, diarrhoea, pruritus and alopecia may be higher with tacrolimus treatment. Renal function, as assessed by serum creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rates, was better in tacrolimus than cyclosporin recipients at up to 5 years' follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Recent well designed trials have consolidated the place of tacrolimus as an important choice for primary immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation and in BMT. Notably, in adults and children receiving transplants, tacrolimus-based primary immunosuppression was at least as effective or provided better efficacy than cyclosporin microemulsion treatment in terms of patient and graft survival, treatment failure and the incidence of acute and corticosteroid-resistant rejection episodes. The reduced incidence of rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus translated into a better cost effectiveness relative to cyclosporin microemulsion treatment. The optimal immunosuppression regimen is ultimately dependent on balancing such factors as the efficacy of the individual drugs, their tolerability, potential for drug interactions and pharmacoeconomic issues.

Lung transplants with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil: a review

Traditionally, immunosuppressive maintenance therapy in solid organ transplantation has consisted of cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine, and prednisone. However, lung transplant recipients are far more frequently affected by acute rejection, especially during the first 6 months after the transplantation, than patients with other transplanted organs. Further, they display a greater risk for chronic transplant dysfunction and ultimate graft loss. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality among long-term survivors after lung transplantation. Acute pulmonary allograft rejection has been identified as the major risk factor for the development of BOS. Based on favourable results in kidney, liver, and heart transplantation, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil have been used as primary prophylaxis and as rescue therapy for recurrent or persistent acute rejection and BOS. A secondary indication is CsA toxicity. This review focuses on reported results of the combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in lung transplantation. These new immunosuppressive drugs have markedly improved the efficacy profiles without additional detrimental toxicities, and appear to be a safe alternative to CsA and azathioprine in patients following lung transplantation. However, at present, BOS is not influenced by these new drugs. The optimal long-term immunosuppressive regimen remains to be established.

Acute allograft rejection after lung transplantation: diagnosis and therapy

Acute rejection remains a significant problem after lung transplantation. While it generally is a treatable condition, significant resources and therapies are directed toward its prevention and resolution. Its larger significance undoubtedly rests in its contribution to the pathogenesis of BOS. Significant questions regarding the origins of AR, the role of LBB, alternative histologic appearances of acute allograft injury, and optimal therapy remain. Controversy regarding the utility of surveillance bronchoscopy and preemptive treatment of occult AR persists because of lack of conclusive evidence. Future investigations might resolve these matters and provide more efficacious and less toxic therapies that will hopefully reduce the impact of chronic rejection and improve long-term outcomes.

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of lung-transplanted patients treated with tacrolimus as rescue treatment for refractory acute rejection

BACKGROUND

Cytokines are important mediators of the complex process of extravasation and influx of peripheral mononuclear cells into a site of graft injury, an action that may be affected by the immunosuppressive regimen. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of different immunosuppressive regimens on cytokine expression in the grafted lung.

METHODS

We analyzed the cytokine profiles in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BAL-F) from 18 lung transplanted patients undergoing a shift from a cyclosporine- to a tacrolimus-based triple therapy regimen due to refractory acute rejection.

RESULTS

Three months after the conversion to tacrolimus, BAL-F levels of interleukin 8 (IL8), IL18, IL12 and IL10 were not significantly different than those measured before conversion. In contrast, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels showed a significant and sustained decrease in BAL-F during tacrolimus therapy. In addition the levels of gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) in the BAL-F were decreased albeit not significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the clinical and functional stabilization of patients observed after conversion to a tacrolimus based regimen, may be due, at least in part, to the induced down-regulation of MCP-1 production.

Critical care issues in lung and heart transplantation

Although much has been accomplished in HTx and LTx in the past few decades, much remains to be conquered. It is an ever-changing, always fascinating field. Though science and technology know no limits, the primary limitation of HTx and LTx continues to be the availability of donor organs. One can only hope that further advances in educating the public will help close the large gap between the list of those waiting and the organs available for transplantation.

Failure of cyclosporin a to rescue peripheral nerve allografts in acute rejection

Prevention and control of graft rejection remain essential in the investigation of peripheral nerve allotransplantation. Although use of cyclosporin A (CsA) has been shown to suppress successfully the rejection of nerve allografts, limited information exists concerning use of this drug to arrest rejection in progress, and thereby effect salvage of these grafts. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of CsA in the treatment of ongoing acute rejection of peripheral nerve allografts. Buffalo rats received posterior tibial nerve grafts from either Lewis or Buffalo donor animals and were divided into five groups: group 1 received isografts and no CsA treatment (n = 8), group 2 received allografts with continuous CsA therapy (n = 10), group 3 received allografts with no treatment (n = 7), group 4 received allografts with initiation of CsA therapy delayed until 3 weeks after the procedure (n = 11), and group 5 received allografts with an interrupted course of CsA (n = 15). All grafts were harvested at 10 weeks. Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated comparable nerve regeneration in groups 1 and 2 and good regeneration in group 3 animals, despite cellular infiltrate suggestive of rejection. At 3 weeks after surgery, group 4 animals showed early rejection and significantly less neuroregeneration than positive controls at 10 weeks after delayed initiation of CsA therapy. Finally, group 5 animals showed early regeneration at 3 weeks but significantly lesser regeneration by 10 weeks after interruption of therapy. In this experimental protocol, CsA was ineffective in rescuing histologically proven rejection in progress.