TOR inhibitors and cardiac allograft vasculopathy: is inhibition of intimal thickening an adequate surrogate of benefit?

Virtual histology assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy following introduction of everolimus--results of a multicenter trial

In this 12-month multicenter Scandinavian study, 78 maintenance heart transplant (HTx) recipients randomized to everolimus with reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure or continued standard CNI-therapy underwent matched virtual histology (VH) examination to evaluate morphological progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Parallel measurement of a range of inflammatory markers was also performed. A similar rate of quantitative CAV progression was observed in the everolimus (n = 30) and standard CNI group (n = 48) (plaque index 1.9 ± 3.8% and 1.6 ± 3.9%, respectively; p = 0.65). However, VH analysis revealed a significant increase in calcified (2.4 ± 4.0 vs. 0.3 ± 3.1%; p = 0.02) and necrotic component (6.5 ± 8.5 vs. 1.1 ± 8.6%; p = 0.01) among everolimus patients compared to controls. The increase in necrotic and calcified components was most prominent in everolimus patients with time since HTx >5.1 years and was accompanied by a significant increase in levels of von Willebrand (vWF) factor (p = 0.04) and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) (p = 0.03). Conversion to everolimus and reduced CNI is associated with a significant increase in calcified and necrotic intimal components and is more prominent in patients with a longer time since HTx. A significant increase in vWF and VCAM accompanied these qualitative changes and the prognostic implication of these findings requires further investigation.

Contemporary concepts in prevention and treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), is characterized by heterogeneous proliferative thickening of the vascular intima of the cardiac allograft vasculature. Since its presentation is commonly clinically silent, early diagnosis and preventative therapy are critical. Preventative therapy including optimization of immunosuppressive therapy and treatment of comorbidities associated with CAV progression must be initiated early since most of the intimal thickening occurs during the first year posttransplant. Long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors is associated with a high incidence of chronic renal disease and also contributes to hyperlipidemia and hypertension, all of which may exacerbate CAV. In addition, statins, antihypertensive agents and anti-CMV agents all have demonstrated benefits in reducing CAV. Once established, the limited treatment options include nonpharmacologic interventions such as retransplantation, percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary artery bypass grafting, transmyocardial laser revascularization and heparin-induced/mediated extracorporeal LDL plasmapheresis (HELP). As the use of new assessment tools increases our understanding of this disease, better preventative and treatment strategies are evolving.

Reversible Sirolimus-associated Pneumonitis after Heart Transplantation

Sirolimus (rapamycin) and everolimus are immunosuppressive agents that inhibit cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Sirolimus has been widely used in renal transplantation, and its use in heart transplantation is increasing. Sirolimus-associated pneumonitis has been described in renal transplant patients. Two cases of sirolimus-associated pneumonitis have been reported after cardiac transplantation. Only 1 case has been described in detail, and this had a fatal outcome. Here, we present a case of sirolimus-associated interstitial pneumonitis in a cardiac transplant recipient that resolved completely with withdrawal of the drug and treatment with corticosteroids.

Three-year results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in cardiac transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

This study reports the 36-month results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) vs azathioprine (AZA) in heart transplant patients.

METHODS

Patients were randomized at the time of transplant to receive MMF (1,500 mg twice a day, N = 327) or AZA (1.5 to 3 mg/kg in 4 daily doses, N = 323) in addition to cyclosporine and corticosteroids; 289 patients in each group received study drug. Data were analyzed in all randomized patients (enrolled) and in patients who received study medications (treated). Clinical and graft assessments continued for 36 months.

RESULTS

For the co-primary end-point, 53 of 289 (18.3%) AZA-treated patients either died or received another transplant compared with 34 of 289 (11.8%) MMF-treated patients (p < 0.01). Time to re-transplantation or patient death was significantly shorter for AZA- than MMF-treated patients (p = 0.029). In patients undergoing intravascular ultrasound, the change in mean maximal intimal thickness was less for the MMF group than for the AZA group (0.06 +/- 0.03 mm vs 0.13 +/- 0.03 mm, respectively; p = 0.056). No significant differences between treatments were observed in quantitative coronary angiographic measurements of transplant coronary vasculopathy. Congestive heart failure, atrial arrhythmia and leukopenia were more common in the AZA group, whereas diarrhea, esophagitis, Herpes simplex, Herpes zoster and cytomegalovirus (CMV) tissue invasion were more common in MMF-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

MMF reduces mortality and graft loss up to 36 months after transplantation.

Conjugation of an antibody to cross-linked fibrin for targeted delivery of anti-restenotic drugs

There is an urgent need to treat restenosis, a major complication of the treatment of arteries blocked by atherosclerotic plaque, using local delivery techniques. We observed that cross-linked fibrin (XLF) is deposited at the site of surgical injury of arteries. An antibody to XLF, conjugated to anti-restenotic agents, should deliver the drugs directly and only to the site of injury. An anti-XLF antibody (H93.7C.1D2/48; 1D2) was conjugated to heparin (using N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (adipic acid dihydrazide) and rapamycin (1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide), and the conjugates purified and tested for activity before use in vivo. Rabbits had their right carotid arteries de-endothelialised and then given a bolus of 1D2-heparin, 1D2-LMWH or 1D2-rapamycin conjugate or controls of saline, heparin, LMWH, rapamycin or 1D2 (+/-heparin bolus) and sacrificed after 2 or 4 weeks (12 groups, n=6/group). Rabbits given any of the conjugates had minimal neointimal development in injured arteries, with up to 59% fewer neointimal cells than those given control drugs. Rabbits given 1D2-heparin or 1D2-LMWH had an increased or insignificant reduction in luminal area, with positive remodelling, while the medial and total arterial areas of rabbits given 1D2-rapamycin were not affected by injury. Arteries exposed to 1D2-heparin or 1D2-rapamycin had more endothelial cells than rabbits given control drugs. Thus, XLF-antibodies can site-deliver anti-restenotic agents to injured areas of the artery wall, where the conjugates can influence remodelling, re-endothelialisation and neointimal cell density, with reduced neointimal formation.

Usefulness of Stanford Scale of Intimal Hyperplasia Assessed by Intravascular Ultrasound to Predict Time of Onset and Severity of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of a single IVUS result described by the Stanford scale to predict CAV development.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were heart transplantation (OHT) before 1997 and at least one IVUS performed before 1998. IVUS studies were performed in 37 patients at 37 +/- 26 months after OHT. Based on the Stanford scale, were divided patients into Four groups: group I (grade 0 or 1): n = 4, 42 +/- 19 years, 2 men/2 women; group II (grade 2): n = 10, 44 +/- 15 years, 9 men/1 woman; group III (grade 3): n = 11, 48 +/- 11 years, 11 men; and group IV (grade 4): n = 12, 46 +/- 8 years, 12 men. We compared the incidence and time of onset of clinically significant CAV, namely significant coronary lesions, myocardial infarction and death caused by CAV.

RESULTS

There was no CAV diagnosed in group I. The rates of CAV in coronary angiograms in groups II, III and IV were: 80%, 36%, and 75%, respectively. Significant CAV was found in 30%, 9%, and 50% of patients, respectively. Average times of onset of any CAV in groups II, III and IV were 4.9, 5.6, and 3.3 years, and for significant CAV were 4.1, 3.6, and 5.5 years, respectively. Deaths in groups I to IV were 1, 4, 2, and 5, respectively. CAV was the reason for death in 1 patient from group III, and 3 patients from group IV.

CONCLUSIONS

Extreme grades on the Stanford scale (0, 1, and 4) describing a single IVUS study in OHT recipients appear useful to stratify patients with the lowest versus the highest risk of CAV development.

Sirolimus immunosuppression in pediatric heart transplant recipients: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus has been used in heart transplant recipients for treatment of rejection, alternative immunosuppression (IS) and promotion of regression and prevention of graft vasculopathy (coronary artery disease [CAD]). This study reports on our center's experience with 16 children who underwent heart transplantation.

METHODS

Data were obtained by retrospective review.

RESULTS

Median age at time of review was 12.3 years (n = 16, 5.1 to 18.0 years; 9 boys, 7 girls), and at time of transplant 7.5 years (6 months to 18.0 years). Median time of sirolimus introduction was 2.7 years (1 month to 8.2 years) post-transplant. Fifteen patients were on steroids, 10 on tacrolimus (FK) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), 5 on FK and 1 on MMF with no calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). The average dose of sirolimus was 0.25 mg/kg or 7.0 mg/m(2) to maintain a target level of 5 to 15 mug/liter. Sirolimus was started for CAD in 6 patients (38%), rejection in 5 (31%), and in 5 with combinations of CNI intolerance, CAD, renal dysfunction and rejection. All 6 who received sirolimus for rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [ISHLT] Grade 3A) showed improvement on follow-up biopsies. Two of 3 who received sirolimus for renal dysfunction showed improvement (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] 43 to 67 and 32 to 106 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively). Side effects included hyperlipidemia (38%), abdominal pain (31%), mouth ulcers (26%), anemia or neutropenia (12.5%), persistent pericardial effusion (6%) and interstitial lung disease (6%). Sirolimus therapy was discontinued in 3 patients due to side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study sirolimus was found to be a valuable IS agent for the management of rejection, significant renal dysfunction and CNI side effects. These results support the need for prospective studies of the role of sirolimus in primary rejection prophylaxis, primary CAD prophylaxis and CAD regression. There also exists a need to establish an adverse event profile for this drug.

Surrogate markers for late cardiac allograft survival

While no definite well-validated surrogate marker for late cardiac allograft outcome is available, the early detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy represents the 'key' candidate as an effective surrogate. Intravascular ultrasound detected intimal thickening has been noted to possess prognostic capability despite the presence of a normal coronary angiogram. Several prospective investigations have pointed to accurate thresholds of intimal thickening that are prognostically relevant and predict not only future angiographic disease but also hard allograft related endpoints including ischemic cardiac events, allograft failure, and death. Because of the resolution of intravascular ultrasound, this technique accords reproducibility and the ability to standardize the degree of intimal thickening over time. Other candidates that may serve as surrogates once appropriately evaluated include measures of allograft pump function, intragraft histology, and peripheral markers including but not limited to structural proteins (cardiac specific troponins), inflammatory markers (CRP), fibrogenic markers (TGF-beta, fibroblast growth factor), and immune markers (anti-HLA Ab and indirect alloantibodies).