The physics of radiosurgery

The Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Image Guided Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Initial Clinical Evaluation

PURPOSE

The present study used cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to measure the inter- and intrafraction uncertainties for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using the Leksell Gamma Knife (GK).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using a novel CBCT system adapted to the GK radiosurgery treatment unit, CBCT images were acquired immediately before and after treatment for each treatment session within the context of a research ethics board-approved prospective clinical trial. Patients were immobilized in the Leksell coordinate frame (LCF) for both volumetric CBCT imaging and GK-SRS delivery. The relative displacement of the patient's skull to the stereotactic reference (interfraction motion) was measured for each CBCT scan. Differences between the pre- and post-treatment CBCT scans were used to determine the intrafraction motion.

RESULTS

We analyzed 20 pre- and 17 post-treatment CBCT scans in 20 LCF patients treated with SRS. The mean translational pretreatment setup error ± standard deviation in the left-right, anteroposterior, and craniocaudal directions was -0.19 ± 0.32, 0.06 ± 0.27, and -0.23 ± 0.2 mm, with a maximum of -0.74, -0.53, and -0.68 mm, respectively. After an average time between the pre- and post-treatment CBCT scans of 82 minutes (range 27-170), the mean intrafraction error ± standard deviation for the LCF was -0.03 ± 0.05, -0.03 ± 0.18, and -0.03 ± 0.12 mm in the left-right, anteroposterior, and craniocaudual direction, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using CBCT on a prototype image guided GK Perfexion unit, we were able to measure the inter- and intrafraction positional changes for GK-SRS using the invasive frame. In the era of image guided radiation therapy, the use of CBCT image guidance for both frame- and non-frame-based immobilization systems could serve as a useful quality assurance tool. Our preliminary measurements can guide the application of achievable thresholds for inter- and intrafraction discrepancy when moving to a frameless approach.

Comparison of (125)I stereotactic brachytherapy and LINAC radiosurgery modalities based on physical dose distribution and radiobiological efficacy

The goal of this study was to make a comparison between stereotactic brachytherapy implants and linear accelerator-based radiosurgery of brain tumors with respect to physical dose distributions and radiobiological efficacy. Twenty-four treatment plans made for irradiation of brain tumors with low-dose-rate (125)I brachytherapy and multiple-arc LINAC-based radiosurgery were analyzed. Using the dose-volume histograms and the linear-quadratic model, the brachytherapy doses were compared to the brachytherapy-equivalent LINAC radiosurgery doses with respect to the predicted late effects of radiation on normal brain tissue. To characterize the conformity and homogeneity of dose distributions, the conformal index, external volume index, and relative homogeneity index were calculated for each dose plan and the mean values were compared. The average tumor volume was 5.6 cm(3) (range: 0.1-19.3 cm(3)). At low doses, the calculated radiobiological late effect on normal tissue was equivalent for external-beam and brachytherapy dose delivery. For brachytherapy at doses greater than 30 Gy, the calculated equivalent dose to normal tissues was less than for external-beam radiosurgery. However, the dose-calculated homogeneity was better for the LINAC radiosurgery, with a mean relative homogeneity index of 0.62 compared to the calculated value of 0.19 for the brachytherapy (P=0.0002). These results are only predictions based on calculations concerning normal tissue tolerance. More data and research are needed to understand the clinical relevance of these findings.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)

BACKGROUND

This article describes the results of a study of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were treated for 36 lesions with SRS from 1993 to 2001. Nineteen patients were male and 13 were female. The median age at primary diagnosis of the tumor was 56 years (range, 33-76 yrs). At the time of initial diagnosis a total neurosurgical resection was performed in 7, a subtotal resection in 21, and a biopsy in 4 patients. Histology evaluations revealed glioblastoma multiforme (WHO Grade IV) in all 32 patients. In all patients radiotherapy was performed as the first-line therapy, applied as fractionated external beam radiotherapy. The median interval between primary irradiation and reirradiation was 10 months. The median dose applied was 15 Gy (range, 10-20 Gy) prescribed to the 80% isodose line that encompassed the target volume. No concomitant chemotherapy was applied.

RESULTS

Treatment was well tolerated by all patients. No acute toxicities > CTC Grade II occurred. No severe long-term toxicities including radionecrosis were observed. The median follow-up time was 13 months (range, 1-89 mo). All patients died of tumor progression during follow-up. The median overall survival from primary diagnosis of the tumor was 22 months (range, 9-133 mo). The survival rate at 1 year was 90%, and 49% and 26% at 2 and 3 years, respectively. Median overall survival after SRS was 10 months. At 6 and 12 months after SRS, survival rates were 72% and 28%, respectively. Median progression-free survival after SRS was 7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS offers effective treatment as a salvage therapy for a subgroup of patients with smaller lesions of recurrent GBM.

Parenchymal pineal tumors: a clinicopathological study of 76 cases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify factors that could lead to optimization of the management of pineal parenchymal tumors (PPT) which remains equivocal and controversial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In order to determine factors that influence PPT prognosis, a series of 76 consecutive patients from 12 European centers with histologically proven tumors was retrospectively reviewed. The clinical records and material for histologic review were available in all cases. Follow-up was achieved in 90% of cases.

RESULTS

According to WHO classification, there were 19 pineocytomas, 28 intermediate and mixed PPT, and 29 pineoblastomas. According to a four-grade institutional classification, there were 11 Grade 1, 27 Grade 2, 20 Grade 3, and 18 Grade 4. Surgical resection was attempted in 44 patients, whereas 30 had biopsy only. In one case, diagnosis was made at autopsy and in another on spinal deposits. Forty-four patients were irradiated following surgery, 15 patients received chemotherapy. Forty-one patients were alive (median follow-up: 85 months); 9 patients died perioperatively; 26 patients relapsed. Univariate analysis showed a good outcome correlated with age above 20 years, tumor diameter less than 25 mm, and low-grade histology. Multivariate analysis confirmed histology and tumor volume to be significant independent prognostic factors. The extent of surgery and radiotherapy had no clear influence on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the prognostic features of PPT and may help to determine treatment strategies based on radiologic and pathologic characteristics.

A dosimetric comparison of fan-beam intensity modulated radiotherapy with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for treating intermediate intracranial lesions

PURPOSE

To compare and evaluate treatment plans for the fan-beam intensity modulated radiotherapy and the Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treating medium-size intracranial lesions (range 4-25 cm3).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Treatment plans were developed for the Leksell Gamma Knife and a fan-beam inverse treatment planning system for intensity modulated radiotherapy. Treatment plan comparisons were carried out using dose-volume histogram (DVH), tissue-volume ratio (TVR), and maximum dose to the prescription dose (MDPD) ratio. The study was carried out for both simulated targets and clinical targets with irregular shapes and at different locations.

RESULTS

The MDPD ratio was significantly greater for the Gamma Knife plans than for the fan-beam IMRT plans. The Gamma Knife plans produced equivalent TVR values to the fan-beam IMRT plans. Based on the DVH comparison, the fan-beam IMRT delivered significantly more dose to the normal brain tissue than the Gamma Knife. The results of the comparison were found to be insensitive to the target locations.

CONCLUSION

The Gamma Knife is better than the fan-beam IMRT in sparing normal brain tissue while producing equivalent tumor dose conformity for treating medium-size intracranial lesions. However, the target dose homogeneity is significantly better for the fan-beam IMRT than for the Gamma Knife.

Comparison of intensity-modulated tomotherapy with stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy for brain tumors

PURPOSE

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) offers the potential to more closely conform dose distributions to the target, and spare organs at risk (OAR). Its clinical value is still being defined. The present study aims to compare IMRT with stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) for patients with medium size convex-shaped brain tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five patients planned with SCRT were replanned with the IMRT-tomotherapy method using the Peacock system (Nomos Corporation). The planning target volume (PTV) and relevant OAR were assessed, and compared relative to SCRT plans using dose statistics, dose-volume histograms (DVH), and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) stereotactic radiosurgery criteria.

RESULTS

The median and mean PTV were 78 cm3 and 85 cm3 respectively (range 62-119 cm3). The differences in PTV doses for the whole group (Peacock-SCRT +/-1 SD) were 2%+/-1.8 (minimum PTV), and 0.1%+/-1.9 (maximum PTV). The PTV homogeneity achieved by Peacock was 12.1%+/-1.7 compared to 13.9%+/-1.3 with SCRT. Using RTOG guidelines, Peacock plans provided acceptable PTV coverage for all 5/5 plans compared to minor coverage deviations in 4/5 SCRT plans; acceptable homogeneity index for both plans (Peacock = 1.1 vs. SCRT = 1.2); and comparable conformity index (1.4 each). As a consequence of the transaxial method of arc delivery, the optic nerves received mean and maximum doses that were 11.1 to 11.6%, and 10.3 to 15.2% higher respectively with Peacock plan. The maximum optic lens, and brainstem dose were 3.1 to 4.8% higher, and 0.6% lower respectively with Peacock plan. However, all doses remained below the tolerance threshold (5 Gy for lens, and 50 Gy for optic nerves) and were clinically acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

The Peacock method provided improved PTV coverage, albeit small, in this group of convex tumors. Although the OAR doses were higher using the Peacock plans, all doses remained within the clinically defined threshold and were clinically acceptable. Further improvements may be expected using other methods of IMRT planning that do not limit the treatment delivery to transaxial arcs. Each IMRT system needs to be individually assessed as the paradigm utilized may provide different outcomes.

Comparison of radiosurgery treatment modalities based on physical dose distributions

PURPOSE

As a means of selecting the optimal stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment modality, a comparison of physical dose distributions to defined targets and nontarget brain tissue has been made for a group of test cases selected to represent a range of treatment-planning situations from small, nearly spherical volumes to large irregular volumes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plans were developed for each case using photon beams from the Leksell Gamma Unit (LGU), multiarc bremsstrahlung photon beams from a linear accelerator (linac) and proton beams, with the objective of encompassing the target as closely as possible with the prescription isodose line, and minimizing dosage to normal tissue within the bounds of standard clinical practice. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for target and for nontarget brain tissue and compared for the various modalities.

RESULTS

In general, protons delivered less dosage to normal brain than other modalities for large and peripheral lesions and LGU plans were more successful at conforming to highly irregular shapes than conventional linac plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences were observed to depend on treatment modality, target characteristics (shape, size and location), and the amount of effort expended on treatment planning and the time allotted for treatment implementation.