Irradiation plus 5-fluorouracil: Cellular mechanisms of action and treatment schedules

Capecitabine/Mitomycin versus 5-Fluorouracil/Mitomycin in Combination with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer

Since EXTRA, a non-randomized phase II trial with 31 patients, explored the use of capecitabine, mitomycin and radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of localized squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC), this treatment has been considered as an acceptable alternative to infusional 5-FU. However, the differences in efficacy between capecitabine and 5-FU in chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) for local SCCAC are not well documented. Patients included in this prospective monocentric cohort study were treated with SIB-RapidArc (a unique RT method treatment for all patients: identical technique, volume and constraints for at-risk organs), mitomycin C and 5-FU each day of RT for 7 weeks (group 1) or capecitabine each day of RT (group 2). Patients treated between July 2009 and August 2017 (group 1) and between November 2012 and April 2018 (group 2) for local SCCAC T2-4 classified as N, M0 or T, N1-3, M0 were included. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and acute toxicities. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were included, 91 in group 1 and 56 in group 2. The two groups were statistically comparable in terms of sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) and TNM. With a median duration of follow-up of 53.5 months, the PFS rate at 3 years was 80% for group 1 and 75% for group 2 (p = 0.32). The 3-year colostomy-free survival rate was 92% for group 1 and 85% for group 2 (p = 0.11). The rate of patients with at least one grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was 35.5% in group 1 and 21.4% in group 2 (p = 0.10), with a trend of fewer acute toxicities with capecitabine. Conclusion: Capecitabine/mitomycin in combination with SIB RapidArc radiation therapy for anal cancer seems as effective as 5-FU-based chemotherapy and is well tolerated with minimal toxicity.

Impact of Concurrent Radiotherapy on Chemotherapy Total Dose and Dose Intensity in Patients with Early Breast Cancer

Aims and background

A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the tolerability as well as the impact of concurrent adjuvant CMF chemotherapy and radiation therapy on total CMF dose and dose intensity.

Methods

The medical records of 59 patients who had received conservative or radical surgery for breast cancer were analyzed. All patients had been assigned to 6 cycles of “1,8 CMF” adjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant radiation therapy. Total drug dose and dose intensity were calculated. Toxicity was recorded scored according to WHO criteria.

Results

A total of 355 cycles was administered. Fifty of 59 patients received at least 85% of the programmed chemotherapy total dose, the median value being 100% (range, 42-100). The median relative dose intensity was 0.97 (range, 0.42-1.01). Forty-four of 59 (75%) patients experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia (20 febrile neutropenia) and 29 (49%) required G-CSF support.

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis showed that it is possible to give concurrent CMF and breast radiation while ensuring adequate chemotherapy total doses and dose intensities to most patients. However, G-CSF support is required in a significant proportion of patients.

Radiotherapy and Oral Capecitabine in the Preoperative Treatment of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Rationale, Preliminary Results and Perspectives

Preoperative radiotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy increases the chances of tumor downstaging and down-sizing and facilitates sphincter-sparing surgical procedures, thereby improving survival and quality of life. Though several innovative agents are being investigated in combination with radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion remains the common schedule used in the preoperative chemoradiation setting. However, the protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil requires specialized pumps and long-term venous access, which makes patients susceptible to infections or thrombosis. To overcome the 5-fluorouracil infusion-related problems, oral 5-fluorouracil precursors and inhibitors of 5-fluorouracil degradation have been developed and explored. These include oral fluoropyrimidines such as tegafur (ftora-fur), uracil plus tegafur (UFT), S-1, eniluracil and the oral carbamate capecitabine. Phase I trials have demonstrated the feasibility of the capecitabine-radiotherapy combination with respect to the bolus or infusion 5-fluorouracil-radiation approach and have defined the optimal dose of capecitabine during radiotherapy (825 mg/m2/day through a bid administration). Severe hand-foot syndrome occurred in 7-15% of patients, representing the most commonly observed toxicity. It is noteworthy that severe diarrhea with capecitabine during radiotherapy was not common. Leukopenia frequently occurred but was mild and reversible. Phase II trials, although limited in number, have evidenced a high probability of pathological complete response (up to 31%) with capecitabine and radiation, with an increased probability of sphincter-sparing surgical procedures. Although it is too early to assess whether oral capecitabine will be able to replace iv 5-fluorouracil in combination with preoperative radiotherapy, the NSABP will address this question in a large randomized trial. Finally, phase I-II trials evaluating escalating doses of capecitabine associated with oxaliplatin or irinotecan with radiotherapy are being carried out to assess the maximum-dose tolerance and efficacy in the preoperative setting. It is likely that these new chemoradiation associations might increase rectal cancer clearance, hopefully without increasing toxicity.

Surgical treatment for locally advanced lower third rectal cancer after neoadjuvent chemoradiation with capecitabine: prospective phase II trial

Introduction

Treatment of rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach with standardized surgical, pathological and radiotherapeutic procedures. Sphincter preserving surgery for cancer of the lower rectum needs a long-course of neoadjuvant treatments to reduce tumor volume, to induce down-staging that increases circumferential resection margin, and to facilitate surgery.

Aim

To evaluate the rate of anal sphincter preservation in low lying, resectable, locally advanced rectal cancer and the resectability rate in unresectable cases after neoadjuvent chemoradiation by oral Capecitabine.

Patients and methods

This trial included 43 patients with low lying (4–7 cm from anal verge) locally advanced rectal cancer, of which 33 were resectable. All patients received preoperative concurrent chemoradiation (45 Gy/25 fractions over 5 weeks with oral capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily on radiotherapy days), followed after 4–6 weeks by total mesorectal excision technique.

Results

Preoperative chemoradiation resulted in a complete pathologic response in 4 patients (9.3%; 95% CI 3–23.1) and an overall downstaging in 32 patients (74.4%; 95% CI 58.5–85). Sphincter sparing surgical procedures were done in 20 out of 43 patients (46.5%; 95% CI 31.5–62.2). The majority (75%) were of clinical T₃ disease. Toxicity was moderate and required no treatment interruption. Grade II anemia occurred in 4 patients (9.3%, 95% CI 3–23.1), leucopenia in 2 patients (4.7%, 95% CI 0.8–17) and radiation dermatitis in 4 patients (9.3%, 95% CI 3–23.1) respectively.

Conclusion

In patients with low lying, locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative chemoradiation using oral capecitabine 825 mg/m², twice a day on radiotherapy days, was tolerable and effective in downstaging and resulted in 46.5% anal sphincter preservation rate.

Tegafur and 5-fluorouracil pelvic tissue concentrations in rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the presence of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in pelvic tissue after oral administration of tegafur. To measure tegafur and 5-FU concentrations in normal rectal mucosa, perirectal fat and residual tumor in rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation. To correlate drug concentrations with cancer downstaging effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three tissue samples taken from 16 surgical specimens after recto-sigmoid resection were analyzed. Tegafur and 5-FU concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. 16 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with preoperative pelvic irradiation (45-50 Gy) sensitized with oral tegafur (400 mg for every 8 hours daily). Seven patients received a precharge dose of tegafur (400 mg oral every 8 hours) 24 hours before surgery.

RESULTS

In 8 of the 9 patients who did not receive a precharge dose, detectable levels of tegafur were observed in fat tissue, normal mucosa and tumor, but detectable 5-FU levels were only observed in one patient. Mean concentrations (ranges) for tegafur in fat, normal mucosa and tumor in patients without the precharge dose were 72.19 (12.1-205.6), 179.53 (11.30-727.7) and 252.35 (27.9-874.6) ng/g, respectively; mean concentrations for 5-FU in the same samples were 0.95, 1.92 and 2.68 ng/g (1 patient), respectively. In patients receiving a tegafur precharge, both tegafur and 5-FU were present in all tissue samples with the exception of 2 fat samples, in which drug concentrations were undetectable. 5-FU levels were higher in tumor than other sites, with a median value of 68.24 ng/g (range 3.8-283.05 ng/g). Tegafur levels were also higher in tumor samples than other sites (mean 3446.53 ng/g, range 1044.5-7847.0 ng/g), except in 2 patients who had higher levels of tegafur in normal mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

Tegafur and 5-FU are not always present in pelvic tissues 5 to 6 weeks after oral administration of tegafur. Both drugs were present in the tissues analyzed, in relevant concentrations, 24 hours after oral administration of tegafur. The data obtained suggest a tendency (not significant) toward a correlation between levels of 5-FU present in the residual tumor and cancer downstaging.

Chronomodulation of topotecan or X-radiation treatment increases treatment efficacy without enhancing acute toxicity

PURPOSE

Topotecan (TPT), a camptothecin analog, is currently used to treat human ovarian and small-cell lung cancer and is in clinical trials for other tumor sites. However, it is unknown whether chronomodulation of TPT treatment is beneficial. We examined the effects of administering TPT or X-radiation (XR) alone at different times of the day or night.

METHODS

We treated mice bearing human colorectal tumor xenografts at four different times representing the early rest period (9 am or 3 HALO [hours after light onset]), late rest period (3 pm or 9 HALO), early active period (9 pm or 15 HALO), and late active period (3 am or 21 HALO) of the mice. We gave either TPT (12 mg/kg, injected i.p.) or XR (4 Gy, directed to the tumor) twice weekly on Days 0, 4, 7, 10 within 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Treatment with either TPT or XR at 3 am demonstrated the greatest efficacy (measured by a tumor regrowth assay) without significantly increasing acute toxicity (assessed by a decrease in leukocyte counts or body weight). Conversely, treatment at 3 pm, in particular, showed increased toxicity without any enhanced efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provided the first evidence that chronomodulation of TPT treatments, consistent with the findings of other camptothecin analogs, is potentially clinically beneficial. Additionally, our findings suggest that chronomodulation of fractionated XR treatments is also potentially clinically beneficial.

Restaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma: role of F18-FDG PET

Multimodality treatment of loco-regional advanced rectal cancer has demonstrated to improve local control and overall survival. Proctoscopy, digital rectal examination (DRE), computer tomography (CT), endorectal ultrasound (ERUS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cannot correctly detect downstaging in rectal tumors after chemo radiation therapy (CRT). New imaging techniques, like 18F-FDG PET, may play some role in predicting the pathologic response to CRT before surgical resection. Aim of the present study was to further investigate the accuracy and predictive value of 18F-FDG PET in a large series of patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative intensified CRT. Between January 2000 and December 2003, 81 patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma in clinical stage II-III disease, according to criteria of TNM classification, were included in this study. All patients were submitted to diagnostic staging workup with DRE, proctoscopy with biopsy, ERUS, CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis or pelvic MRI plus liver ultrasonography, coloscopy or barium colonic enema. One month later the end of CRT all patients were submitted to diagnostic restaging work-up (DRW) and 18F-FDG PET. Surgery was performed 8-9 weeks after the end of CRT and pathologic stage was defined. Moreover a pathologic assessment of tumor regression was made with tumor regression grade score (TRG). PET correctly identified 22/28 (79% specificity) patients with complete pathologic response (pCR). However, sensitivity was 45% (24/53) while PPV, and NPV were equal to 77 and 43%, respectively. Total PET accuracy rate was 56%. PET sensitivity increased from 45 to 56% if the end-point was pCR, or TRG score, respectively. The best correlation was found between PET findings and pathologic stage (P <0.01) or TRG score (P <0.01). The accurate identification of rectal cancer patients with major pathological response after preoperative CRT further supports the necessity of designing prospective studies with new and more accurate was imaging technologies with the main object of offering conservative treatment in responder patients.

Four Decades of Continuing Innovation With Fluorouracil: Current and Future Approaches to Fluorouracil Chemoradiation Therapy

Purpose

Chemoradiotherapy, the combination of external radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy, has been the basis for the oncologic management of many patients since its development in the 1960s. Fluorouracil (FU) chemoradiotherapy has demonstrated success in several organ sites with multiple dosing schedules that now guide the selection of oral analogs of FU to provide new chemoradiotherapy options.

Methods

This article reviews the metabolism and pharmacology of FU and the advantages of administration of FU by continuous infusion or bolus. The potential role and impact of the oral fluorouracil prodrugs UFT, S-1, BOF-A2, and capecitabine as replacements for intravenous administration are discussed. The results of recent chemoradiotherapy studies with FU from 2000 to 2003 are summarized in rectal, head and neck, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, biliary, anal, and cervical cancers.

Results

Chemoradiotherapy with FU has the potential to widen the therapeutic window by minimizing normal tissue toxicity while maintaining effective tumor toxicity. Overall, FU chemoradiotherapy maximizes local control and, for some tumor sites (such as head and neck, pancreatic, biliary, cervical, esophageal, and gastric cancers), improves survival rates. Moreover, FU chemoradiotherapy results in improved organ preservation with excellent functional outcome in several anatomic sites including head and neck cancer, anal, and rectal cancer, with improved sphincter preservation.

Conclusion

FU chemoradiotherapy continues to play an important role in the management of many cancer sites. During the last four decades, optimal dosing schedules have produced a therapeutic gain. The introduction of oral prodrug analogs will likely further improve the results of FU therapy in several organ systems, such as the rectum, head and neck, and esophagus.

Treatment of oesophageal cancer with preoperative chemoradiotherapy may increase operative mortality

AIMS

This phase II multicentric study evaluates a modified preoperative chemoradiotherapy schedule.

METHODS

Patients <75 years with potentially resectable neoplasm were eligible. Treatment included an initial course of CDDP 100 mg/m2 (Day 1) and 5-FU CI 5000 mg/m2 (Days 1-5) followed by 45 Gy (Days 28-63) and 5-FU CI 5000 mg/m2 (Days 28-33), CDDP 75 mg/m2 (Day 56) and 5-FU CI 3750 mg/m2 (Days 56-61). Regional lymph nodes were irradiated.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were studied. Oesophagectomy was performed in 17. Clear margins were achieved in 16 of these. Eight patients showed a pathologic complete response (pCR). One patient died of infection during the preoperative treatment and four died due to acute surgical complications. The study was closed prematurely because of excessive mortality. Median follow-up was 19 months. Local and regional relapse occurred in one and three patients, respectively. Median time and actuarial 3-year of overall survival and progression free rates were 18.6 months and 28%, and 12.7 months and 10.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This schedule showed a high pCR, resectability and local control rate. Treatment-related mortality limits its clinical applicability, but further investigations are warranted.

Tumor treatment by sustained intratumoral release of 5-fluorouracil: effects of drug alone and in combined treatments

PURPOSE

To evaluate an intratumoral polymer implant for sustained delivery of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in a mouse tumor model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

5-FU was incorporated into a polyanhydride-based polymer, bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)propane sebacic acid (CPP:SA) and implanted in RIF-1 mouse fibrosarcoma growing s.c. The effectiveness of treatment was evaluated by tumor growth delay. External beam radiation was 60Co gamma rays, and the source of interstitial radiation was implanted 125I seeds. A second drug, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (cis-DDP), was administered by intraperitoneal injection or by osmotic pump.

RESULTS

For drug/polymer implant alone, the tumor growth delay was proportional to the amount of drug in the implant. The 5-FU polymer implant was most effective when combined with cis-DDP or with acute or fractionated radiation, and in some cases, the effects of combined treatments were greater than additive. The most effective combination was intratumoral 5-FU and low-dose-rate radiation delivered from an interstitial radiation source.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that 5-FU can be effectively delivered by polymer implant and that this mode of delivery is particularly appropriate for combined treatments.

A single-institution experience with concurrent capecitabine and radiation therapy in gastrointestinal malignancies

PURPOSE

We report our clinical experience with 32 patients receiving concurrent irradiation and capecitabine.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Medical records of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies treated with radiation and capecitabine therapy were reviewed.

RESULTS

The population consisted of 20 males and 12 females, with a median age of 67.5 years (45-84 years) and adequate hepatic and bone marrow function. Histology was adenocarcinoma in all patients, except two with esophageal squamous carcinoma. Twenty-one patients received the regimen as adjuvant therapy, three received preoperative therapy, and 8 patients received therapy for palliation. The median dose of capecitabine was 1600 mg/m(2)/day (1200-2500 mg/m(2)/day) orally for 5 days per week for the duration of radiation therapy. Thirty patients received a total dose ranging from 45 Gy to 64 Gy over 4-6 weeks. Two previously radiated patients received total doses of 29.9 Gy and 46 Gy. Grade 3/4 toxicities observed were neutropenia in 3 patients and diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and myocardial infarction in 1 patient each. No treatment-related mortality was observed. Twenty of 21 patients (95.2%) who received adjuvant therapy continue to be in complete remission. Four of 11 (36%) evaluable patients demonstrated a response.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent capecitabine and radiation were very well tolerated and warrant further investigation in prospective trials.

Pathologic downstaging of T3-4Nx rectal cancer after chemoradiation: 5-fluorouracil vs. Tegafur

PURPOSE

To describe downstaging effects in locally advanced rectal cancer induced by 2 fluopirimidine radiosensitizing agents given through different routes in conjunction with preoperative radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From March 1995 to December 1999, two consecutive groups of patients with cT3-4Nx rectal cancer (94% CT scan, 71% endorectal ultrasound) were treated with either (1) 45-50 Gy (1.8 Gy/day, 25 fractions) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (500-1,000 mg/m2 by 24-h continuous i.v. infusion on Days 1-4 and 21-25) or (2) oral Tegafur (1,200 mg/day on Days 1-35, including weekends). Surgery was performed 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation.

RESULTS

The total T downstaging rate was 46% in the 5-FU group and 53% in the Tegafur group. Subcategories were downstaged by the sensitizing agents (5-FU vs. Tegafur) as follows: pT0-1, 14% vs. 23%; pT2, 32% vs. 32%; pT3, 49% vs. 37%; pT4, 5% vs. 7%; and N(0), 74% vs. 86%. Analysis of residual malignant disease in the specimen discriminated mic/mac subgroups (mic: <20% of microscopic cancer residue), with evident superior downstaging effects in the Tegafur-treated group: pTmic 23% vs. 58% (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

When administered concurrent with pelvic irradiation, oral Tegafur induced downstaging rates in both T and N categories superior to those induced by intermediate doses of 5-FU by continuous i.v. infusion. In this pilot experience, oral Tegafur reproduced the characteristics of downstaging described previously when full doses of 5-FU have been combined with radiotherapy.

Prospective trial of preoperative concomitant boost radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer

RATIONALE

To evaluate the response to a concomitant boost given during standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Concomitant boost radiotherapy was administered preoperatively to 45 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in a prospective trial. Treatment consisted of 45 Gy to the pelvis with 18 mV photons at 1.8 Gy/fraction using a 3-field belly board technique with continuous infusion 5FU chemotherapy (300mg/m(2)) 5 days per week. The boost was given during the last week of therapy with a 6-hour inter-fraction interval to the tumor plus a 2-3 cm margin. The boost dose equaled 7.5 Gy/5 fractions (1.5 Gy/fraction); a total dose of 52.5 Gy/5 weeks was given to the primary tumor. Pretreatment tumor stage, determined by endorectal ultrasound and CT scan, included 29 with T3N0 [64%], 11 T3N1, 1 T3Nx, 2 T4N0, 1 T4N3, and 1 with TxN1 disease. Mean distance from the anal verge was 5 cm (range 0-13 cm). Median age was 55 years (range 33-77 years). The population consisted of 34 males and 11 females. Median time of follow-up is 8 months (range 1-24 months).

RESULTS

Sphincter preservation (SP) has been accomplished in 33 of 42 (79%) patients resected to date. Three patients did not undergo resection because of the development of metastatic disease in the interim between the completion of chemoradiation (CTX/XRT) and preoperative evaluation. The surgical procedures included proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis (n = 16), low anterior resection (n = 13), transanal resection (n = 4). Tumor down-staging was pathologically confirmed in 36 of the 42 (86%) resected patients, and 13 (31%) achieved a pathologic CR. Among the 28 tumors (67%) located <6 cm from the anal verge, SP was accomplished in 21 cases (75%). Although perioperative morbidity was higher, toxicity rates during CTX/XRT were comparable to that seen with conventional fractionation. Compared to our contemporary experience with conventional CTX/XRT (45Gy; 1.8 Gy per fraction), improvements were seen in SP (79% vs. 59%; p = 0.02), SP for tumors <6 cm from the anal verge (75% vs. 42%; p = 0.003), and down-staging (86% vs. 62%; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The SP rate with concomitant boost radiation has been highly favorable with rates of response which are higher than those previously reported for chemoradiation without administration of a boost. Further evaluation of this radiotherapeutic strategy appears warranted.

Combined modality therapy of rectal cancers

Rectal cancer accounts for about 10% of new cancer cases each year. It strikes men and women at nearly the same rate, generally in the range of 50-80 years of age, with rising incidence with age. Despite simple screening procedures rectal cancer is often advanced when discovered. Current trends in the management of cancer have focused on organ preservation and improved quality of life without compromising the overall survival. During the last decade substantial progress has been made in treatment modalities: new and improved radiation techniques (conformal radiotherapy, altered fractionation, brachytherapy), chemotherapy (protracted infusion, use of radiosensitizers) and development of surgical procedures-enabling safer postoperative irradiation. In patients with advanced/unresectable disease aggressive combined chemoradiation can be added prior to surgery to downstage the tumour and increase the proportion treated with anal-rectal-sparing procedures. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy regimens are as safe and tolerable as the standard postoperative treatment. In this presentation indications for preoperative radiochemotherapy will be discussed in detail, together with treatment-related side effects, prognostic parameters, tumour response and outcome. Different irradiation settings and chemotherapy schedules are described. In patients with primary resectable disease (mainly Dukes C) several prospective randomised trials have shown less local recurrence with postoperative combined modality therapy.

Mature results of a pilot study of pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent continuous infusion intra-arterial 5-FU for stage IIIB-IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term results of continuous infusion intra-arterial 5-fluorouracil (CI IA 5-FU) given with concurrent pelvic radiotherapy (RT) for FIGO stage IIIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1965 and 1974, 27 patients with extensive FIGO Stage IIIB (22 patients) or Stage IVA (5 patients) squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix were treated with CI IA 5-FU and RT. Twenty-one patients (78%) had bilateral pelvic wall involvement, 25 (93%) had massive tumors (> or =8 cm in diameter), 7 (27%) had involvement of the lower one-third of the vagina, and 15 (56%) presented with hydronephrosis. All patients underwent routine clinical staging, transperitoneal para-aortic lymph node dissection, and bilateral hypogastric artery catheter placement. 5-FU was continuously infused at a dose rate of 10 mg/kg/day on Days 1-15 of RT. The median dose of 5-FU was 376 mg/m2/day (range 270-692). All patients received concurrent pelvic RT to a median dose of 50 Gy at 2.0 Gy per fraction. Only 4 patients received intracavitary RT. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 190 months.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate was 37%. For the 22 patients with FIGO Stage IIIB disease, the 5-year survival rate was 41%. The survival rate for 18 patients treated with only external beam radiation and chemotherapy for Stage IIIB disease was 33%. Four of 10 patients treated with only 50 Gy of external beam radiation and CI IA 5-FU were long-term survivors. Acute complications, including hematologic toxicity and skin reactions, were severe, with 1 death from neutropenic sepsis. Severe late complications were only observed in patients treated with > or =60 Gy of external beam radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

While this series is small, the fact that 4 patients with massive Stage IIIB tumors survived after a total radiation dose of only 50 Gy suggests that RT with CI IA 5-FU deserves further study. Modifications in dose, technique, and route of administration should reduce toxicity, and the addition of intracavitary RT should improve the local effectiveness of combined treatment.