Multiple pathways in regulation of dopamine beta-hydroxylase

Catecholaminergic systems in stress: structural and molecular genetic approaches

Stressful stimuli evoke complex endocrine, autonomic, and behavioral responses that are extremely variable and specific depending on the type and nature of the stressors. We first provide a short overview of physiology, biochemistry, and molecular genetics of sympatho-adrenomedullary, sympatho-neural, and brain catecholaminergic systems. Important processes of catecholamine biosynthesis, storage, release, secretion, uptake, reuptake, degradation, and transporters in acutely or chronically stressed organisms are described. We emphasize the structural variability of catecholamine systems and the molecular genetics of enzymes involved in biosynthesis and degradation of catecholamines and transporters. Characterization of enzyme gene promoters, transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms, transcription factors, gene expression and protein translation, as well as different phases of stress-activated transcription and quantitative determination of mRNA levels in stressed organisms are discussed. Data from catecholamine enzyme gene knockout mice are shown. Interaction of catecholaminergic systems with other neurotransmitter and hormonal systems are discussed. We describe the effects of homotypic and heterotypic stressors, adaptation and maladaptation of the organism, and the specificity of stressors (physical, emotional, metabolic, etc.) on activation of catecholaminergic systems at all levels from plasma catecholamines to gene expression of catecholamine enzymes. We also discuss cross-adaptation and the effect of novel heterotypic stressors on organisms adapted to long-term monotypic stressors. The extra-adrenal nonneuronal adrenergic system is described. Stress-related central neuronal regulatory circuits and central organization of responses to various stressors are presented with selected examples of regulatory molecular mechanisms. Data summarized here indicate that catecholaminergic systems are activated in different ways following exposure to distinct stressful stimuli.

Molecular regulation of gene expression of catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes by stress: sympathetic ganglia versus adrenal medulla

Stress induces tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DBH) gene expression in sympathetic ganglia and adrenal medulla (AM). However, distinct molecular mechanisms appear to regulate these genes in these locations. The elevation of TH mRNA in response to single immobilization stress (IMO) in AM is robust, but transient, while the induction of TH and DBH mRNAs in sympathetic ganglia is slower and more long lasting. Injections of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) elicited induction of TH and DBH gene expression in rat sympathetic ganglia, but not in AM. The superior cervical (SCG) and stellate (StG) ganglia, but not AM, were found to express mRNA for the MC-2 receptor, the major ACTH responsive receptor in adrenal cortex. IMO led to increase in MC-2 receptor mRNA levels in SCG. Thus, ACTH, via the MC-2 receptor, may be directly involved in the stress-elicited regulation of norepinephrine biosynthesis in sympathetic ganglia. The signaling pathways triggered by IMO differed in these locations. In AM, IMO triggered activation of the MAP kinase, JNK, and induction of AP1 factors, Egr1 and phosphorylation of CREB. In contrast in the SCG, with IMO we did not observe changes in JNK and little binding to the AP1 motif of the TH promoter. However, there was an increase in CREB binding to the CRE site of the TH promoter. The results reveal differential mechanisms of regulation of catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes by stress in two components of the sympathoadrenal system and should provide basis for possible selective pharmacologic interventions.

Catecholamine biosynthesis and physiological regulation in neuroendocrine cells

The catecholamines are widely distributed in mammals and their levels and physiological functions are regulated at many sites. These include their release from neuroendocrine cells, the type and sensitivity of the multiple receptors in target cells, the efficacy of the reuptake system in the secretory cells, and the rates of catecholamine biosynthesis and degradation. In the present review the main focus will be on the more recent studies on the biosynthesis in neuroendocrine cells which involves a specific set of enzymes, with special reference to physiologically important regulatory mechanisms. Eight enzymes of the biosynthetic pathway have now been identified, cloned, expressed as recombinant proteins, characterized with respect to catalytic and regulatory properties, and some of them also crystallized. The identification of the tyrosine hydroxylase catalysed reaction as the rate-limiting step in the normal catecholamine biosynthesis has attracted most attention, both in terms of transcriptional and post-translational regulation. In certain human genetic disorders of catecholamine biosynthesis other enzymes in the pathway may become rate-limiting, notably those involved in the biosynthesis/regeneration of the natural co-factor tetrahydrobiopterin in the tyrosine hydroxylase reaction. The enzymes involved seem to be regulated by a variety of physiological factors, both on a long-term scale and a short-term basis, and include the relative rates of synthesis, degradation and state of activation of the biosynthetic enzymes, notably of tyrosine hydroxylase. Multiple surface receptors and signalling pathways are activated in response to extracellular stimuli and play an essential role in the regulation of catecholamine biosynthesis.

Transcriptional control of neurotransmitter phenotype

The specification of neurotransmitter phenotype is an important aspect of neuronal fate determination. Recent studies have begun to define essential transcriptional regulators involved in controlling the mode of neurotransmission in vertebrates and invertebrates, and to examine their regulation by cell-extrinsic factors. An emerging concept is that the control of transmitter choice is intimately linked to that of other aspects of the neuronal phenotype.