Surgical resection of the distal clavicle

A systematic review of the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis

Background

This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarise and present the available evidence for the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Five databases were searched for studies investigating the management of ACJ OA. Included were studies with participants with clinical/radiological signs of primary ACJ OA, an intervention and included a functional outcome measure.

Results

Forty-eight studies were included. Treatments consisted of physiotherapy (n = 1 study), medical only (n = 11) and operative management (n = 36). Operative studies included five comparative trials - physiotherapy versus surgery (n = 1) and open versus arthroscopic resection (n = 4). A total of 1902 shoulders were treated for ACJ OA, mean age (51 years), 58% male and mean follow-up (28.5 months). Treatment with injection showed a mean improvement of 50% in pain levels at follow-up (mean = 7.5 months). The commonest surgical procedure was arthroscopic excision of the distal clavicle and operative studies averaged 6 months of conservative management and a mean functional outcome of 87.8%.

Conclusion

Studies varied in indication, intervention and quality but it did not provide evidence that both non-operative and operative interventions are effective. There was no significant difference between open or arthroscopic distal clavicle excision (DCE). Participants having between 0.5 and 2 cm of clavicle excised had good outcomes and those requiring concomitant shoulder procedures had similarly good outcomes.

Arthroscopic distal clavicle excision is associated with fewer postoperative complications than open

Background

The rate of complications of open compared to arthroscopic distal clavicle excision remain poorly studied. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to (1) Identify most recent national trends in the usage of open vs. arthroscopic approaches for distal clavicle excision (DCE) from 2007 to 2017; (2) to identify and compare the complication rates for both approaches, and to identify patient-specific risk factors for complications; (3) to identify and compare the revision rate for both approaches; and (4) to identify and compare the reimbursement of each approach.

Methods

The PearlDiver database was reviewed for patients undergoing DCE from 2007 to 2017. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: those undergoing arthroscopic DCE (n = 8933) and those undergoing open DCE (n = 2295). The rate of postoperative complications within 90 days was calculated and compared. The revision rate and reimbursement of the arthroscopic and open approach were compared. Statistical analysis included chi-square testing to compare the rates of postoperative complications and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for complications within 90 days. Results were considered significant at P < .05.

Results

The percentage of DCEs performed arthroscopically has significantly increased from 53.9% in 2007 to 69.8% in 2016, with a concomitant decrease in the use of open DCE from 46.1% in 2007 to 30.2% in 2016. The open approach was associated with significantly more postoperative complications, including a significantly greater incidence of surgical site infection (1.9% vs. 0.3%; P < .001), wound disruption (0.3% vs. 0.1%; P < .001), hematoma (0.9% vs. 0.2%; P = .001), and transfusion (0.6% vs. 0.1%; P < .001), than arthroscopic DCE. Several risk factors, including open approach, diabetes, heart disease, tobacco use, chronic kidney disease, and female gender, were identified as independent risk factors for complications after DCE. There was no significant difference in revision rate between open and arthroscopic approaches (P = .126). The reimbursement of open and arthroscopic DCE procedures were comparable, with median reimbursements of $5408 and $5,447, respectively (P = .853).

Conclusion

Both arthroscopic and open DCE techniques were found to have similar reimbursement amounts, with a low rate of complications, although the open technique had a higher rate of early complications such as surgical site infection. Over the study period, there was an increase in the utilization of arthroscopic DCE, while the incidence of the open technique remained constant.

Effect Size in Surgical Intervention Into Shoulder: What Procedures Are Game Changers and What Are Not?

A number of surgical procedures are performed to treat a variety of shoulder pathologies. What is currently not understood is which of these surgical interventions provide the most improvement in patient-reported pain and function.

Questions

We aimed to determine, from a patient's perspective, which were the most effective commonly performed surgical procedures for disorders of the shoulder and which were not.

Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent shoulder surgery by a single surgeon. To be included, at least 20 patients needed to have undergone that procedure and completed a questionnaire evaluating their shoulders function preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was change in response to the question "how is your shoulder overall?" Effect size is reported as Cohen's d (standardized mean difference).

Results

Two thousand two hundred six surgical procedures in 13 categories met the inclusion criteria. All procedures were associated with improvements in the patient-ranked overall shoulder status at 6 months (P < 0.01 to P < 0.0001). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) provided the greatest effect size (improvement) in the overall shoulder status (d = 3.14, 95% CI, 2.49 to 3.79), followed by total shoulder arthroplasty (d = 2.60, 95% CI, 2.10 to 3.10) and capsular release (d = 1.41, 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.75). RTSA provided the greatest effect size in patient-reported shoulder pain, whereas capsular release provided the greatest effect size in patient-reported shoulder function. Acromioclavicular joint resection (d = 1.22, 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.88) and acromioplasty (d = 1.29, 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.61) provided the least effect size overall.

Conclusion

All shoulder surgical procedures in this study provided a notable patient-perceived therapeutic benefit in a relatively short period of time (6 months). RTSA, total shoulder arthroplasty, and capsular release are the most effective procedures. Acromioplasty and acromioclavicular resection are the least effective.

Current evidence for nonpharmacological interventions and criteria for surgical management of persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this systematic review was to investigate the individual/combined effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in individuals with persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. The secondary aims were to investigate the comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacological versus surgical interventions, and to identify the criteria used for defining failure of conservative interventions in individuals who require surgery for persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.

METHOD

Major electronic databases were searched from inception until October 2018. Studies involving adults aged 16 years and older, diagnosed clinically and radiologically with isolated acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis for at least three months or more were included. Studies must explicitly state the type and duration of conservative interventions. Methodological risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Downs and Black checklist.

RESULTS

Ten surgical intervention studies were included for final synthesis. No studies investigated the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions or compared them with surgical interventions. Common nonpharmacological interventions trialed from the 10 included studies were activity modification (n = 8) and physiotherapy (n = 4). Four to six months was the most often reported timeframe defining failure of conservative management (range 3-12 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is no evidence to guide clinicians about the individual or combined effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for individuals with persistent acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.

Distal Clavicular Augmentation with Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction in the Setting of Iatrogenic Induced Acromioclavicular Instability

Although chronic pain and dysfunction of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint can reliably be treated with distal clavicle excision, disruption of the local stabilizing ligamentous structures may result in iatrogenic instability of the joint. Iatrogenic AC joint instability is a rare condition caused by over resection of the distal clavicle with unintended injury to the stabilizing ligaments in the treatment of AC joint pain. Addressing postresection instability can prove to be difficult because most reconstruction techniques are intended for patients with traumatic AC joint instability with the goal of creating an anatomically stable joint. However, in the setting of iatrogenic instability, the decreased bone stock of the distal clavicle results in instability of the AC joint, especially in the horizontal plane, and may cause these techniques to fail. Thus, operative management must aim to correct both the osseous and ligamentous deficits responsible for the genesis of this instability. In this Technical Note, we describe bony augmentation of the distal clavicle with an iliac crest bone autograft for chronic iatrogenic acromioclavicular joint instability with concomitant reconstruction of the AC and coracoclavicular ligaments.

Managing acromio-clavicular joint pain: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Shoulder pain secondary to acromioclavicular joint pain is a common presentation in primary and secondary care but is often poorly managed as a result of uncertainty about optimal treatment strategies. Osteoarthritis is the commonest cause. Although acromioclavicular pain can be treated non-operatively and operatively, there appears to be no consensus on the best practice pathway of care for these patients, with variations in treatment being common place. The present study comprises a scoping review of the current published evidence for the management of isolated acromioclavicular pain (excluding acromioclavicular joint dislocation).

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was utilized in multiple medical databases to identify level 1 and 2 randomised controlled trials, nonrandomised controlled trials and systematic reviews for appraisal.

RESULTS

Four systematic reviews and two randomised controlled trials were identified. No direct studies have compared the benefits or risks of conservative versus surgical management in a controlled environment.

CONCLUSIONS

High-level studies on treatment modalities for acromioclavicular joint pain are limited. As such, there remains little evidence to support one intervention or treatment over another, making it difficult to develop any evidenced-based patient pathways of care for this condition.Level of evidence: 2A.

Autologous distal clavicle versus autologous coracoid bone grafts for restoration of anterior-inferior glenoid bone loss: a biomechanical comparison

BACKGROUND

Treating anterior glenoid bone loss in patients with recurrent shoulder instability is challenging. Coracoid transfer techniques are associated with neurologic complications and neuroanatomic alterations. The purpose of our study was to compare the contact area and pressures of a distal clavicle autograft with a coracoid bone graft for the restoration of anterior glenoid bone loss. We hypothesized that a distal clavicle autograft would be as effective as a coracoid graft.

METHODS

In 13 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulder specimens, we harvested the distal 1.0 cm of each clavicle and the coracoid bone resection required for a Latarjet procedure. A compressive load of 440 N was applied across the glenohumeral joint at 30° and 60° of abduction, as well as 60° of abduction with 90° of external rotation. Pressure-sensitive film was used to determine normal glenohumeral contact area and pressures. In each specimen, we created a vertical, 25% anterior bone defect, reconstructed with distal clavicle (articular surface and undersurface) and coracoid bone grafts, and determined the glenohumeral contact area and pressures. We used analysis of variance for group comparisons and a Tukey post hoc test for individual comparisons (with P <.05 indicating a significant difference).

RESULTS

The articular distal clavicle bone graft provided the lowest mean pressure in all testing positions. The coracoid bone graft provided the greatest contact area in all humeral positions, but the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSION

An articular distal clavicle bone graft is comparable in glenohumeral contact area and pressures to an optimally placed coracoid bone graft for restoring glenoid bone loss.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Basic Science Study; Biomechanics.

Limited distal clavicle excision of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Resection of the distal aspect of clavicle has a well-documented treatment modality in case of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis resistant to conservative treatment.

HYPOTHESIS

Limited (mean ∼0.5cm distal end of clavicle resection) distal clavicle excision of A-C joint arthritis in cases resistant to conservative treatment may reduce the pain and improve the shoulder function.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the results of limited distal clavicle excision of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis resistant to conservative treatment. All patients were evaluated by using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and UCLA shoulder rating scale (University of California Los Angeles), either before surgery or final follow-up period for pain and functional results, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients (48 male, 62 female) with AC joint arthritis, treated between the years of 2008-2012, were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 30 patients (12 male, 18 female) who failed to show improvement with conservative treatment underwent limited surgical open excision of distal clavicle. The mean age of the study population was 52.5±1.2 years. The mean follow-up period was 27±1.3 months. The mean preoperative VAS score was 83.6±5.58 (range, 70-90) while mean VAS was 26.6±9.3 (range, 10-50) at the final follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference between pre- and postoperative VAS scores in patients who had treated by surgical approach (P<0.001). The mean UCLA score of the patients increased postoperatively from 11.5 (range, 9-14) to 29.2 (range, 27-32) at the final follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference between the two time periods with respect to UCLA scores (P<0.001).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In patients with AC osteoarthritis resistant to conservative therapy, the hypothesized limited clavicle excision (mean ∼0.5cm distal end of clavicle resection with preserving coracoclavicular ligaments and inferior capsule) reduced the pain and improved the shoulder function.

CONCLUSION

Our midterm follow-up (mean 27 months) results showed that limited distal clavicle excision of patients with AC joint osteoarthritis resistant to conservative treatment (0.5cm distal end of clavicle resection with preserving inferior capsule, and coracoclavicular ligaments) reduced the pain and improved the shoulder function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (Retrospective study).

Outcome of distal clavicle resection in patients with acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis and full-thickness rotator cuff tear

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of distal clavicle resection (DCR) on subjective and objective outcome measures in patients with acromioclavicular (AC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) and rotator cuff tear.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of consecutive patients with arthroscopic evidence of OA of the ACJ with complete data at 2 years were used for the data analysis. Patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the AC joint underwent a DCR in conjunction with rotator cuff repair, while patients with mild OA of the ACJ underwent surgery related to concomitant rotator cuff tear without a DCR.

RESULTS

Data of 184 (72 females, 112 males, mean age: 62) patients with rotator cuff tear and varying degrees of OA of the AC joint were used for the analysis. Of 184 patients, 144 (78 %) had a resection of distal clavicle (resection group) and 40 (22 %) did not have a resection (no-resection group). Both groups showed a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) improvement in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Constant Murley score, and strength. Multivariable analysis showed that lower pre-operative ASES scores (higher disability), having a larger tear, an active compensation claim, and not having a DCR, had a negative impact on post-operative ASES scores.

CONCLUSION

When untreated surgically, even mild arthroscopic findings of AC joint OA may lead to a poorer outcome after rotator cuff repair. Further characterisation of patients in whom mild arthroscopic findings of OA of AC joint are clinically significant and warrant resection is needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective outcome study, Level II.

Demographic analysis of open and arthroscopic distal clavicle excision in a private insurance database

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and quantify the demographic characteristics of patients undergoing open and arthroscopic distal clavicle excision (DCE) in the United States while also describing changes in practice patterns over time.

METHODS

Patients who underwent DCE from 2004 to 2009 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes in a national database of orthopaedic insurance records. The year of procedure, age, sex, geographic region, and concomitant rotator cuff repair or subacromial decompression (SAD) were recorded for each patient. Results were reported as the incidence of procedures identified per 10,000 patients searched in the database.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2009, 73,231 DCEs were performed; 74% were arthroscopic and 26% were open. The incidence of arthroscopic DCE increased from 37.8 in 2004 to 58.5 in 2009 (P < .001), whereas the incidence of open DCE decreased from 21.1 in 2004 to 14.1 in 2009 (P < .001). Sixty-one percent of DCEs were performed in men (P < .001). Women were more likely to undergo an arthroscopic procedure (P < .001). Arthroscopic DCE was most common in patients aged 50 to 59 years (P < .001). Open DCE was most common in patients aged 60 to 69 years (P < .001). Open rotator cuff repair and SAD were concomitantly performed in 38% and 23% of open DCEs, respectively. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and SAD were concomitantly performed in 33% and 95% arthroscopic DCEs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of DCE using a private insurance database shows that arthroscopic DCEs progressively increased, whereas open DCEs concomitantly decreased between 2004 and 2009. The majority of DCEs were performed in men between the ages of 50 and 59 years. Both arthroscopic and open DCEs are frequently performed in conjunction with rotator cuff repair or SAD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Evaluation and management of adult shoulder pain: a focus on rotator cuff disorders, acromioclavicular joint arthritis, and glenohumeral arthritis

Shoulder pain is a common reason for a patient to see their primary care physician. This article focuses on the evaluation and management of 3 common shoulder disorders; rotator cuff disorders, acromioclavicular joint arthritis, and glenohumeral joint arthritis. The typical history and physical examination findings for each of these entities are highlighted, in addition to treatment options.

How long should arthroscopic clavicular resection be in acromioclavicular arthropathy? A radiological-clinical study (with computed tomography) of 18 cases at a mean 4 years' follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic clavicular resection is a common procedure, but few studies have analyzed predictive factors for outcome.

HYPOTHESES

1) Computed tomography (CT) of clavicular resection is reproductible; 2) Functional outcome correlates with resection length; 3) Other factors also influence outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients operated on between 2005 and 2010 were called back to establish functional scores (Constant, Simple Shoulder Test [SST], satisfaction) and undergo low-dose bilateral comparative computed tomography (CT) centered on the acromioclavicular joints. The assessment criteria were resection edge parallelism and resection length, measured using OsiriX software. Radiological and clinical data were correlated.

RESULTS

18 out of 21 patients (85%: 3 female, 15 male) were assessed. Mean age at surgery was 49 years (range, 40-62 yrs); mean follow-up was 4.2 years (1.6-7.2 yrs). Mean Constant score rose from 57.7 (25-85) to 70.2 (30-96); mean postoperative SST was 9.3 (3-12). 11 patients had very good and 4 poor results. CT resection length was reproducible, with intraclass, intra- and interobserver correlation coefficients >95%. There was no significant correlation between articular resection length on CT and functional scores (P=0.2). Functional scores were negatively influenced by an occupational pathologic context (P<0.01) and by associated tendinopathy.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Low-dose CT enabled reproducible analysis of clavicular resection. The hypothesized correlation between resection length and functional result was not confirmed. Work accidents and occupational disease emerged as risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Single-center retrospective analytic cohort study. Level 4, guideline grade C.

Open versus arthroscopic distal clavicle resection

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the available literature in an attempt to compare the outcome of open versus arthroscopic distal clavicle resection in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint pathology.

METHODS

From January 1966 to December 2008, Medline was searched for the following key words: "acromioclavicular joint arthritis," "acromioclavicular osteolysis," "distal clavicle excision," "acromioclavicular joint excision," "Mumford," and "clavicle." Inclusion criteria included studies that compared the outcome of open versus arthroscopic distal clavicle resection. Studies that could not be translated into the English language or were not published in a peer-reviewed journal were excluded. Data were abstracted from the studies, including patient demographics, surgical procedure, rehabilitation, strength, range of motion, and clinical scoring system.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, including 2 Level II studies, 1 Level III and 14 Level IV studies. Arthroscopic distal clavicle excision results in more "good" or "excellent" outcomes compared with the open procedure. Both arthroscopic techniques result in success rates in excess of 90%, with the direct procedure permitting a quicker return to athletic activities. Performing distal clavicle excision in conjunction with either subacromial decompression or rotator cuff repair also has a high degree of success. A trend toward more "poor" results is seen when distal clavicle excision is performed in patients with post-traumatic acromioclavicular instability or in Workers' Compensation patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that among patients undergoing distal clavicle excision for acromioclavicular joint pathology, those having an arthroscopic procedure, specifically through the direct approach, can expect a faster return to activities while obtaining similar long-term outcomes compared with the open procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review.

The relation of the coracoclavicular ligament insertion to the acromioclavicular jointA cadaver study of relevance to lateral clavicle resection

Resection of the lateral end of the clavicle is a common procedure for arthrosis of the acromioclavicular joint (AC-joint). However, no anatomical data on the distance between the insertions of the coracoclavicular ligaments and the AC-joint have been reported. In 36 cadaver shoulders (18 male), we studied the relation between the AC-joint and the insertions of the joint capsule, trapezoid and conoid ligaments. The distance from the AC-joint to the medial end of its capsule was, on average, 0.7 cm (0.4-0.9) cm in women and 0.8 (0.4-1.2) cm in men. In women, the trapezoid ligament began, on average, at 0.9 (0.4-1.6) cm and ended at 2.4 (2.0-2.8) cm and in men, it began at 1.1 (0.8-1.6) cm and ended at 2.9 (2.1-3.8) cm medial to the AC joint. The corresponding figures for the conoid ligament were 2.6 (2.0-3.7) cm and 4.7 (3.9-6.2) cm. A resection of 1 cm of the lateral clavicle detaches 8%, a resection of 2 cm 60% and a resection of 2.5 cm 90% of the trapezoid ligament. We recommend a maximum resection of 1 cm of the lateral clavicle because a resection of 2 cm or more may cause postoperative AC-joint instability and related pain.

Complications after open distal clavicle excision

Isolated distal clavicle excision performed as an open procedure has been considered safe and, in the literature, has been considered the standard for comparison with arthroscopic distal clavicle excisions. However, we noticed isolated open distal clavicle excision was associated with a number of complications. We therefore raised two questions about the complication rate in a cohort of our patients who had undergone this procedure: (1) What was the complication rate and how did it compare to that in the existing literature on this subject? and (2) Were the complications in our cohort similar to those previously reported? We studied 42 patients who underwent an isolated distal clavicle excision between 1992 and 2003. There were 27 complications (64%), which was substantially higher than rates previously reported. Complications in our cohort not previously reported included continued acromioclavicular joint tenderness and scar hypertrophy. Our study suggests complications after open distal clavicle excisions may be more frequent than and may differ from previously reported rates and types.

Surgical treatment of symptomatic acromioclavicular joint problems: a systematic review

Excision of the distal clavicle has become the mainstay of surgical treatment for acromioclavicular joint arthritis and osteolysis refractory to nonoperative management. Surgical options for symptomatic acromioclavicular joint abnormalities refractory to nonoperative treatment are the classic open distal clavicle excision, direct (superior) arthroscopic excision, and indirect (bursal) arthroscopic distal clavicle excision. We asked whether any of these three procedures provided a better result. We systematically reviewed the medical literature (Medline, EMBASE), assigned a level of evidence for available studies, and critically identified the flaws and biases in the studies to provide comparisons between the published reports. We limited the literature review to clinical reports in the English language published in peer-reviewed journals. The literature supports surgical excision, but the reports are all Level III or IV evidence consisting largely of retrospective case series. Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection has provided more "good or excellent" results than has the open procedure, but is comprised of low-level evidence. Distal clavicle resection has provided satisfactory results when combined with other procedures. Simple distal clavicle resection may have worse outcomes when performed after preceding trauma. The published reports of the removal of medial acromial and inferior distal clavicle osteophytes when performing subacromial decompression are conflicting and may increase post-operative acromioclavicular symptoms.

Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries

Acromioclavicular joint injuries and, more specifically, separations are commonplace both in general practice and during athletic participation. This article reviews the traditional classification as well as the clinical evaluation of patients with acute and chronic acromioclavicular joint separations. It also highlights many recent advances, principally in the anatomy and biomechanics of the acromioclavicular joint ligamentous complex. The concept of increases in superior translation as well as disturbances in horizontal translation with injuries to this joint and ligaments are discussed. This information, coupled with the unpredictable long-term results with the Weaver-Dunn procedure and its modifications, have prompted many recent biomechanical studies evaluating potential improvements in the surgical management of acute and chronic injuries. The authors present these recent works investigating cyclic loading and ultimate failure of traditional reconstructions, augmentations, use of free graft, and the more recent anatomic reconstruction of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments. The clinical results (largely retrospective), including acromioclavicular joint repair, reconstruction and augmentation with the coracoclavicular ligament, supplemental sutures, and the use of free autogenous grafts, are summarized. Finally, complications and the concept of the failed distal clavicle resection and reconstruction are addressed. The intent is to provide a current, in-depth treatise on all aspects of acromioclavicular joint complex injuries to include anatomy, biomechanics, benchmark studies on instability and reconstruction, clinical and radiographic evaluation, and to present the most recent clinical research on surgical outcomes.

Stabilization of the clavicle after distal resection: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

The potential destabilizing effect of distal clavicle resection has received limited attention.

HYPOTHESIS

Suturing the coracoacromial ligament to the undersurface of the distal clavicle after resection could counter clavicle instability.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

The effect of ligament augmentation on posterior translation of the clavicle after resection was evaluated using 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders. Posterior clavicular displacement was measured after the application of a 70-N load under 4 different conditions: (1) the intact joint, (2) after distal clavicle resection, (3) clavicle resection plus acromioclavicular capsular ligament repair, and (4) clavicle resection plus acromioclavicular capsular ligament repair plus coracoacromial ligament augmentation.

RESULTS

Mean displacements for each of the test conditions were as follows: (1) 5.60 mm, (2) 7.38 mm, (3) 7.54 mm, and (4) 6.34 mm. A 32% increase in posterior translation was measured after resection compared to the intact specimen. No reduction in posterior displacement was noted after capsular repair; however, displacement decreased significantly when capsular repair was coupled with ligament augmentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that the destabilizing effect of clavicle resection can be partially countered by the proposed ligament augmentation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

That the destabilizing effect of clavicle resection can be partially countered by the proposed ligament augmentation may be particularly relevant in cases of resection for posttraumatic arthritis after acromioclavicular separation in which some degree of preexisting acromioclavicular capsular attenuation and consequently acromioclavicular joint laxity may be presumed.

Diagnostic value of physical tests for isolated chronic acromioclavicular lesions

PURPOSE

Chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions are a common source of pain and disability in the shoulder. The goal of this study was to evaluate diagnostic values of physical tests for isolated, chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2002, 35 patients underwent a distal clavicle excision for isolated acromioclavicular joint lesions. The results of 3 commonly used examinations for acromioclavicular joint lesions were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy.

RESULTS

The cross body adduction stress test showed the greatest sensitivity (77%), followed by the acromioclavicular resisted extension test (72%) and active compression test (41%). The active compression test had the greatest specificity (95%). All tests had a negative predictive value of greater than 94%, but the positive predictive value was less than 30% for all tests. The active compression test had the highest overall accuracy (92%), followed by the acromioclavicular resisted extension test (84%) and the cross arm adduction stress test (79%). Combinations of the tests increased the diagnostic values for chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

These tests have utility in evaluating patients with acromioclavicular joint pathologic lesions, and a combination of these physical tests is more helpful than isolated tests.

Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with Workers' Compensation claims

SUMMARY

A general perception exists that outcomes of orthopaedic procedures in patient's with Workers' Compensation claims fare worse than those of patients without such claims. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients who have Workers' Compensation claims. This minimum 2-year follow-up study analyzed the occupational, functional, and objective results of patients who underwent arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Twenty-two patients with Workers' Compensation claims representing 5% of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction at our institution between 1987 and 1995 were included in the current study. All reconstructions were performed by the senior author (B.R.B.) using arthroscopic-assisted techniques (single and double-incision) with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts followed by an accelerated rehabilitation protocol. Postoperative follow-up physical examinations revealed a negative anterior drawer in 19 patients (91%), a negative Lachman in 15 patients (68%), and a negative pivot shift in 21 patients (96%). The KT-1000 arthrometric evaluation at follow-up showed a mean maximum manual difference of 1. 9 mm with 15 patients (68%) having a maximum manual difference of </=3 mm and 7 patients (32%) from 3 to 5 mm. The mean postoperative scores for the Hospital for Special Surgery scoring scale was 86, Noyes Sports activity scale 81, Noyes ADL score 36, Noyes Problem with Sports 75, Noyes Sports Function score 87, Lysholm score 82, and the Tegner score 5.9. The Noyes Occupational rating system increased from preoperative 48 to 60 postoperatively and the Noyes Job Title rating system score remained at 5 after surgery. Functional testing revealed mean deficits of no more than 9% between the reconstructed and normal knees. SF-36 testing revealed significantly higher scores in the Role Physical and General Health categories and a significantly lower score in the Mental Health category when compared with United States norms. Subjective evaluation revealed that 95% of the patients would undergo a similar procedure if faced with a similar injury to the contralateral knee in the future. The results of the current study show that ACL reconstruction leads to predictable functional and occupational results in those patients with work-related injuries. All of our patients were able to return to work. The hypothesis that Workers' Compensation compromises the results of ACL reconstruction was not observed in this study.

Painful conditions of the acromioclavicular joint

The acromioclavicular (AC) joint may be affected by a number of pathologic processes, most commonly osteoarthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, and distal clavicle osteolysis. The correct diagnosis of a problem can usually be deduced from a thorough history, physical examination, and radiologic evaluation. Asymptomatic AC joint degeneration is frequent and does not always correlate with the presence of symptoms. Selective lidocaine injection enhances diagnostic accuracy and may correlate with surgical outcome. Nonoperative treatment is helpful for most patients, although those with osteolysis may have to modify their activities. In appropriately selected patients, open or arthroscopic distal clavicle resection is necessary to relieve symptoms. Recent biomechanical and clinical data emphasize the importance of capsular preservation and minimization of bone resection; however, the optimal amount of distal clavicle resection remains elusive. Patients with AC joint instability have poor results after distal clavicle resection.

The acromioclavicular capsule as a restraint to posterior translation of the clavicle: a biomechanical analysis

Excessive posterior translation of the residual clavicle after distal clavicle resection can be associated with significant postoperative pain. Although the acromioclavicular capsule has been identified as the primary restraint to translation of the clavicle along this axis, the individual contributions of the anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior components of the capsular ligament have not been established. The purpose of this study was to define the relative roles of the individual acromioclavicular capsular ligaments in preventing posterior translation of the distal clavicle in normal acromioclavicular joints in a human cadaver model. Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric acromioclavicular joints were mounted on a specially designed apparatus which, when attached to a standard servohydraulic materials testing device, allowed translation of the distal clavicle along the anteroposterior axis of the acromioclavicular joint (i.e., parallel to the articular surface). Resistance to posterior displacement was measured for standardized displacements in the normal specimens and after serial sectioning of each of the acromioclavicular ligaments was performed. Sectioning of the anterior and inferior capsular ligaments had no significant effect on posterior translation at the 5% significance level. However, sectioning of the superior and posterior ligaments had statistically significant effects (P < .05). These capsular structures contributed 56% +/- 23% (+/- SEM) and 25% +/- 16%, respectively, of the force required to achieve a given posterior displacement. To avoid excessive posterior translation of the clavicle after distal clavicle excision, surgical techniques that spare the posterior and superior acromioclavicular capsular ligaments should be used.

The evaluation and treatment of the injured acromioclavicular joint in athletes

Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint are among the most commonly occurring problems in the athletic patient population. However, these injuries are often confused with other problems associated with the shoulder complex. This confusion was noted by Hippocrates (460-377 BC), who realized that acromioclavicular dislocation often was misdiagnosed as a glenohumeral injury. Galen (129-199 AD) experienced an acromioclavicular dislocation and could not tolerate the tight bandaging recommended at the time and thus became one of the earliest noncompliant patients. The understanding of acromioclavicular injuries and their management has evolved rapidly during the last 2 decades. This review will clarify the current concepts in the management and treatment of acromioclavicular injuries in the athlete.