Classification and patient selection in abdominoplasty

Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Scarpa fascia preservation has been proposed to minimize complications associated with conventional abdominoplasty, but its efficacy is unclear. The purpose of this article is to determine the influence of preserving scarpa fascia on reducing postabdominoplasty complications.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of Medline Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases was conducted from the inception till June 2021. Eligible studies were prospective controlled studies investigating postoperative complications after scarpa fascia preservation following abdominoplasty. Stata 15.1 software was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included seven studies with 682 abdominoplasty patients. Abdominoplasty with scarpa fascia preservation could significantly reduce incidence of seroma (OR = - 1.34, 95% CI = - 2.09 - - 0.59, P < 0.05), length of hospital stay (SMD = - 1.65; 95% CI = - 3.50-0.20; P = 0.08), time to drain removal (SMD = - 3.64; 95% CI = - 5.76 - - 1.52; P < 0.05), and total drain output (SMD = - 401.60; 95% CI = - 593.75 - - 209.44; P < 0.05) compared with that of conventional abdominoplasty. However, it failed to achieve a statistically significant reduction in hematoma (OR=- 1.30, 95% CI = - 2.79-0.18, P = 0.08), infection (OR = - 1.03; 95% CI = - 2.17-0.12; P = 0.08), skin necrosis (OR = 0.63; 95% CI = - 1.20-2.45; P = 0.50), and wound dehiscence (OR = 0.28; 95% CI = - 0.28-0.83; P = 0.33). The seroma incidence rate was lower when a scalpel was utilized for dissection rather than electrocautery (3% (95% CI = 1-7%) versus 11% (95% CI = 5-18%)).

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of scarpa fascia during abdominoplasty might reduce the likelihood of postoperative seroma, length of hospital stay, time to drain removal, and total drain output. However, it did not significantly affect the incidence of hematoma, infection, skin necrosis, and wound dehiscence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Predicting lipoabdominoplasty complications with infrared thermography: a delta-R analysis

The diagnosis of the main complications resulting from lipoabdominoplasty has not yet been standardized. Infrared thermal imaging has been used to assess possible complications, such as necrosis and changes in micro- and macro-circulation, based on perforator mapping techniques, among others. The objective of this study was to present two clinical cases involving thermal imaging monitoring of the healing process of lipoabdominoplasty in the immediate postoperative evaluation and its preliminary results. Infrared thermography was performed 24 hours after the operation and on postoperative days 5, 25, and 27. In clinical case 1, it was found that the delta-R (∆TR)-defined as the difference in minimum temperature between the highest and lowest points in the SA3 region (caution suction area) following the classification established by Matarasso-was 0.4°C at 24 hours after surgery and decreased to 0.1°C on a postoperative day 5. There were no complications in this case. In contrast, in clinical case 2, the ∆TR was 1.7°C at 24 hours after surgery (upon hospital discharge) and remained high, at 2.2°C, on postoperative day 5. A higher ∆TR was found in the second patient, who developed necrosis of the surgical wound. The ∆TR thermal index may be a new tool for predicting possible complications, complementing the clinical evaluation and therapeutic decision-making.

A Report of 736 High-Definition Lipoabdominoplasties Performed in Conjunction with Circumferential VASER Liposuction

BACKGROUND

Several innovations and modifications to the abdominal lipectomy procedure have been performed through the years. Despite recent improvements, the lack of natural results, including high scars, navel deformities, and "tense" abdomen, are still challenging. The objective of this study is to present an alternative technique of combined 360-degree truncal liposuction with abdominal definition, abdominoplasty, and neoumbilicoplasty.

METHODS

From January of 2005 to June of 2017, 736 VASER-assisted lipoabdominoplasties were performed. Only healthy women with a body mass index below 33 were included. A three-step procedure was performed: (1) truncal liposculpture, (2) dermolipectomy and plication of the rectus abdominis muscle, and (3) neoumbilicoplasty through a butterfly technique. The follow-up included photographs and medical assessment with a mean of 2 years (up to 5 years). A nonstandardized survey was performed to self-evaluate the results.

RESULTS

Six hundred seventy patients answered the survey (91 percent). Six hundred fifteen patients were satisfied with the procedure (91.79 percent). Minor complications were reported: seroma in 7.3 percent, prolonged bruising in 10 percent, and swelling in 18 percent. Neither flap necrosis nor infections were reported. Neoumbilicoplasty was performed in all patients. Additional procedures were required in 4.6 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-assisted lipoabdominoplasty is an alternative lipectomy technique that prevents stigmata of the procedure. The abdominal definition improves the shape and recreates the superficial anatomy. Neoumbilicoplasty shape, form, and choice of its position over the abdominal wall provide significant improvements in results.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Use of an algorithm in choosing abdominoplasty techniques

OBJECTIVE

to validate an algorithm for the choice of the abdominoplasty surgical technique among the five approaches established in the literature, according to the characteristics of the abdominal wall.

METHODS

we conducted a retrospective study of 245 patients undergoing abdominoplasty, for whom the method of choice of the surgical technique was the proposed algorithm, based on the degree of abdominal flaccidity determined by bimanual maneuver. We studied its applications and conveniences, as well as the complications inherent in each group studied.

RESULTS

according to the algorithm used, the most frequently chosen technique was "Technique IV" (transverse dermolipectomy of Pitanguy - or with a Baroudi-Kepke incision), in 25.71% of the cases. "Technique I" (mini abdominoplasty) had the lowest incidence and the lowest rate of complications. On the opposite, "Technique III", dermolipectomy with remaining vertical scarring, presented a higher incidence of complications, requiring extreme caution in its indication, particularly in relation to patients' expectations regarding the resulting scar and its legal aspects. Among all conducts, the most frequent complication was seroma, with a 10.2% occurrence, solved by simple syringe aspiration and use of elastic compression mesh.

CONCLUSION

the proposed algorithm facilitated the choice of abdominoplasty techniques, offering satisfactory results, which are in line with the complication rates published in the world literature.

A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Abdominoplasty Modifications on the Incidence of Postoperative Seroma

BACKGROUND

Seroma is the most common complication of abdominoplasty. Certain modifications to abdominoplasty may reduce the risk of seroma.

OBJECTIVES

The authors evaluated the incidence of seroma for 3 abdominoplasty techniques: preservation of Scarpa's fascia, placement of progressive tension (or quilting) sutures, and application of fibrin glue.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (World Health Organization) were searched to identify studies of patients who underwent abdominoplasty with seroma as a potential "outcome." RevMan 5.3 was utilized for data management, statistical analyses, and graph preparation.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (1824 total patients) met the criteria for inclusion in this review. The overall risk of bias was high, mainly owing to the nonrandomized nature of most studies. Abdominoplasty with preservation of Scarpa's fascia or placement of progressive tension sutures was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of seroma compared with that of standard abdominoplasty (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0002, respectively). Abdominoplasty with application of fibrin glue was similar to standard abdominoplasty in terms of seroma development.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of progressive tension sutures or preservation of Scarpa's fascia during abdominoplasty may reduce the likelihood of postoperative seroma. Application of fibrin glue has no impact on seroma formation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

The male abdominoplasty

Men have a larger body surface area, distinguishing physical characteristics, and unique aesthetic concerns that present a different therapeutic challenge from women. The primary area of disappointment in males is the inability to alter the intra-abdominal submuscular fat compartment where fat redistributes with advancing age, resulting in enlarged abdominal girth. In general, men who have not experienced large weight fluctuations present with skin of good quality and tone and can benefit from liposuction surgery; those who have poor skin tone, with or without rectus muscle diastasis, may be candidates for a full abdominoplasty or a pannilectomy with liposuction. These procedures represent the overwhelming majority of abdominal contour operations performed in males.

Maximizing the use of the abdominoplasty incision

Candidates for abdominoplasty often request multiple procedures at the time of consultation. Some of these patients have the potential opportunity to have ancillary procedures performed through the abdominoplasty incision, such as breast augmentation or suction-assisted lipectomy. Access via the abdominoplasty incision can also limit the need for distant donor sites, for instance, when autologous fillers or rib graft are necessary. The techniques described are straightforward and are based on standard principles that should be considered when ancillary procedures are performed in conjunction with abdominal contouring procedures. In a review of 70 consecutive patients undergoing abdominoplasty, 91 ancillary procedures were performed in conjunction with the abdominoplasty. Of the total number of patients undergoing abdominoplasty, 29 patients underwent 30 procedures facilitated through their abdominoplasty incision, including 23 suction-assisted lipectomies of the flanks, six breast augmentations, and one rib cartilage harvesting for rhinoplasty. A review of the author's experience and discussion for potential options afforded by this exposure are presented.

Endoscopic intracorporal abdominoplasty: a review of 85 cases

The specialty of plastic surgery has witnessed an explosion of novel procedures with the advent of endoscopy. Surgeons are making more aggressive attempts to reduce the length of scars and subsequent morbidity associated with traditional "open" procedures. Our purpose is to present a new technique of endoscopic abdominoplasty that has largely replaced traditional "full open" techniques at our institution. Since 1985, 85 patients have undergone a procedure that we call the endoscopic intracorporal abdominoplasty. This technique combines traditional abdominal wall liposuction with endoscopic intracorporal plication of the rectus fascia by using a series of horizontal mattress sutures. The procedure is performed using three 1-cm incisions and a series of midline and lateral skin nicks. These 85 patients were compared with 25 patients who underwent traditional open abdominoplasty with anterior plication of the rectus fascia. Average length of surgery was 127 minutes compared to 149 minutes with the open techniques. Length of hospitalization at our institution was 1 postoperative day compared to an average of 3 days with open techniques. No drains were used with the endoscopic techniques, and all of the open procedures had two drains placed. The perioperative rate of morbidity for the intracorporal abdominoplasty was 15 percent (13 of 85 patients) and with the open abdominoplasty cases it was 24 percent (6 of 25 patients). Our conclusion is that the endoscopic intracorporal abdominoplasty reduces operative scars and effectively plicates the rectus fascia, thereby reducing abdominal wall laxity. It has a rate of morbidity in a skilled laparoscopist's hands no greater than with traditional open abdominoplasty.