Prognosis in patients with left bundle branch block and normal dipyridamole thallium-201 scintigraphy

Patients with left bundle branch block pattern and high cardiac risk myocardial SPECT: does the current management suffice?

INTRODUCTION

Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) is frequently used for cardiovascular risk stratification. The significance of MPS in patients with abnormal electrical ventricular activation is often questionable. This review assesses the value of MPS for risk stratification of patients with intrinsic left bundle branch block or that due to right ventricular apical pacing.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature by a search of the MEDLINE database (January 1980 to September 2010). The terms prognosis or prognostic value were combined with SPECT and LBBB or pacing or pacemakers. MPS was categorised as low and high risk according to the original definitions.

RESULTS

We identified 11 studies suitable for review. A low-risk MPS is associated with a low risk of cardiac events whereas high-risk MPS carries a 4.8-fold increased risk, 95% CI [3.2 - 7.2] (p < 0.0001). Despite secondary prevention and an improved medical and interventional care, these figures have hardly changed over time.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A low-risk MPS permits a policy of watchful waiting whereas a high-risk MPS requires further analysis and treatment. The persistent high cardiac death and acute myocardial infarction rate after a high-risk MPS suggest that the current management of these patients does not suffice and needs reconsideration.

The prognostic significance of typical perfusion defects on vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block or right ventricular apical pacing

PURPOSE

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and ventricular pacing may induce typical artefacts that appear as perfusion defects in myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS). We assessed the prognosis of patients with LBBB or right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing who had chest pain and an MPS with only abnormal activation-related defects (AARD).

METHODS

All patients with LBBB or ventricular pacing referred for vasodilator stress MPS between April 2002 and January 2006 were analyzed. AARD were defined as small, nontransmural, fixed defects and small reversible defects in well-defined regions always accompanied with concomitant wall motion abnormalities.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were included, with a mean follow-up period of 3+/-1.3 years. MPS showed AARD in 57 and it was completely normal in 40 patients. No significant difference in cumulative cardiac event-free follow-up was observed between patients with AARD (93%) and normal MPS (85%). The average annual cardiac event rate was not significantly different between the groups (1.7 and 4.3% per year, respectively). No difference was found between patients with LBBB and RVA pacing.

CONCLUSION

Patients with chest pain and LBBB or RVA pacing who show AARD on MPS have a comparable prognosis as patients with abnormal activation and a normal MPS. This justifies MPS for risk stratification of patients with chest pain and LBBB or RVA pacing.

Evaluation of Risk Factors in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block

This retrospective study examined whether classical risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) could also be used to predict CAD in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Clinical and demographic features were studied in patients with/without CAD who presented with LBBB on their surface electrocardiograms and had undergone coronary angiography. Of the 312 patients with LBBB, 161 (51.6%) had CAD. Patients with CAD were more likely to be older, male, have CAD risk factors and to be taking acetylsalicylic acid or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. A model with six independent variables (family history, smoking, angina, advanced age, hypertension and total cholesterol levels) was statistically significant in predicting CAD in patients with LBBB, with an ability to predict patients with and without CAD of 87.1% and 90.6%, respectively. Predictors of CAD in patients with LBBB are consistent with classical risk factors and may help the accurate prediction of patients with CAD.

The additive prognostic value of perfusion and functional data assessed by quantitative gated SPECT in women

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of technetium-99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT imaging in women using quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging.

METHODS

We followed 453 consecutive female patients. Average follow-up was 1.33 years (max. 2.55). Hard endpoints were cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, or documented ventricular fibrillation. Event-free survival curves were obtained. Optimal cutoff values for left ventricular (LV) volumes, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and perfusion data to predict outcome were determined by ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 236 patients had an abnormal study, of whom 27 patients experienced hard events (16 deaths) and 47 patients soft events. For hard events summed stress score (SSS) and LVEF, and for any cardiac event SSS showed independent incremental prognostic value. The survival curves were maximally separated when using cutoff values for SSS of > or = 22 and LVEF < 52% (P < 0.001, HR 4.61 and P < 0.001 HR 5.24 for SSS and LVEF resp.), and SSS > or = 14 (P < 0.001 HR 3.76) for any cardiac event.

CONCLUSION

In women, perfusion and functional parameters derived from quantitative gated technetium-99m tetrofosmin SPECT imaging can adequately be used for cardiac risk assessment. Using quantitative gated SPECT, female patients with an LVEF < 52% or an SSS > or = 22 are at increased risk for subsequent hard events. Furthermore, patients with an SSS > or = 14 are at increased risk for any cardiac events.

Accuracy of non-invasive techniques for diagnosis of coronary artery disease and prediction of cardiac events in patients with left bundle branch block: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) has limitations inherent to different tests, and the relative merits of these tests are unclear. This meta-analysis assessed the accuracy of the frequently used non-invasive techniques, including exercise electrocardiography (ECG), myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and stress echocardiography (SE), for detection of CAD and prediction of cardiac events in patients with LBBB.

METHODS

A review was conducted of all reports on detection of CAD and prediction of cardiac events in patients with LBBB (published between January 1970 and December 2004), and revealed 55 diagnostic and nine prognostic reports with sufficient details to calculate test accuracy. Weighted (by sample size) sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary relative risk ratios (95% confidence intervals) were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity was higher for exercise ECG and (quantitatively analysed) MPI than for SE (83.4% and 88.5% versus 74.6% respectively, p<0.0001). SE had a higher specificity (88.7%) than MPI (41.2%) and exercise ECG (60.1%) (p<0.0001). Based on analysis of eight reports, the relative risk of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients with an abnormal SE and MPI was elevated more than sevenfold, but it did not differ by imaging modality (p=0.9).

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis of non-invasive CAD assessment in LBBB patients revealed that exercise ECG and MPI had the highest sensitivity, while SE had the highest specificity. The prognostic accuracy of MPI and SE appeared similar.

The usefulness of adenosine 99mTc tetrofosmin SPECT for the diagnosis of left anterior descending coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain and left bundle branch block

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of 99mTc tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the diagnosis of left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery disease in 60 subjects with left bundle branch block (LBBB) admitted for chest pain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Adenosine 99mTc tetrofosmin SPECT, transthoracic echocardiogram and coronary angiography were performed, by protocol, in 60 non-infarcted consecutive patients. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 41.6 +/- 10.8%. A significant angiographic disease of the LAD was found in 15 (25%) patients. The sensitivity and the specificity of SPECT was found to be 75% and 89%, respectively; the positive predictive value (PPV) was 70% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91%. During the adenosine infusion the QRS complex width reduced from 131.3 +/- 29.6 ms to 125.5 +/- 28.6 ms in the patients without LAD involvement (P = 0.008) but remained unchanged in LAD disease patients (P = 0.1). Combining SPECT information and QRS analysis the sensitivity increased to 87% with unchanged specificity, the PPV was 74% and the NPV resulted 95%. At 2-year follow-up 13 (22%) patients experienced a cardiac event. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, an LVEF of < or = 35% was the only predictor of cardiac events (P = 0.01, log-rank 6.2).

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of patients with LBBB complaining of chest pain had LAD coronary disease. The highly negative predictive value of adenosine SPECT could help in the exclusion of LAD disease, especially when the SPECT image is combined with the QRS analysis.

The diagnosis of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients with chest pain and complete left bundle branch block: utility of adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT

PURPOSE

Hypertensive patients with complete left bundle branch block who experience chest pain present special problems in the radionuclide diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to assess the utility of Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT for the diagnosis of CAD in 35 hypertensive patients with left bundle branch block hospitalized for chest pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Images were analyzed semiquantitatively for the presence of both fixed or reversible perfusion defects (method A) or only reversible defects (method B) in the distribution of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) territory. Perfusion defects observed in the territory of any other coronary artery were always considered. Thirty-five patients without infarction underwent adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT, transthoracic echocardiography, and coronary angiography.

RESULTS

The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated as 39.9% +/- 11.6%, and the prevalence of CAD was 29%. The sensitivity of SPECT was identical for the two methods at 89%. The specificity increased 19% with method A and 54% with method B. The positive predictive value remained unsatisfactorily low with both methods (27% for method A and 40% for method B), and the negative predictive value improved from 83% with method A to 93% with method B.

CONCLUSIONS

Only reversible perfusion defects in the LAD territory should be considered significant for CAD, and these patients should undergo coronary angiography. Reversible or fixed perfusion defects in the left circumflex and right coronary artery territories should be evaluated according to other clinical parameters (global left ventricular ejection fraction, extension of perfusion defects). The highly negative predictive value of adenosine SPECT could help in the exclusion of CAD.

Prognostic value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block

PURPOSE

Although coronary artery disease is a frequent cause of left bundle branch block, the prognostic value of myocardial ischemia in patients with this conduction abnormality has not been defined. We investigated the value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in risk stratification of patients with left bundle branch block.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred eighty-seven patients [230 men and 157 women, mean (+/- SD) age, 64 +/- 9 years] with complete left bundle branch block on the resting electrocardiogram underwent dobutamine (n = 217) or dipyridamole (n = 170) stress echocardiography to evaluate suspected or known coronary artery disease. A summary wall motion score (on a one to four scale) was calculated. The primary end points were cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

A positive echocardiographic result (evidence of ischemia) was detected in 109 (28%) patients. During a mean follow-up of 29 +/- 26 months, there were 21 cardiac deaths and 20 myocardial infarctions, 63 patients underwent coronary revascularization, and 1 patient received a heart transplant. In a multivariate analysis, four clinical and echocardiographic variables were associated with increased risk of cardiac death: resting wall motion score index [hazard ratio (HR) = 7.5 per unit; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8 to 20; P = 0.001], previous myocardial infarction (HR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.3; P = 0.02), diabetes (HR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 6.6; P = 0.03), and the change in wall motion score index from rest to peak stress (HR = 3.0 per unit; 95% CI, 1.0 to 8.6; P = 0.04). The 5-year survival was 77% in the ischemic group and 92% in the nonischemic group (P = 0.02). Four variables were associated with increased risk of cardiac death or infarction: previous myocardial infarction (HR = 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.8; P = 0.0005), diabetes (HR = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.6; P = 0.01), resting wall motion score index (HR = 2.2 per unit; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.1; P = 0.02), and positive echocardiographic result (HR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.5; P = 0.03). The 5-year infarction-free survival was 60% in the ischemic group and 87% in the nonischemic group (P < 0.0001). Stress echocardiography significantly improved risk stratification in patients without previous myocardial infarction (P = 0.0001), but not in those with previous myocardial infarction (P = 0.08). In particular, it provided additional value over clinical and resting echocardiographic findings in predicting cardiac events among patients without previous infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial ischemia during pharmacologic stress echocardiography is a strong prognostic predictor in patients with left bundle branch block, particularly in those without previous myocardial infarction.