New antiepileptic drugs in children: present and future

Development of orally dissolving films for pediatric-centric administration of anti-epileptic drug topiramate - A design of experiments (DoE) study

Children have often been treated as small adults in relation to drug formulation, but research has now shown this not to be the case. Therefore, there is a push from regulatory bodies to provide drug formulations specifically tailored towards the needs of this fragmented population. Orally dissolving films (ODFs) have been identified as an emerging opportunity, to bridge this gap. Therefore, the aim of this study was to prepare ODFs containing topiramate, an antiepileptic drug, using solvent casting method as a potential alternative to oral tablets/powders for paediatrics. For this purpose, a Design of Experiment (DoE) was employed to optimise formulation parameters. 24 formulations were prepared by changing the polymer type (HPMC, Guar-Gum or PEO), concentration (0.4%-1.2%w/v); plasticizer type (glycerol\sorbitol) and concentration (0.1–0.3%w/v). Disintegration time, content-uniformity, film quality and thickness uniformity were the responses. Surface and molecular profiling were conducted on the optimal formulation (N4). TGA and XRD results demonstrated the stability of materials upon production into films, while the SEM images showed smooth films that proved to be resilient due to good mechanical properties. HPMC-glycerine based ODFs are presented as an effective dosage form to enhance the ease of administration and patient compliance of topiramate, specifically for paediatric patients.

Lamotrigine and its applications in the treatment of epilepsy and other neurological and psychiatric disorders

Lamotrigine is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug, initially approved in 1994 for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures in adults and for the generalized seizures of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in pediatric (>2 years old) and adult populations. Its role in the treatment of bipolar disorder type I has also been well established. In addition, lamotrigine has been successfully used for the management of other neurological conditions such as migraines and neuropathic pain, and preliminary data show promising results. It has favorable pharmacokinetic properties and is generally well tolerated. The small risk of serious skin rash can be minimized with slow titration of the drug and dose adjustment with concomitant medications. Lamotrigine has demonstrated particular benefit in the treatment of women and elderly patients with epilepsy.

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and epilepsy with myoclonic-astatic seizures

Among nonsymptomatic epilepsies exhibiting several types of generalized seizures in children two syndromes were progressively identified: epilepsy with myoclonic-astatic seizures (MAE) and nonsymptomatic Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). Various approaches based on etiology, electroclinical semiology, and mathematical analysis have progressively helped to distinguish these two conditions. Both conditions preferentially affect boys. The course is stereotyped in MAE, characterized by progressive worsening of epilepsy, usual pharmacoresistance at onset and tonic-clonic seizures, myoclonus and frequent episodes of myoclonic status epilepticus. EEG shows 3Hz spike wave bursts characteristic of idiopathic generalized epilepsy together with slowing of the tracing. In LGS, major seizures are mainly atypical absences and tonic seizures with 0.5-2Hz slow spike-waves and eventually focal anomalies. Prognosis in both syndromes ranges from recovery without sequelae to pharmacoresistant epilepsy that has improved over the past 2 decades with the new generation antiepileptic compounds. Iatrogenic factors may contribute to the poor prognosis, mainly in MAE. Pathophysiology remains speculative for both syndromes: although both share factors of brain maturation, MAE is probably mainly related to genetic predisposition whereas LGS results from some unidentified cortical brain malformation. In unfavorable cases, there may therefore be a continuum between both syndromes. They need to be distinguished from other epilepsy syndromes and inborn errors of metabolism that begin in the same age range: atypical idiopathic benign epilepsy, frontal lobe epilepsy with secondary bisynchrony, ring chromosome 20, ceroid lipofuscinosis, and nonsymptomatic late-onset spasms.

Pharmacotherapy for children and adolescents with epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Childhood epilepsies are the most frequent neurological problems that occur in children. Despite the introduction of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) 25-30% of children with epilepsy remain refractory to medical therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to highlight the main published data on the treatment of childhood epilepsy. The electronic database, PubMed, and abstract proceedings were used to identify studies. The aim of antiepileptic therapy should be to provide complete seizure control, if possible without the burden of any side effect. Since 1993, new agents have been approved for use as an antiepileptic. Although there are few published data (especially in pediatric populations) to establish that the second-generation AEDs are more efficacious than the older AEDs, they appear to have better tolerability.

EXPERT OPINION

Old AEDs are efficacious agents that continue to play a major role in the current treatment of epilepsy. These agents actually remain the first-line treatment for many specific seizure types or epileptic syndromes. The new AEDs were initially approved as adjunct agents and--subsequently--as monotherapy for various seizure types in the adult and children. Despite these improvements, few AEDs are now considered to be a first-choice for the treatment of epilepsy in children.

CNS adverse events associated with antiepileptic drugs

A variety of newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are now available for treating patients with epilepsy in addition to the 'conventional' drugs that have been available throughout a large part of the last century. Since these drugs act to suppress the pathological neuronal hyperexcitability that constitutes the final substrate in many seizure disorders, it is not surprising that they are prone to causing adverse reactions that affect the CNS.Information on adverse effects of the older AEDs has been mainly observational. Equally, whilst the newer drugs have been more systematically studied, their long-term adverse effects are not clearly known. This is illustrated by the relatively late emergence of the knowledge of visual field constriction in the case of vigabatrin, which only became known after several hundred thousand patient-years of use. However, older drugs continue to be studied and there has been more recent comment on the possible effect of valproate (valproic acid) on cognition following exposure to this drug in utero.With most AEDs, there are mainly dose-related adverse effects that could be considered generic, such as sedation, drowsiness, incoordination, nausea and fatigue. Careful dose titration with small initial doses can reduce the likelihood of these adverse effects occurring. Adverse effects such as paraesthesiae are more commonly reported with drugs such as topiramate and zonisamide that have carbonic anhydrase activity. Weight loss and anorexia can also be peculiar to these drugs. Neuropsychiatric adverse effects are reported with a variety of AEDs and may not be dose related. Some drugs, such as carbamazepine when used to treat primary generalized epilepsy, can exacerbate certain seizure types. Rare adverse effects such as hyperammonaemia with valproate are drug specific. There are relatively very few head-to-head comparisons of AEDs and limited information is available in this regard.In this review, we discuss the available literature and provide a comprehensive summary of adverse drug reactions of AEDs affecting the CNS.

New antiepileptic drugs in pediatric epilepsy

New antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), introduced since 1993, provide more diverse options in the treatment of epilepsy. Despite the equivalent efficacy and better tolerability of these drugs, more than 25% of patients remain refractory to treatment. Moreover, the issues for pediatric patients are different from those for adults, and have not been addressed in the development and application of the new AEDs. Recently published evidence-based treatment guidelines have helped physicians to choose the most reasonable AED, although they cannot fully endorse new AEDs because of the lack of well-designed, randomized controlled trials. We review the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, adverse reactions, efficacy, and tolerability of eight new AEDs (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide), focusing on currently available treatment guidelines and expert opinions regarding pediatric epilepsy.

Antiepileptic drug treatment in children

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders of childhood, and antiepileptic drugs represent the main component of its treatment. The current emphasis in epilepsy treatment is to improve quality of life, not only by suppressing seizure, but also by minimizing the side effects of medications. The last 15 years have been characterized by significant advances in the development of new agents that have helped us to get closer to this goal. Knowledge of the essential properties, key indications and interactions of each antiepileptic drug will help to optimize efficacy and reduce adverse reactions. Age is also a determining factor of the epilepsy phenotype and its treatment. This review addresses the principles of pediatric epilepsy treatment, summarizes the profile of each of the commonly used antiepileptic drugs, and provides a treatment paradigm for particular seizures and epilepsy syndromes of childhood.

Restless Legs Syndrome

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common and often disabling sensorimotor disorder. Epidemiologic studies suggest that RLS is an underrecognized and undertreated disorder affecting both children and adults. The diagnosis is based primarily on the following four essential criteria: (1) an urge to move, usually associated with paresthesias, (2) onset or exacerbation of symptoms at rest, (3) relief of symptoms with movement, and (4) symptoms manifesting in a circadian pattern. Supplemental workup including polysomnography, iron profile, and/or neuropathy screen can provide support for the diagnosis and aid in the treatment strategy. Behavioral techniques, dopaminergic agents, opiates, benzodiazepines, and antiepileptics all have potential value in treating this disorder. Dopaminergic agents continue to be the most effective RLS treatment. However, due to their potential long-term side effects, these agents should not be considered the sole treatment of choice. In the end, the therapeutic plan should be individualized to suit each patient's presentation and needs.

Epilepsy in children: the evidence for new antiepileptic drugs

Childhood epilepsy remains a challenge to treat. Despite the availability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), >25% of children with childhood epilepsy continue to have seizures. Conventional AEDs have been the mainstay of therapy for many years but are often poorly tolerated and have a tendency to interact with other drugs. Current American Academy of Neurology guidelines support the use of four of the newer AEDs (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine) as adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in children, based on class I evidence. This paper includes a summary of the results from a recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which shows that levetiracetam is also effective and well tolerated in this pediatric population, and provides evidence supporting its use in refractory partial seizures in children.

Oxcarbazepine: a review of its use in children with epilepsy

Oxcarbazepine (Trileptal, Timox) is structurally related to carbamazepine and has anticonvulsant activity. Studies suggest that the anticonvulsant activity of oxcarbazepine is mediated via the blocking of neuronal ion channels. In patients aged <18 years, the efficacy of oxcarbazepine monotherapy was similar to that of phenytoin in children with partial onset or generalized tonic-clonic seizures in a 48-week trial. Additional supporting findings demonstrated that 43-71% of patients with partial onset, generalized or undetermined epilepsy were seizure free after oxcarbazepine monotherapy (mean dosage 27.7-50 mg/kg/day; duration 1-5 years). In contrast, one small nonblind trial showed more patients treated with oxcarbazepine monotherapy than with carbamazepine monotherapy had recurrent seizures during 16 months of therapy (although the conclusions that can be drawn from this trial are limited). As adjunctive therapy, oxcarbazepine was significantly better than placebo at reducing seizure frequency in children and adolescents with refractory partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization: the median percentage change in partial onset seizure frequency was 35% vs 9%, respectively, during 16 weeks of therapy. In noncomparative trials of adjunctive oxcarbazepine (mean dosage of 34.5-56.7 mg/kg/day), 7-11% of patients with partial onset or generalized seizures were seizure free during treatment, and 20-54% had seizure reductions of > or=50%. Oxcarbazepine was generally well tolerated during monotherapy and adjunctive therapy; 2.5% and 10% of patients withdrew from well controlled trials of oxcarbazepine monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. Oxcarbazepine monotherapy was better tolerated than phenytoin and events observed in oxcarbazepine-treated patients were transient. Oxcarbazepine metabolism is largely unaffected by induction of the cytochrome (CYP) P450 system. However, oxcarbazepine can inhibit CYP2C19 and induce CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, thereby interfering with the metabolism of other drugs (e.g. phenytoin). In addition, oxcarbazepine decreases plasma levels of oral contraceptives and alternative contraceptive methods should be used. In conclusion, oxcarbazepine (as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy) has shown efficacy in the treatment of partial onset seizures in children with epilepsy. Nevertheless, the generally favorable tolerability profile and relatively low potential for drug interactions of oxcarbazepine make it a valuable option in the treatment of childhood epilepsy.

Therapeutics in pediatric epilepsy, Part 1: The new antiepileptic drugs and the ketogenic diet

Epilepsy is one of the most common and challenging neurologic disorders affecting children. Although various modalities exist to treat pediatric-onset seizures, seizures in 25% of children who are diagnosed as having epilepsy remain refractory to available therapies. Of the 8 new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and zonisamide), all but 2 (zonisamide and levetiracetam) have received Food and Drug Administration approval for adjunctive use in the pediatric population. However, most of the new AEDs used in adults have also been used in children, beyond the AEDs' approved indications. The ultimate goal of patient management is to choose the therapeutic option that provides the best chance of improving the patient's quality of life. Issues that relate to treatment choice include the likelihood of seizure recurrence, type and severity of seizures, available AED efficacies and toxicities, need for hematologic monitoring, ease of dosing, underlying medical conditions, medication interactions, urgency of initiating therapy, and cost. In this review, we discuss these issues for each of the 8 new AEDs; we also discuss the ketogenic diet and briefly review the older AEDs. Knowledge of the available AEDs will enable the practitioner to choose the best drug or drugs for individual patients.

Treatment of epilepsy in the multiply handicapped

The medical management of epilepsy in the multi-handicapped patient requires careful evaluation, classification, and pharmacologic treatment. It is estimated that 20-40% of patients with mental retardation and cerebral palsy have epilepsy. This review reports the clinical trial data and personal experience related to the use of newer AEDs in the chronic management of epilepsy syndromes in children and adults, as well as information available on the treatment of seizures in individuals with mental retardation and associated handicaps. Furthermore, clusters of seizures, prolonged seizures and status epilepticus are more commonly seen in the multiply handicapped and mentally retarded population and require special attention. The new antiepileptic drugs felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide show specific advantage in some multiply handicapped patients, be it for seizure control or medication tolerance. Furthermore, new modalities of treatment for prolonged seizures allow better efficacy both outside of hospital and within hospital facilities. The treatment of epilepsy in multi-handicapped and retarded adults and children has significantly advanced in the past few years, and much of this improvement can be attributed to improved knowledge and monitoring of new antiepileptic drugs. Conventional anticonvulsants remain first line therapy for most clinicians, but newer AEDs must broaden the therapeutic option and do allow improved therapy for some multiply handicapped patients.

Treatment of epilepsy in the new millennium

Treatment options for epilepsy have increased markedly since 1990, when only carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, and valproate were used commonly for partial and secondarily generalized seizures. Those with primary generalized seizures received ethosuximide or valproate. Over the past decade, however, additional agents have been introduced, with the promise of improved seizure control and minimal side effects. The new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)-felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and oxcarbazepine-have demonstrated superior efficacy for some with refractory epilepsy. In addition, the new agents frequently are better tolerated when used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. The optimal place for the new AED will require additional studies and careful postmarketing surveillance and assessments. Although these AEDs offer benefits, not all patients with epilepsy have responded. Thus, the search for new AEDs continues.

Adverse reactions to new anticonvulsant drugs

A lack of systematic pharmacoepidemiological studies investigating adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to anticonvulsants makes it difficult to assess accurately the incidence of anticonvulsant-related ADRs. Most of the available information in this regard stems from clinical trial experience, case reports and postmarketing surveillance, sources that are not, by any means, structured to provide precise data on adverse event epidemiology. For various ethical, statistical and logistical reasons, the organisation of structured clinical trials that are likely to provide substantial data on ADRs is extremely difficult. This review concentrates on current literature concerning serious and life-threatening ADRs. As with the older anticonvulsants, the majority of ADRs to newer anticonvulsants are CNS-related, although there are several that are apparently unique to some of these new drugs. Gabapentin has been reported to cause aggravation of seizures, movement disorders and psychiatric disturbances. Felbamate should only be prescribed under close medical supervision because of aplastic anaemia and hepatotoxicity. Lamotrigine causes hypersensitivity reactions that range from simple morbilliform rashes to multi-organ failure. Psychiatric ADRs and deterioration of seizure control have also been reported with lamotrigine treatment. Oxcarbazepine has a safety profile similar to that of carbamazepine. Hyponatraemia associated with oxcarbazepine is also a problem; however, it is less likely to cause rash than carbamazepine. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus has been reported frequently with tiagabine, although there are insufficient data at present to identify risk factors for this ADR. Topiramate frequently causes cognitive ADRs and, in addition, also appears to cause word-finding difficulties, renal calculi and bodyweight loss. Vigabatrin has been reported to cause seizure aggravation, especially in myoclonic seizures. There have been rare reports of other neurological ADRs to vigabatrin, such as encephalopathy, aphasia and motor disturbances. Vigabatrin-induced visual field constriction is the latest and most worrying ADR. Many questions regarding the nature of this potentially serious ADR remain unanswered, as no prospective controlled study examining the phenomenon has been published. Rare cases of behavioural ADRs and IgA and IgG2 deficiency associated with the use of zonisamide have been reported. However, relatively few patients so far have been exposed to this drug, and therefore more postmarketing information is required. The relatively late establishment of aplastic anaemia and hepatic failure as potentially fatal ADRs of felbamate, and of visual field constriction with vigabatrin, should serve as ample reminders that ADRs can appear at any time.

Managing pediatric epilepsy syndromes with new antiepileptic drugs

The management of epilepsy in the pediatric patient requires careful evaluation, classification, and pharmacologic treatment. Despite best efforts on the part of clinicians, approximately 25% of children remain refractory to appropriate medical therapies. The development of an improved classification system and the emergence of several new antiepileptic drugs have enabled some progress in this area, specifically in children with disorders such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and infantile spasms, which are notoriously difficult to control. However, limited data are available that define the optimal use of new antiepileptic agents in pediatric patients. To most effectively treat children with epilepsy syndromes, further research must be completed to validate the positive effects described in case reports, open-label clinical trials, and early controlled clinical trials.

Use of new antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of childhood epilepsy

The management of epilepsy in children requires careful evaluation, classification, and pharmacologic treatment. With classic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), at least 25% of children remain refractory to appropriate therapy. The past decade has allowed the introduction of a number of newer AEDs for treatment of both adults and children with epilepsy. These include felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, and vigabatrin. Emerging information regarding the efficacy of these AEDs in treating childhood epilepsy syndromes suggests advantages for many patients. Limited data are available that define the optimal use of new AEDs in pediatric patients. Further research must be completed to validate the positive effects described in existing clinical trials of the new AEDs in the treatment of childhood epilepsy.

Felbamate

Felbamate (FBM) was the first of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) approved in the United States in 1993 with broad-spectrum efficacy against partial and generalized seizures of various types, and indicated for use as adjunctive and monotherapy. The identification of idiosyncratic aplastic anemia and hepatotoxicity, however, drastically curtailed its use. To update information concerning FBM and its idiosyncratic effects, case studies and literature reviews were undertaken. Thirty-four FBM-associated aplastic anemia patients have been reported, with 13 known fatalities. The overall FBM aplastic anemia risk is estimated at between 27 and 209 per million vs. 2 to 2.5 per million in the general population. Prior AED hypersensitivity, cytopenia, and immune disease significantly increase risk. FBM aplastic anemia has not been reported in children below the age of 13 years. Hepatic failure is much less common, occurring with an overall risk similar to that associated with valproate, but children below the age of 5 years have been affected. The recent identification of a reactive metabolite, atropaldehyde, and HLA studies suggest that high-risk patients can be identified. The efficacy profile of FBM should encourage further investigations to allow its better use, but at present FBM is not a first-line AED.

Overview of lamotrigine and the new antiepileptic drugs: the challenge

Lamotrigine, like all antiepileptic drugs, can be effective when used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. In general, adverse effects are reduced when monotherapy is employed. The most frequent adverse effect prompting withdrawal of lamotrigine is rash. This potentially life-threatening adverse effect occurs more frequently in children, is increased when a rapid dose titration schedule is employed, and is greater when lamotrigine, is prescribed in combination with valproate. The availability of lamotrigine and other antiepileptic drugs represents a major advance for the treatment of childhood epilepsy. The challenge in using all of the new antiepileptic drugs, including lamotrigine, is to balance the expected improved efficacy with the potentially serious adverse effects.