Gifts from surgical research. Contributions to patients and to surgeons (2)

NIH Funding for Surgeon-Scientists in the US: What Is the Current Status?

BACKGROUND

Recent literature suggests that the future of surgeon-scientists in the US has been threatened for the past several decades. However, we documented an overall increase in NIH funding for surgeon-scientists, as well as the number of NIH-funded surgeons, from 2010 to 2020.

STUDY DESIGN

NIH-funded principal investigators (PIs) were identified for June 2010 and June 2020 using the NIH internal data platform iSearch Grants (version 2.4). Biographical sketches were searched for key terms to identify surgeon-scientists. Grant research types and total grant costs were collected. American Association of Medical Colleges data were used to determine total surgeon and physician populations. Bivariate chi-square analyses were performed using population totals and were corroborated using z-tests of population proportions using JMP (version 13.0.0). A 2-tailed p value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In June of 2020, a total of 1,031 surgeon-scientists held $872,456,710 in NIH funding. The percentage of funded surgeons significantly increased from 2010 (0.5%) to 2020 (0.7%) (p < 0.05), and the percentage of funded other physicians significantly decreased from 2.2% in 2010 to 1.6% in 2020 (p < 0.05). All surgeons sustained R grant funding at both time points (58% in 2020 and 60% in 2010), and specifically maintained basic science-focused R grants (73% in 2020 and 78% in 2010).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found surgeon-scientists are increasing in number and NIH funding and are becoming more diverse in their research efforts, while maintaining a focus on basic science.

The First 100 Years of American College of Surgeons Presidential Addresses

INTRODUCTION

We reviewed the first 100 years of presidential addresses delivered at the fall congress of the American College of Surgeons (ACS). Our hypothesis was that these addresses would be an excellent indicator of the College's position on surgical policy, ethics, methods, and education.

METHODS

All ACS presidential addresses from 1913 to 2013 were identified through the ACS archives website. This included the presenter, title, year, and citation if published in a peer reviewed journal. The text of each address was obtained from the ACS archives, or from the listed citations. Addresses were then classified into 1 of 6 subgroups based on content-surgical credo, medical innovation, medical education, surgical history, business and legal, and personal tribute. The 100-year period was divided into 5 interval each of 20-year and the frequency of each category was graphed over time.

RESULTS

There were 111 ACS presidential addresses delivered in the study period. Distribution by category was surgical credo (57%), surgical history (14%), medical innovation (10%), medical education (8%), business and legal (6%), and personal tributes (5%). The frequency of surgical credo has remained stable over time. Business and legal emerged as a new category in 1975. The other topics had low, but stable frequency.

CONCLUSION

ACS presidential addresses do reflect the College's position on surgical policy and practice. The college has remained consistent in serving its members, maintaining, and defining the role of its organization, the qualifications for membership, and the expectations for the professional conduct of its members.

[Research and surgery]

From the Second World War onwards an amazing development in science and clinical & surgery practice has taken place: antibiotics, blood storage, cardiac surgery, organ and tissue transplant, complete joint replacement, total intravenous nutrition or minimally invasive surgery. Paradoxically, during the last two decades of the XXth century, social popularity of doctors has decreased at the same time of some important changes: increases in costs of medical attention, trials against medical mistakes, some doubts on the real role of Academic Public Hospitals and rising in the importance of alternative medicine. Increasing complexity of biomedical research in the continuous changing age of molecular biology has promoted an increasing scepticism regarding clinics and surgeons are able to keep on contributing to medical advances. The study of the contemporaneous History of Medicine demonstrates that some of the more significant achievements have been accomplished by surgeons. Undoubtedly Science and Clinics must get adapted to these times of change and persist in generating important findings. Current Clinical and surgical practice is completely determined by yesterdays' scientific research; tomorrow won't be different.